Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Warren Barr South Loop during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment and a history of confusion was sent to a methadone clinic appointment without the required escort after the scheduled escort called out unexpectedly. Facility staff were unable to communicate the need for an escort in time, and the LPN on duty was not informed of the requirement. A CNA supervisor, untrained as an escort, accompanied the resident but did not participate in the appointment, resulting in the resident attending without proper supervision as required by facility policy.
A resident with cognitive impairment and multiple complex medical needs developed a stage 2 pressure ulcer that was identified by a wound care NP, but the recommended treatment was not ordered or documented in the electronic health record or TAR. Additionally, the care plan was not updated to address the new wound, despite facility policy requiring such updates. Interviews with the LPN and DON confirmed the lack of documentation and care plan revision.
Surveyors found that several residents were living in rooms with broken thermostats lacking temperature indicators and, in one case, a dresser that was dirty, missing a handle, and had drawers that would not close. The Maintenance Director and a resident's POA confirmed these issues, and staff were unable to determine or control room temperatures, resulting in an environment that did not meet homelike standards.
A resident with end stage renal disease did not receive hemodialysis services three times weekly as ordered by the physician, with missed and undocumented treatments due to transportation issues and lack of communication. Nursing staff and the DON were unable to confirm or provide documentation that the required dialysis sessions occurred, and the physician was not notified of the missed treatments.
The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of food items and did not enforce appropriate hair covering for kitchen staff, potentially affecting all 153 residents. The Food Service Director was observed without proper hair coverings, and several food items in the walk-in cooler were found unlabeled and potentially spoiled. Facility policies emphasize the importance of food labeling and personal hygiene, but these were not adhered to.
The facility failed to follow infection control policies, lacking proper signage and PPE for residents on isolation, including a COVID-19 positive resident. Two residents requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions did not have appropriate signage or isolation carts. Additionally, the facility lacked policies for distributing information on shingles and screening for HIV, Hepatitis B, and C.
The facility failed to ensure appropriate use of side rails for several residents, leading to potential safety risks. One resident was observed with three half side rails up, despite their assessment indicating the use of only two. Another resident had both legs squeezed between two side rails while trying to eat, contrary to their assessment. Additionally, the facility neglected to evaluate side rail use quarterly for two residents, with one assessment overdue and another incomplete.
The facility failed to properly label and store medications, including inhalers and insulin pens, leading to potential cross-contamination and expired medication use. Additionally, a vial of acetylcysteine solution was improperly stored at a cognitively impaired resident's bedside, risking unauthorized access and medication errors. The DON confirmed the need for secure storage and proper labeling.
A resident receiving a pureed diet struggled with their meal due to inappropriate consistency, containing food particles and skin. The facility's failure to prepare pureed food correctly affected 19 residents. Staff confirmed that pureed food should be smooth, but improper preparation led to the presence of particles, posing a choking hazard.
The facility failed to provide prescribed therapeutic diets for several residents, leading to dietary interventions not being followed. One resident did not receive the prescribed double portion of protein and other dietary items, while another received incorrect liquid consistency, resulting in a choking episode. Errors in diet orders were due to communication issues between the electronic health record and kitchen systems, affecting residents with specific dietary needs.
A facility failed to properly document a resident's code status, resulting in conflicting orders of Full Code and DNR. The resident, diagnosed with dementia and adult failure to thrive, had a care plan indicating Full Code, but physician orders showed DNR. Staff were unable to locate the resident's POLST form, and there was confusion about the resident's actual code status. An audit did not find the POLST form, and the nurse supervisor changed the code status to Full Code in the records.
A facility failed to conduct a quarterly restraint assessment for a resident with sheepskin restraints to prevent trach pulling. The care plan was outdated, and the last assessment was from several months prior, despite policy requiring quarterly evaluations. The Restorative Nurse confirmed the missed assessment.
The facility failed to set low air loss mattresses to the correct weight settings for two residents, one with a stage 4 sacral wound and another at high risk for pressure ulcers. The incorrect settings compromised the mattresses' effectiveness in relieving pressure and aiding wound healing. The Wound Care Coordinator confirmed the discrepancies, noting the importance of proper settings based on residents' current weights.
A facility failed to enforce its smoking policy, allowing a resident with a downgraded smoking status to keep cigarettes and a lighter in a room with an oxygen tank, creating a fire hazard. Staff were unaware of the violation, and the presence of smoking materials in the room posed a significant risk to both residents involved.
The facility failed to follow its policies for medication administration and disposal, leading to deficiencies in pharmaceutical services. A resident did not receive medications as ordered, with prepared medications left at the bedside. Additionally, controlled substances were not properly disposed of, with discrepancies in narcotic count sheets and compromised blister packets found in medication carts. The DON confirmed that procedures were not followed, risking medication errors and diversion.
A resident received a meal containing ham, contrary to their documented dietary restrictions against pork and beef, leading to a deficiency. Despite the resident's clear preferences and the Registered Dietitian's notes, the meal served did not align with the resident's needs, violating the facility's policy on food preferences.
The facility failed to administer influenza and pneumococcal vaccines in a timely manner for three residents. Despite obtaining consents in September, the vaccines were administered with significant delays, and one resident did not receive the pneumococcal vaccine at all. The Director of Nursing could not explain the delays, and no documentation was provided to account for the issues.
A resident with a history of stroke, muscle wasting, and hypertension experienced a delay in receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, despite having signed an informed consent. The vaccine was administered nearly three months after consent was given. The facility's policy involves conducting clinics or obtaining vaccines from a pharmacy, but no documentation was provided to explain the delay.
Two residents with significant medical and cognitive impairments were found with uncombed, tangled, and matted hair due to the facility's failure to provide necessary grooming and hygiene care. Despite care plans indicating the need for assistance with ADLs, staff did not consistently perform hair care tasks, leading to poor grooming and hygiene. Observations and staff interviews confirmed the deficiency in adhering to the facility's policies on shower and hygiene.
A facility failed to investigate an alleged abuse incident involving a resident who was reportedly hit in the face. The resident's sister reported the incident to the ADON, who claimed to have informed the Administrator, but the Administrator stated he was not informed. The DON also had no knowledge of the incident. The facility's policy requires immediate reporting and investigation of abuse allegations, which was not followed in this case.
A resident with cognitive impairment and a history of burns was found with multiple wounds and burns, reportedly from spilled hot water. The facility failed to assess and document the source of the injury or rule out abuse. Staff were unaware of any incidents, and the resident's care plan did not address her preference for hot water or include safety interventions. The deficiency was compounded by a lack of communication and delayed investigation.
A resident with a history of falls and high fall risk sustained a frontal lobe hematoma after attempting to get out of bed unassisted. The care plan, which included being up for meals and having a bed alarm, was not followed. Staff interviews revealed that the resident was not assisted out of bed in the morning as required, and the facility's investigation into the incident was incomplete.
A resident with complex medical conditions developed a sacral pressure ulcer that worsened significantly, but the family was not informed of the changes. Despite the facility's policy requiring notification of significant changes, the family discovered the deterioration independently. Staff interviews confirmed the expectation to notify the physician and family, which was not met.
A resident with a tracheostomy repeatedly pulled it out due to inadequate restraint measures. The facility failed to update the care plan promptly after the first incident, and the necessary double strap restraints were not implemented until days after the second incident, despite being part of the care plan. The facility did not follow its policy for person-centered care plans.
A facility failed to provide adequate respiratory care for a resident with a tracheostomy, leading to multiple incidents of dislodgement and ultimately the resident's death. The facility did not follow physician orders or update the care plan promptly, resulting in insufficient monitoring and care. The respiratory therapist and nursing staff failed to perform scheduled suctioning and monitoring, and there was confusion regarding the use of restraints.
A facility failed to provide proper wound care for three residents, resulting in a Staph bacteremia for one resident and inadequate documentation for others. Dressings were not changed as ordered, and treatment orders were not accurately transcribed. The facility's policy for prompt identification and documentation of skin breakdown was not followed, leading to significant health issues.
A resident suffered a finger fracture after hitting it on a bed rail, which was used without proper assessment or a physician's order. The facility failed to conduct a bed rail assessment or discuss risks and benefits with the resident. Staff acknowledged the need for such assessments and orders, but none were completed. The facility's documentation confirmed the oversight, and the lack of a policy on side rails contributed to the issue.
A resident with reduced mobility developed severe pressure ulcers due to the facility's failure to implement preventive measures and timely nutritional interventions. Despite recommendations from a Wound Nurse Practitioner, there were delays in dietary assessments and essential treatments. The resident's condition worsened, leading to hospitalization for sepsis.
A facility failed to ensure a resident received enteral nutrition feedings via G-tube per physician orders. The LPN turned off the feeding pump prematurely and discarded the feeding container without proper verification, resulting in the resident not receiving the prescribed amount of enteral nutrition.
Two residents reported being sexually abused by a CNA, who inappropriately applied lotion to their private parts. Both residents, who have intact cognition, expressed feeling violated and fearful. Staff members corroborated the residents' accounts, and the incidents were reported to the police and IDPH.
The facility failed to provide reasonable access to telephones for five residents, impacting their ability to communicate with family and friends. The Maintenance Director found that the phones in these residents' rooms were not working, and staff did not follow the protocol to check and report non-working phones daily. One resident reported his phone had been non-functional for three weeks, and another expressed frustration over missed communications with family and church members.
Resident Sent to Methadone Clinic Without Required Escort Due to Communication and Staffing Failures
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with moderate cognitive impairment and a history of confusion was sent to a methadone clinic appointment without the required escort. The resident's medical record indicated diagnoses including encephalopathy, opioid abuse, and cancer, and the Minimum Data Set documented a BIMS score of 12/15, reflecting moderate cognitive impairment. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was known to be forgetful, sometimes disoriented, and at risk of getting lost or harmed if left unsupervised in the community. Facility policy and a list of residents on methadone both specified that this resident required an escort for safety and to ensure the secure return of controlled substances. On the day of the appointment, the scheduled escort called out due to an emergency shortly before the resident's transportation arrived. The work clerk attempted to notify nursing staff that an escort was needed, but was unable to reach anyone by phone and ultimately learned the resident had already left without an escort. The LPN on duty, who was an agency nurse working his first shift at the facility, was not informed during shift handoff that the resident needed an escort and was unfamiliar with the facility's communication systems. The CNA who prepared the resident for the appointment also did not have information about the need for an escort. When the resident arrived at the clinic, a CNA supervisor who was not trained as an escort accompanied the resident but did not enter the clinic or participate in the appointment, as he was unsure of his responsibilities. The facility's policy required that, in the absence of a family member or representative, staff must escort residents with cognitive impairment or those receiving methadone to appointments. The lack of communication, inadequate handoff, and failure to ensure a trained escort resulted in the resident attending the appointment without appropriate supervision.
Failure to Follow Wound Care Recommendations and Update Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow the wound care specialist's recommendations for treating a resident's pressure ulcer and did not update the comprehensive care plan to address a new skin alteration. The resident, who was cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for activities of daily living, had multiple hospital admissions and re-admissions. Upon re-admission, a wound care nurse practitioner identified a stage 2 pressure ulcer on the resident's left lateral leg and recommended specific treatment. However, there was no evidence that a treatment order was entered into the electronic health record, nor was there documentation in the Treatment Administration Records (TAR) that the recommended wound care was provided. Interviews with facility staff, including the wound care LPN and the Director of Nursing, revealed that the wound care team may not have been made aware of the resident's wound, and no treatment orders or documentation could be found for the wound in question. Additionally, the resident's care plan was not revised to reflect the new skin alteration, contrary to facility policy, which requires care plans to be updated based on current resident conditions. Facility policies also mandate prompt identification, documentation, and treatment of skin breakdown, as well as timely updates to care plans, but these procedures were not followed in this case.
Failure to Maintain Homelike Environment Due to Broken Thermostats and Unclean Furniture
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for three residents. Observations revealed that multiple resident rooms had broken thermostats with no temperature indicators, making it impossible for residents or staff to determine or control the room temperature. Additionally, one resident's dresser was found to be missing a handle, had drawers that would not close, and was dirty with hardened paste on its surface. These issues were confirmed through interviews with the resident's power of attorney and the Maintenance Director, who acknowledged the problems and the lack of temperature markings on the analog thermostats. The facility's policies require that the environment be maintained in a homelike condition and that malfunctioning equipment be reported and addressed by the maintenance department. However, the observed deficiencies indicated that these policies were not followed, as the maintenance and housekeeping issues persisted until brought to the attention of staff during the survey. The Maintenance Director was unable to determine the temperature settings in the affected rooms and had to perform immediate, on-the-spot repairs and cleaning, further demonstrating the lack of ongoing maintenance and attention to resident comfort.
Failure to Ensure Hemodialysis Services Provided as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with end stage renal disease and multiple comorbidities, including dependence on renal dialysis, was not provided with hemodialysis services three times weekly as ordered by the physician. Documentation revealed that the resident missed a scheduled dialysis session due to a transportation issue, and there was no evidence in the electronic health record that the physician was informed of the missed treatment. Additionally, there was no documentation confirming whether the resident received dialysis on the rescheduled date or on the following scheduled dialysis day. Nursing staff interviewed were unable to verify or locate records indicating that the resident received the required treatments on those days. The facility's policy required that dialysis communication and assessments be completed and documented for each dialysis session, and that the physician be notified if a session was missed or refused. However, review of the resident's records showed no dialysis assessments, progress notes, or communication for the dates in question. The Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of documentation and was unable to explain why the resident missed dialysis or whether the treatments were provided as ordered.
Deficiency in Food Safety and Personal Hygiene Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper labeling and dating of food items and did not enforce appropriate hair covering for kitchen staff, which could potentially affect all 153 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. During an initial kitchen tour, the Food Service Director (V11) was observed without any hair coverings, including a hairnet or beard/mustache covering. Upon noticing the surveyor, V11 left the kitchen and returned with a beard protector that did not cover his mustache and was still not wearing a hairnet. V11 acknowledged the requirement for all kitchen staff to wear hairnets and beard guards to prevent hair from contaminating food. Further inspection of the kitchen revealed several food items in the walk-in cooler that were not labeled or dated, including an opened package of deli ham, sliced American/Swiss cheese, sausage links, and bacon. V11 admitted that these items should have been labeled with the date they were opened and a use-by date, typically within seven days, to prevent serving spoiled food to residents. Additionally, a large box of defrosted cheese omelets was found with brown spots, indicating spoilage. V11 stated that the omelets were defrosted upon delivery and should have been cooked from a frozen state, as per the manufacturer's guidelines. The facility's policies and signage emphasize the importance of proper food labeling and personal hygiene to prevent foodborne illnesses. The policies require that Time/Temperature Controlled for Safety (TCS) foods be labeled with a use-by date no more than seven days from preparation or opening. Despite these guidelines, the facility failed to adhere to its own standards, as evidenced by the unlabeled and potentially spoiled food items and the lack of proper hair coverings for kitchen staff.
Infection Control Deficiencies in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its infection control policies and procedures, resulting in several deficiencies. Specifically, the facility did not have the correct transmission-based precaution signage for two residents, R151 and R290. R151, who tested positive for COVID-19, did not have a droplet precaution sign outside their room, and staff failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering the room. The staffing coordinator, V8, entered R151's room with a regular mask instead of an N95 and did not perform hand hygiene after exiting the room. Additionally, the facility did not place an isolation cart outside R290's room, who was on contact isolation for Clostridium Difficile (C. DIFF). The facility also failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for residents R16 and R181, who had conditions warranting such precautions. R16, who had enteral feeding and a sacral wound, did not have EBP signage or an isolation cart set up. Similarly, R181, who had an open wound with red-colored drainage, did not have EBP signage or an isolation cart. The Director of Nursing, V2, acknowledged that residents with open wounds or medical devices should be placed on EBP, but this was not done for R16 and R181. Furthermore, the facility lacked policies and procedures for distributing information about the risks associated with shingles and how to protect residents against the varicella-zoster virus. There were also no policies for HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C screening or Hepatitis B immunization. The facility did not provide evidence of offering education on the Shingles vaccine to several residents, including R151. The Director of Nursing admitted that the facility could provide Shingles vaccine information upon request but did not have a policy for distributing it to all newly admitted residents.
Inappropriate Use of Side Rails and Lack of Quarterly Evaluations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the appropriate use of side rails for several residents, leading to potential safety risks. For instance, one resident was observed with three half side rails up, despite their assessment indicating the use of only two half-length rails for assistance. This resident was cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Another resident was found with both legs squeezed between two half side rails while trying to eat lunch, although their assessment and consent specified the use of only two half-length rails. This resident also had cognitive impairments and needed staff assistance with ADLs. Additionally, a third resident was observed with all four half side rails up, contrary to their assessment and care plan, which indicated the use of only two half-length rails. This resident was severely cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with ADLs. The facility's Restorative Nurse confirmed that side rail assessments are conducted for all residents to prevent entrapment and determine proper use, and that no resident should have more than two half-length side rails. However, the facility failed to adhere to these guidelines, as evidenced by the observations and interviews. The facility also neglected to evaluate the use of side rails quarterly for two residents. One resident's side rail assessment was overdue, and the facility could not provide a recent assessment. Another resident's assessments were incomplete, and the facility admitted to missing the required evaluations. The facility's policy mandates quarterly evaluations of side rail use, but this was not consistently followed, leading to deficiencies in ensuring resident safety.
Medication Storage and Labeling Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and labeling, leading to several deficiencies. During an inspection, it was observed that a resident's Arnuity Ellipta inhaler was not labeled with the date it was opened, which is necessary to determine its expiration. Additionally, insulin pens for multiple residents were either not dated or not stored in individual clear bags, which is required to prevent cross-contamination. The Director of Nursing confirmed that medications should be labeled with the opening and expiration dates and stored individually to maintain infection control. Another significant issue was the improper storage of medication at a resident's bedside. An unopened vial of acetylcysteine solution was found at the bedside of a cognitively impaired resident, which should have been securely stored in the medication room. The Respiratory Manager acknowledged that leaving medication at the bedside could lead to other residents accessing it, potentially causing medication errors. The Director of Nursing reiterated that medications should not be left at the bedside and should be stored securely to prevent unauthorized access.
Inappropriate Pureed Food Consistency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prepare pureed food in the appropriate diet consistency form, which has the potential to affect 19 residents receiving pureed diets. During an observation, a resident was seen struggling with their meal, which was supposed to be pureed but contained food particles and skin that the resident could not chew. The resident's meal ticket indicated a Cardiac-Pureed diet, and the resident expressed difficulty in eating the meal due to its inappropriate consistency. The Food Service Director confirmed that the pureed food should be smooth with no lumps, as the presence of particles poses a choking hazard. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the issue arose from improper preparation of the pureed ham, where the skin was not removed before pureeing. The Training Chef and the Speech Language Pathologist both emphasized that pureed food should have a smooth, applesauce-like consistency without detectable particles. The Regional Director of Operations acknowledged the oversight and noted that the skin should have been removed prior to pureeing. The facility's policy on food preparation mandates that food be prepared in a manner that meets residents' needs, but this was not adhered to in this instance.
Failure to Provide Prescribed Therapeutic Diets
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide therapeutic diets and dietary interventions as prescribed by the physician and Registered Dietitian for four residents. One resident, who had a diagnosis of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and other conditions, did not receive the prescribed double portion of ground ham, soup, fortified pudding, milk, and Mrs. Dash seasoning packet. The resident expressed dissatisfaction with the missing items and noted that sometimes he does not receive the prescribed items. The Registered Dietitian had documented the need for these dietary interventions to address the resident's severe protein-calorie malnutrition and pressure ulcer. Another resident, with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the prostate and other conditions, did not receive the prescribed nectar thick liquids and instead received thin liquids, which led to a choking episode. The resident's diet order had been updated to include nectar thick liquids, but this change was not reflected in the kitchen's computer system, resulting in the resident receiving the incorrect diet. The Registered Dietitian confirmed that the physician's order did not transfer correctly to the kitchen system, causing the error. Additional deficiencies were observed with two other residents. One resident, on a cardiac-pureed diet, received the wrong type of meat and did not receive the prescribed whole milk or double portions of fruits and vegetables. Another resident, on a renal diet, received ham instead of the prescribed hamburger patty, which was inappropriate due to the high sodium content of ham. The Food Service Manager acknowledged the errors and emphasized the importance of following the diet orders as prescribed by the physician.
Failure to Properly Document and Identify Resident's Code Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly identify and document a resident's code status, leading to conflicting orders for the resident's advanced directives. The resident, who had medical diagnoses of dementia and adult failure to thrive, was documented as having a Full Code status in their care plan, which was intended to be clearly identified in the medical record. However, the physician orders at the time indicated a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) status, which was entered by a former facility nurse. This discrepancy resulted in two conflicting code statuses for the resident. The facility's staff, including nurses and the Director of Nursing, were unable to locate the resident's POLST form in the electronic medical records or in hard copy, and there was confusion among the staff regarding the resident's actual code status. An audit conducted by the facility did not find the POLST form, and the nurse supervisor eventually changed the resident's code status in the electronic records to Full Code. Attempts to contact the responsible party and the nurse who entered the DNR order were unsuccessful. The facility's Advance Directives policy requires that an Advance Directive form be completed and maintained, but the facility failed to provide the resident's POLST form as required.
Failure to Conduct Quarterly Restraint Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policy of assessing a resident's need for restraints at least quarterly. A resident, identified as R99, had an active order for bilateral sheepskin restraints to prevent the resident from pulling their tracheostomy tube. The resident's care plan was not updated to reflect the use of the sheepskin restraints, as it still mentioned the use of bilateral soft wrist restraints. During the survey, it was observed that the resident was using the sheepskin restraints, but the facility had not completed the required quarterly restraint assessment. The facility's policy, last revised in August 2024, mandates that restraint assessments be conducted quarterly, during significant changes, and as needed. However, the most recent restraint assessment available for R99 was dated August 2024, and no updated assessment was provided despite requests from the surveyor. The Restorative Nurse confirmed that the resident was due for a restraint assessment in early February 2025, but it was not completed. This oversight indicates a failure to comply with the facility's own policy regarding restraint assessments.
Incorrect Mattress Settings for Residents with Pressure Ulcer Risks
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that low air loss mattress devices were set to the correct weight settings for two residents, one with a current pressure ulcer and another at high risk for developing pressure ulcers. Resident 56, who has a stage 4 sacral wound, was observed on a low air loss mattress set to 120 pounds, despite their current weight being 84 pounds. The Wound Care Coordinator confirmed that the mattress should have been set between 80 to 90 pounds to relieve pressure on the wound effectively. This incorrect setting could compromise the intended purpose of the mattress in aiding wound healing. Similarly, Resident 66, who is at high risk for skin breakdown due to a history of pressure injuries, was found on a mattress set to 180 pounds, while their current weight was 136 pounds. The resident expressed discomfort, stating the mattress felt too firm, akin to lying on a wood block. The Wound Care Coordinator acknowledged that the mattress should have been set to 135 pounds. Both residents require staff assistance with positioning in bed, and the facility's policy mandates the use of specialized air mattresses for residents with stage 3 and 4 pressure sores to control moisture, heat, and friction.
Failure to Enforce Smoking Policy Creates Fire Hazard
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its smoking policy and smoking assessment protocols, resulting in a potential fire hazard. During an observation, it was noted that a resident, R110, who was previously downgraded to a dependent smoking status due to non-compliance, was found to have cigarettes and a lighter in her room. This was despite the presence of an oxygen tank in the shared room with another resident, R141, who was on hospice care and required oxygen for shortness of breath. The presence of smoking materials in a room with oxygen poses a significant fire risk, which was not mitigated by the facility's staff. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of awareness and enforcement of the smoking policy. The Registered Nurse, V13, was unaware of the lighter in the room and acknowledged the fire hazard, while the Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services staff, V14, confirmed that even residents allowed to smoke independently should not have lighters in rooms with oxygen. The Social Service Director, V16, admitted to being informed about the smoking materials only after the observation and acknowledged the safety risk. The Director of Nursing, V2, reiterated the danger of having lighters in rooms with oxygen, highlighting the risk to both residents involved.
Medication Administration and Disposal Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policies and procedures for medication administration and disposal, resulting in deficiencies in pharmaceutical services for several residents. One resident did not receive medications according to the physician's order, as observed when prepared crushed medications were left at the bedside, which were supposed to be administered via a gastrostomy tube. The Licensed Practical Nurse acknowledged that the medications should not have been left at the bedside, as this could lead to medication errors and prevent the resident from receiving the intended benefits. Additionally, the facility did not properly dispose of controlled substances, as evidenced by compromised blister packets found in the medication carts. For two residents, the narcotic count sheets did not match the actual medications present, and the medications were not disposed of according to the facility's policies. The Director of Nursing confirmed that discontinued controlled medications should not be stored in the medication carts and should be properly disposed of with a witness present. The facility's failure to follow its own policies for medication storage, labeling, and disposal was further highlighted by the discrepancies in the narcotic count sheets and the improper handling of controlled substances. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the facility's procedures were not followed, which could lead to potential medication errors and diversion of controlled substances.
Failure to Follow Resident's Dietary Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to a resident's documented food preferences, resulting in a deficiency during a dining observation. On February 18, 2025, a surveyor observed a resident, identified as R81, receiving a lunch tray that included ham with gravy, despite the resident's clear preference and dietary restriction against consuming pork or beef due to indigestion. The resident expressed confusion and concern about the meal, noting that the meal ticket did not list ham as part of the meal and reiterated that the kitchen staff was aware of their dietary restrictions. Further investigation revealed that the Registered Dietitian, identified as V31, had documented R81's food preferences in the resident's progress notes on September 26, 2024, indicating that R81 should not receive pork or beef. The facility's menu management system and the resident's meal tracker were supposed to reflect these preferences, but the meal served did not align with the resident's documented needs. The facility's policy mandates that individual dining preferences, including food dislikes and intolerances, be identified and recorded within 48 hours of admission, yet this protocol was not followed in this instance.
Delayed Administration of Vaccines
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer influenza and pneumococcal vaccines in a timely manner for three residents. The Director of Nursing (V2) explained that the facility holds immunization clinics if there are enough residents consenting to the vaccines, otherwise, they order the vaccines from the pharmacy. However, there were delays in administering the vaccines to residents R93, R118, and R151. R93 signed the consent for the influenza vaccine on 9/18/2024 but did not receive it until 11/15/2024. R118 signed the consent on 9/17/2024 and received the vaccine on 10/25/2024. R151 signed the consent on 10/3/2024 and received the vaccine on 12/12/2024. Additionally, R151 consented to the pneumococcal vaccine on 1/06/2025 but had not received it by the time of the survey. The facility's policies for influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations, last revised on 9/16/2024, state that vaccines should be offered and administered seasonally or as soon as they become available. The Director of Nursing was unable to provide a reason for the delay in vaccine administration and mentioned that the Infection Preventionist, who might have more information, was out of the country. The facility did not provide any documentation or correspondence related to the delay in vaccine administration before the conclusion of the survey.
Delayed COVID-19 Vaccination Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer a COVID-19 vaccination in a timely manner for a resident identified as R118. R118's medical history includes diagnoses of cerebral infarction, muscle wasting, muscle atrophy, hypertension, and seizures. The resident's informed consent for the COVID-19 vaccine was signed on October 22, 2024, but the vaccine was not administered until January 17, 2025. This delay in vaccination was identified during a survey, where it was noted that the facility's policy is to conduct COVID-19 clinics when there are enough consenting individuals, or otherwise obtain vaccines from the pharmacy for individual administration. During interviews, the Director of Nursing and acting Infection Preventionist (V2) acknowledged the delay but could not provide a specific reason for it, suggesting that the facility might have reached out to the pharmacy and found the vaccine unavailable. The facility's COVID-19 Vaccination Policy, last revised in July 2024, states that the facility will promote and provide vaccinations whenever available and consented to. However, no documentation or correspondence explaining the delay was provided by the facility before the survey concluded.
Failure to Provide Adequate Grooming and Hygiene Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents who are unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming. Specifically, two residents, identified as R1 and R6, were observed with uncombed, tangled, and matted hair. Both residents have significant medical conditions and cognitive impairments, making them dependent on staff for personal hygiene and grooming. Despite the care plans indicating the need for assistance with ADLs, including personal hygiene, the facility did not adequately provide these services. R1 was observed with matted hair and a mattress that emitted a foul odor, suggesting inadequate hygiene care. R1's family member reported concerns about the lack of bathing and hair care, which were not addressed promptly by the staff. Observations by surveyors and interviews with staff confirmed that R1's hair was not combed or washed regularly, leading to a matted and unkempt appearance. The staff admitted to not performing hair care tasks, and the resident's condition was not adequately addressed until after the surveyor's intervention. Similarly, R6 was observed with tangled and matted hair, with brown particles and dry scalp. Staff interviews revealed that hair care was not consistently provided, and the resident's hair was not combed or washed as required. The facility's policies on shower and hygiene, as well as the restorative nursing program, were not followed, resulting in the residents' poor grooming and hygiene. The lack of adherence to these policies contributed to the deficiency in providing necessary ADL care for the residents.
Failure to Investigate Alleged Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its policy to investigate an allegation of abuse involving a resident, identified as R4, who was reportedly hit in the face on the morning of 11/6/2024, prior to discharge. R4's sister, V3, reported the incident to the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), V4, who claimed to have informed the Administrator, V1, but V1 stated he was not informed. The Director of Nursing (DON), V2, also claimed to have no knowledge of the incident. The facility's policy requires immediate reporting of abuse allegations to the Administrator and submission of a final investigation report to the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) within five working days. However, V3 reported not receiving any follow-up on the incident, indicating a failure in the facility's abuse reporting and investigation process.
Failure to Assess and Document Resident's Injury Source
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly identify and assess a resident for the source of an injury in a timely manner, which led to a deficiency. The resident, an elderly female with a history of third-degree burns, weakness, and osteomyelitis, was found to have multiple wounds and burns. The resident reported that hot water was spilled on her, but there was no documentation or assessment to confirm the source of the injury or rule out abuse. The resident's cognitive impairment and language barrier further complicated the situation, as she was unable to clearly communicate the cause of her injuries. The facility's staff, including the Director of Nursing, Licensed Practical Nurse, and Certified Nursing Assistant, were interviewed, and none reported being aware of any incidents involving hot water or burns. The resident's skin and wound evaluations documented blisters and burns on various parts of her body, but there was no documentation of the resident explaining the source of the injury or if abuse was ruled out. The resident's care plan did not address her preference for hot water or include risk and safety interventions. The facility's failure to assess and document the source of the resident's injuries, as well as the lack of communication among staff, contributed to the deficiency. The resident's cognitive impairment and language barrier were not adequately considered in the assessment process, leading to a lack of clarity regarding the cause of her injuries. The facility did not initiate an investigation until after the resident's grandson visited, indicating a delay in addressing the issue.
Failure to Follow Fall Prevention Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow care plan interventions to provide adequate supervision for a resident, identified as R2, who was at high risk for falls. R2, who had a history of falls and was categorized as a high fall risk, attempted to get out of bed unassisted and sustained a frontal lobe hematoma leading to an intraparenchymal hemorrhage. The care plan for R2 included being up in common areas for meals and having a bed alarm to alert staff when attempting to get up unassisted. However, on the morning of the incident, R2 was still in bed around 8:15 AM, despite breakfast being served at 8:00 AM, and the bed alarm was not mentioned as having alerted staff. Interviews with staff revealed that R2 was a maximum assist resident and should have been a priority to be assisted out of bed in the morning. The Falls Coordinator, V10, stated that R2's fall interventions were not followed, as R2 was not up for breakfast in the common area as per the care plan. The Certified Nursing Assistant, V11, found R2 in a precarious position with her feet against the radiator and her back against the bed, indicating an attempted fall. The staff did not witness the fall, and there was no documentation of the nurse assigned to R2 being interviewed for the incident investigation. The facility's investigation into the fall incident was incomplete, lacking interviews from the nurse assigned to R2. The facility's policy for fall occurrences states that residents identified as high risk for falls should have interventions in place, and these interventions should be reevaluated and revised as necessary. However, the failure to ensure R2 was up for breakfast and the lack of a complete investigation into the incident highlight deficiencies in the facility's adherence to its policies and care plan interventions for fall prevention.
Failure to Notify Family of Pressure Ulcer Deterioration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify a resident's responsible party of changes in the resident's pressure ulcer condition. The resident, who was admitted with multiple complex medical conditions including cardiac arrest, encephalopathy, and chronic kidney disease, developed a sacral pressure ulcer that worsened significantly over time. Despite the deterioration of the wound, which was initially identified as a stage 3 pressure ulcer and later reclassified as an unstageable deep tissue injury, the family was not informed of these changes. The resident's care plan included specific instructions for skin care and monitoring, highlighting the high risk for skin impairment due to the resident's medical history and condition. The wound care nurse and other staff members documented the progression of the wound, noting significant changes in size, exudate, and tissue condition. However, there was no documentation of family notification regarding the worsening condition of the wound, despite the facility's policy requiring such communication. Interviews with staff members, including the wound care nurse practitioner and the director of nursing, revealed that the expectation was to notify the physician and the resident's representative of any changes in wound appearance. However, this notification did not occur, as confirmed by the resident's family member, who discovered the wound's deterioration independently. The facility's policies on notification for change of condition and skin care regimen emphasize the importance of informing family members of significant changes, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Implement Individualized Care Plan for Resident with Tracheostomy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an individualized or person-centered care plan for a resident who had an order for restraints due to pulling out his tracheostomy. This deficiency was identified when the resident, who was admitted with a tracheostomy providing oxygen at 28 percent due to respiratory failure, pulled out his tracheostomy twice. The first incident occurred the day after admission, and the second incident happened three days later. Despite these incidents, the care plan did not address the issue of the resident pulling out his tracheostomy until after the second occurrence. The facility's response to the incidents was inadequate, as the care plan instructed a change from soft restraints to double strap sheep skin limb holders, but there was no physician order documented until several days later. The Restorative Nurse/Supervisor admitted that the double strap restraints were not implemented until they were available, which was six days after the second incident. During this period, no other interventions were documented to prevent further incidents. The facility's policy required person-centered care plans, but this was not adhered to in the case of this resident.
Failure to Provide Adequate Respiratory Care for Resident with Tracheostomy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate respiratory care for a resident with a tracheostomy, as per the physician's orders and care plan interventions. The resident, who had a history of respiratory failure and required a tracheostomy for oxygenation, experienced multiple incidents of tracheostomy dislodgement. Despite these incidents, the facility did not implement effective interventions or closely monitor the resident to prevent further occurrences. The care plan was not updated promptly after the initial incident, and there was a lack of physician orders for necessary restraint changes. On several occasions, the resident's tracheostomy was dislodged, leading to emergency situations where the resident required hospital transfers. The facility staff, including the respiratory therapist and nursing staff, failed to provide consistent monitoring and care as required. The respiratory therapist did not perform scheduled suctioning and monitoring, and there was a significant gap in documentation of respiratory care. Additionally, the nursing staff did not document vital signs as ordered, and there was confusion regarding the use and documentation of restraints. The lack of adherence to physician orders and care plan interventions resulted in the facility staff being unaware of the resident's tracheostomy dislodgement, ultimately leading to the resident's death. The facility's policies on tracheostomy care and monitoring were not provided upon request, indicating a possible lack of established protocols. The deficiency highlights the facility's failure to ensure the safety and well-being of a resident with critical respiratory needs.
Inadequate Wound Care and Documentation in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate wound care for three residents, leading to significant health issues. For Resident 1, the facility did not follow the prescribed wound care orders, resulting in a Staph bacteremia and a foul odor from a sacral pressure ulcer. The wound care coordinator did not change dressings as required, and the treatments documented in the Physician Order Sheets were incongruent with the actual orders. The resident's sacrum dressing was found to be saturated and disintegrating, and the odor in the room was noted by multiple staff members. Resident 2's treatment was also inadequately documented, with scheduled dressing changes left blank on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). The Director of Nursing confirmed that the notes were not properly recorded in the progress notes, indicating a lack of adherence to the facility's documentation policy. This failure to document and administer wound care as ordered could potentially lead to further complications for the resident. Resident 3's initial wound assessment was delayed, and the care plan did not include specific treatment orders. The sacral wound was noted to have a mild odor, indicating a change in condition that was not addressed. The facility's policy requires prompt identification and documentation of skin breakdown, but this was not followed, leading to inadequate care for the residents involved.
Failure to Assess and Manage Bed Rail Use Leads to Resident Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly assess and manage the use of bed rails for a resident, identified as R11, which resulted in an injury. R11 was observed with a soft cast on his left hand due to a nondisplaced fracture of the middle phalanx of his left middle finger, which he reported occurred after hitting it on the bed rail. Despite using the bed rails to assist with mobility, R11 stated he was never shown how to use them safely nor informed about the potential risks. The facility did not conduct a bed rail assessment, obtain a physician's order for the bed rails, or discuss the risks and benefits with R11, as required. The facility's staff, including the LPN, DON, ADON, and Restorative Nurse, acknowledged the necessity of a physician's order and a bed rail assessment for the use of bed rails. However, it was revealed that no such assessment or order was completed for R11. The Restorative Nurse admitted that the side rail assessment, which should have been conducted upon admission and periodically thereafter, was missed for R11. This oversight was confirmed by the facility's documentation, which lacked any record of a side rail assessment or physician's order for R11. The facility's job descriptions for various nursing roles emphasize the importance of following established safety precautions and ensuring person-centered care, yet these protocols were not adhered to in R11's case. The absence of a policy on side rails further contributed to the oversight. The failure to perform a bed rail assessment and obtain the necessary physician's order, along with the lack of communication regarding the risks and benefits of bed rails, directly led to R11's injury.
Failure in Pressure Ulcer Care Leads to Resident's Hospitalization
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate pressure ulcer care and prevention for a resident, leading to the development and worsening of pressure injuries. The resident, who had anoxic brain damage and reduced bed mobility, was initially admitted with intact skin. However, after being readmitted from the hospital, preventive measures such as the application of skin moisture barriers were not ordered or implemented as per the facility's policy. This oversight contributed to the resident developing three unstageable pressure ulcers by the end of May. Despite recommendations from the Wound Nurse Practitioner for a nutritional consult due to the risk of wound complications, there was a significant delay in the resident being assessed by a dietitian. The resident was not seen by the dietitian until 18 days after the pressure injuries were identified, and essential nutritional interventions such as multivitamins, zinc sulfate, and protein supplements were not provided in a timely manner. This delay in nutritional support likely contributed to the deterioration of the resident's condition. Furthermore, the facility failed to carry out orders for laboratory testing and antibiotic therapy as recommended by the Wound Nurse Practitioner. The resident's condition worsened, with the wounds becoming malodorous and the resident developing a fever, indicative of infection. Ultimately, the resident was transferred to the hospital with a diagnosis of sepsis, highlighting the severe impact of the facility's failures in providing appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevention.
Failure to Administer Enteral Nutrition Per Physician Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident received enteral nutrition feedings via G-tube per physician orders. The surveyor observed the resident lying in bed with the enteral feeding pump turned off and the feeding tube not connected. The enteral feeding container, labeled with the date 04/05/2024, had approximately 500ml left, indicating that the feeding was not administered as per the physician's order, which specified that the feeding should continue until the full volume of 980ml was reached. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on duty admitted to turning off the feeding pump at approximately 10 AM but could not recall the remaining volume at that time. The LPN also discarded the feeding container without proper documentation or verification, which was later retrieved from the biohazard bin by the Director of Nursing (DON), confirming the remaining volume was approximately 520ml. The physician's order for the resident specified that the enteral feeding should be administered at a rate of 70ml/hr starting at 7 PM and should not be turned off until the full volume was reached. The care plan also documented the need to give GT tube feeding and water flush as ordered. The facility's policy on enteral tube feeding care and physician orders emphasized the importance of following the physician's orders accurately. The LPN's actions of turning off the feeding pump prematurely and discarding the feeding container without proper verification led to the deficiency, as the resident did not receive the prescribed amount of enteral nutrition.
Failure to Protect Residents from Sexual Abuse by CNA
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that two residents, R1 and R2, remained free from abuse, resulting in both residents being sexually abused by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), identified as V3. R1, a resident with multiple medical conditions including acute and chronic respiratory failure and anxiety disorder, reported that V3 applied lotion to his private parts inappropriately and played with them, despite R1's protests. R1 also mentioned a previous incident where another unnamed CNA was rough with him during ADL care. R1's BIMS score indicated intact cognition, and he expressed feeling violated and upset by V3's actions. R2, another resident with conditions such as muscle wasting and HIV disease, also reported inappropriate behavior by V3. R2 stated that V3 stroked his private parts while applying skin breakdown prevention cream, which was not a standard practice. R2 expressed fear of retaliation from V3 and was visibly emotional while recounting the incident. R2's BIMS score also indicated intact cognition, and he stated that he felt safe at the facility as long as V3 did not provide care to him. Multiple staff members, including other CNAs and an LPN, corroborated the residents' accounts. They reported that R2 had complained about V3's rough handling and inappropriate behavior. The facility's policy on abuse and neglect clearly defines abuse and outlines the expectations for professional care, which were not met in these instances. The incidents were reported to the police and the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH), and V3 was escorted out of the building pending investigations.
Failure to Provide Reasonable Access to Telephones
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide reasonable access to the use of a telephone for five residents, which impacted their ability to receive and make calls without being overheard. During a tour of several residents' rooms, the Maintenance Director (V18) and the surveyor found that the phones in the rooms of five residents were not working, as there was no dial tone and calls could not be made or received. V18 acknowledged the importance of working phones for residents to communicate with family and friends and stated that staff should check daily to ensure phones are operational and report any issues to maintenance for repair. However, this protocol was not followed, leading to the deficiency. One resident (R10) reported that his phone had not been working since he arrived at the facility three weeks prior, preventing him from making or receiving calls. Another resident (R11) expressed frustration that her phone was not working, and she was unable to communicate with her family and church members. A CNA (V23) confirmed that there were no phones in the hallways and that the only alternative for residents with non-working phones was to use the nursing station phone. The facility's policy on maintenance, dated 7/28/2023, states that all resident care equipment and the building environment should be maintained by the maintenance department, and any malfunctioning equipment should be reported to maintenance, which was not adhered to in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,229 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 22 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Chicago
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southview Manor | 1.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Ryze On The Avenue | 1.8 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Kensington Place Nrsg & Rehab | 1.8 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Terraces At The Clare | 2.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Warren Barr Gold Coast | 2.9 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Warren Barr South Loop.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.