Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Trueman Pointe Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with cognitive impairment and requiring substantial assistance fell from bed during a bed bath, resulting in a skin tear. The STNA rolled the resident to the side, leading to the fall. The incident was confirmed by the DON, indicating a lack of adequate supervision and assistance.
A resident with documented allergies to strawberries and pineapples was served crushed pineapple, despite clear indications on their meal ticket. Kitchen staff and a nurse failed to prevent this oversight, which was confirmed by a diet technician. The facility's policy requires accommodation of food allergies, which was not followed in this instance.
The facility failed to provide individualized activities for two residents with cognitive impairments, as observed during a survey. One resident preferred one-on-one and independent activities, but was only provided with the daily chronicle and TV. Another resident, with moderate cognitive impairment, also received similar activities despite having specific interests. The Activity Director confirmed the lack of tailored activities for cognitively and physically impaired residents, leading to a deficiency finding.
A facility failed to implement physician orders for a resident's pressure ulcer treatment, resulting in a deficiency. The resident, with multiple diagnoses and total care dependence, had a stage 3 pressure ulcer requiring daily dressing changes. Despite the Wound NP's order, the dressing change was not documented until several days later. An LPN confirmed the changes were done, but the facility lacked a wound care policy.
Inadequate Assistance Leads to Resident Fall During Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate assistance was provided to prevent a fall for a resident during care. The resident, who was readmitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, type II diabetes mellitus, aphasia, retention of urine, and encephalopathy, had cognitive impairment and required substantial to maximal assistance for turning. The resident's medical records indicated a need for extensive to total dependence on staff for bed mobility, requiring one to two staff members for assistance. During a bed bath, a State tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) rolled the resident to the right side to wash their back, resulting in the resident sliding out of bed and sustaining a one-centimeter skin tear to the left ear. The incident occurred at approximately 10:35 P.M., and the fall investigation confirmed that the resident had no previous falls. The Director of Nursing verified the incident, highlighting a deficiency in providing adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents during care.
Failure to Accommodate Resident's Dietary Allergies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's dietary preferences and allergies were respected, leading to a deficiency in care. Resident #34, who was admitted with diagnoses including respiratory failure, lymphedema, and heart disease, had documented allergies to strawberries and pineapples. Despite this, the resident was served crushed pineapple as part of their lunch meal on 09/17/24. The meal ticket for Resident #34 clearly indicated a dislike and allergy to pineapple, yet the kitchen staff placed pineapple on the resident's tray. Interviews and observations confirmed the oversight. Kitchen Staff #144 acknowledged the error, and Registered Nurse #163 confirmed the presence of pineapple on the tray despite the allergy being noted. The Diet Technician verified that the resident should not have been served pineapple and that tray tickets should be reviewed for allergies. The facility's policy mandates that food preferences and allergies be accommodated, yet this was not adhered to, resulting in the resident receiving food they were allergic to.
Failure to Provide Individualized Activities for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide activities that met the needs of two residents, Resident #8 and Resident #56, as observed during a survey. Resident #8, who was admitted with severe cognitive impairment and other medical conditions, expressed a preference for one-on-one activities and independent activities in his room. Despite this, the activities provided were limited to the daily chronicle being delivered and the TV being on in his room. The Activity Director confirmed that there were no specific activities tailored for cognitively and physically impaired residents, and Resident #8 was not offered any items from the activity department. Resident #56, who had moderate cognitive impairment and other medical conditions, also preferred activities in his room and had specific interests such as sports and using electronic devices. However, the activities provided were similar to those for Resident #8, with the daily chronicle and TV being the primary activities. The Activity Director acknowledged that Resident #56 did not attend many group activities and could not participate in food-related activities due to dietary restrictions. Like Resident #8, there were no specific activities for cognitively and physically impaired residents. The deficiency was identified as the facility's failure to provide appropriate and individualized activities for these residents, which was confirmed through observations, record reviews, and staff interviews. The Activity Director verified that the activities were not tailored to the residents' needs and that the latest activities were scheduled only until 4:00 P.M. This deficiency was investigated under a specific complaint number, indicating non-compliance with regulatory requirements.
Failure to Implement Pressure Ulcer Treatment Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement physician orders for pressure ulcer treatment for a resident, leading to a deficiency. The resident, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy and dependence on a ventilator, was assessed as cognitively intact but required total dependence on care. The resident's care plan included interventions for a pressure ulcer at the left gluteal fold, which was identified as a stage 3 ulcer on 04/17/24. The Wound Nurse Practitioner ordered a daily dressing change with a foam dressing to protect the ulcer, but this order was not entered into the resident's chart until 04/23/24, resulting in a lack of documented dressing changes from 04/17/24 to 04/22/24. An interview with the LPN responsible for wound care confirmed that the dressing changes were completed despite the absence of documentation in the resident's chart. The facility was unable to provide a policy on wound care for pressure ulcers, further highlighting the deficiency. This issue was investigated under specific complaint numbers, indicating non-compliance with the required standards for pressure ulcer care.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 546 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Hilliard
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darby Glenn Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 1.2 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Norwich Springs Health Campus | 1.2 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Mill Run Care Center | 1.7 mi | — | 21 | 0 |
| Mayfair Village Nursing Care Center | 1.9 mi | — | 13 | 0 |
| The Sanctuary At Tuttle Crossing | 2.1 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Trueman Pointe Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.