Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at August Healthcare At Richmond during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple comorbidities and a history of pressure ulcers was re-admitted with intact skin but did not receive consistent weekly skin assessments or have a care plan addressing pressure ulcer prevention. Facility staff failed to document or implement preventive interventions such as regular repositioning and use of pressure-relieving surfaces until after two advanced-stage pressure injuries were discovered during a facility-wide skin sweep. Documentation for turning and repositioning was inconsistent, and required assessments and care planning were not completed as per facility policy.
Facility staff did not create a comprehensive care plan for a resident at risk for pressure ulcers, despite a history of sacral wounds and a Braden Scale assessment indicating risk. The care plan lacked specific preventive interventions and did not address the resident's refusal of care, contrary to facility policy. Staff interviews and documentation review confirmed these omissions.
Failure to Prevent and Timely Identify Pressure Ulcers in At-Risk Resident
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to implement necessary interventions, care, and services to prevent the development of pressure ulcers in a resident identified as being at risk. The resident, who had multiple comorbidities including end stage renal disease, diabetes, heart failure, dementia, and a history of sacral pressure ulcers, was re-admitted to the facility with intact skin. Despite being at risk, as indicated by a Braden Scale score of 17 and a history of previous pressure injuries, the resident did not have a care plan addressing pressure ulcer prevention, and no specific interventions were documented to prevent pressure-related injuries. Weekly skin assessments, as required by facility policy, were not consistently performed between the resident's re-admission and the discovery of two advanced-stage pressure injuries. The facility only identified the injuries during a facility-wide skin sweep, which was initiated after it was recognized that weekly skin reviews were not being completed. Documentation also showed inconsistent or missing records for turning and repositioning, which are critical interventions for pressure ulcer prevention, especially for residents with limited mobility and incontinence. Interviews with facility staff, including the Wound Care Nurse and DON, confirmed that preventive measures such as air mattresses and regular repositioning were only implemented after the wounds were discovered, rather than proactively based on the resident's risk profile. The care plan lacked interventions for pressure ulcer prevention and did not address the resident's refusal of care or changes in condition. Facility policies required systematic risk assessment, care planning, and intervention for at-risk residents, but these were not followed, resulting in the resident developing two advanced pressure injuries.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plan for Pressure Ulcer Prevention
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to address the risk of pressure ulcer development for one resident who had a history of a sacral ulcer and was identified as being at risk for pressure injuries. Upon re-admission, the resident's Braden Scale assessment indicated risk, but the care plan did not include specific interventions for pressure ulcer prevention. Staff interviews revealed that weekly skin reviews were not consistently performed according to facility policy, and preventive measures such as air mattress use, protein supplementation, frequent turning and repositioning, and off-loading of heels were not documented in the care plan prior to the development of new pressure injuries. The care plan also lacked documentation addressing the resident's refusal of care, including baths, skin assessments, and dialysis treatments. Facility policy required the interdisciplinary team to develop a care plan with measurable goals and appropriate interventions for residents at risk of pressure injuries, but this was not followed. The deficiency was confirmed through staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation, with no additional information provided by facility staff during the exit meeting.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 156 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 9 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Richmond
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Westport Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 0.8 mi | — | 16 | 0 |
| The Laurels Of University Park | 2 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Cedarfield Pinnacle Living | 2.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing Center | 2.7 mi | — | 14 | 0 |
| Parham Health Care & Rehab Center | 3.8 mi | — | 52 | 3 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for August Healthcare At Richmond.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.