Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at River's Bend Health Services during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors found that the facility did not follow its abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy requiring pre-employment background screening when hiring a CNA. The policy mandates documented background, reference, and credential checks, including DOJ and Governmental Findings reports, before hire. For one CNA, the only DOJ and Governmental Findings reports available were dated the same day the surveyor requested them, well after the CNA’s hire date. The BOM reported being unable to locate any earlier reports or receipts showing that checks had been requested before hire, and the NHA confirmed that no such documentation existed.
An allegation that a cognitively impaired resident with dementia, CKD with heart failure, anxiety, and depression did not receive care from a CNA during a specific shift was reported internally to the NHA but was not reported to the State Agency as required by the facility’s abuse/neglect policy. The policy mandates reporting all alleged violations to the SA and other agencies within defined timeframes, yet the NHA stated the allegation was not reported because it was believed to be a miscommunication issue.
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation that a CNA did not provide care to a resident with dementia, chronic kidney disease with heart failure, anxiety, and depression, who had severely impaired cognition and an activated POA. The investigation, initiated after an RN’s emailed allegation, consisted of a limited number of summarized staff interviews, one interview with the resident’s POA, and an investigative narrative by the NHA, but did not include interviews with other residents to identify similar concerns or staff education on neglect, and no additional documentation was produced when requested.
A resident with intact cognition reported that two staff members argued and used threatening language during a medical transport, then instructed the resident not to tell anyone. The incident was reported to facility staff, but no follow-up or investigation occurred, and the required report to the State Agency was not made, contrary to facility policy and regulations.
A resident with intact cognition reported that two staff members argued and used vulgar language during a medical transport, then threatened the resident not to report the incident. The facility did not initiate or document an investigation into the abuse allegation, despite its policy requiring immediate action and thorough documentation.
A resident with multiple medical conditions and a history of falls was found to have a room with sticky floors, stains, and debris that were not cleaned in a timely or thorough manner, despite facility policy and staff training requiring regular and complete cleaning. Housekeeping staff failed to move furniture or address spills and dirt as expected, and the issue persisted even after an attempted cleaning.
A resident with multiple health conditions experienced a fall while walking with a CNA, resulting in an abrasion. The facility's policy requires notifying the POAHC after such incidents, but the LPN confirmed that only the Hospice agency was informed. The NHA stated that the POAHC should have been notified within several hours.
A resident's care plan was not individualized or updated following a fall and changes in condition. The plan lacked specific details on the level of assistance needed for ADLs, particularly dining, and did not incorporate the interdisciplinary team's recommendation for two staff to assist during ambulation. The resident had a history of dementia, stroke, and heart failure, with intact cognition.
The facility failed to provide substantial evening snacks, resulting in a gap of over 14 hours between supper and breakfast. Residents, including those with diabetes, expressed concerns about the lack of a snack cart or pass, and staff confirmed the absence of a structured snack system. The Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged the deficiency and the need for a snack pass.
The facility failed to store and prepare food safely, with unlabeled, undated, and expired items found in the 300 unit refrigerator. The temperature log was blank, and milk and juice were not kept cold during lunch service, exceeding safe temperature limits. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the need for proper temperature control.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program, as staff did not wear PPE during high-contact care for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, and unbagged soiled linens were transported through hallways. The lack of appropriate signage and adherence to linen handling policies were confirmed by the Infection Preventionist and Director of Nursing.
The facility failed to properly store and label medications, resulting in an unlocked medication cart, expired medications and supplies in storage areas, and an undated inhaler administered to a resident. These deficiencies were confirmed by staff and the DON, highlighting lapses in adherence to the facility's medication storage policy.
A resident was allowed to self-administer medication without a physician's order or assessment, as required by the facility's policy. A nurse assumed the resident had the necessary order due to their cognitive status, but this was not verified. The DON confirmed the need for a physician's order and assessment for self-administration.
The facility failed to monitor and communicate significant weight changes for two residents. One resident, with severe cognitive impairment and on tube feeding, experienced a significant weight gain without physician notification. Another resident, with multiple health conditions and on diuretics, had inconsistent weight monitoring and significant weight fluctuations without re-weights or physician notification.
A facility failed to maintain a CPAP/BiPAP machine for a resident with obstructive sleep apnea according to policy and manufacturer's guidelines. The resident reported the machine had not been cleaned in months, and there was no documented cleaning schedule or instructions in the medical record. Staff interviews revealed confusion about cleaning responsibilities, and a gallon of distilled water was found on the floor in the resident's room.
The facility did not ensure two residents received and signed necessary Medicare coverage notices. One resident did not receive an ABN form when Medicare benefits ended, and there was no evidence of being informed about private pay costs. Another resident received the NOMNC form only one day before Medicare coverage ended, instead of the required two days. This resulted in inadequate notification of financial responsibilities and appeal rights.
The facility failed to provide adequate transfer notices to three residents who were hospitalized. A resident with intact cognition was transferred without a written notice, while another resident received notice for only one of two hospitalizations. A third resident with severe cognitive impairment had an unsigned transfer notice. The facility's policy requires signed and dated notices, which was not adhered to.
The facility failed to provide bed hold notifications to three residents or their representatives upon hospital transfers, as required by policy. One resident with intact cognition and another with severe cognitive impairment did not receive proper notifications, confirmed by staff interviews and record reviews.
Failure to Complete and Document Pre-Employment Background Check for CNA
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to implement its Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy regarding required pre-employment background screening for one CNA. The written policy, revised 7/15/22, states that potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property, and that background, reference, and credential checks will be conducted and documented for potential employees and other specified personnel. During surveyor review on 1/28/26, the facility was asked to provide background check information, including Department of Justice (DOJ) and Governmental Findings reports, for eight staff members. For CNA-C, who was hired on 7/9/25, the DOJ and Governmental Findings reports provided to the surveyor were dated 1/28/26, the same day the surveyor requested them, rather than prior to the hire date. The Business Office Manager reported being unable to locate prior DOJ and Governmental Findings reports for CNA-C and stated that new reports were requested that day. The Business Office Manager believed a thorough background check had been completed by a previous human resources staff member but could not locate the required documentation or any receipt showing that the checks were requested before CNA-C’s hire. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the facility did not have a receipt for DOJ and Governmental Findings reports requested for CNA-C prior to hire and acknowledged awareness that the reports could not be found.
Failure to Report Alleged Neglect to State Agency
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to report an allegation of neglect to the State Agency (SA) as required by its Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy. The policy, revised 7/15/22, states that the facility will designate a leadership position responsible for reporting allegations or suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation to the state Survey Agency and other officials, and that all alleged violations must be reported to the Administrator, State Agency, Adult Protective Services, and other required agencies within specified timeframes. The policy further specifies that allegations involving abuse or serious bodily injury must be reported immediately but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, and all other reportable events must be reported not later than 24 hours, with final investigation results reported within five working days as required by state agencies. For one sampled resident (R1), an allegation of neglect involving a CNA (CNA-E) on 12/23/25 between 2:00 PM and 9:00 PM was reported internally to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA-A) but was not reported to the SA. R1 had dementia, chronic kidney disease with heart failure, anxiety, and depression, and a recent MDS dated 12/18/25 showed a BIMS score of 0/15, indicating severely impaired cognition; R1 also had an activated POA. On 1/28/26, the surveyor requested the facility’s report to the SA regarding the allegation that R1 did not receive care from CNA-E during the specified time period and was unable to interview R1 due to cognitive impairment. During an interview on the same day, NHA-A acknowledged not reporting the allegation of neglect to the SA and stated the belief that reporting was unnecessary because the facility had determined the incident was a miscommunication issue.
Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Allegation of Neglect
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of neglect involving one resident and a CNA. The facility’s Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, revised 7/15/22, requires that a designated leader report allegations of abuse or neglect to the state agency and that immediate investigations occur when allegations or suspicions arise. An allegation was made that on 12/23/25, between 2:00 PM and 9:00 PM, a CNA did not provide care to a resident. The resident had dementia, chronic kidney disease with heart failure, anxiety, depression, and a BIMS score of 0/15 indicating severely impaired cognition, and had an activated POA. On 1/28/26, the surveyor reviewed the facility’s investigation, which consisted of an emailed allegation from an RN, four summarized staff interviews, one summarized interview with the resident’s POA, and an investigative narrative written by the NHA. The investigation did not include interviews with additional residents to determine if others had similar concerns and did not include staff education related to neglect. The surveyor was unable to interview the resident due to cognitive impairment. During interview, the NHA stated they believed staff education had been provided and additional residents had been interviewed, but no proof of these actions was provided, and the NHA indicated the facility had determined the incident was a miscommunication issue.
Failure to Report Alleged Staff-to-Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse to the State Agency as required by both facility policy and state and federal regulations. A resident, who had intact cognition and was their own decision maker, reported that during a medical transport, two staff members argued with each other, used vulgar language, and then yelled at the resident in a threatening manner not to disclose the incident. The resident reported this event to facility staff but did not receive any follow-up or investigation regarding the allegation. Upon review, the facility's grievance file did not contain any documentation related to the resident's report of abuse. Interviews with the Director of Nursing confirmed that the incident was reported to the former Nursing Home Administrator, but there was no evidence that the required report to the State Agency was made. The current Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged that the allegation should have been reported in accordance with policy and regulations, but it was not.
Failure to Investigate Alleged Staff-to-Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse involving one resident. The resident, who had intact cognition and was their own decision maker, reported that during transportation to a physician appointment, two staff members argued, yelled at each other using vulgar language, and then yelled at the resident in a threatening manner not to disclose the incident. The resident reported feeling uncomfortable and informed facility staff of the incident. However, there was no evidence in the facility's grievance file of an investigation into the allegation, and the Director of Nursing confirmed that while the incident was reported to the former Nursing Home Administrator, there was no further information or documentation regarding an investigation. Upon review, the current Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged that an investigation should have been initiated after the resident's report, and that the involved staff should have been suspended pending the outcome. The facility's own policy required immediate and thorough investigation of abuse allegations, including interviews and documentation, but these steps were not followed. The lack of investigation and documentation constituted a failure to respond appropriately to the reported abuse allegation.
Failure to Maintain Clean and Safe Resident Room Environment
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident's room was not maintained in a safe, clean, and comfortable condition as required by facility policy. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis, heart failure with pericardial effusion, COPD, and anxiety, and who had experienced multiple falls due to weakness, reported that housekeeping staff did not clean the room daily and that the floor had been sticky for several days. Direct observation by the surveyor confirmed the presence of sticky floors, brown stains, dirt, and debris near the bed, in the corners, and behind the recliner. The resident pointed out a food spill that had remained for several days, and after housekeeping staff mopped the floor, the surveyor noted that the sticky condition and debris persisted, especially in areas not moved or cleaned under furniture. Interviews with housekeeping staff and the housekeeping manager revealed that staff were trained to recognize environmental hazards such as spills and sticky floors and were expected to move furniture and thoroughly clean all areas, including under beds and behind recliners. Despite this, the cleaning performed was incomplete, and the floor was not cleaned according to policy or training. The housekeeping manager confirmed that the floor was not cleaned to expectations and required re-cleaning. Other staff, including CNAs, indicated that floors should always be clean and that they had received training on environmental hazards, but the deficiency persisted in this instance.
Failure to Notify POAHC After Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify a resident's Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) in a timely manner following a fall incident. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, ischemic stroke, pulmonary hypertension, and chronic diastolic heart failure, experienced a witnessed fall while walking with a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). The fall resulted in the resident being lowered to the floor and sustaining an abrasion on the upper back. Despite the facility's Fall Prevention and Management Guidelines policy requiring notification of the physician and family/responsible party after a fall, the POAHC was not informed. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) responsible for completing the incident report confirmed that the POAHC was not notified, although the resident's Hospice agency was informed. The Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged that nursing staff should report such incidents to the POAHC within several hours.
Failure to Update and Individualize Resident Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to individualize and update the comprehensive care plan for a resident, identified as R2, following a fall and changes in their condition. R2's care plan did not specify the level of assistance required for activities of daily living (ADLs), particularly in dining, despite the resident's self-reported weight loss and varied intake since admission. Additionally, after a fall on December 4, 2024, where R2 was lowered to the floor by a CNA due to their hips giving out, the care plan was not updated to reflect the interdisciplinary team's recommendation for two staff members to assist R2 during ambulation. R2's medical history includes dementia, ischemic stroke, pulmonary hypertension, and chronic diastolic heart failure, with intact cognition as per the Minimum Data Set assessment. The Power of Attorney for Healthcare was activated prior to the fall incident. Despite the facility's policies requiring care plan updates following a fall or change in condition, R2's care plan remained unchanged, lacking specific interventions for fall prevention and dining assistance. This oversight was confirmed through interviews with R2's Power of Attorney for Healthcare and the Nursing Home Administrator.
Failure to Provide Substantial Evening Snacks
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to consistently provide or offer a substantial evening snack to residents, resulting in a gap of more than 14 hours between the supper and breakfast meals. This deficiency was identified through resident and staff interviews, which revealed that the facility did not have a regular snack cart or snack pass. The Dietary Manager acknowledged that while staff could enter the kitchen to make a sandwich or retrieve a snack upon request, there was no structured system in place to ensure snacks were regularly offered to residents. Several residents, including those with diabetes mellitus, expressed concerns during a Resident Council interview about the lack of an evening snack cart or snack pass. One resident mentioned that they sometimes experienced low blood sugar in the evening and had to rely on busy CNAs to fetch a snack from the kitchen. Another resident confirmed the absence of a snack pass and noted that they had not seen sandwiches or cookies available for some time, leading them to use vending machines for snacks. A third resident mentioned purchasing their own snacks but expressed a desire for snacks to be offered by the facility. Staff interviews corroborated the residents' concerns, with staff members stating that they had to go to the kitchen to find snacks for residents, which was challenging due to their busy schedules. The Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged the lack of a snack policy and the regulation requiring no more than 14 hours between meal times. The administrator verified that the facility should be completing a snack pass for residents, highlighting the gap in the current system.
Food Storage and Temperature Control Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner, as observed during a survey. The 300 unit refrigerator was found to be in an unclean condition, with items that were not labeled, dated, or were expired. The temperature log for the refrigerator was blank, indicating a lack of monitoring. Various food items, including bran flakes, bagels, apple juice, lemon water, pudding, watermelon, yogurt, and summer sausage, were found unlabeled, undated, or expired. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the refrigerator should be cleaned, and all items should be labeled and dated, with expired food discarded. However, there was no process in place for cleaning the refrigerator or disposing of resident food. Additionally, during lunch service, milk and juice were not maintained at the required cold temperature. The drink cart used for lunch service contained milk and juices in a bin of ice, but the items were not fully submerged. As a result, the temperature of the milk and juice exceeded the safe limit of 41 degrees Fahrenheit. The milk was recorded at 46.2 degrees Fahrenheit, and the apple juice at 49.2 degrees Fahrenheit. These temperatures were verified by a Certified Nursing Assistant who confirmed that the drink cart arrived before the meal cart, and the 600 unit was the last to receive meal trays. The Dietary Manager was informed of the drink temperatures post-service and acknowledged that cold drinks and food should remain under 41 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility's failure to maintain proper food storage and temperature control practices was in violation of the Wisconsin Food Code, which requires ready-to-eat, potentially hazardous food to be date-marked and stored at appropriate temperatures. This deficiency had the potential to affect more than four of the 69 residents residing in the facility.
Infection Control Deficiencies in PPE Use and Linen Handling
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by two specific incidents. In the first incident, a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to a permacath did not have appropriate signage outside their room, and staff did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE) during high-contact care activities. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed assisting the resident with dressing without wearing PPE, despite the presence of a PPE cart outside the room. The Infection Preventionist and Director of Nursing confirmed that PPE should have been worn and signage should have been posted. In the second incident, a CNA was observed transporting unbagged soiled linens through a resident hallway, contrary to the facility's contracted service policy, which requires contaminated laundry to be bagged at the point of collection. The CNA acknowledged the error, and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility did not have its own policy for transporting linens, relying instead on the contracted service's policy, which was not being followed.
Medication Storage and Labeling Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled according to their policy, leading to several deficiencies. One of the medication carts was found unlocked and unattended in the 100 wing hallway, which was confirmed by both an LPN and the Director of Nursing (DON) as a violation of the facility's policy that requires medication carts to be locked when not in use or attended by authorized personnel. Additionally, expired medications and medical supplies were found in three of the five medication carts and two of the three medication storage rooms. These included various medications and supplies with past expiration dates, such as insulin syringes, supplements, and medical equipment. The presence of these expired items was verified by multiple staff members, including medication technicians and LPNs, and acknowledged by the DON, who stated that staff are expected to regularly check for expired items. Furthermore, a resident was administered an inhaler that lacked an open date, contrary to the manufacturer's instructions, which specify a disposal timeline after opening. The inhaler was used for a resident with intact cognition and responsible for their healthcare decisions. The absence of an open date was confirmed by the medication technician and the DON, who stated that staff are expected to date medications like insulin, eye drops, and inhalers upon opening.
Failure to Obtain Physician's Order for Self-Administration of Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a physician's order was obtained and a self-administration of medication assessment was completed for a resident who was allowed to self-administer medication. A registered nurse left medication at the resident's bedside for self-administration without verifying the necessary physician's order or assessment. The resident, who was cognitively intact and responsible for their healthcare decisions, did not have documentation in their care plan or a physician's order permitting self-administration of medication. The incident was observed when a registered nurse assumed the resident had an order to self-administer medication due to their cognitive status. However, upon review, it was confirmed that no such order existed. The Director of Nursing confirmed that a physician's order is required for residents to self-administer medication and that nurses should observe medication administration unless an assessment is completed. This oversight led to a deficiency in the facility's compliance with its policy on resident self-administration of medication.
Failure to Monitor and Communicate Significant Weight Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that two residents received the necessary care and services to prevent and monitor significant weight changes. For one resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and was receiving 100% of their nutritional intake via gastrostomy tube feeding, the facility did not notify the resident's physician of a significant weight gain. Despite a recommendation from the Registered Dietician to adjust the tube feeding, the physician was not informed of the resident's weight changes or the dietician's recommendations until the issue was identified by a surveyor. Another resident, who had intact cognition and was diagnosed with morbid obesity, asthma, type 2 diabetes, and edema, had orders for daily weight monitoring due to the use of a diuretic medication. However, the facility failed to consistently monitor the resident's weight, missing 17 weight checks over a period of time. The resident experienced significant weight fluctuations, but no re-weights were obtained, and the physician was not notified of these changes. The Director of Nursing confirmed the oversight in monitoring and communication regarding the resident's weight changes.
Failure to Maintain CPAP/BiPAP Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the CPAP/BiPAP equipment for a resident with obstructive sleep apnea, as per the facility's policy and manufacturer's recommendations. The resident, who had intact cognition, reported that the CPAP/BiPAP machine had not been cleaned in a month or two. The facility's policy required regular cleaning and maintenance of the CPAP/BiPAP equipment, but there was no cleaning schedule or instructions for filling the humidifying chamber documented in the resident's medical record. The resident's medical record indicated that staff should check the resident every two hours during the night and document the use of the CPAP/BiPAP machine, but it lacked specific orders for cleaning the machine. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of clarity and responsibility regarding the cleaning of the CPAP/BiPAP machines. A Licensed Practical Nurse confirmed that licensed staff were responsible for cleaning the machines, typically during the PM shift, but there was no consistent practice in place. A CNA was unsure about who was responsible for cleaning the machines, and the Director of Nursing was also uncertain about who should clean the machine and equipment. Additionally, a gallon of distilled water was observed on the floor in the resident's room, indicating potential issues with the storage and handling of equipment supplies.
Failure to Provide Required Medicare Coverage Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that two residents received and signed the necessary forms to inform them of their Medicare coverage ending and potential financial liability. Resident R223 did not receive a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) form when their Medicare benefits ended, and there was no evidence that R223 or their representative were informed of the facility's private pay costs. R223 remained in the facility under private pay status until their passing. Resident R173 did not receive the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form at least two calendar days before their Medicare services ended, as required. The NOMNC form was signed and dated by R173 only one day before the end of their Medicare Part A coverage. The facility's failure to provide these forms in a timely manner resulted in a lack of proper notification to the residents about their financial responsibilities and appeal rights.
Failure to Provide Adequate Transfer Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely and adequate transfer notices to three residents who were hospitalized. Resident 223, who had intact cognition, was transferred to the hospital due to a change in condition but neither the resident nor their emergency contact received a written transfer notice. Similarly, Resident 20, who also had intact cognition, was hospitalized twice, but only received a written transfer notice for one of the hospitalizations. The facility confirmed that a written transfer notice was not provided for the earlier hospitalization. Resident 70, who had severe cognitive impairment and a professional guardian, was transferred to the hospital following a change in condition. Although a transfer notice was present in the medical record, it was not signed by the resident or their guardian. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that staff are expected to ensure transfer notices are signed and dated, indicating a lapse in the facility's adherence to its own transfer and discharge policy.
Failure to Provide Bed Hold Notifications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide bed hold notifications to three residents or their representatives upon their transfer to the hospital, as required by the facility's Transfer and Discharge policy. This policy mandates that a notice of the resident's bed hold policy be provided at the time of transfer, or as soon as possible, but no later than 24 hours after the transfer. Resident 223 was transferred to the hospital on January 26, 2023, due to a change in condition, but neither the resident nor their emergency contact received a bed hold notification. Similarly, Resident 20, who was hospitalized twice, did not receive a bed hold notice for either transfer, and Resident 70's bed hold and notice of transfer form was incomplete and unsigned. The surveyor's review of medical records and interviews with staff confirmed these deficiencies. Resident 223 had intact cognition with a BIMS score of 13 out of 15, while Resident 20 had a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident 70, who had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 0 out of 15, had a professional guardian to assist with healthcare decisions. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the lack of bed hold notices for Residents 223 and 20, and the Director of Nursing acknowledged the incomplete documentation for Resident 70.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 98 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Manitowoc
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shady Lane Nursing Care Center | 1.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| St Marys Home For The Aged | 1.7 mi | — | 10 | 0 |
| Complete Care At Manitowoc Llc | 1.9 mi | — | 6 | 0 |
| North Ridge Health And Rehabilitation Center | 3.1 mi | — | 20 | 0 |
| Hamilton Health Services | 8.8 mi | — | 12 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for River's Bend Health Services.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.