Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Union House Nursing Home during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with a history of mental health disorders and aggression struck another resident multiple times in the chest after verbally taunting them. The incident was witnessed, reported, and confirmed through investigation, with the aggressor admitting to the physical abuse.
The facility failed to implement a policy for national background checks for LNAs, with only three out of 22 having evidence of such checks. Despite a memo from the Department of Aging and Independent Living requiring these checks, the facility's policy did not reflect this requirement, and the Clinical Lead RN was unaware of the memo.
The facility failed to implement weekly skin checks for three residents at risk for skin integrity issues due to immobility and incontinence. Despite care plans requiring weekly checks, documentation showed significant lapses, with one resident receiving only three checks in 24 weeks, another only one check in 19 weeks, and a third only two checks in 20 weeks. This deficiency was confirmed by an LPN and the DON.
The facility failed to implement adequate fall prevention interventions for two residents at high risk for falls. Despite multiple falls, including incidents resulting in injury, the care plans for these residents were not updated with new interventions as required by facility policy. The Director of Nursing confirmed the lack of adherence to the policy, contributing to the deficiency.
A resident with a hand wound had their soiled gauze dressing improperly handled and reused by an LNA and RN, both of whom were not wearing gloves. The gauze, which had touched the floor, was secured with tape that had been stuck to a chair, violating infection control protocols.
The facility failed to ensure residents' rights to self-determination by keeping all doors locked 24/7, requiring staff intervention for entry and exit. Observations and interviews revealed that residents were dissatisfied with the lack of access to door codes, which restricted their ability to leave and return independently. The DON confirmed that only staff had the code and no policy existed for operating a locked facility.
A resident with Alzheimer's and severe dementia struck another resident with a cane, leading to a physical altercation. Despite interventions in place, the facility failed to prevent the incident, as confirmed by nursing staff. The aggressive behavior of the resident was known, yet the measures were ineffective in ensuring the safety of other residents.
Resident-to-Resident Physical Abuse Due to Unmanaged Aggression
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a history of schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and prior aggression towards others was involved in a physical altercation with another resident. The care plan for this resident identified a potential for behavioral issues and aggression. On the date of the incident, the resident was observed sitting in the dining area when another resident walked by. The aggressive resident began calling the other resident names and then struck them in the chest multiple times. The incident was witnessed and subsequently reported to the state agency as a facility reported incident (FRI). During the facility's investigation, the resident admitted to striking the other resident, citing personal dislike as the reason. The investigation confirmed that physical abuse occurred.
Failure to Implement National Background Checks for LNAs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a policy related to national background checks for their employees, specifically Licensed Nursing Assistants (LNAs). A review of the human resource files revealed that only three out of 22 LNAs employed at the facility had evidence of national background checks. This deficiency was confirmed through interviews and record reviews, where the Clinical Lead Registered Nurse (RN) admitted that the facility did not complete national background checks for their employed LNAs. A memo from the Department of Aging and Independent Living, dated October 5, 2022, outlined the requirement for facilities to conduct national criminal background checks prior to employment and annually thereafter. The facility's existing policy, titled Abuse Prevention Program, last revised in December 2016, did not specify the requirement for national background checks. The Clinical Lead RN was unaware of the memo and confirmed that the abuse policy had not been updated to reflect the requirement for national background checks, leading to the deficiency.
Failure to Implement Weekly Skin Checks for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement care plan interventions for three residents, leading to a deficiency in care. Resident #27 had a care plan initiated to address the risk of skin integrity alteration due to immobility and urinary incontinence, with a goal to remain free from skin alterations. The care plan required weekly skin checks by a licensed nurse, but documentation showed that skin checks were conducted only three times over a 24-week period. Similarly, Resident #39's care plan, initiated to prevent skin integrity issues related to incontinence and immobility, was not followed as required. The resident's records indicated only one skin check in 19 weeks. Resident #294 also had a care plan for skin integrity risks, with only two skin checks documented in 20 weeks. During an interview, both a Licensed Practical Nurse and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the weekly skin checks were not implemented as per the care plans for these residents.
Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and implementation of interventions to prevent falls for two residents. Resident #39, diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, and muscle weakness, was identified as high risk for falls due to disorientation, poor vision, and unsafe attempts to get out of bed and chairs. Despite sustaining five falls in two months, including two consecutive falls and a subsequent fall on December 5, 2024, no new interventions were added to the resident's care plan after the last fall. The facility's policy requires reviewing and updating the care plan after each fall, but this was not adhered to, as confirmed by the Director of Nursing. Similarly, Resident #11, with diagnoses including dementia, schizophrenia, anxiety, depression, and psychosis, was also at risk for falls due to poor safety awareness and unsteadiness. This resident experienced four falls in four months, with the last fall occurring on December 5, 2024, resulting in bruising. Despite the facility's policy to update care plans after falls, no new interventions were added to Resident #11's care plan following the last incident. The Director of Nursing confirmed the lack of adherence to the policy, which contributed to the deficiency in preventing falls.
Inadequate Infection Control During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by an incident involving a resident with a wound on their hand. During an observation, the resident was seen unwrapping a soiled gauze dressing that was visibly contaminated with blood. The gauze was allowed to dangle and come into contact with the floor of the dining area/TV room. A Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA), who was not wearing gloves, attempted to redress the wound using the same contaminated gauze. Subsequently, a Registered Nurse (RN) also assisted without wearing gloves and secured the gauze with the original tape that had been stuck to the arm of the resident's chair. The Director of Nursing (DON) later confirmed that the soiled dressings should not have been reused.
Facility Fails to Ensure Residents' Right to Self-Determination
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor residents' rights to self-determination and access to the outside world by keeping all doors locked 24/7, requiring staff intervention for entry and exit. This practice was observed during a survey when the front door was locked, and access was only possible by ringing a doorbell to alert staff. A staff member explained that exiting the facility required entering a code on a keypad, which only employees knew. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that residents were not allowed to have the code, and there was no policy or procedure for operating a locked facility or assessing residents' ability to exit independently. Interviews with residents revealed dissatisfaction with the locked doors. One resident, who had been at the facility since 2014, expressed frustration at no longer having the code to exit independently, as they frequently used the porch and left for outside interests. Another resident, who had been at the facility for two years, stated they enjoyed sitting outside but required staff assistance to exit and re-enter the building. The DON confirmed that only staff had the code and could not locate any policy addressing the locked facility.
Failure to Protect Residents from Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from physical abuse, as evidenced by an incident involving two residents. Resident #1, who has Alzheimer's, severe vascular dementia, and an agitation-induced psychotic disorder, struck Resident #2, who has end-stage Lewy body dementia and parkinsonism, with a cane. This incident occurred in the early morning hours when Resident #2 was standing in the doorway of their room. Despite attempts by witnesses to intervene and redirect, both residents fell to the ground during the altercation. Resident #2 recalled the incident, stating that Resident #1 had hit them multiple times and often caused trouble with others. The facility's records indicate that Resident #1 had a history of aggressive behavior, including hitting staff and other residents with a cane. Interventions in Resident #1's care plan included monitoring while walking the halls and encouraging appropriate use of the cane. However, these measures were ineffective in preventing the incident. Interviews with the Assistant Director of Nursing and the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident #1 had struck Resident #2 and staff members during attempts to manage the behavior, indicating a failure to protect residents from physical abuse.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 32 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Glover
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greensboro Nursing Home | 6.8 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
| Maple Lane Nursing Home | 8.5 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Pines Rehab & Health Center | 15 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| St. Johnsbury Health & Rehab | 18.2 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
| Bel Aire Center | 19.2 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Union House Nursing Home.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.