Salem Center
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in Salem, West Virginia.
- Location
- 255 Sunbridge Drive, Salem, West Virginia 26426
- CMS Provider Number
- 515071
- Inspections on file
- 21
- Latest survey
- June 5, 2025
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 0
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Salem Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors identified multiple infection control failures, including a resident's suction machine left uncleaned and uncovered, wheelchairs and a geri-chair with torn arm pads exposing inner padding, inoperable laundry room ventilation, soiled linen and trash left in shower rooms, and improper use of the facility van to transport soiled linen without disinfection. The facility also lacked proper infection surveillance and water management protocols, with no documentation of flushing or maintenance of fixtures in unoccupied rooms.
Multiple deficiencies were observed, including broken and missing fixtures, unfinished drywall, stains, and damaged furniture in several resident rooms. In the kitchen, the exhaust fan and air conditioning were not working, causing excessive heat, and several pieces of equipment were broken or nonfunctional. The shower rooms had non-operational ventilation, musty odors, and visible black and brown substances on surfaces and equipment. Staff confirmed the ongoing nature of these issues.
Kitchen staff lacked training on the use of the fire compression system, as observed when they were unable to identify how to manually activate the fire hood during a survey. The maintenance department had to demonstrate the activation process, revealing that staff were previously unaware of the correct procedure.
Surveyors identified multiple deficiencies in food storage and handling, including open and unlabeled food items, expired products, improper storage of staff personal drinks, unclean kitchen areas, and inadequate hair/beard covering by kitchen staff. Additionally, kitchen and nourishment room temperatures were found to be above recommended levels, and food items were left uncovered and unlabeled, all in violation of professional standards and facility policy.
Resident wheelchairs were observed lined up on both sides of a hallway, blocking a direct walking path. The facility administrator confirmed the insufficient space and lack of a clear passage during staff interview.
The facility failed to maintain operational venting systems in both laundry and shower rooms, resulting in unsanitary and uncomfortable conditions. Staff confirmed that the venting systems had been non-functional for over a month, leading to high humidity, musty odors, and the potential for microorganism transfer between dirty and clean areas.
The facility did not maintain operational ventilation systems in the shower rooms and dirty laundry room, resulting in humid, musty conditions and visible substances on shower surfaces and chairs. Staff confirmed the ventilation had been non-functional for over a month, and the lack of negative pressure in the laundry area potentially allowed microorganism transfer between rooms.
Multiple residents reported that meals were bland, cold, and not served according to individual preferences, with food lacking seasoning and visual appeal. Care plans did not document dietary preferences or interventions for meal satisfaction, and the kitchen environment was unsanitary with broken equipment. Despite complaints, requested test trays for surveyors were not delivered, and staff failed to communicate or follow up on these requests.
A resident left the facility for a procedure and did not return, but the required transfer or discharge notice was not completed. The DON and Administrator confirmed that no documentation was provided, as staff did not think it was needed in this case.
Surveyors found that garbage and refuse were not properly disposed of, with overflowing trash cans and boxes on the kitchen floor, expired food containers left on counters, and multiple issues in the dumpster area including blocked drainage pipes and scattered trash and gloves. Staff confirmed the trash overflow and acknowledged the problems in the dumpster area.
Multiple Infection Control Failures in Facility Equipment, Laundry, and Water Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain infection control standards in multiple areas, as evidenced by direct observations and staff interviews. One incident involved a resident's suctioning machine, which was found with a half-full canister of a clear/yellow thick substance and an uncovered cord exposed to the environment. The responsible RN confirmed the machine had not been cleaned or covered after use and had not noticed its condition prior to the observation. Additionally, several resident-assigned wheelchairs and a geri-chair in a hallway were observed with cracks and tears in the arm pads, exposing the inner padding. The facility's Infection Preventionist acknowledged these as infection control issues. The laundry room's ventilation system, designed to maintain negative pressure and prevent cross-contamination between dirty and clean laundry areas, was found to be inoperable for over a month. The air conditioning unit in the clean laundry room was also not functioning. Housekeeping staff and the Regional Director of Maintenance confirmed the ongoing issues with the ventilation system. Furthermore, soiled linen and trash were not removed from shower rooms between uses, and the shower rooms were noted to be humid, musty, and had visible black substance on the walls, which was confirmed by maintenance staff during inspection. The facility also failed to implement proper infection control protocols when using the facility's transport van to carry soiled linen to an offsite laundromat. The van was used to transport soiled linen and then residents, without any arrangements for cleaning or disinfecting the van between uses. The Infection Preventionist was unaware of this practice. Additionally, the facility did not maintain adequate infection surveillance or implement water management protocols, such as flushing and draining dead legs or fixtures in unoccupied rooms. Maintenance and administrative staff confirmed the absence of logs or documentation for these activities, and unoccupied rooms were not properly maintained during periods of vacancy.
Environmental Deficiencies in Resident Rooms, Kitchen, and Shower Rooms
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed multiple deficiencies in the facility's environment, including resident rooms, the kitchen, and shower rooms. In several resident rooms, there were broken or missing toilet seats and tank lids, chipped and unfinished drywall, scuff marks, peeling paint, brownish stains on floors, loose bed foot rails, broken bedside table drawers, and black spots or stains on walls and toilets. These issues were confirmed by the facility administrator during a walkthrough, who acknowledged the presence of these environmental deficiencies. In the kitchen, the exhaust fan above the stove was not working, the air conditioning was inoperable resulting in temperatures exceeding 91 degrees, and staff were observed perspiring heavily during meal preparation. Additional issues included a broken convection oven, a non-functional upright freezer, a broken sink drain lever, a spill left on the floor, and a broken trash receptacle foot pedal at the handwashing station, which prevented staff from lifting the lid without contamination. The kitchen account manager confirmed the duration of these problems and the lack of timely repairs. In the shower rooms, the ventilation system was not operational, resulting in humidity and a musty odor, with black substances on the shower stall walls and brown substances on shower chairs. Staff interviews confirmed the venting system had been nonfunctional for over a month.
Failure to Train Kitchen Staff on Fire Compression System Use
Penalty
Summary
Kitchen staff were not provided with education or training on how to use the fire compression system in the facility's kitchen. During an observation, it was noted that there was no manual pull chain for the fire system, and when questioned, kitchen staff were unaware of how to manually activate the fire hood to extinguish a fire. The maintenance department later demonstrated to both staff and surveyors the button used to activate the fire hood, confirming that kitchen staff did not previously know how to operate the fire compression system.
Improper Food Storage and Handling Practices
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed multiple failures in food storage and handling practices within the facility's kitchen and nourishment pantries. In the kitchen pantry, spices and a corn muffin mix box were left open and exposed, and a box of elbow noodles was stored without an opening or expiration date. Additionally, expired spaghetti was found in the pantry. In the cooler, staff personal drinks were stored alongside facility food items. The kitchen area was found to have food spills on the floor that were not cleaned, and a metal basin pan was left on the floor near the stove. Utensil drawers contained dried food spots and utensils were not stored in a uniform manner. The chef was observed with hair and beard not fully covered, wearing only a hat with hair exposed at the neck. The kitchen temperature was recorded at 91 degrees due to a broken air conditioner, and the cooler temperature was elevated at 51 degrees, which was acknowledged by both the Kitchen Account Manager and the facility administrator. In the nourishment pantries, the refrigerator in Nutrition Room One was consistently above the recommended temperature, with logs showing temperatures of 42-44 degrees over several days. A bowl of oatmeal was left uncovered and unlabeled on the counter, and staff reported that the room became excessively hot when the ice machine was running, affecting the refrigerator's ability to maintain safe temperatures. In another nutrition room, a tray of medicine pudding cups was found in the refrigerator without labels or dates, which was confirmed by the Nurse Infection Preventionist as having come from food service in that condition. These findings indicate a pattern of non-compliance with professional standards for food storage and handling, as well as facility policy requirements.
Obstructed Hallway Due to Wheelchair Placement
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to provide sufficient hallway space and equipment, as evidenced by resident wheelchairs lined up on both sides of the Hill Top Front Hallway, obstructing a direct walking path. This was observed during a random opportunity for discovery, with the hallway arrangement leaving no clear passage for those walking through. The facility administrator acknowledged the lack of adequate space and direct path during a staff interview. No specific details about individual residents' medical history or conditions at the time of the deficiency were provided in the report.
Non-Operational Ventilation in Laundry and Shower Rooms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment in both the laundry and shower rooms. During an inspection, it was observed that the venting system responsible for maintaining negative pressure in the dirty laundry room was not operational, and the air conditioning unit in the clean laundry room was also non-functional. Housekeeping staff confirmed that the venting system had been out of service for over a month, and the Regional Director of Maintenance acknowledged the issue. The lack of negative pressure in the dirty laundry room could allow microorganisms to transfer into the clean laundry room when the connecting door is opened. In the shower rooms, the venting system was also found to be non-operational, resulting in high humidity and a musty odor. The Regional Maintenance Director confirmed the conditions and stated that repairs were underway. A nursing assistant reported that the venting system in the shower rooms had not been working for over a month. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were notified of the issues with the shower rooms.
Inadequate Ventilation in Shower and Laundry Rooms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate ventilation in both the shower rooms and the dirty laundry room. During an inspection, it was observed that the venting systems in the two shower rooms were not operational, resulting in humid conditions and a musty odor. The shower stall walls had a black substance present, and several shower chairs had a brown substance on the underside of the seats and on the chair legs. Staff interviews confirmed that the venting system in the shower rooms had not been operational for over a month. In the dirty laundry room, the venting system responsible for maintaining negative pressure was also found to be non-functional. This failure potentially allowed the transfer of microorganisms from the dirty laundry room into the clean laundry room whenever the connecting door was opened. Housekeeping staff confirmed that the venting system in the laundry room had not been operational for over a month, and the Regional Director of Maintenance acknowledged the issue during the inspection.
Failure to Provide Palatable, Appealing, and Properly Served Meals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food and drink were palatable, visually appealing, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature, as evidenced by observations, staff and resident interviews, and record reviews. Multiple residents reported that meals were bland, cold, and not served according to their individual preferences. Food was described as lacking seasoning, being overcooked or undercooked, and visually unappealing, with no garnishes or condiments provided. The care plans reviewed did not document residents' dietary preferences, dislikes, or specific modifications, and there were no interventions listed to support resident satisfaction with meals. The dietary manager acknowledged that resident food preferences were not routinely gathered, except during infrequent walk-throughs and committee meetings, and relied on CNAs to relay concerns. Environmental observations in the kitchen revealed poor sanitation, broken equipment, inadequate refrigeration, and lack of ventilation or air conditioning, further compromising food quality and safety. Despite resident complaints about food quality, the facility failed to provide requested test trays for surveyors to assess food temperature, appearance, and taste. The dietary manager admitted to not following up on the delivery of test trays, and the survey team was not notified when trays were placed on the meal cart, resulting in the trays not being received. Staff interviews confirmed the oversight, and the facility administrator acknowledged the breakdown in communication. These failures were observed for all five residents reviewed for food satisfaction, with a facility census of 87.
Failure to Provide Transfer/Discharge Notice Prior to Resident Leaving
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the required transfer or discharge notice prior to a resident leaving the facility. During a record review, it was found that there was no documentation of a transfer or discharge notice for a resident who left the facility for a procedure and subsequently went home. When documentation was requested, both the DON and the Administrator confirmed that no transfer or discharge paperwork had been completed for this resident, as staff did not believe it was necessary in this situation. This deficiency was identified for one of two residents reviewed for closed records related to hospitalization and discharge.
Improper Disposal of Garbage and Refuse
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed improper disposal of garbage and refuse in multiple areas of the facility. In the kitchen, boxes and trash were found on the floor next to an overflowing trash can, and expired food containers were stacked on the side sink counter during lunch preparation. In the dumpster area, three dumpsters were inspected: one had a broken tree branch protruding from the drainage pipe, blocking drainage; another had a garbage bag and used clear gloves scattered on the ground behind it; and a third had a plastic garbage bag with trash protruding from the drainage pipe, also blocking drainage. Staff interviews confirmed that the kitchen trash can was overflowing and that expired food was awaiting disposal, and the Kitchen Account Manager acknowledged the issues in the dumpster area, stating she was unaware of the blocked drains and that the littered gloves were not from the kitchen.
Latest citations in West Virginia
The facility failed to prevent accident hazards and adequately supervise residents when two residents obtained cannabis gummies and CBD products via DoorDash, kept them in a bedside box with vape pens and OTC medications, and offered gummies to another resident, resulting in altered mental status, red eyes, paranoia, and ER transfers without a documented thorough investigation by administration. In a separate incident, a resident with decision-making capacity reportedly used a vape in a room with an active oxygen concentrator and refused a room search, leaving a potential fire hazard unresolved. Additional observations showed that a resident care planned for bilateral fall mats was in bed with one mat propped against the wall instead of on the floor, and another high-fall-risk resident was in bed with the bed not in the lowest position as required by the care plan, with staff confirming these fall-prevention interventions were not in place.
Two residents were not protected from neglect when one was left overnight in a soiled brief despite requests for incontinence care, resulting in raw, excoriated skin to the sacrum and scrotum, and another was served a grilled cheese sandwich despite an order for a mechanical soft diet, causing coughing before the tray was replaced. Staff interviews and documentation confirmed that the first resident had not been changed during the night and that prior skin assessments showed no issues, while the second resident’s diet order and the facility’s nutrition manual identified grilled sandwiches as inappropriate for a mechanical soft diet; neither incident was entered into the facility’s reportables or grievance systems.
The facility failed to accurately post daily nurse staffing information, with incorrect dates, unclear corrections, and mismatched total hours worked on most reviewed days. The daily staffing sheet was not readily visible on entry and, when located, contained multiple discrepancies between posted staffing and actual time-punch records. During one night shift, the posted sheet listed more LPNs and NAs than were actually present, with one NA found sleeping and another conducting personal business on a laptop in the breakroom, while one NA was assigned 1:1 to a resident, leaving two NAs to care for the remaining residents. These issues were confirmed through record review, observation, and staff interviews.
The facility failed to ensure adequate nursing staff on all shifts, leading to prolonged call light response times and unmet care needs. Multiple residents reported waiting from 45 minutes to several hours for assistance, including toileting and incontinence care, and described staff leaving the floor during smoke breaks and meal tray pass, leaving minimal coverage. Staffing records showed nursing HPPD below required minimums on at least one reviewed day, and an external report flagged low weekend staffing. One resident reported being left overnight in a soiled brief while having diarrhea, later found with raw, red skin to the sacral and scrotal areas, and this incident was not documented as a grievance or reportable event. A night-shift observation also revealed fewer staff on duty than posted, with one NA sleeping and another conducting personal business, while only two NAs were left to care for more than fifty residents.
Surveyors found that residents were not provided a way to file anonymous grievances and reported fear of retaliation for making complaints. During a Resident Council meeting, multiple residents stated they had no anonymous grievance option and felt their concerns raised in council were not taken seriously. The Social Worker confirmed there was no anonymous grievance mechanism and that residents and families had to request grievance forms from nursing or department heads, despite a written policy stating that residents and representatives have the right to file grievances orally or in writing and that staff will make prompt efforts to resolve them.
Two residents did not receive care according to physician orders and professional standards. One resident with a documented right hand contracture had orders and a care plan directing splinting of the left, functional hand, and surveyors observed the contracted right hand tightly fisted without a splint in place; the OT and DON later confirmed the order should have been for the right hand. Another resident with an order for Humalog Kwikpen requiring the provider to be called for blood sugar (BS) readings over 400 had multiple BS values above 400 documented on the MAR, but there was no documentation that the provider was notified on those occasions, which was confirmed by an RN consultant.
Surveyors identified multiple failures to follow food safety and sanitation policies, including soiled food service equipment, outdated and improperly labeled food items, and inadequate documentation of manual ware washing procedures. Personal items such as employee coats were stored on bread racks, and trash bins were placed on the same shelves as milk containers on beverage carts used for residents. These observations showed that staff did not consistently maintain clean food preparation areas, properly label and date TCS foods, or separate trash and personal belongings from food and food-contact surfaces.
The facility did not follow its own food safety and sanitation policies requiring trash to be contained in covered, leak-proof containers. During a kitchen walkthrough with the Director of Dining Services (DDS), a surveyor observed an uncovered trash can next to the juice machine and another uncovered trash can in the dish room. The DDS confirmed that these trash receptacles lacked lids, contrary to Healthcare Services Group (HCSG) policies that require the DDS to ensure appropriate lids are provided for all containers.
Two residents reported and staff observed sexually inappropriate behavior by a male resident, including entering a resident’s room uninvited while naked from the waist down and pulling on her in bed, and placing his hands under another resident’s blanket and rubbing near and on her private area. Both residents described the contact as unwanted, and one was documented as cognitively intact with capacity. Despite staff corroboration and resident statements to clinical providers, the facility’s investigations concluded that sexual abuse was not substantiated, citing lack of physical harm and inconsistent statements, and failed to adequately assess or address whether the residents felt safe or to alleviate their expressed anxiety.
The facility failed to ensure food was palatable, attractive, and maintained at a safe and appetizing temperature, as shown by tray temperature checks and interviews with several residents and staff. At lunchtime, kitchen staff were not taking or recording temperatures for items on the always-available menu, including beef patties, hotdogs, and brown gravy, before meal service began. The DDS acknowledged that temperatures for these always-available menu items were not being monitored or documented.
Failure to Control Resident Access to Non-Prescribed Substances and Implement Fall-Prevention Measures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an environment as free from accident hazards as possible and did not provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents, particularly related to resident access to non-prescribed substances and implementation of fall-prevention measures. An anonymous resident reported that two female residents purchased cannabis gummies via DoorDash and offered them to another resident, who refused. These two residents were later sent to the hospital after one was noticeably impaired. Record review showed no investigation documented in the facility’s reportable or grievance logs regarding these residents’ changes in condition due to cannabis gummies being brought into the facility and offered to other residents. Nursing documentation for one of the involved residents described a change in condition with altered mental status, suspicion of substance abuse, and tachycardia, leading to transfer to the ER for evaluation and toxicology screening. A late-entry note indicated the resident was educated on facility policies prohibiting OTC medications and CBD products in the room. Another nursing note detailed that a CNA reported a resident had consumed a gummy given by another resident, then discarded the second gummy, which the CNA retrieved from the trash. On assessment, the resident was found lying in bed with reddened eyes, reporting feeling tired, and vital signs were obtained. The resident stated she had consumed “pot gummies” and allowed the nurse to inspect a wooden box at the bedside, which contained several red sugar-coated gummies, three vape pens (including a suspected CBD vape pen), a bottle of Benadryl, and several Imodium tablets. The resident reported purchasing the gummies and CBD vape pen from DoorDash, and the items were removed with her consent. Further documentation showed that another nurse was informed that two residents had consumed an unknown gummy-like substance. On assessment, one resident had very red eyes and reported feeling paranoid, with vital signs recorded. This resident stated she had received two gummies from another resident and that a third resident knew about the gummies. The nurse interviewed the third resident, who reported that the resident supplying the gummies had told her she had gummies and THC pens and planned to give gummies to another resident. The nurse also noted that as staff were going to check on the resident who supplied the gummies, a DoorDash delivery person arrived and handed a bag to the nurse containing a pack of cigarettes and a receipt showing two CBD purchases. Facility administration had no evidence that a thorough investigation into this incident had been completed, and only limited action was taken following the event, leading surveyors to identify an immediate jeopardy situation due to residents being susceptible to drug abuse from other residents. The facility also failed to address other accident hazards and fall-prevention interventions for additional residents. One resident, who had capacity to make her own medical decisions, was involved in an incident where she reportedly used a vape in her room while an oxygen concentrator was present and turned on. The resident was verbally educated by the Administrator about the dangers of vaping near oxygen equipment, the smoking policy requiring smoking paraphernalia to be stored by nursing staff, and the prohibition of vaping inside the facility. However, during the survey period it remained unknown whether the resident still had vape pens in her possession, and she refused a room search, leaving a possible serious fire hazard unresolved at the time of review. In separate observations related to fall prevention, one resident was observed lying in bed with a fall mat that was supposed to be in place on the floor instead leaned against the wall behind the headboard. Record review confirmed the care plan required fall mats on both sides of the bed while the resident was in bed, and an LPN acknowledged that the floor mat was not in place. Another resident, care planned as at risk for falls due to multiple factors including muscle weakness, cognitive impairment, incontinence, psychoactive medication use, recent hospitalizations, visual impairment, and a history of traumatic brain injury and multiple CVAs, was observed lying in bed with the bed not in the low position despite a care plan intervention specifying that the bed should be in the lowest position. A RN consultant confirmed that the bed was not in the lowest position while the resident was in bed.
Failure to Prevent Neglect in Incontinence Care and Diet Texture Management
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves failure to protect residents from neglect by not providing timely incontinence care and by not providing the correct diet texture. One resident reported during interview that he had been left overnight without his brief being changed while experiencing diarrhea, despite requesting to be changed. Two CNAs separately stated that when they saw the resident the following morning, he reported not having been changed all night, that aides had come in only to change his roommate and then left, and that his skin was "raw," "pretty bad," and red. Both CNAs reported the condition of his skin to an LPN, and an order was written later that day for wound care to excoriated sacrum and scrotum every shift. Prior skin assessments from earlier in the month documented no issues to the sacrum or scrotum, and the incident was not found in the facility’s reportables or grievances. The Administrator confirmed that, if accurate, this situation would constitute neglect under the facility’s abuse policy, which defines neglect as failure to provide necessary goods and services to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. A second deficiency concerns failure to provide the correct food texture to another resident who had an active diet order for mechanical soft texture. Progress notes document that this resident was served a grilled cheese sandwich on a dinner tray, which she began to eat before an NA noticed and removed the tray. The resident coughed a few times and then was fine, and the NA obtained another tray with food the resident could eat without problem. The resident’s diet order specified mechanical soft foods, and the facility’s Diet and Nutrition Care Manual lists grilled sandwiches as foods to avoid on a mechanical soft diet. A nurse consultant later confirmed that this incident occurred as documented and that it was not reported.
Failure to Accurately Post Daily Nurse Staffing Information
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to accurately post daily nurse staffing information in a prominent, accurate manner as required, with inaccuracies identified on 22 of 23 reviewed days. Upon surveyor entrance, the daily nurse staffing sheet was not readily visible and was ultimately located on a wall near the nurse’s station. Review of posted staffing sheets and time punch detail reports revealed multiple discrepancies, including incorrect dates on several postings and numerous errors in the total hours worked for various dates. On some days, corrections were written over original entries, making it impossible to clearly determine the actual number of nurse aides working or the correct total hours. In several instances, the posted total hours did not match the actual hours worked as shown on time detail reports, with both understatements and overstatements of staffing hours documented. During a nighttime observation, the posted staffing sheet listed two LPNs, three NAs, and zero RNs on duty, but a visual count showed only one LPN and two NAs actually present, with no RN. One NA was found sleeping on duty upon arrival, and another NA was in the breakroom with a makeshift office setup using a table, laptop, battery charger, and large rolling briefcase. It was later learned that one NA was assigned 1:1 to a resident, leaving two NAs to cover the remaining 56 residents. When questioned, an LPN stated that another LPN listed on the staffing sheet had called in sick due to pregnancy. These observations and documentation reviews were discussed with the Regional Director of Operations and an RN consultant, confirming that the posted staffing information did not accurately reflect the actual staffing levels and hours worked on multiple dates.
Insufficient Staffing Leading to Delayed Care and Resident Neglect
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide sufficient nursing staff on all shifts to meet residents’ needs, resulting in delayed responses to call lights and inadequate incontinence care. During a resident council meeting, multiple residents reported waiting 1–3 hours for call lights to be answered, with staff sometimes stating they would return but not coming back for hours, and some residents reporting staff said they had been outside smoking with a resident. Individual resident interviews corroborated these concerns, with residents stating that night shift took a long time to answer call lights, that it could take 45 minutes to an hour or more to receive assistance, and that staff would delay changing residents during meal tray pass or after a scheduled smoke break when most aides and a nurse accompanied residents outside, leaving only one nurse to cover the floor. Staffing record reviews for specific dates showed Hours Per Patient Day (HPPD) below the minimum required 2.25 on at least one day, and the facility’s CASPER report triggered for low weekend staffing. A specific incident of neglect was identified for one resident who reported being left overnight in a soiled brief while experiencing diarrhea, despite requesting to be changed. Two CNAs independently stated that when they saw this resident the following morning, he reported not having been changed all night, and both described his skin as raw, bad, and red; one CNA stated she had changed him the previous day and that he reported no changes overnight, and both CNAs reported the condition to an LPN, who then notified an RN, leading to a wound care order for excoriation to the sacrum and scrotum. Prior skin assessments earlier in the month showed no issues in those areas, and the incident was not documented in reportables or grievances. Additionally, a night-shift observation found a discrepancy between the posted staffing sheet and actual staff present: the sheet listed two LPNs, three NAs, and no RNs, but only one LPN and two NAs were observed, with one NA found sleeping on duty and another engaged in personal business on a laptop, while a third NA was assigned 1:1 to a resident, leaving two NAs to cover 56 other residents. The administrator confirmed that the described incontinence incident would constitute neglect if accurate.
Failure to Provide Anonymous Grievance Process and Protect Residents From Fear of Retaliation
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified that the facility failed to honor residents’ rights to voice grievances without fear of reprisal and to provide a method for anonymous grievance submission. During a Resident Council meeting attended by 11 residents, residents reported they had no way to file an anonymous grievance, did not want to report complaints due to fear of retaliation, and felt that concerns raised in Resident Council were not taken seriously. An interview with the Social Worker confirmed there was no method for anonymous grievances and that residents and family members had to request a grievance form from a nurse or department head. Review of the facility’s Grievances/Complaints policy showed that residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances orally or in writing with facility staff or the designated agency, and that the Administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances, but the facility’s actual practice did not provide an anonymous option or alleviate residents’ fear of retaliation. This deficiency involved at least one identified resident (Resident #22) and the broader resident group, who reported barriers to exercising their grievance rights and lack of confidence that their concerns raised in Resident Council would be addressed, in contrast to the facility’s written grievance policy.
Failure to Follow Splinting and Blood Glucose Notification Orders
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards and physician orders for two residents. For one resident with a documented right hand contracture, surveyors observed that the right hand was tightly fisted and that no splinting device was in place. Record review showed active orders to apply and remove a splint to the left hand every night shift for mobility, and the care plan directed left hand splinting as ordered, despite the medical record listing a diagnosis of a right hand contracture. During interviews, the occupational therapist confirmed the splinting order should have been for the right hand, and the Director of Nursing confirmed that both the orders and care plan were written to place a splint on the resident’s functional hand instead of the contracted hand. For another resident with an order for Humalog Kwikpen, the physician’s order specified to hold the medication for blood sugar (BS) less than 100 and to call the provider for BS over 400. Review of the Medication Administration Record for March and April showed multiple dates on which the resident’s blood sugar exceeded 400. The facility was unable to provide documentation that the provider was contacted on those dates when the blood sugar was over 400, as required by the order. A registered nurse consultant confirmed that, according to the documentation, the provider was not notified when the resident’s blood sugar readings were over 400 on the identified dates.
Food Storage and Sanitation Deficiencies in Dietary Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with its own food safety and sanitation policies and professional standards. During an initial kitchen walkthrough, the surveyor, accompanied by the Director of Dining Services, observed multiple sanitation and storage issues, including a juice machine top soiled with debris, crumbs in the toaster tray, and a soiled microwave in the pantry. In the dry storage room, there was an opened, outdated brownie mix past its use-by date, and employee coats were found hanging on the bread rack. In the walk-in cooler, a case of bacon lacked an open or use-by date, and the meat slicer, though covered, had old food debris on and around the blade. The three-compartment sink log for that morning’s breakfast lacked recorded water temperature and sanitizer concentration, contrary to policy requirements for monitoring and documenting manual ware washing. Additional observations showed improper handling and storage of food and related items outside the main kitchen. A beverage in the pantry refrigerator was not labeled or dated. During a dining observation, beverage carts for two halls had trash bins placed on the same shelf as milk containers intended for residents. On a subsequent day, an employee’s coat was again found hanging on the bread rack, despite prior identification of this issue. These findings demonstrated that staff did not consistently follow facility policies requiring clean, sanitary food preparation and service areas, proper labeling and dating of TCS foods, and appropriate separation of personal items and trash from food and food-contact surfaces.
Uncovered Trash Receptacles in Food Service Areas
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional food safety standards and did not follow proper sanitation practices for food preparation equipment, with the potential to affect all 60 residents. Healthcare Services Group (HCSG) Policy #28 requires all trash to be contained in covered, leak-proof containers to prevent cross-contamination, and HCSG Policy #30 requires the Dining Services Director to ensure appropriate lids are provided for all containers. During an initial kitchen walkthrough with the Director of Dining Services (DDS), the surveyor observed that the trash can beside the juice machine had no lid and that the trash can in the dish room also had no lid. The DDS confirmed both observations and acknowledged that there was no lid available for the dish room trash can.
Failure to Substantiate and Address Resident Sexual Abuse Allegations
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to appropriately use investigation results and residents’ reports to determine and substantiate sexual abuse allegations involving one male resident and two female residents. In the first incident, a cognitively intact resident reported that she awoke in her bed to find a male resident in her room, uninvited, naked from the waist down and pulling on her leg, and stated she thought he was going to try to rape her. Staff responding to her yelling found the male resident in her room wearing only a t‑shirt, with no brief or pants, and the resident told staff to remove him from her room. During examination by an NP, she again reported that a man came into her room and pulled her down in bed. Despite these observations and statements, the facility’s Five‑Day Follow‑Up report concluded that allegations of sexual abuse were not substantiated, and the facility’s position, as verified by the Administrator, was that no physical harm was done, which was the basis for not substantiating sexual abuse. The facility did not adequately evaluate whether this resident felt safe or address her expressed anxiety about the incident. In the second incident, another cognitively intact resident with a BIMS score of 14 and a physician determination of capacity reported sexual abuse by the same male resident. A CNA witnessed the male resident’s hands under this resident’s blanket, rubbing close to her private parts, and when staff intervened and asked if he had touched her private area, she stated yes. During the facility’s investigation, the resident told the Social Worker and Administrator that the male resident rubbed her private area and that she believed the contact was intentional, and she also told her attending physician that he had touched her private area. When later seen by a psychologist, she voiced no recollection of the event. The facility’s Five‑Day Follow‑Up report stated that sexual abuse could not be substantiated due to inconsistency in statements, and the Administrator confirmed that the male resident had touched her but asserted it was accidental while rubbing her leg under the blanket. The facility failed to recognize and address this resident’s expression of anxiety about the unwanted touching and did not adequately evaluate whether she felt safe, leaving her and other residents vulnerable during and after the investigative process.
Failure to Monitor and Record Food Temperatures for Always-Available Menu Items
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food and drink were palatable, attractive, and maintained at a safe and appetizing temperature, as evidenced by food tray temperatures, resident interviews, and staff interviews involving four identified residents (#47, #33, #42, and #9) out of a census of 60. On 4/28/26 at 12:00 PM, it was observed that kitchen staff were not taking and recording temperatures for items on the always-available menu prior to the start of the lunch meal service. Specifically, beef patties, hotdogs, and brown gravy did not have recorded temperatures before meal service began. The Director of Dining Services acknowledged that temperatures for always-available menu items were not being taken or recorded. No additional medical history or specific clinical conditions of the involved residents were provided in the report.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 24, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
