Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at The Manor Healthcare Residence during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to provide a private space for residents' monthly council meetings, compromising their right to privacy. Meetings were held in the Dining Room and front lobby, both lacking privacy, with staff present. The AT Director and ADM acknowledged the issue, with the ADM recognizing the potential discomfort for residents in disclosing concerns without privacy.
The facility failed to ensure resident privacy by not consistently knocking on doors before entering rooms. During lunch tray distribution, staff entered the rooms of five residents without knocking, despite the facility's policy requiring it. Interviews revealed that while some residents were not bothered, others preferred staff to knock to avoid being startled. Staff admitted to lapses in following the protocol, attributing it to task focus or forgetfulness.
The facility failed to store food properly in the kitchen, with items like sausage patties and cookie dough left unsealed and exposed to air, risking foodborne illness. Interviews revealed that staff did not follow the policy requiring food to be labeled, dated, and sealed, despite the potential risks. The Dietary Manager and Administrator were responsible for monitoring these practices, but the deficiency was not identified during routine checks.
Lack of Privacy for Resident Council Meetings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a private space for residents' monthly council meetings, which is a violation of residents' rights to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility. During a Resident Council interview, it was observed that the AT Director gathered several residents in the Dining Room, where other residents were watching TV and staff were present, thus compromising privacy. When asked about a more private space, the AT Director suggested moving the meeting to the front lobby area, which was also not private, and there was no effort to redirect staff away from the area. Interviews with the AT Director and the ADM revealed a lack of training and awareness regarding the importance of privacy during Resident Council meetings. The AT Director admitted to not having specific training on privacy issues and expressed an inability to prevent staff from being present. The ADM acknowledged the residents' right to privacy during these meetings and recognized the potential discomfort residents might feel in disclosing concerns without privacy. The facility's Resident Rights Policy, although not dated, supports the residents' right to personal privacy, including during meetings of family and resident groups.
Failure to Ensure Resident Privacy by Not Knocking Before Entering Rooms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the privacy of residents by not consistently knocking on their doors before entering their rooms. This deficiency was observed during the distribution of lunch trays, where staff members CNA A and CNA B entered the rooms of five residents without knocking. The residents involved had various medical conditions, including cognitive impairments, chronic diseases, and physical disabilities, which necessitate a respectful and considerate approach to their care. Interviews with the residents revealed mixed feelings about the lack of knocking. Some residents expressed that it did not bother them, while others indicated a preference for staff to knock to avoid being startled or to be aware of someone entering their room. Despite the residents' varied reactions, the facility's policy clearly states that staff should knock and request permission before entering, as the facility is considered the residents' home. Interviews with staff, including the ADON, CNA A, and CNA B, confirmed that they were aware of the policy requiring them to knock before entering residents' rooms. However, they admitted to lapses in following this protocol, attributing it to being focused on tasks or simply forgetting. The ADM acknowledged that staff had become relaxed in adhering to this policy, despite ongoing training on resident rights and dignity. The facility's Dignity Policy emphasizes treating residents with respect, which includes knocking before entering their rooms.
Improper Food Storage Practices in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food safety and sanitation in their kitchen, as observed during a survey. Specifically, food items in the kitchen freezer and dry storage area were found to be improperly stored, with several items such as sausage patties, cinnamon rolls, cookie dough, grits, corn tortillas, nonfat dry milk, and corn muffin mix left unsealed and exposed to air. This lack of proper sealing could lead to foodborne illnesses among residents, as the food could become frostbitten, stale, or contaminated by pests. Interviews with the Dietary Manager (DM), Cook (CK C), and Administrator (ADM) revealed that the facility's policy required all food items to be labeled, dated, and sealed to prevent contamination and spoilage. Despite this policy, the staff failed to ensure compliance, with the DM and CK C acknowledging the potential risks of unsealed food. The ADM confirmed that the DM was responsible for monitoring food storage practices, but the ADM's monthly checks did not identify the issue. The facility's Dietary Services Policy and Procedures, dated 2012, also emphasized the need for securely covering unused food, yet this was not followed, leading to the deficiency.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 16 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Mexia
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mexia Ltc Nursing And Rehab | 0.2 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
| Skilled Care Of Mexia | 0.7 mi | — | 1 | 1 |
| Teague Nursing And Rehabilitation | 11.4 mi | — | 7 | 0 |
| Groesbeck Ltc Nursing And Rehabilitation | 11.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Windsor Healthcare Residence | 11.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for The Manor Healthcare Residence.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.