Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Goldwater Care Toluca during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple medical and psychosocial conditions, including anxiety, depression, hepatic encephalopathy, chronic pain, and impaired vision, was care planned as being at risk for abuse/neglect. After the resident became upset when a CNA could not obtain a requested salad, the CNA reported the interaction to the Social Service Director, who then entered the resident’s room. According to the resident and multiple staff, including a COTA and DON, the Social Service Director approached the resident with an angry attitude, got close to the resident’s face, and used profane and degrading language, calling the resident an "a******" and using additional obscenities while defending the CNA. The resident reported feeling humiliated and degraded. Other staff and a resident council leader reported prior concerns and complaints about this staff member’s behavior. These events occurred despite facility policies that prohibit abuse, define mental and verbal abuse, and require staff to treat residents with courtesy and respect at all times.
The facility failed to employ a certified Food Service Manager/Dietary Manager despite its own assessment and job description identifying this position as necessary to oversee food and nutrition services for 63 residents. For about two months, there was no designated dietary manager, with the DON intermittently overseeing the department and dietary staff informally sharing management tasks. Resident council records and interviews with residents, dietary staff, a contracted RD, an ombudsman, and a contracted dietary supplier all confirmed the absence of a manager and described significant problems with food service, including meals not matching posted menus, cold or undercooked food, lack of menu choices, frequent shortages of coffee and milk, inedible salads, and inadequate snacks for a resident with diabetes and a resident on a special diet.
The facility failed to follow its planned, dietician-reviewed menus and did not consistently provide the listed food items or nutritionally balanced meals. The facility assessment and policies required a Dietary Manager and adherence to planned menus, but the position had been vacant for months, with the DON informally overseeing the kitchen and dietary staff improvising due to supply issues and budget-driven order cuts. On multiple occasions, planned menu items such as ham in a western egg bake and baked potatoes were not served, and substitutes like sweet potatoes were used instead. Several alert and oriented residents reported that food was often cold, undercooked, not edible, lacking in variety or choice, and did not match the menu or their special diets, with frequent shortages of milk, coffee, salads, and appropriate snacks for conditions such as diabetes. Staff and a contracted supplier confirmed recurring shortages, poor portion control, and mismanagement of ingredients, leading to routine deviations from the posted menus.
A resident became upset when a CNA could not obtain a requested salad, leading to a conflict that prompted the Social Service Director to enter the room. According to multiple staff statements and the resident’s own account, the Social Service Director approached the resident aggressively, got close to the resident’s face, and used profane, degrading language, including calling the resident an “a******” and telling the resident not to be a “f****** a******” to staff. A COTA overheard the interaction while providing therapy to the roommate and immediately reported it to the DON. Although the facility’s abuse policy defines such conduct as mental and verbal abuse and requires prompt identification and reporting, the final investigation concluded that no verbal abuse occurred and treated the behavior only as unprofessional language, resulting in a failure to properly identify and substantiate abuse.
A resident with a history of wrist fracture fell and injured her left wrist when a CNA failed to use a gait belt during a transfer, contrary to facility policy. The CNA attempted to assist the resident off the toilet by grabbing her bra, causing the resident to lose balance and fall. The resident was hospitalized with an acute wrist fracture and prescribed a wrist splint and pain medication.
The facility failed to employ a certified Infection Prevention Nurse, affecting all 62 residents. An Infection Prevention Nurse was hired but is not yet certified, although she is signed up for courses. Her employee file confirmed her hire date but lacked certification or training documentation.
A registered nurse failed to follow proper infection control protocols during wound care for a resident. The nurse used the same soiled gloves to handle clean items and placed a soiled incontinence brief on the floor, compromising infection prevention measures.
The facility failed to conduct the required quarterly QA meetings and did not ensure the attendance of required committee members. Missing signatures from key members and the absence of meeting minutes for several months were confirmed by the Administrator. These failures have the potential to affect all 63 residents currently residing in the facility.
The facility failed to utilize appropriate PPE, audit for PPE compliance, and screen staff during a COVID-19 outbreak, potentially affecting 63 residents. Staff did not consistently adhere to PPE guidelines, and non-approved KN95 masks were used. Agency staff were not included in COVID-19 source testing, and specific incidents showed lapses in infection control practices.
The facility failed to provide clean, stain-free linens for bathing, compromising the dignity of nine residents. Observations and interviews revealed that residents were given discolored washcloths with brown/tan stains for personal hygiene. The Housekeeping Manager confirmed that stained linens were supposed to be repurposed, but soiled washcloths were observed in the laundry bin ready for washing with other whites. The Administrator acknowledged the policy change to no longer provide disposable wipes, requiring staff to use washcloths instead.
The facility failed to perform a PASARR rescreen for a resident diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder upon admission, despite the facility's policy requiring rescreening with any significant change of status. The DON confirmed the oversight.
A resident with multiple diagnoses fell in the facility's transport van due to an improperly secured seatbelt. The van driver, new to the job, had loosened the seatbelt at the resident's request, leading to the fall. The resident required hospital evaluation for pain in his right leg.
The facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction for a resident prescribed Seroquel for a year, despite minimal documented episodes of agitation and anxiety. The DON confirmed that the resident's behaviors did not warrant the continued use of the antipsychotic medication, and a GDR had not been attempted as required by the facility's policy.
Failure to Protect a Resident From Verbal and Mental Abuse by Social Services Staff
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to protect a resident’s right to be free from mental and verbal abuse by staff, as required by its Abuse Prevention and Reporting Policy and Resident Rights Policy. The facility’s policies define abuse as the willful infliction of intimidation, punishment, or mental anguish, and specifically describe mental and verbal abuse as conduct that can cause humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation. The policies also require staff to treat residents with courtesy, professionalism, and respect at all times, and emphasize staff training on resident rights, what constitutes abuse, and the obligation to report suspected abuse. The incident centers on one resident with multiple medical and psychosocial conditions, including anxiety disorder, depression, hepatic encephalopathy, psychoactive substance abuse, vertebral disc degeneration with discogenic back pain, heart failure, liver disease, fall history, abnormal gait, lack of coordination, abnormal posture, impaired visual function, and a care plan identifying an activities of daily living performance deficit and risk for abuse/neglect. The resident’s care plan notes that the resident is at risk for abuse/neglect and is to be cared for in a safe manner and to verbalize any incidences of abuse or neglect. On the day of the incident, a CNA delivered the resident’s lunch tray, and the resident requested a salad. The CNA went to the kitchen, found it closed, and reported back that a salad was not available. The resident became angry, told the CNA to get out of the room, and, according to staff statements, called the CNA derogatory names, including “piece of s***,” and allegedly threw a tray. The CNA then informed the Social Service Director that the CNA did not want to return to the room alone. The Social Service Director then went to the resident’s room. According to multiple staff and resident statements, the Social Service Director approached the resident with an angry attitude, got very close to the resident’s face, and used profane and degrading language. A Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant, who was in the bathroom providing therapy to the roommate, reported overhearing the Social Service Director tell the resident, “You have to quit being an a****** to my staff,” and that the Social Service Director argued with the resident, stating the resident could go get their own salad and could not yell at staff, emphasizing that the CNA was the only CNA on the unit. The COTA described the Social Service Director as aggressive, rude, and berating, using “a lot of other bad words,” and reported that the resident was very upset. The Director of Nursing reported being told by the COTA that the Social Service Director told the resident, “do not be a f****** a****** to my staff,” and immediately reported this to the Administrator. The resident stated that they had an “explosive attitude” and acknowledged not being nice to the CNA, but reported that the Social Service Director came into the room right after the conflict with the CNA, got inches from the resident’s face, and was “cussing and screaming,” telling the resident to “f*** off” and calling the resident an “a******.” The resident reported feeling belittled, humiliated, helpless, and like an “idiot,” and expressed that the Social Service Director, who was supposed to help with discharge planning, instead degraded them. Other staff, including the Therapy Director and Resident Council President, reported hearing that the Social Service Director had been fired for cursing at the resident and described prior concerns and complaints about the Social Service Director’s behavior toward residents and staff. The facility’s own final abuse investigation documented that the Social Service Director was overheard telling the resident not to be an “a******” to staff and acknowledged unprofessional conduct by cursing during the conversation, although the facility’s internal conclusion stated that verbal abuse did not occur. These actions and interactions, as documented by multiple witnesses and the resident, constitute the basis for the cited deficiency related to failure to protect the resident from mental and verbal abuse.
Failure to Employ a Dietary Manager Resulting in Ongoing Food and Menu Problems
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to employ a certified Food Service Manager/Dietary Manager as identified as necessary in its own Facility Assessment Tool and Dietary Manager job description. The assessment specifies that a Food Service Manager/Dietary Manager is needed to care for the resident population, and the job description outlines responsibilities such as planning, organizing, developing, and directing the Food and Nutrition Services Department, maintaining menus, participating in survey inspections, and possessing Food Service Sanitation Manager Certification. Despite these documented requirements, the facility census showed 63 residents on 12/24/25, and on multiple survey dates (12/27/25, 12/28/25, and 12/29/25) the facility could not identify or provide evidence of an employed Food Service Manager/Dietary Manager, nor a contact person for that role. The employee contact list also documented “Dietary Manager none.” Resident Council minutes from two separate meetings documented that the facility was looking for a new Dietary Manager, that the DON was handling dietary questions, and that there was no Food Committee meeting due to the absence of a manager. Multiple staff interviews confirmed that the former Dietary Manager had left about two months earlier and that no replacement had been hired. The DON stated that the facility did not currently have a Dietary Manager and that she helped out in the department when she could, while dietary staff reported that they “all just pitch in,” with certain cooks handling “a lot of the kitchen stuff” and one cook stating that they “pretty much do everything” in the kitchen because there had been no manager since the former manager left. The contracted registered dietician and the ombudsman both corroborated that the facility was still looking for a Dietary Manager and had not hired one. Multiple alert and oriented residents reported ongoing problems with food quality and service during the period without a Dietary Manager. The Resident Council President stated that there had not been a kitchen manager for a long time and described the kitchen as run “terrible,” with menus not matching what was served and food being cold and undercooked. Other residents reported that they did not receive what was on the posted menu, that food was “not edible,” undercooked, cold, and sometimes consisted only of carbohydrates without fruit or vegetables. Several residents stated that the facility frequently ran out of coffee and milk, that salads were brown, mushy, and slimy, and that they could not obtain requested items such as turkey sandwiches. One resident on a special diet reported not receiving what they were supposed to get and inadequate assistance when requesting alternatives, and another diabetic resident reported insufficient evening snacks. Staff, including the MDS RN/manager on duty, acknowledged hearing resident complaints that the food was terrible and that the posted menu was not followed.
Failure to Follow Planned Menus and Provide Nutritionally Appropriate Meals
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow its planned, dietician-reviewed menus and ensure that meals met residents’ nutritional needs as required by policy and facility assessment. The facility’s assessment tool identified the need for a Food Service/Dietary Manager to ensure appropriate food services and menus. Facility policies and the Dietary Manager job description required that menus be planned in advance, maintained, followed, and that residents be offered items from the planned menu. Resident Council minutes over several months documented ongoing dietary concerns, including removal of available off‑menu options, lack of a Dietary Manager, and complaints that substitutes were becoming regular meals instead of true alternatives. Surveyor observations on specific dates showed that posted menu items were not served as planned. The week-at-a-glance menu listed western egg bake with ham for breakfast and baked potato with sour cream and margarine for lunch on a specific date, but the western omelet served that morning contained no ham, and residents at lunch received sweet potatoes instead of baked potatoes. Multiple alert and oriented residents reported that the menu was frequently not followed, that food was cold, undercooked, or not edible, that there was often no choice, and that they did not receive what was listed on the menu or what their special diets required. Residents also reported frequent lack of milk and coffee, inability to obtain requested items such as turkey sandwiches, brown and slimy salads, meals composed only of carbohydrates without fruit or vegetables, and inadequate evening snacks for a resident with diabetes. Staff interviews confirmed that the facility had been without a Dietary Manager for about two months, with the DON informally overseeing the department and dietary staff “pitching in” without clear management. Dietary staff and the contracted dietary supplier reported ongoing problems obtaining and managing ingredients needed to follow the menus, frequent running out of key items such as milk and ham, and corporate-driven budget constraints that led to cutting orders and improvising menu items. The contracted supplier noted that ham supplies were depleted after a Christmas potluck, leaving no ham for the planned western omelet, and that sweet potatoes were substituted for baked potatoes due to lack of regular potatoes. Staff also described poor portion control and failure to properly use or prepare produce such as lettuce, contributing to food waste and further deviation from the planned menus. These actions and inactions resulted in the facility not following its posted menus and not consistently providing the planned, nutritionally appropriate meals to its 63 residents.
Failure to Identify and Substantiate Verbal Abuse Toward a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to identify and substantiate verbal and mental abuse toward a resident in accordance with its Abuse Prevention and Reporting Policy. The policy defines abuse as including willful mental abuse and verbal abuse, such as harassing, insulting, yelling, or threatening a resident, and requires staff to promptly investigate and report all allegations. An incident occurred involving the former Social Service Director (V4) and a resident (R1) after R1 became upset when a Certified Nursing Assistant (V17) could not obtain a requested salad because the kitchen was closed. R1 reacted by telling V17 to get out of the room, calling V17 derogatory names, and allegedly throwing a tray. V17 then reported to V4 that V17 did not want to return to R1’s room alone. Multiple staff and the resident provided statements describing V4’s subsequent interaction with R1. The Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (V13), who was in the bathroom providing therapy to R1’s roommate, reported overhearing V4 approach R1’s bedside with an attitude, get close to R1’s face, and berate R1 using profanity, including calling R1 an “a******” and telling R1 not to be a “f****** a******” to staff. V13 stated that V4 was aggressive, rude, and degrading toward R1 and immediately reported the incident to the Director of Nursing (V2). R1’s own written and verbal statements corroborated that V4 entered the room right after the conflict with V17, got inches from R1’s face, screamed and cursed, told R1 to “f*** off,” and called R1 an “a******,” which R1 described as belittling, humiliating, and degrading. Despite these statements, the facility’s Final Abuse Investigation, completed by the former Administrator/Abuse Coordinator (V18), concluded that verbal abuse did not occur and characterized V4’s conduct only as unprofessional use of profanity not directed at the resident. The investigation documented that V4 used profane language during the conversation but did not substantiate abuse, even though staff statements and R1’s account indicated cursing and degrading language directed at R1. V2 later stated that, based on the information and statements collected, V4 did mentally and verbally abuse R1 and that the investigation could have reached a more thorough determination by substantiating the abuse. The failure to recognize and substantiate this conduct as abuse, despite corroborating evidence, represents the facility’s failure to follow its own abuse policy and to properly identify abuse for one of three residents reviewed for abuse investigations.
Improper Transfer Technique Leads to Resident Fall and Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policy of using a gait belt for all physical assist transfers, which resulted in a resident falling and injuring her left wrist. The incident involved a CNA who attempted to assist the resident off the toilet by grabbing her bra instead of using a gait belt, leading to the resident losing her balance and falling to the bathroom floor. This action was contrary to the facility's documented procedures, which mandate the use of a gait belt for all transfers to ensure resident safety. The resident involved in the incident had a history of a previous wrist fracture and required assistance with toileting due to mobility limitations. At the time of the incident, the resident was being assisted by the CNA, who was reportedly in a hurry and did not follow the proper transfer protocol. The resident's care plan indicated a risk for falls and injury, highlighting the importance of following established safety procedures during transfers. Following the fall, the resident was transported to the hospital, where X-rays confirmed an acute fracture of the left wrist. The resident was subsequently prescribed a wrist splint and pain medication. The facility's failure to use a gait belt during the transfer and the improper handling by the CNA directly contributed to the resident's fall and subsequent injury.
Failure to Employ Certified Infection Prevention Nurse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ a certified Infection Prevention Nurse, which has the potential to affect all 62 residents residing in the facility. The Administrator stated that an Infection Prevention Nurse was hired, but she is not yet certified. Although the nurse is signed up for the necessary courses, she has not started them. The nurse was hired in October 2024 and began work on October 29, 2024. A review of her employee file confirmed the hire date but showed no certification or Infection Preventionist Training documentation.
Infection Control Breach During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to proper infection prevention and control practices during wound care for a resident. A registered nurse (RN) was observed preparing to perform wound care on a resident who had a bowel movement. The RN, while wearing clean gloves, removed the resident's stool-covered wound dressing and placed it in the soiled incontinence brief, which was then placed on the floor. The RN, still wearing the same soiled gloves, touched the door handle and accepted clean linens from a certified nursing assistant (CNA), thereby contaminating clean items. The RN continued to provide incontinence care to the resident without changing the soiled gloves, further compromising infection control protocols. The RN later stated that she was unaware that she should not touch clean items with soiled gloves and typically placed dirty incontinence briefs on the floor if a trash can was not available. This incident highlights a breach in the facility's infection prevention and control program, which aims to prevent and control infections among residents and staff.
Failure to Conduct Required QA Meetings and Ensure Attendance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct the required quarterly Quality Assurance meetings and did not ensure the attendance of the required Quality Assurance committee members. Specifically, the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Meeting Minutes attendance sign-in sheets were missing signatures from key members such as the Medical Director and Director of Nursing Services for meetings held in April 2023 and April 2024. Additionally, there were no available meeting minutes for July 2023, October 2023, and January 2024. The facility's policy mandates that the Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee meet at least quarterly and include specific members such as the Medical Director, Director of Nursing Services, and other key personnel. The Administrator confirmed the missing signatures and the absence of meeting minutes for the specified months. These failures have the potential to affect all 63 residents currently residing in the facility.
Inadequate PPE Use and COVID-19 Screening During Outbreak
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to utilize appropriate PPE, audit for PPE compliance, and screen staff during a COVID-19 outbreak, potentially affecting 63 residents. The facility's Infection Control-Interim COVID-19 policy required the use of NIOSH-approved N95 respirators, gowns, gloves, and eye protection for healthcare providers entering rooms of residents with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. However, observations revealed that staff, including agency CNAs and registered nurses, did not consistently adhere to these guidelines. For instance, an agency CNA entered a resident's room without properly tying the gown, and a registered nurse entered another resident's room without any PPE. Additionally, residents with confirmed COVID-19 were observed wandering the halls without proper PPE, and staff failed to redirect them effectively. The facility also failed to ensure the availability of NIOSH-approved PPE. PPE supply cabinets contained non-approved KN95 masks, which were used by staff entering COVID-19 isolation rooms. The Infection Control Preventionist admitted to not conducting PPE audits and only monitoring hand hygiene compliance. Furthermore, the facility did not include agency staff in COVID-19 source testing, despite having multiple agency staff working during the outbreak. This omission was confirmed by both agency CNAs and the Infection Control Preventionist, who acknowledged that excluding agency staff from testing skewed the sampling and was not all-inclusive. Specific incidents included a registered nurse entering a resident's room on droplet precautions with only a surgical mask and face shield, failing to don full PPE, and not changing the mask after exiting. The facility's documentation showed that 63 residents resided in the facility at the time of the survey. These deficiencies highlight significant lapses in infection control practices, particularly during a COVID-19 outbreak, putting residents and staff at risk of infection.
Failure to Provide Clean Linens for Bathing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide clean, stain-free linens for bathing for nine residents, compromising their dignity and self-worth. Observations and interviews revealed that residents were given discolored washcloths with brown/tan stains for personal hygiene. One resident expressed disgust at the stained washcloths, stating it was undignified and unsanitary. Another resident was upset about being given a filthy washcloth to wash her face and mentioned being asked to use a blood-stained towel on a community shower chair. The Housekeeping Manager confirmed that stained linens were supposed to be repurposed for housekeeping or kitchen use, but soiled washcloths were observed in the laundry bin ready for washing with other whites. The Resident Council President and other residents voiced concerns about being demeaned by using feces-stained washcloths for bathing. During a group meeting, multiple residents agreed that the stained washcloths were demeaning. The facility's Administrator acknowledged the policy change to no longer provide disposable wipes for incontinence care, requiring staff to use washcloths instead. The Administrator stated that staff were not supposed to use stained washcloths and would remind the laundry staff to discard them.
Failure to Perform PASARR Rescreen for Resident with Severe Mental Illness
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to perform a PASARR (Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review) rescreen after the emergence of a newly diagnosed severe mental illness for one of two residents reviewed for PASARR screening, in the sample of 30. The facility's policy mandates that PASARR Level 1 screens be completed annually and with any significant change of status. Resident 2 (R2) was admitted with diagnoses of Bipolar Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder, but the current PASARR screen provided by the Director of Nurses indicated no diagnosis of Severe Mental Illness at the time of the original admission. The Director of Nurses confirmed that R2 had not undergone a PASARR rescreen upon admission to the facility, despite the severe mental illness diagnoses.
Failure to Ensure Safe Transport Leading to Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transported in the facility's transport van, resulting in a fall. The incident involved a resident with diagnoses including dependence on a wheelchair, diabetes mellitus with diabetic autonomic neuropathy, and an acquired absence of the left leg. The resident fell in the transport van while en route to a doctor's appointment. The fall investigation revealed that the resident was not wearing his wheelchair seatbelt, and the van's lap belt was too loose, allowing the resident to slip forward out of his wheelchair when the van came to a stop. The van driver, who was new to the job, admitted to loosening the seatbelt at the resident's request because it was uncomfortable, which contributed to the fall. During a group meeting, the resident recounted the fall and the subsequent pain in his right leg, which required evaluation at a local hospital emergency room. The resident also mentioned that he was not sitting in his usual spot in the van due to another resident being transported. The van driver confirmed the details of the incident, acknowledging that the seatbelt should have been much tighter and that he now understands the importance of ensuring seatbelt safety. The facility's fall risk care plan was updated to include educating the bus driver and resident on seatbelt safety while in a wheelchair.
Failure to Attempt Gradual Dose Reduction for Antipsychotic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for a resident prescribed Seroquel, an antipsychotic medication, within the first year of its prescription. The facility's policy mandates that residents on psychotropic drugs should receive GDRs and behavioral interventions unless clinically contraindicated, with GDRs encouraged at least twice yearly. However, for one resident with multiple diagnoses including Major Depressive Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Dementia, the facility did not attempt a GDR despite the resident being on the same dose of Seroquel for a year. The resident's behavior monitoring sheets documented minimal episodes of agitation, anxiety, and restlessness, which did not justify the continued use of the antipsychotic medication according to the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON confirmed that the resident's behaviors did not warrant the use of Seroquel and acknowledged that a GDR had not been attempted. During an interview, the resident expressed that he was doing well at the facility and was in the process of applying for disability with plans to discharge and live independently. The resident did not display any adverse behaviors during the observation. The DON stated that loud noises could trigger and agitate the resident but confirmed that the resident was not a harm to himself or others. Despite this, the facility did not follow its policy to attempt a GDR, leading to the deficiency noted in the report.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 42 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Toluca
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henry Rehab And Nursing | 13.9 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Lacon Rehab And Nursing | 14.5 mi | — | 7 | 1 |
| Apostolic Christian Home | 15.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Flanagan Rehabilitation And Health Care Center | 15.5 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Parker Nursing & Rehab Center | 17.5 mi | — | 14 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Goldwater Care Toluca.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.