Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Hamlin Place Of Boynton Beach during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple health issues experienced a delay in receiving physical and occupational therapy due to confusion over insurance coverage. Despite being eligible for Medicare Part B, therapy services were postponed for three weeks, leaving the resident uninformed about her rights to timely treatment. Facility staff admitted the delay was an error, and the administration acknowledged the findings.
A resident, who was cognitively sound, was not accommodated to attend her care plan meeting. Despite being invited, she chose not to leave her bed, and the facility did not offer to hold the meeting in her room. Instead, her family participated via phone, and decisions about her care were made without her direct input.
A resident with mild cognitive impairment and a persistent rash did not receive timely dermatological care. Despite a consult order, the facility lacked an on-site dermatologist and delayed scheduling an appointment. The resident reported ineffective treatment with the provided cream.
Delayed Therapy Services Due to Insurance Confusion
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to inform a resident of her rights to receive timely specialized rehabilitation services, specifically physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT). The resident, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including a right hip fracture and a history of falling, required immediate therapeutic interventions as ordered by her physician. Despite the physician's orders for PT and OT to begin shortly after admission, the services were delayed due to issues related to the resident's insurance coverage. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the delay in therapy services was attributed to confusion over the resident's payor source. The Rehabilitation Consultant admitted that the delay was an error on their part, as they were unsure who would cover the costs of the therapy. The Business Office Manager confirmed that the resident was eligible for Medicare Part B and should have received services without delay. However, the necessary paperwork to initiate the authorization for treatment was not processed in a timely manner. The resident expressed that she was not informed about her right to receive therapy within 24 hours of admission and was left waiting for three weeks before starting treatment. This lack of communication and delay in therapy services resulted in the resident experiencing a prolonged period of inactivity, which she described as difficult. The facility's administration acknowledged the findings during the exit conference, but no further information was provided to address the identified concern.
Resident Excluded from Care Plan Meeting
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accommodate a resident's participation in her care plan meeting, which is a requirement for person-centered care. The resident, who was cognitively sound and capable of handling her personal affairs, was not present at her care plan meeting. Despite being invited, the resident chose not to leave her bed, and the facility did not offer to conduct the meeting in her room. Instead, the facility involved the resident's family members in the meeting via phone conference, where decisions regarding her care were made without her direct input. The resident had multiple medical conditions, including atrial fibrillation, heart disease, and chronic pain, which were discussed during the meeting. The interdisciplinary team, along with the resident's family, made decisions about her medication and mobility without her presence. The MDS Coordinator and Social Worker acknowledged that the resident was not present, and the facility did not provide an explanation for her absence. The administration was informed of these findings during the exit conference, but no further information was provided to address the concern.
Failure to Ensure Timely Dermatologist Consultation for Resident with Rash
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for a resident with a skin rash. The resident, who has mild cognitive impairment and requires substantial assistance with daily activities, was admitted to the facility and later developed a rash. Despite having an order for a dermatologist consult dated 05/30/24, the resident had not been seen by a dermatologist by the time of the survey. The resident expressed dissatisfaction with the cream provided, stating it was ineffective, and had requested a dermatologist consultation, which had not yet been arranged. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that the resident had a persistent rash and that the facility no longer had a dermatologist available to see residents on-site. The ADON mentioned that they were searching for a dermatologist and that the earliest appointment available for the resident was on 06/21/24. The facility had prescribed Triamcinolone Acetonide cream and Ivermectin for the rash, but the delay in obtaining a dermatologist consultation contributed to the deficiency.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 136 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Lantana
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vi At Lakeside Village | 0.9 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
| Finnish-american Village | 1.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Lake Worth Rehabilitation Center | 2.2 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Terraces Of Lake Worth Care Center And Rehab | 2.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Heartland Nursing & Rehab Center | 3.1 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Hamlin Place Of Boynton Beach.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.