Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Fairview Rehab & Healthcare during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with a history of fractures and requiring personal care assistance experienced a significant change in condition, including low oxygen saturation and low blood pressure. Despite these changes, the facility staff failed to notify the physician promptly, delaying necessary medical intervention. The facility's policy mandates immediate physician notification for significant changes, which was not adhered to in this case.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering exited a facility undetected, leading to a diagnosis of hypothermia and frostbite after being found two miles away. Staff failed to follow policy by not conducting a head count or checking outside when a door alarm sounded, assuming another resident triggered the alarm. The resident had previously eloped, indicating a pattern of inadequate supervision.
The facility failed to provide the required 80 square feet of living space per resident bed for four residents in rooms certified for two beds. Measurements confirmed that the rooms were only 75.7 square feet per resident. Despite residents not expressing concerns, the facility did not meet regulatory requirements.
Failure to Notify Physician of Resident's Condition Change
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the physician of abnormal vital signs and a change in condition for a resident, identified as R1, who was part of a sample of nine residents reviewed for physician notification. R1 was admitted with diagnoses including unspecified fracture of the humerus and cervical vertebra, and required assistance with personal care. On 12/10/2024, R1's son observed a low oxygen saturation level, which was confirmed by the nurse's pulse oximeter reading of 93%. Despite the son's concerns and the application of supplemental oxygen, the physician was not notified of this change in condition. On 12/11/2024, R1 was found to be lethargic and difficult to arouse, with a blood pressure reading of 89/53, significantly lower than her baseline. Despite these concerning signs, the physician was not contacted immediately. Instead, the nurse attempted to manage the situation by encouraging fluid intake. It was not until later in the afternoon, when R1's condition did not improve, that the physician was finally notified, and R1 was sent to the hospital for evaluation. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Nurses and various nurses, revealed a lack of adherence to the facility's policy on notifying physicians of significant changes in a resident's condition. The staff acknowledged that the physician should have been contacted immediately upon noticing the abnormal vital signs and changes in R1's behavior. The facility's policy requires prompt notification of the physician and the resident's representative in such situations, but this protocol was not followed in R1's case.
Resident Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident at risk of elopement, resulting in the resident exiting the facility without staff knowledge. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering, was found approximately two miles away from the facility by the sheriff's office. The resident was not wearing shoes or a coat and was exposed to cold temperatures, leading to a diagnosis of hypothermia and frostbite upon evaluation at a local hospital. The incident occurred when the door alarm in the bird room sounded, but staff did not follow the facility's policy to conduct a thorough investigation and head count. Staff assumed another resident had triggered the alarm and did not check outside or verify the whereabouts of all residents. The resident had previously eloped from the facility on multiple occasions, indicating a pattern of inadequate supervision and failure to implement effective interventions. Interviews with staff revealed that the facility's policy for responding to door alarms was not followed, as staff did not perform a head count or visually check outside when the alarm sounded. The resident's care plan included interventions for elopement risk, but these were not effectively implemented or documented, contributing to the resident's ability to leave the facility undetected.
Removal Plan
- All staff, including department heads, have been educated to ensure that they are aware of policy related to resident elopement, including steps to take if alarm is sounding, doing thorough check of both inside and outside the facility along with facility head count, residents' supervision and not leaving residents unattended in potentially unsafe locations.
- Education was provided by the Director of Nursing and was completed, with education on-going. All staff will be educated prior to their next shift.
- The facility completed an elopement assessment for R1.
- R1's care plan has been updated and does identify R1 is at risk for elopements with interventions put into place.
- Interventions were reviewed, and new interventions put into place for R1 by Chief Operations Officer and Director of Nursing Services.
- Resident placed on 15-minute checks.
- Resident has activity basket in his room that has DVDs and magazines about sports.
- Resident 1:1 activity increased. He likes playing bags, watching movies or TV that talk about playing ball.
- Increase visual checks and monitoring of resident.
- Offer activity blanket.
- Offer resident snacks that he likes such as soft cookies and milk.
- Resident information placed in facility wander book.
- Resident will be redirected by offering to sit and reminisce of past times.
- Resident will be redirected to courtyard for outdoor walks weather permitting.
- Resident will be redirected away from doors.
- Residents at risk for elopement were reviewed by Director of Nursing Services to ensure person centered interventions are in place and are in careplan, to address elopement behaviors and to decrease risk.
- Elopement assessments are completed upon admission, quarterly, annually, and as needed for all residents by Director of Nursing Services and/or Minimum Data Set/MDS coordinator.
- All alarmed exit doors were inspected and found to be in good working order by Regional Environmental Director.
- A QAPI meeting was held with team members to discuss R1 incident and plan of correction. Plan of correction initiated immediately.
- The QA team has been notified of the Immediate Jeopardy and the abatement plan has been put into place.
- QA team will review the results of the audits once a week for 2 weeks then monthly for 2 months to ensure Plan of Correction is effective.
Failure to Provide Adequate Room Space
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the required 80 square feet of living space per resident bed for four residents (R10, R20, R27, and R44) in rooms certified for two beds. On 05/15/24, the Maintenance Director measured the rooms of R10 and R27, as well as R44 and R20, and found that each room measured 143 inches by 152.5 inches, equating to 75.7 square feet per resident living space. The measurements did not include the closet or inset dresser space. Both sets of residents were observed sitting in their rooms watching TV and stated they had no concerns about the room size. However, the rooms did not meet the regulatory requirement of 80 square feet per resident bed. The Regional Administrator confirmed that all rooms on the A and B halls, which are Medicaid certified, are under the required 80 square feet per resident living space. A facility room roster dated 5/13/24 confirmed the residency of R10, R20, R27, and R44 in the measured rooms. A review of six months of Resident Council meeting minutes indicated no concerns related to room size were raised by the residents. Despite the residents' lack of complaints, the facility was found deficient in meeting the required room size standards.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 79 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Du Quoin
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duquoin Nursing & Rehab | 0.1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Pinckneyville Nursing & Rehab | 9.9 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Helia Healthcare Of Benton | 16 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Integrity Hc Of Herrin | 16.8 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Shawnee Senior Living | 16.9 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Fairview Rehab & Healthcare.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.