Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Pines Village Inc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for two residents, leading to deficiencies in their care. One resident's care plan did not include critical aspects such as antidepressant medication, colostomy, and urinary catheter care. Another resident's care plan lacked documentation of incontinence and UTI history. Staff interviews confirmed that these omissions were against facility policy.
A facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen therapy and develop a care plan for a resident with COPD and pneumonia. The resident was observed receiving oxygen without a corresponding order, and the care plan lacked any mention of respiratory care. Staff acknowledged the oversight, and the deficiency was identified as a failure to follow facility policies on oxygen administration and care plan updates.
The facility failed to conduct annual performance appraisals for two CNAs, as required by policy and state regulations. The LNHA confirmed the oversight, and the HR Manager stated that reminders had been sent to the prior DON to complete the appraisals.
The facility failed to notify CMS and receive authorization for a name change as required by 42 CFR 424.516. The LNHA provided documents from NJDOH but could not initially provide evidence of CMS approval. The CMS 855A application was not submitted prior to the surveyor's inquiry, and the LNHA acknowledged this oversight.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop person-centered comprehensive care plans for two residents, leading to deficiencies in their care. Resident #34, who was admitted with diagnoses including paraplegia, pressure ulcer, and colostomy, had severe cognitive impairment and required maximum assistance with activities of daily living. Despite being on antidepressant medication and having an indwelling urinary catheter and colostomy, the resident's care plan did not include these critical aspects of their care. Interviews with staff revealed that the care plan should have included interventions for the use of antidepressant medications, behaviors associated with depression, and care for the colostomy and urinary catheter, but these were missing from the care plan. Resident #38, who had a diagnosis of a urinary tract infection and was frequently incontinent of urine, also had an incomplete care plan. The resident's care plan did not include their incontinence or history of UTIs, nor did it outline related interventions. Interviews with staff indicated that incontinence rounds were performed every two hours to prevent UTIs and skin breakdown, but this was not documented in the care plan. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the care plan should have been comprehensive and included all necessary interventions to address the resident's needs. The facility's policy on comprehensive care plans stated that they should be developed within seven days after the completion of the comprehensive MDS assessment and should describe the services needed to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. However, the care plans for both residents were found to be incomplete and lacking essential information, leading to deficiencies in their care.
Failure to Obtain Physician's Order and Develop Care Plan for Oxygen Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen therapy and develop a care plan for respiratory care for a resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pneumonia. The resident was observed receiving oxygen via nasal cannula without a corresponding physician's order in the medical record. The resident's care plan also lacked any mention of respiratory care, despite the resident's dependence on supplemental oxygen and continuous oxygen therapy as indicated in the Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) assessment tool. Interviews with the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Registered Nurse (RN) revealed that they were aware of the need for physician's orders for oxygen therapy and the importance of including respiratory care in the care plan. However, the orders were not present in the electronic medical record (EMR) until the surveyor's inquiry prompted the staff to enter them. The LPN and RN both emphasized that orders are necessary to ensure the correct administration of oxygen and that the care plan should reflect the resident's respiratory needs. The Interim Director of Nursing (DON) and the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) acknowledged the oversight, confirming that the resident did not have any oxygen orders prior to the surveyor's inquiry. The facility's policies on oxygen administration and comprehensive care plans were reviewed, which indicated that a practitioner's order is required to initiate oxygen therapy and that care plans should be updated to reflect any changes in the resident's status. The deficiency was identified as a failure to follow these policies, resulting in the resident not having the necessary orders and care plan for their respiratory care needs.
Failure to Conduct Annual Performance Appraisals for CNAs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to evaluate the performance of all Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) on an annual basis. This deficiency was identified during a review of the personnel records of five randomly selected CNAs. Specifically, CNA #1, hired on 02/20/19, had their last documented performance appraisal on 05/27/22, and CNA #2, hired on 07/26/21, had their last documented performance appraisal on 12/16/22. Both CNAs did not have annual performance reviews conducted within the past year, as required by the facility's policy and state regulations. During interviews, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) confirmed that performance appraisals should be done annually and acknowledged the oversight. The Director of Nursing (DON) was identified as responsible for completing the appraisals, while the Human Resource (HR) Manager was responsible for sending reminders. The HR Manager stated that several email reminders had been sent to the prior DON to complete the appraisals. The facility's policy on performance appraisals indicated that evaluations should be conducted at the end of the orientation period, annually, and when considering a team member for promotion, with no evaluations given less than once a year.
Failure to Notify CMS and Receive Authorization for Facility Name Change
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify CMS and receive authorization for a change in the facility's name in accordance with 42 CFR 424.516. The surveyor reviewed the facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (form CMS-671) and found discrepancies in the facility's name. The Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided documents from the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) indicating the name change but could not initially provide evidence of CMS approval. The LNHA acknowledged that the CMS 855A application, required for the name change, had not been submitted prior to the surveyor's inquiry. The LNHA confirmed that the business office was in the process of completing the CMS 855A application on the day of the surveyor's inquiry. An email from the business office later confirmed that the Medicare Enrollment Application was submitted. The LNHA, along with the Interim Director of Nursing and the Director of Plant Operation, acknowledged that the application should have been completed and received approval from CMS prior to the name change. The facility's policy on name changes included notifying the state and other agencies, filing the official name change with the IRS, and updating permits and licenses with regulatory agencies.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 249 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 9 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Whiting
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crestwood Manor | 0.2 mi | — | 7 | 0 |
| Whiting Gardens Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 1.1 mi | — | 9 | 1 |
| Aristacare At Whiting | 1.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Aristacare At Manchester | 5.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Complete Care At Arbors | 5.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Pines Village Inc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.