Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Glengariff Health Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors found that the facility did not provide enough nursing staff on a resident unit, with staffing schedules showing fewer CNAs than required by the facility's own assessment. Two residents reported delayed care due to short staffing, and nursing staff described overwhelming workloads and the need to prioritize care, especially on weekends. Facility leadership did not update staffing practices or implement new interventions despite being aware of low weekend staffing.
A resident with dementia and full cognition was physically abused by an LPN, who placed hands on the resident's neck and pushed them in their wheelchair. The incident was witnessed by several staff members but was not reported as required by policy. The abuse was only discovered after video review related to a separate staff injury, and the resident's care plan was not updated following the event.
The facility failed to report two incidents involving residents as required by state law. One resident had unexplained bruises, and another was involved in an altercation resulting in a fall. Staff did not report these incidents to the New York State Department of Health within the mandated timeframe, citing confusion over the nature of the incidents and lack of evidence.
The facility failed to investigate alleged abuse and injuries for two residents. One resident had an unexplained facial injury, with inconsistent accounts of its cause, and the facility did not rule out abuse or neglect. Another resident was involved in an altercation resulting in a fall, but no investigation was documented. The facility did not adhere to its policy requiring thorough investigations, leading to repeat deficiencies.
An LPN in a LTC facility was found to be conducting assessments and signing as an RN Supervisor, which is outside their scope of practice. This occurred for 17 accident and incident reports, including one involving a resident with a history of falls and cognitive impairment. The facility's leadership was aware of the issue, but the practice continued due to unclear job descriptions.
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate incidents and injuries of unknown origin for three residents, including a resident found on the floor with a hematoma, another with multiple injuries over several months, and a third with a bruise to the left eye. The investigations were incomplete, lacking statements from key staff and timely conclusions, and did not rule out abuse, neglect, and mistreatment.
The facility failed to administer medications within one hour of the ordered time on two units and did not ensure drug records were in order for controlled substances. Nurses did not seek assistance when running late, and discrepancies were found in the controlled substance administration records.
The facility failed to report a resident-to-resident altercation within the required two-hour timeframe. One resident, with severe cognitive impairment, was allegedly pushed by another resident, resulting in a fall. The incident was reported to the New York State Department of Health three days later, contrary to federal regulations and the facility's policy.
A resident was admitted without the required PASARR screening being completed prior to admission, contrary to the facility's policy. The screening was completed two days after admission, and interviews revealed that the Admission department was responsible for ensuring all pre-admission documents were completed beforehand.
A resident with Asthma, End Stage Renal Disease, and Diabetes was found with an unlabeled inhaler in their room without a Physician's order or assessment for self-administration. Staff interviews revealed that the resident's family brought medications from home, but the facility did not have proper orders or assessments in place.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment did not receive a recommended calcium supplement despite the physician's approval. The facility's staff were unclear about the process for implementing pharmacist recommendations, leading to a breakdown in the medication regimen review process.
A resident continued to receive Oxybutynin and Benadryl despite the physician's agreement to discontinue these medications based on the consultant pharmacist's recommendations. The medications were still administered from February to May, even though they were no longer medically required. Interviews revealed that the physician likely gave verbal orders to discontinue the medications but did not ensure the orders were executed.
A resident did not receive timely follow-up dental care as recommended by a dentist. The resident had to schedule their own appointment, and staff were unaware of the need for follow-up. The facility's Medical Director was not notified for medical clearance, leading to a delay in addressing the resident's dental needs.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment fell and sustained a head injury, requiring hospital transfer. The facility failed to notify the resident's designated representative within the required timeframe, as per their policy. The representative was unaware of the incident until a later visit, and there was no documented evidence of timely notification.
A resident with a history of serious health conditions experienced stroke-like symptoms and was examined by a physician who failed to document the findings. Despite the resident's symptoms, the physician did not observe abnormalities and did not write a progress note, leading to a deficiency in documentation. The resident was later transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with a possible acute Cerebral Vascular Insufficiency.
A resident with advanced cancer was not provided timely hospice services due to the unavailability of the social worker over the weekend. Despite a physician's order and family requests, the hospice referral was delayed until Monday, and the resident passed away shortly after. The facility's social work department failed to communicate and document the referral process effectively.
A resident with advanced cancer and a request for hospice services experienced a delay in receiving a referral due to miscommunication and lack of documentation among facility staff. The resident's family requested hospice care, but the referral was not made promptly, and the resident passed away shortly after the referral was finally initiated.
Deficiency Due to Insufficient Nursing Staff on Resident Unit
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of residents, particularly on Unit 2, as identified during a recertification survey. Payroll-Based Journal Staffing Data for the specified quarter showed excessively low weekend staffing, and a review of staffing schedules revealed that the number of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) assigned to Unit 2 frequently fell below the facility's own stated par levels. The Facility Assessment indicated that five CNAs were required for a full census of 39 residents during the day shift, but staffing records showed that only three or four CNAs were often scheduled, even when the census was in the mid-30s. The facility did not update its Facility Assessment to reflect actual census or acuity changes and did not implement new interventions despite being aware of low weekend staffing triggers. Two residents in the Resident Council reported concerns about short staffing, especially on weekends, stating that delayed responses to call bells sometimes lasted up to an hour and affected their care. Anonymous nursing staff also expressed that insufficient staffing led to overwhelming workloads, prioritization of certain residents over others, and the need to stay beyond their shifts to complete care tasks. These staff members indicated that the number of residents assigned per CNA was often too high, impacting the timeliness and quality of care provided. Interviews with facility leadership, including the Administrator, Staffing Coordinator, and Director of Nursing Services, revealed a lack of consensus on staffing adequacy. While the Staffing Coordinator and Director of Nursing Services stated that four CNAs were sufficient for the census levels observed, this contradicted the Facility Assessment and staff feedback. The Administrator acknowledged the discrepancy between the Facility Assessment and actual staffing but maintained that the assessment was only a suggestion and not a requirement. No new measures were taken to address the identified low weekend staffing.
Failure to Protect Resident from Physical Abuse by LPN
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) physically abused a resident by placing both hands on the resident's neck and pushing them backwards in their wheelchair. This incident was captured on video surveillance and observed by multiple staff members present at the nurse's station. The LPN was seen pointing a finger at the resident's face before the physical contact occurred. The event was not immediately reported by the staff who witnessed or were aware of the altercation. The resident involved had diagnoses including dementia, major depressive disorder, and obesity, but was documented as having full cognition according to a recent mental status assessment. The resident's care plan identified them as at risk for abuse and included interventions such as prompt investigation of all allegations and ensuring a safe environment. However, the care plan was not updated or amended following the incident, and the required reporting procedures were not followed by staff who witnessed or were aware of the abuse. Interviews revealed that staff members who observed or intervened in the incident did not report the abuse to supervisors as required by facility policy. Instead, attention was initially focused on a subsequent incident in which the resident reportedly attacked a staff member. The abuse was only discovered after video review related to the staff injury, indicating a failure in immediate recognition and reporting of abuse as mandated by facility policy and state regulations.
Failure to Report Abuse and Injury Incidents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment within the required 24-hour timeframe to the New York State Department of Health. This deficiency was identified in the cases of two residents. The first resident was observed with bruises on their forehead and above their right eye, with the cause of the injury unknown. Despite the facility's policy requiring immediate reporting of such incidents, the injury was not reported to the state authorities. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of consensus on whether the injury was considered abuse, leading to a failure in reporting. The second resident was involved in an altercation with another resident, resulting in a fall and head injury. The incident was not reported to the New York State Department of Health, as required. The facility's staff, including the Administrator and Director of Nursing, failed to complete an Accident and Investigation report. There was confusion regarding the existence of video evidence of the incident, with conflicting accounts from the Administrator and other staff members about whether the video was reviewed and what it showed. Both cases highlight a breakdown in the facility's internal communication and adherence to reporting protocols. The facility's policy mandates immediate reporting of suspected abuse or injuries of unknown origin, yet these incidents were not reported in a timely manner. The lack of documentation and failure to follow through with required procedures contributed to the deficiency identified during the survey.
Failure to Investigate Alleged Abuse and Injuries
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure thorough investigations of alleged violations of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown origin, for two residents. Resident #1 was observed with an injury of unknown origin on the right side of their face and eyebrow area. Despite multiple interviews and assessments, the facility did not document a thorough investigation to rule out abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. The resident provided inconsistent accounts of how the injury occurred, and the family member suggested it could be from a bug bite. The medical director noted the resident's propensity for bruising due to fragile skin, but the facility did not conclusively determine the cause of the injury. Resident #2 was involved in an altercation with another resident, resulting in a fall and head injury. The facility did not document an investigation into the incident, and there was no Accident and Investigation report completed. The administrator and director of nursing claimed to have reviewed video footage but did not observe the altercation or fall, leading to a lack of formal investigation. The absence of documentation and investigation into the incident represents a failure to comply with regulatory requirements for reporting and investigating potential abuse or neglect. The facility's policy requires all allegations to be thoroughly investigated, with the administrator responsible for initiating investigations. However, in both cases, the facility did not adhere to its policy, resulting in repeat deficiencies. The lack of documented evidence and failure to conduct comprehensive investigations into these incidents highlight significant lapses in the facility's procedures for handling potential abuse or neglect cases.
LPN Conducts RN-Level Assessments in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that care was provided in accordance with professional standards by allowing a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) to perform duties outside their scope of practice. Specifically, the LPN was serving as a Unit Manager and completed assessments for 17 out of 17 reviewed records following accidents and falls on their unit. The LPN signed their name in the space designated for a Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor, which is beyond the LPN's scope of practice. The job description for the Unit Manager did not specify who should complete the assessments, leading to this oversight. One of the residents involved, who had a history of falls and mild cognitive impairment, had an accident and investigation form completed by the LPN. The form was incorrectly signed by the LPN as the RN Supervisor, and there was no documented evidence that an RN or physician had completed or signed the assessment. Interviews with the facility's Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed awareness of the issue, yet the practice continued. The LPN stated they were following the job description provided to them, which included completing accident and investigation forms, but denied completing the assessments themselves, claiming they only documented assessments done by an RN or physician, although no such documentation was found.
Inadequate Investigation of Incidents and Injuries
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that all incidents, including injuries of unknown origin, were thoroughly investigated. This deficiency was identified for three residents. Resident #530 was found on the floor with a hematoma and skin tears, but the investigation was incomplete, lacking statements from key staff and a timely conclusion. The investigation summary was not completed within the required 5-day timeframe, and the facility failed to rule out abuse, neglect, and mistreatment. Resident #140 had multiple injuries of unknown origin over several months, but the facility did not conduct thorough investigations to identify the root cause or rule out abuse, neglect, and mistreatment. The investigation summaries were incomplete, and statements from staff who provided care within the previous 72 hours were not obtained. The Risk Manager and Director of Nursing Services acknowledged that the investigations were not thorough. Resident #133 sustained a bruise to the left eye, but the facility's investigation was inadequate. The investigation did not include statements from all relevant staff, and the conclusion did not determine how the injury occurred. The Director of Nursing Services admitted that the investigation was not thorough and did not include necessary details to rule out abuse, neglect, and mistreatment.
Medication Administration and Controlled Substance Record Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that medications were administered within one hour of the ordered administration time on two units during unit observations. Specifically, on Unit 2 in the Glengariff building, three residents did not receive their 9:00 AM medications within the required time frame. Licensed Practical Nurse #6 was observed administering medications at 12:02 PM and stated they were still administering the 9:00 AM medications due to being the only nurse for 39 residents. The nurse did not inform their supervisor about the delay. Similarly, on Unit 1 in the Glengariff building, eleven residents did not receive their 9:00 AM medications within the required time frame. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 was observed administering the 9:00 AM medications at 11:12 AM and stated they did not ask for help despite the time-consuming nature of the task. Both unit supervisors confirmed that the medication nurses should have reached out for assistance if they were running late with medication administration. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that drug records were in order and accounted for all controlled drugs on one unit during the medication storage task. Specifically, the controlled substance administration record for a resident indicated a zero balance of Oxycodone 10-milligram tablets, but the medication blister pack had one tablet remaining. Registered Nurse #1 explained that the remaining tablet was put in the double-locked narcotic box after the medication was discontinued. However, Licensed Practical Nurse #7 erroneously documented the administration of Oxycodone on both the discontinued 10-milligram and the active 5-milligram Controlled Medication Administration Record forms. The Director of Nursing Services stated that discontinued controlled medications should be brought to the Nursing Office and not stored on the units. The facility's policies on medication administration and storage of controlled substances were not followed, leading to delays in medication administration and discrepancies in controlled substance records. The Director of Nursing Services and the Medical Director emphasized the importance of timely medication administration and proper documentation, highlighting the need for nurses to seek assistance when necessary to ensure compliance with the facility's policies.
Failure to Timely Report Resident-to-Resident Altercation
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were reported immediately, as required by federal regulations. Specifically, an incident occurred between two residents, where one resident allegedly pushed the other, resulting in a fall. This incident was not reported to the New York State Department of Health until three days later, despite the requirement to report such incidents within two hours if they involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. The facility's policy mandates immediate reporting and investigation of such incidents, but this protocol was not followed in this case. Resident #151, who has severe cognitive impairment, was allegedly pushed by Resident #82, who is cognitively intact but has a history of Schizophrenia and involuntary movements. The incident occurred in a shared bathroom, and Resident #151 was found on the floor, complaining of pain and claiming to have hit their head. X-rays later showed no acute fractures. Resident #82 claimed that Resident #151 had pushed them first, and they pushed back in response. A witness, another resident, corroborated that Resident #82 pushed Resident #151, causing the fall. Interviews with staff and residents revealed that there were no prior incidents between the two residents. The Director of Nursing Services acknowledged that the incident should have been reported within two hours, as required. The delay in reporting this incident constitutes a failure to comply with federal regulations and the facility's own policies, leading to the identified deficiency.
Failure to Complete PASARR Screening Prior to Admission
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that preadmission screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability was conducted prior to their admission. This deficiency was identified for one resident who was admitted with diagnoses of Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type, Major Depressive Disorder, and End Stage Renal Disease. The Level 1 Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screening for this resident was not completed until two days after their admission to the facility, contrary to the facility's policy which mandates that all residents have the required pre-admission screen prior to admission. The screen was eventually completed and signed by the facility's Director of Social Services after the resident had already been admitted. Interviews with the Co-Director of Admission and the Director of Social Services revealed that the Admission department was responsible for ensuring that all admission documents, including the PASARR forms, were present and completed prior to a resident's admission. The Co-Director of Admission, who was not involved in the resident's admission, stated that the screen should have been completed by the transferring facility and obtained before admission. The Director of Social Services noted the missing screen the day after the resident's admission and completed it the following day. The Administrator confirmed that the admission office should have ensured all pre-admission documents were reviewed and completed accurately before the resident's admission.
Failure to Ensure Safe Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that Resident #531's environment remained free of accident hazards, as the resident was not assessed to safely self-administer their medications. An inhaler was observed in Resident #531's room without a label indicating the resident's name or directions for administration, and there was no staff member present. Additionally, Resident #531 did not have a Physician's order for the use of the inhaler. The facility's policy requires that only licensed individuals administer medications and that residents may self-administer only if assessed and deemed capable by the attending physician and interdisciplinary care planning team. Resident #531, who has diagnoses of Asthma, End Stage Renal Disease, and Diabetes, was observed with an unlabeled Breo-Ellipta inhaler brought from home. The resident's Physician's orders did not include this inhaler, and there was no assessment for self-administration of medications. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident's family insisted on bringing medications from home, but the facility did not have proper orders or assessments in place. The Director of Nursing Services confirmed that no medications should be left with a resident without supervision and that all medications must be properly labeled and have a Physician's order for administration.
Failure to Implement Approved Medication Regimen Review Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that the medication regimen review recommendations approved by the physician were implemented. This deficiency was identified for a resident with severe cognitive impairment who was recommended by the consultant pharmacist to start a calcium supplement. Although the physician approved the recommendation, no physician's order was written, and the resident did not receive the supplement. Interviews with nursing staff revealed confusion about the process for implementing pharmacist recommendations, with some staff unsure if a verbal order from the physician was required or if the physician needed to update the electronic medical record directly. The Director of Nursing Services and the Medical Director acknowledged issues with the medication regimen review process, noting that a significant percentage of pharmacist recommendations were not being implemented. The Medical Director mentioned that the pharmacist should alert the physician by phone and place the recommendation in the physician's box, while the physician should instruct the nursing supervisor to make the order change and document it in the progress note. Despite these procedures, the calcium supplement order for the resident was not written, highlighting a breakdown in the facility's process for handling medication regimen review recommendations.
Failure to Discontinue Unnecessary Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medication. This deficiency was identified for one resident who continued to receive Oxybutynin and Benadryl despite the physician's agreement to discontinue these medications based on the consultant pharmacist's recommendations. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and was always incontinent of bladder and bowel, continued to receive Oxybutynin from February to May and Benadryl on several occasions in March and May, even though the medications were no longer medically required. The resident's comprehensive care plan and physician's orders documented the need to discontinue these medications, but the orders were not executed. The physician's progress notes indicated that the recommendations to discontinue the medications were appreciated and agreed upon, but there was no documentation of the actual discontinuation. The resident's medication administration records showed that the medications were still being administered despite the discontinuation orders. Interviews with the attending physician and the medical director revealed that the physician likely gave verbal orders to discontinue the medications but could not recall to whom they spoke. Both the attending physician and the medical director acknowledged that the medications should have been discontinued if they were no longer necessary. The medical director emphasized that it was the physician's responsibility to ensure that the medication discontinuation orders were executed.
Failure to Ensure Timely Follow-Up Dental Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility did not ensure that Resident #127 received timely follow-up dental care as recommended by a dentist. The resident, who had diagnoses including Dysphagia, Obesity, and Diabetes Mellitus, was seen by a dentist on 3/18/2024. The dentist recommended a follow-up visit in one week for tooth extraction, requiring medical clearance to stop Aspirin. However, there was no documented evidence that these recommendations were addressed until 5/7/2024. Interviews with the resident and staff revealed a lack of communication and follow-through regarding the dental recommendations. The resident stated that they had to call the dental office themselves to schedule the follow-up appointment. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 and Registered Nurse Supervisor #2 were unaware of the need for a follow-up appointment, and Licensed Practical Nurse #5, who was responsible for scheduling, did not review the dental consultation form or schedule the necessary follow-up. The facility's Medical Director and other physicians were not notified to provide the required medical clearance for the dental procedure. The Director of Nursing Services confirmed that nursing supervisors should have reviewed and addressed the dental recommendations promptly. The failure to ensure timely follow-up care resulted in a delay in addressing the resident's dental needs.
Failure to Notify Resident's Representative of Significant Change
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to immediately notify the designated representative of a resident following a significant change in the resident's physical status. On 3/17/2024, a resident with severe cognitive impairment, diagnosed with Dementia with Psychotic Disturbance, Anxiety Disorder, and Depression, fell and sustained a scalp laceration after hitting their head on a radiator. The resident was subsequently transferred to the hospital for evaluation. Despite the facility's policy requiring notification of the resident's representative within 24 hours of such incidents, there was no documented evidence that the representative was informed until two days later, on 3/19/2024. Interviews conducted during the survey revealed that the designated representative was not aware of the incident until they visited the resident on 3/26/2024. The representative stated they did not receive any communication from the facility on the dates in question. The Assistant Director of Nursing and the Director of Nursing confirmed that it was the responsibility of the Registered Nurse Supervisor to notify the resident's representative and document the communication in the medical record. However, the Registered Nurse Supervisor responsible for the notification was unavailable for an interview.
Physician Documentation Deficiency During Resident's Stroke-Like Episode
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a physician wrote, signed, and dated a progress note at each required visit, as evidenced during a recertification and extended survey. This deficiency was identified in the case of a resident who experienced stroke-like symptoms on a specific date. Although a physician examined the resident, no documentation of the examination findings was recorded in the resident's medical record. The resident was subsequently transferred to the hospital by emergency medical services and diagnosed with a possible acute Cerebral Vascular Insufficiency. The resident, who was cognitively intact, had a history of End Stage Renal Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, and Depression. On the day of the incident, the resident reported symptoms such as numbness in the hand and slurred speech to a Certified Nursing Assistant, who then notified a Licensed Practical Nurse. The nursing supervisor was informed, and a physician on the unit was asked to examine the resident. Despite the examination, the physician did not document any findings, as they did not observe any abnormalities and deferred further action to the resident's Primary Physician. Interviews with facility staff, including the Medical Director and the Director of Nursing Services, confirmed that the physician who examined the resident should have documented the assessment in the medical record. The lack of documentation was a clear violation of the facility's policy and regulatory requirements, as it failed to provide a complete and accurate account of the resident's condition and the care provided during the incident.
Failure to Provide Timely Hospice Referral for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide medically-related social services to Resident #380, who was admitted with a diagnosis of advanced stomach cancer, dysphagia, and depression. The resident's care plan included comfort measures and a do-not-resuscitate order. On a Saturday, the resident's designated representative requested a hospice service referral, which was ordered by the physician. However, the facility's social worker or designee was unavailable to process the referral until the following Monday. During the weekend, the family member communicated with the nursing staff about the resident's declining condition and the need for hospice services. Despite this, the social worker on call did not follow up with the family or facilitate the hospice referral. The Director of Social Work was aware of the family's interest in hospice care but did not act on the physician's order for a hospice consult. The referral was finally made on Monday, but the resident passed away shortly after, before the hospice services could be initiated. Interviews with the social worker and the Director of Social Work revealed a lack of communication and documentation regarding the hospice referral. The social worker admitted to rushing the referral process and failing to document it properly. The facility's administrator confirmed that the social work department is responsible for initiating hospice referrals and ensuring follow-up on physician orders. This deficiency highlights a failure in the facility's process for timely hospice referrals, impacting the resident's end-of-life care.
Delayed Hospice Referral for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident, who requested hospice services, was provided with the necessary referral in a timely manner. Resident #380, who was diagnosed with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, dysphagia, and depression, had a designated representative who requested hospice services. Despite the request being made, the referral was delayed, and the resident passed away shortly after the referral was finally made. The facility's policy on Comfort Care and Palliative Care did not adequately address the criteria for hospice referral or the procedure to transfer residents to a hospice program. This lack of clarity contributed to the delay in providing hospice services to Resident #380. The resident's care plan included directives for comfort measures and do-not-resuscitate orders, indicating the need for hospice care, yet the facility did not act promptly on the family's request. Interviews with facility staff revealed a breakdown in communication and responsibility. The Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged the request for hospice services but indicated that the social work department was responsible for making the referral. However, the social worker did not document or act on the request over the weekend, and the Director of Social Work was not aware of the physician's order for a hospice consult. This miscommunication and lack of documentation led to the failure to provide timely hospice care for Resident #380.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 766 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 10 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Glen Cove
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emerge Nursing And Rehabilitation At Glen Cove | 0.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Glen Cove Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation | 0.7 mi | — | 6 | 0 |
| The Amsterdam At Harborside | 4.2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Sands Point Center For Health And Rehabilitation | 4.2 mi | — | 8 | 0 |
| Sunharbor Manor | 6.3 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Glengariff Health Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.