Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Aventura At Assumption Village during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions and moderate cognitive impairment did not have the administration of PRN Percocet accurately documented. On several occasions, the controlled drug record showed the medication was removed, but there was no corresponding entry on the MAR. This discrepancy was identified after the resident alleged an LPN gave the wrong medication and took her Percocet. Investigation confirmed that required documentation procedures were not followed, leading to incomplete records for controlled substances.
Staff did not follow proper hand hygiene and glove-changing protocols during incontinence care for two residents who were dependent on staff for all ADLs and always incontinent. In both cases, CNAs failed to change gloves or perform hand hygiene after providing peri care and before applying clean briefs or touching the environment, contrary to facility policy and CDC guidelines.
A resident with chronic pain and multiple health conditions did not receive six scheduled doses of Lyrica due to a delay in prescription renewal and miscommunication among staff, resulting in increased pain and headaches. The facility failed to ensure pain management medication was administered as ordered.
A nurse failed to prime an insulin pen before administering a prescribed dose to a resident with diabetes, despite manufacturer instructions requiring priming to ensure accurate dosing. The nurse was unsure of the correct priming procedure, and the facility's policy to follow physician orders and manufacturer instructions was not adhered to during the observed medication administration.
A resident with hypertension and other conditions was prescribed Carvedilol with instructions to hold the dose if systolic BP was below a certain threshold. Nursing staff administered the medication without documenting BP readings prior to each dose, and the MAR did not prompt for this documentation. Interviews confirmed BPs were checked but not recorded in the EMR, and any written records were discarded, resulting in incomplete and inaccurate medical records.
The facility did not provide substantial evening snacks to residents when the time between dinner and breakfast exceeded 14 hours, affecting 92 residents. Observations showed meal delivery intervals exceeded 14 hours, and residents reported not being offered snacks. The Dietary Manager confirmed the issue, and the facility policy required snacks or resident agreement for such meal plans, which was not followed.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in food storage, preparation, and serving, affecting 92 residents. Observations revealed undated and exposed food items, expired foods, and unsanitary practices during tray line processes. The facility's policies on food safety and sanitation were not followed, leading to potential risks for residents.
The facility failed to follow its weekly and always available menus, affecting several residents. Budget constraints and delivery issues led to frequent menu substitutions, such as chicken tenders for meatballs and toast for donuts. Residents expressed dissatisfaction with the inconsistency between the menu and meals served, and the Ombudsman noted systemic concerns with food quality and choices.
The facility failed to provide palatable and appropriately heated meals to residents, affecting eight individuals and potentially impacting nearly all residents receiving meals. Residents expressed dissatisfaction with food quality, noting it was often cold and lacked flavor. An observation confirmed that peas served were at an inadequate temperature and flavor, which was corroborated by a dietitian. The facility's policy to ensure palatable food was not followed.
A resident experienced a significant unplanned weight loss of 9.3%, but the facility failed to notify the physician and resident representative as required by policy. The dietitian did not contact the resident's representatives due to their work schedules and only thought she informed the nurse practitioner, who confirmed there was no written notification in the chart.
A resident with multiple health conditions, including hemiplegia and dementia, did not receive the necessary meal setup assistance as outlined in her care plan. Staff consistently left meal trays with lids intact and did not assist in cutting food or opening packages, despite the resident's need for such help. This was confirmed through observations, interviews, and documentation review.
The facility failed to monitor a resident's weekly weights as ordered, impacting her nutritional care, and did not adhere to another resident's fluid restriction, risking his health. Despite orders and care plans, weights were missed, and fluid intake exceeded limits, with no accurate tracking system in place.
A facility failed to maintain proper communication with a dialysis center for a resident with end-stage renal disease. The resident, who required dialysis thrice weekly, did not receive communication forms from the facility to take to the dialysis center. Although the resident brought back forms from the center, there were significant gaps in documentation. Staff interviews confirmed the lack of communication, and the LPN Manager acknowledged the missing forms, stating that the facility should have contacted the dialysis center when forms were not received.
Two residents were found with unattended medications at their bedsides, contrary to the facility's policy requiring nurse supervision during medication administration. One resident, with moderate cognitive impairment, had medications left out of reach, while another, requiring a mechanically altered diet, was unable to swallow potassium tablets without assistance. The facility's policy mandates that medications be administered safely and with supervision.
A resident with quadriplegia and dysphagia, on a mechanical soft diet, received coleslaw instead of green beans, contrary to their dietary requirements. The facility's policy mandates adherence to prescribed diets, but the meal provided did not meet the necessary consistency, as confirmed by staff. This incident suggests a broader issue with meal preparation for residents on specialized diets.
The facility failed to maintain proper infection control procedures, affecting three residents on isolation precautions. A resident with an antibiotic-resistant infection and another with a urinary catheter were not provided care with the required PPE by CNAs who were unaware of the enhanced barrier precautions. Additionally, a CNA failed to doff PPE after exiting a COVID-19 positive resident's room, contrary to facility policy.
A facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for a resident's leave of absence (LOA), resulting in the resident being stranded twice at a bus station due to a dead wheelchair battery. The resident, who had multiple medical conditions, left the facility without signing out or notifying staff, and the care plan did not address their LOA preferences or needs. Despite being aware of the resident's tendencies, the facility did not update the care plan to ensure safety during LOA.
A facility failed to refund an overpayment to a resident's family within the required 30 days after the resident's discharge. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and was admitted as a private pay, expired in the facility. Despite the spouse's inquiry, the refund was not processed, as confirmed by the Business Office Manager and Administrator.
Failure to Accurately Document Controlled Drug Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately document the administration of a controlled medication, specifically Percocet, for a resident with multiple complex medical conditions including neuropathy, diabetes, chronic pain, and moderate cognitive impairment. Review of records showed several instances where Percocet was removed for PRN administration as documented on the controlled drug record (CDR), but there was no corresponding documentation on the medication administration record (MAR) to confirm that the medication was actually administered. This discrepancy occurred on multiple dates and times, indicating a pattern of incomplete or missing documentation for controlled substances. The issue came to light following an allegation by the resident that an LPN gave the wrong medication and stole her Percocet. Investigation revealed that the LPN in question was suspended, tested positive for benzodiazepines without a current prescription, and was later terminated. Interviews with staff and review of facility policy confirmed that nurses are required to document all administered controlled medications on both the MAR and CDR to prevent medication errors. The facility's failure to ensure accurate and complete documentation for controlled drug administration created the potential for significant medication errors and/or misappropriation.
Failure to Follow Hand Hygiene and Glove Use During Incontinence Care
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to follow appropriate infection control practices during incontinence care for two residents who were dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and were always incontinent of bowel and bladder. In one instance, a CNA provided peri care to a resident, then, without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene, touched a barrier cream container, applied the cream, continued care to the resident's buttocks, and applied a new brief, all with the same soiled gloves. The CNA only removed gloves and washed hands after completing the care and handling soiled materials. The CNA confirmed in an interview that she did not change gloves or wash hands between steps as required. In another instance, a different CNA performed incontinence care for a resident, including removing a soiled brief, washing the resident's peri area and buttocks, and applying a clean brief, all without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. The CNA then pulled up the covers and lowered the bed while still wearing the soiled gloves. The CNA confirmed in an interview that she did not change gloves or wash hands before applying the clean brief and handling the resident's environment. The facility's policy and CDC guidelines require glove changes and hand hygiene after contact with body fluids and before moving from a soiled to a clean site, which was not followed in these cases.
Failure to Administer Ordered Pain Medication Due to Prescription Renewal Delay
Penalty
Summary
A resident with multiple chronic conditions, including multiple sclerosis, chronic pain, and paraplegia, was admitted to the facility and had a care plan that included both scheduled and as-needed pain medications. The resident was prescribed Lyrica 100 mg twice daily for pain, among other pain management medications. Review of the medication administration record revealed that the resident did not receive six scheduled doses of Lyrica over several days. Documentation showed that some doses were held without a reason, while others were not administered because the medication was on order or awaiting a prescription renewal from the nurse practitioner. Progress notes indicated a delay in obtaining the necessary prescription, resulting in missed doses. Interviews with the resident confirmed that the missed doses led to increased pain and more frequent, severe headaches during the period when Lyrica was not administered. Nursing staff and the Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged that there was a miscommunication regarding the timely renewal of the prescription, which led to the interruption in pain management. Facility policy required pain to be managed according to the care plan and professional standards, but the failure to ensure timely medication renewal and administration resulted in the resident not receiving ordered pain management as required.
Failure to Prime Insulin Pen Prior to Administration
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a registered nurse failed to properly administer insulin to a resident with type 2 diabetes mellitus and multiple other diagnoses, including hypertension and peripheral vascular disease. The resident had a physician's order for Humalog (Insulin Lispro) to be administered subcutaneously before meals according to a sliding scale based on finger-stick blood sugar (FSBS) results. During a medication administration observation, the nurse checked the resident's blood sugar, which was 238, and prepared to administer three units of insulin as ordered. However, the nurse did not prime the insulin pen prior to dialing the dose and administering the medication. Interview with the nurse confirmed that the insulin pen needle was not primed before use, and the nurse was uncertain about the specific priming instructions. Review of the manufacturer's instructions for the Insulin Lispro KwikPen indicated that the pen should be primed with two units before administration to ensure accurate dosing. The facility's policy required medications to be administered according to physician orders and manufacturer instructions, but this was not followed in this instance, resulting in the resident potentially receiving an incorrect dose of insulin.
Failure to Document Blood Pressure Prior to Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation of specified assessment criteria for a resident receiving medication with blood pressure (BP) parameters. A resident with multiple diagnoses, including hypertension and peripheral vascular disease, had a physician order for Carvedilol to be administered twice daily, with instructions to hold the medication if systolic BP was less than 130. During medication administration observation, the nurse did not document the BP prior to giving the medication, and the last recorded BP in the medical record was several days prior. There was no evidence in the medical record that BP was checked and met the ordered parameters before each dose, as required by the medication order. Further review revealed that the medication administration record (MAR) did not prompt or provide a place for nurses to document BP readings before each Carvedilol dose, only requiring monthly vital signs. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed that BPs were typically checked before administration but not documented in the electronic medical record, and any written notes were discarded. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed the lack of documentation and that nursing administration was not informed of the issue prior to the survey. Facility policy required documentation of services and objective observations in the resident's medical record, which was not followed in this case.
Failure to Provide Evening Snacks When Meal Intervals Exceed 14 Hours
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were offered a substantial snack in the evening when the time between dinner and breakfast exceeded 14 hours. This deficiency had the potential to affect 92 residents who received meals from the kitchen, excluding two residents who were identified as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). Observations revealed that the time between dinner and breakfast delivery exceeded 14 hours for all meal delivery carts, with the longest interval being 15 hours and 40 minutes. The facility's policy stated that no more than 14 hours should elapse between a substantial evening meal and breakfast unless a nourishing snack was provided at bedtime, which was not the case. Interviews with residents during a Resident Council meeting indicated that they felt the time between dinner and breakfast was too long and that snacks were not being offered in the evening. Some residents had snacks provided by their families, but others did not have family support or the means to purchase snacks. The Dietary Manager confirmed that meal times had been adjusted, resulting in intervals greater than 14 hours between dinner and breakfast, and acknowledged that a substantial snack was not being offered to all residents. The facility's policy required resident group agreement for meal plans exceeding 14 hours between dinner and breakfast, which had not been obtained.
Sanitation and Food Safety Deficiencies in Facility Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions, potentially affecting all 92 residents who received food from the kitchen. Observations revealed multiple issues in the dry storage area, walk-in cooler, and walk-in freezer, including open and undated packages of food, food items exposed to air, and equipment with visible corrosion and food debris. The facility's policy required items to be dated when opened and discarded after three days, but these practices were not followed. Further observations in the skilled and intermediate unit refrigerators showed a lack of labeling and dating on various food items, including expired foods and items with offensive smells. The facility's policy mandated that all food and beverages be labeled with the resident's name and dated to ensure food safety, but this was not adhered to, leading to the presence of expired and potentially unsafe food items. During the tray line process, dietary aides were observed using soiled towels to dry trays and dome lids, which were placed on a dirty cart. This practice was confirmed by the dietitian as inappropriate, and the facility's policy required kitchen areas and equipment to be kept clean and free of grime. The county health inspection report also noted non-compliance in maintaining food in good condition and ensuring food contact surfaces were cleaned and sanitized.
Menu Inconsistencies and Substitutions Due to Budget and Delivery Issues
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the weekly and always available menus were followed, affecting seven residents and potentially impacting all residents except for two who were NPO. The facility's always available menu included items such as deli sandwiches, chef salads, and baked lemon pepper fish, among others. However, observations and interviews revealed that several items were missing from the menu, and substitutions were frequently made due to budget constraints and delivery issues. For instance, on multiple occasions, items like chicken tenders and toast were substituted for meatballs and donuts, respectively, due to late or incomplete deliveries. Interviews with the Dietary Manager and Dietary Aides confirmed that budget limitations and delivery schedules often resulted in unavailable menu items, leading to substitutions that did not match the planned menu. Residents expressed dissatisfaction with the inconsistency between the menu and the meals served, and the Ombudsman noted systemic concerns with food quality and choices. The facility's policy stated that substitutions should only occur in uncontrollable situations, yet the frequency of substitutions indicated a broader issue with inventory management and budget adherence.
Deficiency in Food Palatability and Temperature
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food served to residents was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. This deficiency affected eight residents and had the potential to affect nearly all residents receiving meals from the kitchen. During a review of the monthly Residents' Dietary Meeting minutes, it was noted that residents expressed a desire for food to be seasoned more and served hotter. Interviews with residents revealed dissatisfaction with the food quality, with one resident stating the food was terrible and relying on outside food. An ombudsman also reported systemic concerns regarding food quality, choices, and temperatures. An observation of the dinner tray line and a test tray revealed issues with food temperature. The test tray, which included milk, cranberry juice, cobbler, chicken, and peas, was found to have peas at a temperature of 109.5 degrees Fahrenheit, which was considered cold and lacking flavor. The dietitian confirmed these findings. Further interviews with residents during a council meeting indicated that meals were often cold and lacked good taste. The facility's policy stated that menus would be followed and food would be palatable, yet this was not adhered to, leading to the deficiency.
Failure to Notify of Significant Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the physician/nurse practitioner and resident representative of a significant weight change for a resident. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia, dysphagia, vascular dementia, lymphedema, and obesity, experienced a significant unplanned weight loss of 9.3% between October and November. Despite this significant weight change, there was no documented evidence that the physician or resident representative was informed, as required by the facility's policy. Interviews with the dietitian and nurse practitioner confirmed the oversight. The dietitian acknowledged the significant weight loss but admitted she had not contacted the resident's representatives due to their work schedules and only thought she had verbally informed the nurse practitioner. The nurse practitioner stated that if she had been notified, there would have been a written record in the chart. The facility's policy mandates that any weight change of five percent or more should be communicated to the physician and resident representative, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Assist Resident with Meal Setup
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the necessary assistance to Resident #36 during meal times, as required by her care plan. Resident #36, who has a history of cerebral ischemia, dementia, hemiplegia, and other conditions, was observed to have difficulties with eating due to her physical impairments. Despite her care plan indicating the need for setup assistance with meals, staff consistently left meal trays with lids intact and did not assist in cutting food or opening packages. This lack of assistance was confirmed through interviews with the resident, her family, and staff members, as well as through observations of meal setups that were not completed as required. The deficiency was further highlighted by the documentation in the electronic medical record, which showed multiple instances where no setup or physical help was provided to Resident #36. Interviews with staff, including CNAs and LPNs, confirmed that the resident required setup assistance, which included opening food packages, removing lids, and ensuring accessibility of utensils. The facility's policy on Activities of Daily Living, revised in August 2022, mandates appropriate support for residents unable to perform ADLs independently, including meal assistance, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Monitor Nutritional Needs and Fluid Restrictions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident #70's weekly weights were obtained as ordered, which was crucial for monitoring her nutritional status. Resident #70 had a complex medical history, including hemiplegia, dysphagia, vascular dementia, and significant weight loss, necessitating enteral feeding. Despite a physician's order for weekly weights to monitor trends, several weights were missed in October and November 2024. Interviews with the LPN Manager and Dietitian revealed that the weights were not consistently recorded, and there was uncertainty about the accuracy of the weights that were obtained. Additionally, the facility did not adequately monitor and follow Resident #57's fluid restriction, which was critical due to his end-stage renal disease and other related conditions. The care plan specified a 1000 ml fluid restriction, with dietary and nursing staff responsible for providing specific amounts. However, observations and interviews indicated that the resident received more fluids than allowed, and there was no system in place to accurately track fluid intake. The resident was unaware of the specifics of his fluid restriction, and staff did not consistently adhere to the prescribed limits. The facility's policies on weight assessment and fluid restriction were not effectively implemented, leading to deficiencies in the care of Residents #70 and #57. The lack of adherence to these policies resulted in missed weight measurements for Resident #70 and excessive fluid intake for Resident #57, highlighting a failure in monitoring and documentation processes within the facility.
Failure in Communication with Dialysis Center
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis center for a resident requiring dialysis services. Resident #57, who has end-stage renal disease and is dependent on renal dialysis, was affected by this deficiency. The resident was scheduled for dialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. However, there were significant gaps in the communication between the facility and the dialysis center, as evidenced by missing communication sheets from the dialysis center on multiple occasions. The facility did not send communication forms with the resident to the dialysis center, and there was no documented evidence of communication on dialysis days. Interviews with the resident and facility staff confirmed that the resident did not take any paperwork to the dialysis center, but brought back forms from the center, which were supposed to be placed in the medical chart. The LPN Manager acknowledged the missing communication forms and stated that if there was no communication from the dialysis center, the facility staff should have contacted the center. The renal RN from the dialysis facility confirmed that the facility never sent forms with the resident, but the dialysis center staff consistently sent forms back with the resident.
Medication Administration Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended, affecting two residents and potentially impacting 20 additional residents. Resident #27, who had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with personal care, was found with a medicine cup containing five pills on his bedside table, which he could not reach. The nurse confirmed leaving the medication unattended, contrary to the facility's policy that required nurses to remain with residents while they took their medicine. Resident #4, who had intact cognition but required a mechanically altered diet, was also found with a medication cup containing potassium tablets at her bedside. The resident confirmed that the nurse left the medication in her room without supervision, and she was unable to swallow the potassium tablets without assistance. The facility's policy stated that residents could only self-administer medications if deemed safe by the care planning team, which was not the case for Resident #4. Interviews with the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility's policy required nurses to stay with residents until they finished taking their medication. The facility's policy on administering medications, revised in August 2022, emphasized that medications should be administered as prescribed and in a safe manner, which was not adhered to in these instances.
Inappropriate Meal Consistency for Resident on Mechanical Soft Diet
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents on mechanical soft diets received meals with the appropriate consistency, affecting one resident specifically. Resident #6, who has diagnoses including quadriplegia, dysphagia, unspecified dementia, and macular degeneration, was identified as being on a mechanically altered diet. The resident's care plan and physician orders specified a regular diet with mechanical soft texture and thin consistency. However, during an observation, it was noted that Resident #6 received coleslaw with shredded cabbage instead of the prescribed green beans, which was not suitable for a mechanical soft diet. This inconsistency was confirmed by a Certified Nursing Assistant who removed the coleslaw from the tray. The facility's policy requires that menus be followed and food be served in a form designed to meet individual needs. Despite this, the meal provided to Resident #6 did not adhere to the dietary requirements outlined in the care plan and physician orders. The Speech Therapy staff confirmed that coleslaw was inappropriate for a mechanical soft diet, highlighting a lapse in the facility's adherence to dietary protocols. This incident was part of a broader issue, as the facility identified 13 residents on mechanical soft diets, indicating a potential systemic problem in meal preparation and delivery.
Infection Control Deficiencies in PPE Usage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper infection control procedures, affecting three residents who were observed for isolation precautions. Resident #68, who had a stroke with right-sided weakness and dementia, was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) due to an antibiotic-resistant infection. Despite a sign indicating the need for personal protective equipment (PPE) during high-contact activities, two certified nursing assistants (CNAs) entered the resident's room without donning PPE and provided incontinence and catheter care. Both CNAs were unaware of the EBP requirement. Similarly, Resident #148, who had a left femur fracture and urinary retention, was also on EBP due to an indwelling urinary catheter. A CNA entered the room without PPE and provided incontinence care, unaware of the EBP requirement. Resident #151, diagnosed with COVID-19 and dementia, was on droplet precautions. A sign on the door indicated the need for an N95 mask, gown, gloves, and face shield. A CNA exited the resident's room wearing PPE and proceeded to the nurse's station to obtain a straw, then returned to the room without doffing the PPE. The registered nurse confirmed that the CNA should have removed the PPE before exiting the room. The facility's policies on EBP and COVID-19 precautions were not followed, leading to these deficiencies.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident's Leave of Absence
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a resident regarding their leave of absence (LOA) from the facility. The resident, who was cognitively intact and used a wheelchair for mobility, had multiple medical conditions including multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, diabetes, and pressure ulcers. Despite having a physician's order allowing LOA with medications, the care plan did not address the resident's preference for LOA or the necessary preparations for such absences, such as ensuring the resident's power wheelchair was fully charged and that they had a means of communication. On two occasions, the resident left the facility without signing out or notifying staff, resulting in them being stranded at a bus station due to a dead wheelchair battery. The resident was subsequently found by emergency services and taken to a hospital for evaluation. The facility's LOA book did not have records of the resident signing out on these dates, and the care plan lacked any mention of the resident's LOA preferences or needs, such as taking medications with them as per the physician's order. Interviews with staff and the resident revealed that the facility was aware of the resident's tendency to leave on Saturdays and their impulsive nature. However, the care plan was not updated to reflect these preferences or to ensure the resident's safety during LOA. The facility's policy required residents to sign out and receive medications for LOA, but there was no policy to include LOA preferences in the care plan, contributing to the oversight.
Failure to Refund Overpayment to Resident's Family
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a final accounting of overpayment to the spouse of a resident within thirty days of the resident's discharge, as required by their Resident Admission Agreement. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and was admitted with diagnoses including dislocation of an unspecified cervical vertebrae and respiratory failure, expired in the facility. The resident was admitted as a private pay resident, and the admission agreement, signed by the spouse, stipulated that refunds should be made within 30 days of discharge. Upon review, it was found that the facility received a payment of $3825.00 for the resident's stay, while the total cost was only $1020.00, resulting in an overpayment of $2805.00. Despite the spouse's inquiry about the refund in September 2023, the facility had not issued the refund. The Business Office Manager and the Administrator confirmed that all refunds are processed through their corporate office, and no refund check had been issued to the spouse. This deficiency was investigated under Complaint Number OH00154001.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 354 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 8 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near North Lima
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willow Woods Rehabilitation And Nursing | 0.2 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
| Caprice Health Care Center | 0.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Shepherd Of The Valley Poland | 0.9 mi | — | 8 | 0 |
| Briarfield Place | 1.3 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Hampton Woods Nursing Center, Inc | 2.2 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Aventura At Assumption Village.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.