Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Evervella Of White Hall during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Two cognitively intact residents reported that they did not consistently receive water or other fluids during the night shift, with one stating there was nothing to drink from early evening until breakfast and another stating that water was not passed at night. Resident council minutes also documented that water was not being passed on the night shift. The DON stated she expected staff to pass water/fluids at night, and the facility’s hydration policy requires offering sufficient fluids, including between meals, to maintain proper hydration and health.
A resident with a rare blood cancer experienced a deficiency in care due to the facility's failure to coordinate with the oncology provider. Despite critical lab findings and the need for a Jak-2 mutation test, the facility did not complete the necessary lab work or communicate results, delaying treatment. The oncologist's office repeatedly stressed the importance of the lab and treatment, but the facility staff failed to act, resulting in a significant delay in the resident's care.
A resident with Myeloproliferative, a rare blood cancer, had a critical lab test ordered to determine treatment dosing. The facility failed to notify the Oncologist and Attending Physician of the lab results, which were crucial for the resident's treatment. Despite multiple attempts by the Oncology RN to stress the importance of the lab, the results were not communicated, delaying the resident's treatment since June. The facility's policy for notifying physicians of abnormal lab results was not followed.
The facility failed to ensure RN coverage for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, potentially affecting all 106 residents. An LPN confirmed the shift timings, but records showed missing RN coverage on specific dates. The administrator attributed this to a new scheduler's misunderstanding of shift timings.
The facility failed to follow proper hand hygiene and medication handling protocols, as an LPN did not sanitize hands before and after glove use and administered medications that had fallen on a cart. Additionally, the facility lacked an effective system to monitor and track infections, with several residents receiving antibiotics for UTIs without meeting criteria, and the infection control log missing organism documentation. The Infection Preventionist was unaware of facility-wide organisms, relying on monthly pharmacy reports.
The facility failed to effectively implement an antibiotic stewardship program, as four residents were prescribed antibiotics for UTIs without meeting clinical criteria, and the infection control log lacked documentation of the organisms involved. The Infection Preventionist/RN was unaware of the organisms present, except on the rehab unit, and tracking was only done monthly. This deficiency contradicts the facility's program requirements for infection tracking and antibiotic use monitoring.
A resident with cognitive impairment was subjected to a physical altercation when another resident, frustrated by repetitive behavior, threw a liquid on them during lunch. Staff interviews revealed the aggressor had a history of irritability and verbal conflicts, and the facility acknowledged insufficient supervision to prevent the incident.
The facility experienced a medication error rate of 8% due to an LPN administering incorrect doses to two residents. One resident received a lower dose of Famotidine than prescribed, while another was given a double dose of Vitamin D3. The errors occurred because the LPN did not adhere to the facility's guidelines requiring multiple checks against the MAR during medication preparation and administration.
The facility did not provide the required 80 square feet of floor space per resident in eight three-bed rooms, affecting 23 residents. These rooms only offered 77 square feet per resident bed, despite being Medicaid certified. The administrator noted that resident compatibility and behaviors are evaluated before room assignments.
Failure to Provide Night-Shift Hydration
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s provision of fluids during the night shift, based on resident interviews, record review, and facility documents. One cognitively intact resident (R6) reported on the morning of 2/23/2026 that she does not always have water at her bedside and that from approximately 6–7 p.m. until breakfast she has nothing to drink. Another cognitively intact resident (R9) reported on 2/24/2026 that water is not passed on the night shift. Resident council minutes from 2/2026 documented that water was not being passed on the night shift. The Director of Nursing (V1) stated on 2/25/2026 that she would expect staff to be passing water and fluids on the night shift. The facility’s 2023 hydration policy states that the facility will offer each resident sufficient fluid, including water and other liquids, consistent with resident needs and preferences to maintain proper hydration and health, and that interventions will be individualized and include offering a variety of fluids during and between meals. These findings show that, despite the facility’s written hydration policy and the DON’s stated expectations, residents reported not receiving water or fluids during the night shift, and resident council documentation corroborated that water was not being passed at night.
Failure to Coordinate Oncology Care for Resident with Blood Cancer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to coordinate services between the facility and a resident's oncology provider, leading to a deficiency in the quality of care for a resident with a blood cancer diagnosis. The resident, who has been diagnosed with Myeloproliferative Neoplasm, a rare blood cancer, was supposed to have an individualized care plan that included coordination with an oncologist. However, the care plan did not address the resident's blood cancer or the need for oncology consultations. Despite critical lab findings indicating elevated platelet counts, the necessary Jak-2 mutation test was not completed in a timely manner, delaying the resident's treatment. The resident's progress notes indicate multiple instances where critical platelet levels were reported, and the need for a hematologist consultation was emphasized. Despite these critical findings, there was a lack of follow-up and coordination between the facility and the oncology provider. The resident's oncologist's office repeatedly attempted to communicate the importance of the Jak-2 lab test and the subsequent treatment with Hydroxyurea, which is crucial for managing the resident's condition. However, the facility staff failed to complete the lab work and communicate the results to the oncologist, resulting in a significant delay in the resident's treatment. Interviews with facility staff and the oncology provider revealed a breakdown in communication and coordination. The Assistant Director of Nursing was unaware of the situation until late October, despite the oncologist's office making multiple attempts to stress the importance of the lab and treatment. The facility was unable to verify that the lab results were communicated to the prescribing physician's office, highlighting a significant lapse in the coordination of care for the resident.
Failure to Notify Physicians of Critical Lab Results
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the Oncologist and Attending Physician of a significant lab value for a resident diagnosed with Myeloproliferative, a rare blood cancer. The resident had an increase in platelets, splenomegaly, and weight loss, and was recommended to have a Jak-2 mutation test. The lab was collected on 7/2/2024, but the results were not communicated to the Oncologist or Attending Physician. The Oncology Registered Nurse (V5) stated that the lab was critical for the resident's treatment, as it would determine the dosing of Hydroxyurea, a medication necessary to decrease platelet counts and prevent a stroke. Despite multiple attempts by V5 to educate the facility staff on the importance of the lab and medication, the lab results were not communicated, and the resident had not been seen or treated since June. The Assistant Director of Nursing (V3) was unaware of the situation until contacted by V5 on 10/24/2024. V3 then arranged for the resident to be sent to the hospital for the lab to be drawn. The facility received the lab results on 7/15/2024, but there was no confirmation that the results were sent to or received by the Oncology office. The Administrator (V1) confirmed that there was no verification of communication with the prescribing physician's office. The facility's policy requires prompt notification of abnormal lab results to the physician, which was not followed in this case.
Failure to Provide RN Coverage for 8 Consecutive Hours
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day for 7 days a week, which has the potential to affect all 106 residents residing at the facility. This deficiency was identified through interviews and record reviews. A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed the shift timings, indicating that the day shift runs from 6 AM to 6 PM and the night shift from 6 PM to 6 AM. However, the facility's staff assignments for August, September, and October 2024 showed that on specific dates, there was no documentation of an RN working for 8 consecutive hours. The facility administrator acknowledged the issue, attributing it to a new scheduler who may not understand that a new day starts at midnight, and stated that they follow federal guidelines for RN coverage.
Infection Control and Medication Handling Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to proper hand hygiene and medication handling protocols, as observed with a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) who did not perform hand hygiene before donning gloves and after removing them. The LPN was seen preparing and administering medications to residents without sanitizing hands, and in one instance, picked up medications that had fallen onto a medication cart with bare hands before administering them to a resident. The facility's policies on hand washing and glove use were not followed, contributing to potential cross-contamination risks. Additionally, the facility did not have an effective system in place to monitor and track infections. Several residents were prescribed antibiotics for urinary tract infections (UTIs) without meeting the McGreer's Criteria for UTIs, and the infection control log failed to document the organisms responsible for these infections. The Infection Preventionist admitted to not being aware of the organisms present in the facility, except for those on the rehab unit, and relied on monthly reports from the pharmacy to track antibiotic use. The facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program and Surveillance for Healthcare Associated Infections policies were not effectively implemented. The Infection Preventionist acknowledged that the McGreer's Criteria were completed after antibiotics were prescribed, rather than at the onset of symptoms. The Administrator expected staff to track and monitor all infections, but the current practices did not align with the facility's documented procedures for infection tracking and antibiotic stewardship.
Failure in Antibiotic Stewardship Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program, as evidenced by the lack of monitoring and tracking of antibiotic use and infections for four residents. These residents were prescribed antibiotics for urinary tract infections (UTIs) without meeting the McGreer's criteria for such infections. The facility's infection control log did not document the specific organisms causing the UTIs for any of these residents. This indicates a failure in the facility's process to ensure that antibiotics are prescribed based on appropriate clinical criteria and that infections are properly tracked and documented. The Infection Preventionist/RN admitted to not knowing the organisms present in the facility, except for those on the rehab unit, and stated that tracking and trending were only done at the end of the month when the pharmacy provided a list of residents on antibiotics. This lack of timely tracking and documentation of infections and antibiotic use is contrary to the facility's own Antibiotic Stewardship Program, which requires tracking the types and locations of infections and using microbiology culture data to guide antibiotic selection. The Administrator expected staff to track and monitor all infections, but this expectation was not met, leading to the deficiency.
Failure to Prevent Resident Altercation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to evaluate, monitor, and prevent a physical altercation between two residents, leading to an incident of abuse. One resident, who was cognitively intact, threw a brown liquid on another resident, who was severely cognitively impaired, during lunch. The incident occurred after the resident who threw the liquid expressed frustration with the other resident's repetitive behavior, which was reportedly bothersome to other residents. Staff did not intervene or redirect the behavior of the resident who was perceived as bothersome, leading to the altercation. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident who threw the liquid was known to be grouchy, especially when desiring a smoke, and had a history of verbal arguments with other residents. The staff acknowledged that more supervision should have been provided to prevent such incidents. The facility's undated Abuse Policy emphasized the commitment to protecting residents from abuse and outlined prevention measures, but these measures were not effectively implemented in this case.
Medication Administration Errors Lead to 8% Error Rate
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer medications as prescribed by the ordering physician for two residents, resulting in a medication error rate of 8%. One resident was given 10 mg of Famotidine instead of the prescribed 20 mg twice a day for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Another resident received four Vitamin D3 capsules of 2000 IU each, instead of the prescribed 25 mcg tablets, leading to a double dose. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) responsible for administering these medications did not realize the errors at the time of administration. The facility's guidelines require that medication and dosage be checked against the Medication Administration Record (MAR) at least three times during the preparation and administration process, which was not adhered to in these instances.
Inadequate Living Space in Resident Rooms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the required 80 square feet of floor space per resident in eight three-bed resident rooms, affecting 23 residents. These rooms, numbered 51 to 58, were observed to house three residents each, despite only providing 77 square feet per resident bed according to historical measurement data. All these rooms are Medicaid certified. The deficiency was identified during an observation on October 16, 2024, at 9:00 AM. The facility's administrator acknowledged the situation, stating that they evaluate resident compatibility and behaviors before assigning them to a three-person room.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 45 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near White Hall
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott County Nursing Center | 8.5 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Jerseyville Manor | 21.2 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Grove Health & Rehab Ctr, The | 22.2 mi | — | 10 | 1 |
| Evercare Of Calhoun | 22.3 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Jacksonville Skld Nur & Rehab | 22.8 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Evervella Of White Hall.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.