Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Robstown Nursing And Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to maintain food safety and sanitation standards, with issues such as wet floors, unclean utensils, and improper food storage. Observations revealed residue on dishes, improperly maintained juice guns, and expired or uncovered food items. Staff interviews highlighted a lack of awareness and adherence to protocols, with the FSM and Administrator unaware of the ongoing issues.
A resident with a high fall risk was not provided with a comprehensive care plan that included necessary interventions such as keeping the bed in a low position and using fall mats. Despite a high fall risk score, these precautions were not consistently implemented, and staff were not fully informed about the required interventions. Observations showed the resident's bed was not in the lowest position, and fall mats were absent, highlighting a communication gap in the facility.
The facility failed to provide the required 80 square feet per resident in 47 shared rooms, with all rooms measuring under 160 square feet. The Administrator acknowledged the issue and planned to apply for a room waiver, as no changes had been made since the last survey. The Bed Classification form confirmed all rooms were certified for two residents, despite not meeting space requirements.
A facility failed to report an alleged abuse incident involving two residents to law enforcement within the required timeframe. A resident with Alzheimer's was injured in an altercation with another resident with a history of aggression, resulting in a skin tear. Despite the incident meeting criteria for immediate reporting, the facility delayed notifying the police. Staff interviews revealed differing opinions on whether the incident constituted abuse, but the facility's policy was not followed.
Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety, as observed during a survey of the kitchen. The floors were found to be wet and slippery, posing a safety hazard. Utensils and dishes were not properly cleaned and sanitized, with plastic drinking glasses, coffee cups, and bowls showing heavy residue, stains, and scratches. The juice guns were improperly maintained, soaking in a cloudy brown liquid with a removable black substance around the heads. Additionally, the ice machine had a brownish substance on the ice chute, and the can opener was crusted with filth. Food storage practices were also inadequate. Ingredients were left open to air, such as a Styrofoam bowl with a white powdered substance that was uncovered and had discolored clumps. Food items in the refrigerator and freezer were not properly labeled or stored, with expired pudding and improperly packaged cookie dough and ice cream. The dry storage area contained bowls of cereal that were not properly covered. These lapses in food storage and preparation could potentially lead to foodborne illnesses among residents. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness and adherence to proper food safety protocols. The dishwasher admitted to not checking the cleanliness of dishes before use and was unaware of the residue in the plastic items. The cook acknowledged the improper storage of thickener and was unsure of the cause of clumping. The Food Service Manager (FSM) was informed of the issues but had not implemented effective corrective measures. The Maintenance Supervisor noted that the ice machine's vent cover frequently fell off, which could lead to contamination. The Administrator was unaware of the ongoing issues in the kitchen, indicating a breakdown in communication and oversight within the facility.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plan for High-Risk Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident, identified as Resident #48, which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet her medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs. The care plan did not adequately address the resident's risk for falls, as it lacked specific interventions to ensure her safety, such as keeping the bed in a low position and using fall mats. Despite the resident's high fall risk score of 10, indicating a high risk, these precautions were not consistently implemented. Observations revealed that the resident's bed was not in the lowest position, and fall mats were absent on multiple occasions. Interviews with staff, including an LVN and the ADON, indicated a lack of awareness and inconsistency in implementing the necessary fall precautions. The LVN, who was new to the facility, was unaware of the resident's fall history and the required interventions. The ADON and DON acknowledged the resident's high fall risk but stated that the IDT team had decided to remove the fall mats, believing them unnecessary. The facility's policy on comprehensive care plans requires that qualified staff be notified of their roles and responsibilities in carrying out interventions. However, the report highlights a communication gap, as the nursing staff was not fully informed about the interventions needed for Resident #48. This lack of communication and failure to implement the care plan interventions placed the resident at risk of not receiving the necessary care to maintain her highest practicable well-being.
Deficiency in Resident Room Space Requirements
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the required 80 square feet per resident in 47 shared resident rooms, as observed during a survey. The deficiency was identified in multiple rooms, with measurements showing that all rooms were under 160 square feet, which is below the required space for two residents. During an interview, the Administrator acknowledged the issue and mentioned plans to apply for a room waiver, indicating that no changes had been made to room sizes since the last survey. The facility's Bed Classification form confirmed that all rooms were certified for two residents, despite not meeting the space requirements.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Abuse Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an alleged abuse incident involving two residents to local law enforcement within the required timeframe. Resident #1, who has severe cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's Disease, was involved in a physical altercation with Resident #2, who has severe impairment and a history of aggressive behaviors. The altercation resulted in a skin tear on Resident #1's right forearm. Despite the incident meeting the criteria for immediate reporting to law enforcement, the facility did not notify the police until over a month later. Resident #1, who has no history of aggressive behavior, was injured during the altercation initiated by Resident #2. Resident #2, who has a history of physical and verbal aggression, reportedly grabbed Resident #1's arms, causing the injury. The facility's investigation concluded that Resident #2's actions led to the skin tear, but the incident was not reported to law enforcement as required by the facility's policy. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of consensus on whether the incident constituted abuse or assault. The Director of Nursing and other staff members believed the incident met the definition of assault, yet the Administrator decided not to report it to the police initially. The facility's policy mandates reporting such incidents within two hours if they involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, but this protocol was not followed.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 129 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Robstown
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avir At River Ridge | 4.1 mi | — | 15 | 1 |
| Windsor Calallen | 4.4 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Avir At Corpus Christi | 12.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of Morga | 15 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Windsor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Of Corpu | 15.2 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Robstown Nursing And Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.