Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Pine Ridge Post Acute during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with dementia and severe cognitive impairment experienced a fall resulting in a hematoma and nasal fracture. The facility's investigation did not include required interviews with the social worker who reported the fall, the resident's representative present at the time, or all relevant staff, and contained conflicting information about the resident's cognition. This incomplete investigation did not meet the facility's policy for abuse and neglect investigations.
A resident with moderately impaired thinking and at risk of elopement was found away from the facility. A wander alarm was placed on the resident, but the care plan was not updated when the alarm was moved from the ankle to the wheelchair. Staff confirmed the care plan should have been revised to reflect this change.
A resident with moderately impaired thinking and a history of elopement attempts left the facility unsupervised and was found by law enforcement at a store 1.5 miles away. The resident, who used a wheelchair, fell and sustained a knee injury. Staff confirmed the resident's risk for elopement and the unsuitability of leaving unsupervised.
The facility failed to adequately monitor the use of diuretics, anticoagulants, and antibiotics for several residents, as evidenced by the lack of documentation in the MAR/TAR. Staff interviews revealed that monitoring was expected to occur through care plans and alert charting, but this was not consistently documented. Residents on medications such as furosemide, apixaban, and doxycycline were at risk due to insufficient monitoring practices.
The facility failed to routinely check the dishwasher temperature and test the sanitizing solution, as required by professional standards for food service safety. The Dietary Director and Aide admitted to not logging the necessary information due to a lack of test strips, leading to incomplete records. This oversight placed residents at risk for foodborne illness.
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for a resident with a feeding tube, as required by policy. Additionally, clean linens were improperly handled, and medical equipment, including glucometers and vital signs equipment, was not disinfected after use with residents. Staff interviews confirmed lapses in following infection control guidelines.
A facility failed to obtain informed consent before administering psychotropic medications to a resident with depression, insomnia, and anxiety. Despite the facility's policy requiring informed consent, there was no documentation of consent for the prescribed medications, including Trazodone, Sertraline, and Buspirone. Staff interviews confirmed the expectation of obtaining consent, but records showed no evidence of informing the resident or their representative about the risks and benefits.
A resident requiring assistance for bed mobility reported discomfort due to the lack of fitted sheets on their air mattress, leading to sleepless nights. Despite requests, staff cited regulations against fitted sheets, yet observations showed other residents with fitted sheets on similar mattresses. Staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in practices and a lack of awareness of the resident's needs.
A facility failed to ensure a resident's advance directive was properly completed. The resident's DPOA form, signed in 2019, lacked notarization or witness signatures as required by state law. The Social Services Director acknowledged the oversight, noting the resident has a guardian. This failure risked the resident's healthcare preferences not being honored.
A facility failed to provide a written transfer or discharge notice to a resident and/or their representative, as required by regulations. The resident was discharged to an acute hospital twice due to a change in condition, but no documentation of the notice was found in the EHR. Interviews with staff confirmed the absence of the notice, despite the facility's policy requiring it.
A facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to a resident or their representative during a transfer to a hospital, as required by policy. The oversight was confirmed through record reviews and staff interviews, indicating a lapse in following the facility's procedures for informing residents of their rights during transfers.
The facility failed to accurately assess two residents' MDS, leading to omissions and inaccuracies. One resident's antibiotic use was not recorded, and another's MDS inaccurately marked surgical wound care. These errors were acknowledged by the MDS Coordinator, highlighting deficiencies in the assessment process.
A facility failed to complete a PASARR Level I for a resident with major depressive disorder, as the form did not indicate a mood disorder despite the resident's diagnosis and prescription for antidepressants. The Social Services Director admitted the oversight, and a new PASARR was only completed 22 days after admission, delaying necessary evaluations.
A facility failed to notify the State PASARR Coordinator after a resident with SMI experienced a significant change in condition, including electing hospice services and being certified with a terminal illness. Despite the facility's policy requiring notification, staff did not inform the state authorities, placing the resident at risk for unmet care needs.
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for two residents, leading to unmet care needs. One resident had incomplete plans for skin, pain, vision, antibiotic use, and urostomy, while another resident with diabetes and blindness had unaddressed nail care needs. Staff interviews confirmed the lack of necessary goals and interventions in the care plans.
A resident with diabetes and legal blindness did not receive necessary nail care, resulting in long, untrimmed fingernails with debris. Despite the facility's policy, staff failed to coordinate and provide timely nail care, as observed in multiple instances. Interviews revealed a lack of communication and missing physician orders for nail trimming.
A facility failed to follow physician orders for a resident discharged with abdominal drains, as the orders to empty and document drain output daily were not implemented until 19 days after admission. Staff interviews confirmed the oversight, acknowledging that the orders should have been followed from the time of admission.
The facility failed to properly maintain, label, date, and store respiratory equipment for three residents, leading to deficiencies in care. A resident's oxygen tubing was not changed as required, and another resident's nebulizer mask was improperly stored. Additionally, a resident received oxygen at a higher rate than ordered without proper documentation. Staff interviews confirmed these lapses in following physician orders and facility policies.
A resident with a history of falls and osteoporosis fell and fractured their right leg during therapy due to the therapist's failure to use a required gait belt and provide hands-on contact, as per facility policy.
Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Resident Fall Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate a fall incident involving a resident with severe cognitive impairment and dementia. The resident, who was on a blood thinner, experienced a fall resulting in a hematoma and nasal fracture. The investigation report did not include interviews with key individuals such as the social services director who initially reported the fall, the resident's representative who was present at the time, or other staff who had contact with the resident during the incident. There were also conflicting statements regarding the resident's cognitive status and insufficient documentation of how the fall was discovered and managed. The facility's policy requires that all reports of abuse, neglect, or injuries of unknown origin be thoroughly investigated, including interviews with the person reporting the incident, the resident or their representative, staff on all shifts, and documentation of the investigation. However, the investigation into this incident lacked interviews from the social worker who reported the fall and the resident's representative, despite both being directly involved or present. The investigation also failed to clarify how the social worker became aware of the fall and did not include statements from all relevant staff. Staff interviews revealed uncertainty about the reporting process and the thoroughness of the investigation. The DON and other staff acknowledged that interviews with the social worker and the resident's representative would be expected, but these were not conducted. The investigation report contained inconsistencies and did not fully comply with the facility's own policy for abuse and neglect investigations, leading to an incomplete assessment of the incident.
Failure to Revise Elopement Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise the elopement care plan for a resident who was at risk of elopement. The resident, who had moderately impaired thinking and used a wheelchair for mobility, was found by local law enforcement approximately 1.5 miles away from the facility. Following this incident, a wander alarm was placed on the resident to alert staff when the resident approached monitored exit doors. However, the care plan was not updated to reflect changes in the placement of the wander alarm. Initially, the wander alarm was placed on the resident's left ankle, as indicated in the care plan. However, it was later moved to the arm of the resident's wheelchair at the resident's request. Despite this change, the care plan was not revised to reflect the new location of the wander alarm. Staff interviews confirmed that the care plan should have been updated to ensure consistency with the actual placement of the wander alarm.
Resident Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary supervision, resulting in the elopement of a resident with moderately impaired thinking who used a wheelchair for mobility. The resident, identified as being at risk for elopement upon admission, left the facility unsupervised and was found by local law enforcement at a store approximately 1.5 miles away. The resident had a history of elopement attempts and was known to sit by the door, indicating a desire to leave. Surveillance footage confirmed the resident left the facility at 12:47 AM by entering the code to open the door. Upon being found, the resident reported falling out of their wheelchair while attempting to navigate a curb, resulting in a bruise and scratch on their left knee. The resident was assisted by strangers and subsequently returned to the facility by law enforcement. Interviews with staff, including a CNA, LPN, Resident Care Manager, and Assistant Director of Nursing Services, confirmed the resident's risk for elopement and the unsuitability of leaving the facility unsupervised, especially at night.
Inadequate Monitoring of Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring for the use of diuretics, anticoagulants, and antibiotics for several residents, leading to potential risks of unnecessary medications and adverse side effects. Resident 3, who was on furosemide for congestive heart failure, was not adequately monitored for diuretic use as indicated by the absence of documentation in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR). Staff interviews revealed that monitoring was expected to occur for three days after initiating the medication, but this was not reflected in the records. Resident 26 was prescribed both furosemide and apixaban, yet there was no documentation of monitoring for either medication in the MAR/TAR. Staff indicated that monitoring was included in the care plan rather than the MAR/TAR, and residents were placed on alert charting for 72 hours when starting these medications. Similarly, Resident 28, who was on apixaban for atrial fibrillation, also lacked documentation of monitoring in the MAR/TAR, with staff stating that monitoring was part of the care plan. Resident 10, also on apixaban, showed no evidence of monitoring for anticoagulant use in the MAR/TAR, with staff indicating that monitoring was done through care plans and documented by exception. Resident 11 was on doxycycline without a stop date and lacked documentation of monitoring for antibiotic use. Staff interviews revealed that there was no active monitoring for adverse side effects, and Resident 11 did not have a care plan for antibiotic use, which should have included monitoring interventions.
Failure to Monitor Dishwasher Temperature and Sanitizer Levels
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the dishwasher temperature was checked and the sanitizing solution was tested routinely in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficiency was identified during an observation and interview with the Dietary Director and Dietary Aide, who stated that they were responsible for checking the dishwasher temperature and sanitizer concentration three times a day. However, the December 2024 Dishwasher Temperature/Sanitizer Log form was found to be incomplete, with missing entries for specific dates. Staff K admitted that they had run out of test strips and were unable to test the sanitizing solution, leading to a lapse in the required safety checks. The facility's policy, adopted on August 1, 2024, mandates that dishes and other multi-use items be cleaned and sanitized properly after each use, with proper logging of temperatures. Despite this policy, the staff failed to log the necessary information, and the Dietary Director confirmed the expectation for staff to perform these checks and maintain records. The Administrator also acknowledged the expectation for staff to adhere to the facility's process for checking dishwasher temperatures and testing the sanitizing solution. These failures placed residents at risk for foodborne illness and a diminished quality of life.
Infection Control Deficiencies in EBP and Equipment Disinfection
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for Resident 119, who was admitted with a feeding tube. Despite the facility's policy requiring gown and glove use for residents with feeding tubes, observations revealed that no EBP signage or personal protective equipment (PPE) cart was present outside Resident 119's room. Staff members, including LPNs and the Resident Care Manager, acknowledged that Resident 119 should have been on EBP since admission, but they were not following the necessary precautions. Additionally, the facility did not adhere to proper infection control practices regarding the handling of clean linens. A Certified Nurse Assistant was observed carrying clean towels and linens against their body, contrary to the facility's policy that requires linens to be carried away from the body to prevent contamination. Interviews with staff confirmed that clean linens should not touch staff clothing, indicating a lapse in following established infection control guidelines. The facility also failed to disinfect medical equipment, such as glucometers and vital signs equipment, after use with residents. Observations showed that LPNs did not sanitize glucometers after checking blood sugar levels for two residents, and vital signs equipment was not disinfected after use with two other residents. Staff interviews revealed a lack of adherence to the facility's infection control policies, which require equipment to be cleaned and disinfected between resident uses to prevent the transmission of infections.
Failure to Obtain Informed Consent for Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to inform a resident and/or their representative before administering psychotropic medications, which is a violation of their policy and regulatory requirements. The resident, identified as Resident 10, was admitted with diagnoses including depression, insomnia, and anxiety. The facility's policy on psychotropic medication use, revised in July 2022, mandates that residents or their representatives must be informed of the risks and benefits of such medications before administration. However, a review of the clinical records revealed that there was no documentation of informed consent for the psychotropic medications prescribed to Resident 10, which included Trazodone, Sertraline, and Buspirone. Interviews with facility staff, including the Resident Care Manager, Regional Clinical Nurse, and Assistant Director of Nursing, confirmed that informed consent was expected to be obtained and documented prior to administering psychotropic medications. Despite this expectation, the records lacked evidence of informed consent for Resident 10's medications. Staff acknowledged the absence of initial informed consents and the failure to provide information related to the risks and benefits of the medications to the resident or their representative, as required by the facility's policy and regulatory standards.
Failure to Provide Comfortable Bed Sheets for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a comfortable bed sheet for Resident 10, who required maximum physical assistance for bed mobility and total assistance for transfers. Resident 10 reported discomfort due to the lack of fitted sheets on their air mattress, which caused the flat sheet to slip, leaving them lying on the cold vinyl surface. Despite the resident's repeated requests for a fitted sheet, staff informed them that it was against regulations to use fitted sheets on air mattresses, citing safety concerns. However, observations revealed that fitted sheets were available in the facility's linen rooms, and other residents with air mattresses were using fitted sheets. Interviews with staff members, including a CNA and the Assistant Director of Nursing, indicated a lack of awareness and inconsistency in the facility's practices regarding the use of fitted sheets on air mattresses. Staff members provided conflicting information about the safety and regulations concerning fitted sheets, and there was no evidence that Resident 10's preferences were adequately considered or addressed. This oversight placed Resident 10 at risk for unmet care needs and discomfort, as their concerns about the bed sheets were not communicated or resolved effectively.
Failure to Complete Advance Directive for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that an advance directive was properly obtained and completed for one of the residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident 4's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) form, which was signed and dated in 2019, was not notarized or witnessed by two different witnesses as required by Washington State law. This oversight was identified during a joint record review with the Social Services Director, who acknowledged the incomplete status of the DPOA form and mentioned that Resident 4 has a guardian. The facility's policy on advance directives, revised in September 2022, mandates that the social services director or designee inquire about the existence of any written advance directives prior to or upon a resident's admission. If a resident or their representative has not established an advance directive, the facility staff is expected to offer assistance in doing so. However, in this case, the staff did not ensure that Resident 4's advance directive was completed according to the legal requirements, placing the resident at risk of not having their healthcare preferences honored.
Failure to Provide Written Transfer/Discharge Notice
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a written transfer or discharge notice to a resident and/or their representative, as required by state and federal regulations. This deficiency was identified during a review of the facility's policy titled 'Notice of Transfer or Discharge,' which mandates the provision of written notice in accordance with regulations. The review of Resident 27's discharge Minimum Data Set and nursing progress notes indicated that the resident was discharged to an acute hospital on two separate occasions due to a change in condition. However, there was no documentation in the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) that a written notice of transfer or discharge was provided. Interviews with facility staff, including the Regional Nurse, Assistant Director of Nursing, and Administrator, confirmed that no written notice was given to Resident 27 or their representative. Staff F, the Regional Nurse, acknowledged the absence of the written notice in the EHR, and Staff B, the Assistant Director of Nursing, confirmed that no notice was provided. The Administrator stated that it was expected for staff to provide such notices, indicating a lapse in following the facility's policy and regulatory requirements.
Failure to Provide Bed Hold Notice During Hospital Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to a resident or their representative during a transfer to an acute hospital. The facility's policy, revised on April 7, 2023, mandates that upon transfer, the resident and/or their representative should be offered the option to hold the bed, and a copy of the bed hold policy should be provided. However, a review of Resident 27's records, including the discharge Minimum Data Set and nursing progress notes, revealed no documentation that such a notice was offered or provided when the resident was transferred to the hospital on October 3, 2024. Interviews with facility staff, including the Regional Nurse, Assistant Director of Nursing, and Administrator, confirmed that the bed hold notice was not offered or provided to Resident 27 or their representative. This oversight placed the resident or their representative at risk of not being informed about their right to hold the bed during the hospital stay, as required by the facility's policy and regulatory standards.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately assess two residents, leading to deficiencies in their Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For one resident, the November 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) indicated the use of bacitracin ointment, a topical antibiotic, over a five-day period. However, this antibiotic use was not marked in Section N of the resident's admission MDS. The MDS Coordinator, Staff J, acknowledged the omission and confirmed that the bacitracin should have been included, indicating an inaccurate assessment. For another resident, the admission MDS inaccurately marked surgical wound care in Section M, despite the absence of a surgical wound care treatment order during the look-back period. The November 2024 TAR showed orders to flush a drain, which Staff J clarified was not a skin treatment. This discrepancy further highlighted the inaccuracy in the resident's MDS assessment. These failures in accurate assessment placed the residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, potentially affecting their quality of life.
Failure to Complete PASARR Level I for Resident with Depression
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the completion of a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I for a resident with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Upon admission, the resident's PASARR Level I form did not indicate the presence of a mood disorder, despite the resident having a diagnosis of depression and being prescribed an antidepressant medication shortly after admission. This oversight meant that the resident was not flagged for a Level II evaluation, which is necessary to determine if additional mental health services are required. The facility's policy requires that the Admissions Coordinator, Medical Records Director, or designee ensure a PASARR Level I is included in the admission paperwork and updated as necessary. However, the Social Services Director acknowledged that the PASARR form for the resident was not updated to reflect the diagnosis of depression, and a Level II evaluation was not requested in a timely manner. It was only 22 days after the resident's admission that a new Level I PASARR was completed and sent for a Level II evaluation, indicating a lapse in the facility's adherence to its own procedures.
Failure to Notify State PASARR Coordinator of Significant Change in Resident's Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the State PASARR Coordinator after a significant change in condition occurred for a resident with serious mental illness (SMI). The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, had a Level I PASARR indicating SMI and was referred for a Level II PASARR evaluation. Despite a significant change in status, as evidenced by the resident electing to receive hospice services and being certified with a terminal illness, the facility did not notify the appropriate state authorities as required by their policy. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the Social Services Director acknowledged the resident's Level II PASARR related to SMI but admitted to not notifying the state mental health authority or the PASARR Coordinator about the resident's significant change in status. The facility's administrator also confirmed the expectation that staff should notify the State PASARR Coordinator when such changes occur, indicating a lapse in following established procedures. This oversight placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.
Incomplete Care Plans and Unmet Care Needs for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for two residents, leading to unmet care needs. Resident 11, who was admitted with an ostomy, antibiotics, and opioid use, had incomplete care plans for skin, pain/opioid use, vision, antibiotic use, and urostomy. Staff interviews confirmed that the care plans lacked necessary goals and interventions, which were required to address the resident's specific needs. Resident 20, admitted with type 2 diabetes and legal blindness, required assistance with personal hygiene. Observations revealed that the resident had long, untrimmed fingernails with debris, which were not addressed despite being part of the care plan. Staff interviews indicated that the responsibility for nail care was not properly executed, as the care plan specified that a nurse should trim the nails due to the resident's diabetes. The failure to follow the care plan resulted in the resident experiencing discomfort.
Failure to Provide Nail Care for Diabetic Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary assistance with nail care for a resident, identified as Resident 20, who was unable to perform this activity independently. Resident 20, who was admitted with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus and legal blindness, required set-up assistance with personal hygiene. Observations on two separate occasions revealed that Resident 20 had long, untrimmed fingernails with brown debris underneath, which were causing discomfort. Despite the resident's requests and the facility's policy to maintain personal hygiene, the necessary nail care was not provided. Interviews with staff members revealed a lack of coordination and communication regarding the responsibility for nail care, particularly for residents with diabetes. Staff N, a CNA, indicated that shower aides typically cut residents' nails, but for those with diabetes, a nurse should perform the task. However, Staff O, an LPN, acknowledged the oversight and offered to cut the resident's nails. Further, Staff E, the Resident Care Manager, noted that a physician's order was required for nail trimming for diabetic residents, which was missing in Resident 20's records. The Assistant Director of Nursing, Staff B, confirmed that nurses should provide nail care for diabetic residents and expected CNAs to coordinate with nurses to ensure timely nail care, which did not occur in this case.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Drain Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement and follow physician orders for a resident who was discharged from the hospital with abdominal drains. The hospital discharge orders required the facility to empty and record the output from the drains at least once a day and to document this information. However, upon review, it was found that there were no orders or documentation indicating that the resident's drain was emptied or that the drainage output was recorded daily until 19 days after the resident's admission to the facility. Interviews with facility staff, including the Resident Care Manager and the Assistant Director of Nursing, confirmed that the orders to manage the resident's drain were not followed as per the hospital's discharge instructions. The staff acknowledged that the orders should have been implemented from the time of the resident's admission, but they were only started much later. This oversight placed the resident at risk of not receiving necessary care services and having unmet care needs.
Deficiencies in Respiratory Care and Equipment Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain, label, date, and properly store oxygen tubing, nasal cannula, and nebulizer masks for three residents, leading to deficiencies in respiratory care. Resident 5 had an order for oxygen at 2 liters via nasal cannula at bedtime for sleep apnea, but there was no documentation indicating that the oxygen tubing had been changed in November or December 2024. Observations revealed that Resident 5's nasal cannula was improperly stored and not labeled or dated. Interviews with staff confirmed that the nasal cannula should have been stored in a bag and dated, but it was not changed because there were no issues reported. Resident 32 had an order for oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula, but their oxygen tubing was also not labeled or dated. During an observation, it was noted that Resident 32's nasal cannula was undated, and the oxygen concentrator had an undated bottle of distilled water attached. Staff interviews revealed that the facility had stickers for labeling, but the tubing was not dated, and there was no order to change the oxygen tubing documented in the MAR. Resident 120 had orders for inhalation medication via nebulizer four times a day and oxygen at 2 liters per minute continuously. However, the nebulizer mask was not properly stored, and the oxygen tubing and nasal cannula were undated. Observations showed that Resident 120 was receiving oxygen at a higher rate than ordered, and there was no physician order to increase the oxygen during activity. Staff interviews confirmed that the nebulizer mask should have been stored in a bag and that the oxygen orders were not followed correctly.
Failure to Use Required Assistive Device During Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the use of a required assistive device, specifically a gait belt, and hands-on contact during therapy for a resident with a history of falls and osteoporosis. The resident, who required assistance for activities of daily living, experienced a fall in the therapy gym while working with a therapist. The resident's right knee gave out, leading to a fall on their right hip and back, resulting in a right leg fracture and subsequent hospitalization. Interviews with staff, including the Director of Rehabilitation and a Physical Therapy Assistant, confirmed that it was the policy and procedure of the therapy department to use a gait belt when working with residents on exercise equipment. The staff acknowledged that the therapist should have used a gait belt and provided contact guard assistance to stabilize the resident during the exercise. The failure to adhere to these policies placed the resident at risk for falls and injury.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 881 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Edmonds
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edmonds Post Acute | 0.5 mi | — | 60 | 0 |
| Lynnwood Post Acute Rehabilitation Center | 1.9 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Bridges To Home | 2.9 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
| Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 3.1 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
| Richmond Beach Rehab | 3.3 mi | — | 23 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Pine Ridge Post Acute.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.