Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Gwynedd Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with a history of stroke and mobility impairment sustained a laceration during care when they fell while being assisted by a nursing aide. The facility's investigation was incomplete, lacking details such as the duration the resident was standing, the wheelchair's location, and interviews with roommates. Conflicting staff statements about the resident's care needs were noted, and the facility's policies on incident reporting and investigation were not fully adhered to.
A facility failed to update a resident's care plan to reflect their preference for bedside toileting, despite the resident's cognitive intactness and right to choose. The resident, with conditions including cerebral infarction and hemiplegia, sustained an injury during toileting care. Staff confirmed the care plan lacked updates for the resident's preferences and safe instructions, violating the facility's policy for comprehensive, person-centered care plans.
The facility failed to store food according to professional standards, as several bags of hamburger and hotdog buns were not labeled with delivery or best by dates. One bag of hamburger buns showed signs of spoilage with grayish green powdery matter. The Director of Dietary confirmed these observations and discarded the affected items.
A resident was not permitted to return to the facility after hospitalization, despite available beds and policies allowing readmission. The resident, who had dementia and tested positive for COVID-19 without symptoms, was not communicated with regarding readmission plans. Interviews confirmed the lack of documentation and communication with the responsible party.
Incomplete Investigation of Resident Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into a potential case of resident abuse and/or neglect involving a resident who sustained an injury during care. The resident, who had a history of cerebral infarction and right-sided dominant impairment, required moderate assistance for activities of daily living and transfers. The incident occurred when the resident, while being assisted by a nursing aide, became weak and fell, resulting in a laceration that required sutures. The facility's investigation was incomplete, as it did not include critical details such as the length of time the resident was standing, the location of the wheelchair at the time of the fall, interviews with the resident's roommates, or an assessment of the bedframe structure. Statements from staff members provided conflicting information about the resident's care needs, with some indicating the use of a mechanical lift and two-person assistance for transfers, while others noted the resident could stand with one-person assistance. The facility's policies on reporting and investigating incidents, as well as abuse prevention, were not adequately followed. The policies require immediate examination of the resident, completion of an investigation report, and determination of reasonable cause for abuse. However, the investigation lacked comprehensive interviews and assessments, failing to meet the facility's standards for thoroughness and accuracy.
Failure to Update Resident Care Plan for Toileting Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident, specifically related to incontinent care. The facility's policy requires that care plans include measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's needs, derived from a thorough analysis of comprehensive assessments. However, the care plan for the resident in question did not reflect the resident's preferences and proper safe instructions regarding toileting needs, which included the preference to be toileted at bedside. The resident, who entered the facility with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, and hemispheres, required moderate assistance for activities of daily living and used a wheelchair. Despite having an intact cognitive status, as indicated by a BIMS score of 14, the resident sustained an injury while receiving toileting care at bedside. The investigation concluded that it was within the resident's rights to choose to be toileted at bedside, yet the care plan was not updated to reflect this preference. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the resident's care plan had not been updated with the resident's preferences and proper safe instructions regarding toileting needs. This oversight indicates a failure to adhere to the facility's policy of revising care plans as information about the resident's condition changes, thereby not fully addressing the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs.
Failure to Properly Label and Store Food Items
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. During an observation of the kitchen, it was found that several plastic bags containing hamburger and hotdog buns were not labeled with the date delivered or the best by date. One of the plastic bags containing hamburger buns had a sticker with the delivery date of 10/13, but the best by date was not written on the sticker. Additionally, another plastic bag containing hamburger buns was observed to have grayish green powdery matter at the bottom of the buns, indicating potential spoilage. The Director of Dietary, Employee E3, confirmed these observations during an interview conducted at the time of the investigation. Employee E3 acknowledged that all bags should have been labeled with the delivery date and best by date, as per the facility's policy on receiving and safe food handling procedures. Following the observation, Employee E3 removed and discarded the four bags of buns that were not properly labeled and showed signs of spoilage.
Failure to Readmit Resident After Hospitalization
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to permit a resident to return after hospitalization, violating their own policy on readmission. The resident, who was of Korean descent and had been admitted for long-term care due to conditions such as anxiety, dementia, diabetes, hypertension, and depression, was transferred to the hospital for a change in mental status. During the hospital stay, the resident was diagnosed with dementia with behavioral disorder, depression, anxiety, and tested positive for COVID-19 without symptoms. Despite the facility having available beds, there was no documentation of communication with the resident's responsible party regarding readmission plans. Interviews with the Nursing Home Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Admissions Director confirmed the lack of communication and documentation in the clinical record about the resident's readmission. The facility's policies required adherence to CDC guidelines for COVID-19 management, which included accepting residents with COVID-19 under specific precautions. However, the facility did not follow through with these policies, resulting in the resident not being readmitted post-hospitalization.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,247 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 11 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Lansdale
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harborview Rehabilitation And Care Center At Lansd | 2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care Center At Brittany | 2.1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Elm Terrace Gardens | 2.1 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| St Mary Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 2.3 mi | — | 15 | 0 |
| Willowbrooke Ctskdcarectr Atnormandy Farms Estates | 2.4 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Gwynedd Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.