Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Courtland, Llc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A GNA was observed by staff engaging in inappropriate physical contact with a resident, including touching the resident's vaginal area and kissing the resident on the lips. The resident confirmed the contact was consensual and requested, but facility policy prohibits any romantic or sexual involvement between staff and residents. The incident resulted in a deficiency for failure to protect the resident from abuse.
Surveyors found that the facility did not notify the Ombudsman of resident transfers, failed to provide written bed hold policy notices to responsible parties during hospitalizations, and did not supply discharge instructions to a resident with complex medical needs after rehabilitation. These deficiencies were confirmed through record review and staff interviews.
A resident was prescribed a continuous glucose monitoring device to avoid painful finger sticks, but the device was discontinued after a short period without a facility policy in place. The Medical Director informed the provider that the device could not be used, but there was no formal or documented education for staff or providers, and no policy or procedure was developed regarding the use or non-use of such devices.
Failure to Protect Resident from Sexual Abuse by Staff
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) was observed by another GNA and a Registered Nurse (RN) engaging in inappropriate physical contact with a resident. The staff members witnessed the GNA touching the resident's vaginal area and kissing the resident's breast. During subsequent interviews, the accused GNA stated that the resident had requested the application of barrier cream to the vaginal area due to itching, which the GNA did, and denied kissing the resident's breast but admitted to kissing the resident on the lips. The resident confirmed that they had initiated physical contact and consented to the actions, specifically requesting the application of cream, and denied that the GNA kissed her breast but acknowledged a kiss on the lips. Facility policy prohibits employees from becoming romantically or sexually involved with residents. The incident was reported and reviewed, and the GNA involved was later terminated for violating the facility's Standard of Conduct Policy. The deficiency was cited as the facility failed to ensure that the resident remained free from abuse, as required by regulations and facility policy.
Failure to Notify Ombudsman, Provide Bed Hold Policy, and Discharge Instructions
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified that the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of resident transfers and did not provide written notice of the facility's bed hold policy to residents or their representatives upon transfer to the hospital. Specifically, for two residents who were hospitalized, there was no documentation that the Ombudsman was informed of their transfers, and no evidence that the bed hold policy was communicated in writing to their responsible parties. Interviews with the Regional Clinical Director confirmed that, during the relevant period, the facility was not providing these required notifications or documentation. Additionally, the facility failed to provide discharge instructions to a resident and their family upon discharge after rehabilitation for deconditioning and medication management following a kidney transplant. The resident had complex care needs, including gastrostomy tube feeding, wound care, and anti-rejection medications, yet there was no documentation of discharge planning or instructions provided at the time of discharge. The absence of this documentation was confirmed by the Regional Clinical Director during the survey.
Lack of Policy and Oversight for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility's Medical Director failed to ensure the adequate implementation of resident care interventions and policy review regarding the use of a continuous glucose monitoring device for a resident. Upon admission, the resident was prescribed a continuous glucose monitoring device to monitor blood glucose levels without finger sticks, which the resident preferred due to pain in the fingertips. However, the device was discontinued shortly after being ordered, despite the resident and family expressing dissatisfaction with reverting to finger sticks. Medical record review confirmed the device was ordered and used for approximately 2.5 days before being removed. Interviews with facility staff revealed that there was no existing policy for the use of continuous glucose monitoring devices, as the facility typically associated such devices with home settings. The Medical Director communicated to the provider that the device could not be used in the facility, but there was no formal or documented education provided to staff or other providers regarding this decision. Additionally, there was no documentation of a policy or procedure being developed for the use or non-use of such devices, nor any formal education following the Medical Director's awareness of the device's use in the facility.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,218 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Baltimore
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autumn Lake Healthcare At Pikesville | 1.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| North Oaks Communities | 1.6 mi | — | 13 | 0 |
| Resorts Of Augsburg | 1.7 mi | — | 40 | 0 |
| King David Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 1.8 mi | — | 22 | 0 |
| Future Care Old Court | 1.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Courtland, Llc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.