Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Farmington Village Nrsg during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Several residents were observed waiting in their wheelchairs at the entrance to the dining room or near the nurse's station due to a lack of available seating, with staff and an ombudsman confirming that not all residents who wished to eat in the dining room could be accommodated at once. This resulted in some residents waiting up to an hour before being able to eat, as most preferred dining in the communal area and the facility did not have enough seats for all.
Surveyors found that opened dry food items in the kitchen, such as mixes and fillings, were not labeled with the date they were opened and were not stored in airtight containers. The Dietary Manager confirmed that items were only dated upon receipt and left in their original bags with clips, contrary to facility policy requiring labeling and airtight storage.
Multiple residents were unable to eat in the dining room at their preferred time due to a lack of available seating, resulting in some waiting up to an hour for a spot to open. Staff, including CNAs and an LPN, confirmed that the dining room does not have enough seats for all who wish to eat there, and the DON acknowledged that most residents prefer the dining room, causing recurring delays.
Staff failed to thoroughly cleanse the area around a resident's sacral pressure ulcer, leaving fecal matter at the exterior border of the wound during wound care. Despite facility policy and wound care orders requiring cleansing of the wound and surrounding area, the wound nurse and CNA completed the dressing change and replaced the resident's brief without removing the fecal matter. The wound nurse later acknowledged that the fecal matter should have been cleansed.
A resident with a central line receiving IV Vancomycin for an infection was not placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions as required by facility policy. Staff provided care without donning a gown, and the resident's care plan did not include EBP, despite ongoing treatment and the presence of an indwelling device. The DON confirmed that EBP was not implemented for this resident.
Insufficient Dining Room Seating Limits Resident Access to Meals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient seating in the dining room to accommodate all residents who chose to eat there, resulting in several residents having to wait for extended periods before being able to eat. On multiple occasions, groups of residents were observed sitting in their wheelchairs at the entrance to the dining room or near the nurse's station, waiting for a seat to become available. Staff members, including certified nursing assistants and an LPN/staff educator, confirmed that there were not enough seats for all residents who wished to eat in the dining room at the same time, leading to some residents having to wait until others finished their meals. Residents reported that if they did not arrive early enough, they would have to wait up to an hour before being able to eat, and expressed frustration with the situation. The ombudsman also noted that the lack of dining room seating was a significant concern, as it frequently resulted in residents waiting for a spot to open up. The facility had 83 residents at the time, and the issue was acknowledged by the Director of Nursing, who stated that most residents preferred to eat in the dining room, further exacerbating the seating shortage.
Failure to Date and Properly Store Opened Dry Food Items
Penalty
Summary
During a kitchen tour, surveyors observed multiple opened dry food items, including cake mix, cornbread mix, waffle mix, buttermilk biscuits, pudding and pie filling, graham cracker crumbs, strawberry and lime gelatin mixes, and batter mix, that were not labeled with the date they were opened. The Dietary Manager confirmed that the facility only dates items upon receipt and does not date them when opened. Additionally, none of the opened dry food items were stored in airtight containers; instead, they were left in their original bags with clips to keep them closed. These practices were not in accordance with the facility's policy, which requires opened products to be labeled, dated with the use by date, and tightly covered, and for dry goods to be stored in plastic containers with tight-fitting lids.
Insufficient Dining Room Seating Limits Resident Access to Meals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient seating in the dining room to accommodate all residents who chose to eat there, resulting in multiple residents having to wait for extended periods before being able to eat. Observations showed several residents in wheelchairs waiting at the entrance to the dining room while others were already seated and eating. Staff interviews confirmed that residents often have to wait for a seat to become available, as there are not enough seats for everyone who wishes to eat in the dining room at the same time. This situation was corroborated by both staff and the facility ombudsman, who noted that the lack of seating is a recurring issue. Residents reported that if they did not arrive early enough, they would have to wait up to an hour before being able to eat, and some were observed waiting near the nurse's station or in their rooms due to the lack of available seating. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that while some residents choose to eat in their rooms, most prefer the dining room, leading to insufficient seating capacity during meal times. The deficiency directly affected multiple residents who were unable to eat at their preferred time and location due to the facility's failure to reasonably accommodate their needs and preferences.
Failure to Cleanse Fecal Matter from Pressure Ulcer During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
During wound care for a resident with a sacral pressure ulcer, staff failed to thoroughly cleanse the area around the wound, leaving fecal matter at the exterior border. The facility's policy and the resident's wound care orders required cleansing the wound and surrounding area with a specified solution and patting it dry with gauze. Observation showed that the wound nurse and CNA performed wound care without removing a round ball of light brown fecal matter present in the upper gluteal cleft at the exterior border of the wound. After completing the dressing change, the staff replaced the resident's adult brief and covered her without addressing the fecal matter. The wound nurse later confirmed that the fecal matter should have been cleansed from the wound area.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident with Central Line
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a central line who was receiving intravenous Vancomycin for an infection related to an internal joint prosthesis. According to the facility's own EBP policy, residents with indwelling medical devices such as central lines are required to be placed on EBP, which includes the use of gowns and gloves by staff during high-contact care activities. However, during direct observation, a registered nurse provided care to the resident by flushing the central line and administering medication while only wearing gloves and not donning a gown. The nurse also confirmed that the resident was not on EBP at the time of care. Further review revealed that the resident's care plan did not include any documentation or plan for EBP, despite ongoing treatment for infection via a central line. Interviews with the Director of Nursing confirmed that all residents with central lines should be on EBP and that this particular resident was never placed on such precautions. The lack of signage and absence of an EBP care plan contributed to the failure to implement the required infection prevention measures for the resident.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 77 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Farmington
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loft Rehab & Nursing Of Canton | 6.9 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Renaissance Care Center | 8.9 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Sunset Rehabilitation And Health Care | 9.5 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Graham Hospital | 9.6 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
| Clayberg, The | 17 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Farmington Village Nrsg.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.