Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Van Healthcare during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to provide adequate pharmaceutical services, resulting in medication errors for three residents. A resident received incorrect Vitamin D3 dosage and continued a discontinued diabetic medication for months. Another resident was given incorrect Vitamin C dosage and faced discrepancies in Gabapentin administration. Additionally, insulin was improperly administered to a third resident. These actions violated facility policies and proper medication administration procedures.
The facility failed to maintain accurate clinical records and physician orders for three residents, leading to potential risks in care. A resident lacked documented orders for dialysis treatment, another had unclear antidepressant medication orders resulting in inconsistent dosages, and a third resident's nutritional supplement order did not specify the amount to be administered. These deficiencies highlight issues in record-keeping and medication management.
A facility failed to maintain proper infection control by allowing a resident's urine catheter bag to touch the floor. Observations revealed the bag was improperly hung on a trash can, contrary to facility policy. A CNA and the DON confirmed the bag should have been hung from the bed and placed in a covering bag.
Medication Administration and Pharmaceutical Service Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of three residents, resulting in medication errors and improper administration. For one resident, the facility did not ensure the availability of medications in the form ordered by the physician. The medication aide administered a different dosage of Vitamin D3 than prescribed and failed to consult the charge nurse. Additionally, the facility continued to administer a discontinued diabetic medication for three months and did not initiate the replacement medication as ordered by the physician. Another resident experienced a similar issue with the administration of Vitamin C, where the medication aide gave a different dosage than prescribed without consulting the charge nurse. There was also a discrepancy in the administration of Gabapentin, as the medication aide was unsure if the resident had been receiving the correct dosage due to conflicting labels. The facility's failure to ensure the correct medications and dosages were administered as per physician orders was evident in these cases. Furthermore, a third resident received insulin injections in an unsafe manner. The LVN massaged the injection site after administering insulin, which is against proper technique as it can increase the rate of absorption. The facility's policies and procedures were not followed, leading to these deficiencies in pharmaceutical services and medication administration.
Deficiencies in Clinical Record Maintenance and Medication Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for three residents, leading to potential risks in their care and treatment. For Resident #3, the facility did not have physician orders for dialysis treatment or care of the dialysis access device, despite the resident receiving dialysis three times a week. The resident's care plan and MDS assessment indicated she was receiving dialysis, but there were no documented orders for this treatment or for the care of the shunt site, which was observed to be uncovered. Resident #7's physician orders for the administration of an antidepressant medication, Venlafaxine, were unclear and inconsistent. The orders included conflicting instructions regarding the dosage, with records indicating both 225mg and 375mg daily doses. The medication administration records showed that the resident received 375mg daily, which was not aligned with the intended prescription. Interviews with the DON and PMHNP revealed confusion over the correct dosage and the use of both generic and brand names for the medication, leading to a risk of medication errors. For Resident #21, the facility failed to specify the amount of a liquid nutritional supplement, Med Pass 2.0, to be administered. The physician's order did not indicate the quantity to be given, and the MAR lacked documentation of the amount provided or consumed by the resident. This oversight was acknowledged by the medication aide, who administered an arbitrary amount without consulting the charge nurse or DON. The lack of clear orders and documentation posed a risk of inadequate nutritional support for the resident, who was at risk for weight changes and malnutrition.
Infection Control Deficiency: Improper Handling of Urine Catheter Bag
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program, which resulted in a deficiency related to the improper handling of a urine catheter bag for a resident. During observations on two separate occasions, the resident's urine catheter bag was found hanging on a trash can beside the bed, with the bottom of the bag touching the floor. This improper placement was confirmed by a CNA, who acknowledged that the bag should not be touching the floor and should be hung from the bed below the resident's feet. Additionally, the bag should have been placed in a covering bag, as per the facility's policy. The Director of Nursing (DON) also confirmed that the urine catheter bag should have been in a covering bag and noted that the facility had recently purchased new covering bags. The facility's policy on anchoring catheter bags clearly indicated that they should not touch the ground.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 137 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 7 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Van
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avir At Bradburn | 11.2 mi | — | 4 | 2 |
| Azalea Trail Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 11.3 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Avir At Grand Saline | 11.7 mi | — | 16 | 1 |
| Canton Oaks | 12.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Mineola Gardens Wellness & Rehabilitation | 13.5 mi | — | 6 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Van Healthcare.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.