Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at St Mary Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors found that the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in the main kitchen and on one nursing unit. The mop sink in the kitchen janitors' closet was clogged with black sludge around its base, and a front sink in a resident room was clogged with brown residue, indicating inadequate environmental cleanliness and maintenance.
The facility failed to properly store and date food items in the dietary department, as observed during a survey. Undated opened bags of food were found in the freezer, and expired dairy products were present in the cooler. The Food Service Director confirmed these items should have been dated and expired items removed, indicating non-compliance with the facility's food safety policy.
The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for three residents, each with cognitive impairments and other diagnoses. Despite assessments indicating the need for specific interventions, the care plans lacked these necessary components. The DON confirmed the absence of documented evidence addressing these care areas.
The facility failed to follow physician's orders for medication administration and monitoring for four residents. Medications were administered outside prescribed blood pressure parameters, and one resident was not weighed as ordered. The DON confirmed these discrepancies.
Clogged and Unsanitary Sinks in Kitchen and Resident Room
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment in the main kitchen and on one nursing unit. During an observation period from 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. on January 29, 2026, the mop sink in the main kitchen janitors' closet was found to be clogged with an accumulation of black sludge around the base of the sink. In addition, in a resident room identified as [ROOM NUMBER], the front sink was observed to be clogged with a brown residue. These conditions were cited under 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) and 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3)(e)(2.1) related to the licensee’s responsibility and management requirements for maintaining a safe, clean, and comfortable environment.
Failure to Properly Store and Date Food Items
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policy on food safety, specifically regarding the proper storage and dating of food items in the dietary department. During a tour of the dietary department, surveyors observed several instances of non-compliance. In the freezer, opened bags of onion rings, raw cookies, and fish sticks were found without dates. Additionally, a box labeled for diced chicken contained opened bags of breaded meat and diced chicken, both undated. In the dairy cooler, a container of sour cream and multiple cartons of milk were found past their use-by dates, and a parmesan cheese container was covered with red food debris. The production walk-in cooler contained an opened case of orange juice and a package of hot dogs, both undated. In dry storage, an opened package of sprinkles had dried flour on it, and a package of tortillas was undated. The tray line milk cooler also contained expired milk cartons. The Food Service Director confirmed these items should have been dated and expired items removed, indicating a failure to maintain sanitary conditions and proper food storage practices.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for three residents, as identified in their comprehensive assessments. Resident 6, diagnosed with metabolic encephalopathy and mild cognitive impairment, had a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Care Area Assessment (CAA) summary indicating that cognitive loss should be addressed in the care plan. However, there was no evidence of interventions for cognitive loss in the current care plan. Similarly, Resident 9, with diagnoses including aphasia, dementia, and brain injury, had an MDS CAA summary noting the need to address cognitive loss and dementia. Despite a quarterly MDS summary indicating limited cognition, the care plan lacked interventions for these issues. Resident 61, diagnosed with dementia and brain injury, also had an MDS CAA summary highlighting the need to address cognitive loss and communication deficits. However, the care plan did not include interventions for these areas. The Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of documented evidence addressing the identified care areas in the care plans during an interview. This deficiency was noted under 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
Failure to Follow Physician's Orders for Medication Administration and Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement physician's orders for four residents, leading to medication administration errors and lack of required monitoring. Resident 28, diagnosed with hypertension and heart failure, received atenolol twice in January 2025 when their systolic blood pressure (SBP) was below the prescribed threshold of 120 mm/Hg. Similarly, Resident 32, with heart failure, hypertension, and chronic kidney failure, was administered nifedipine and metoprolol tartrate multiple times in December 2024 and January 2025 despite their SBP being below 120 mm/Hg. Additionally, Resident 32 was not weighed as ordered on specified dates in December 2024 and January 2025. Resident 55, who had heart failure, was given carvedilol three times in January 2025 when their SBP was below the required 100 mm/Hg. Resident 258, diagnosed with hypotension, received midodrine four times in January 2025 when their SBP exceeded the maximum limit of 130 mm/Hg. The Director of Nursing confirmed these discrepancies, acknowledging that medications were administered outside the established parameters and that Resident 32 was not weighed as ordered.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,199 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 10 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Lansdale
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elm Terrace Gardens | 0.7 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Harborview Rehabilitation And Care Center At Lansd | 0.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Montgomeryville Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitati | 1.3 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Gwynedd Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | 2.3 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Horsham Center For Jewish Life | 3.3 mi | — | 6 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for St Mary Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.