Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Princeton Medical Lodge during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to include necessary dental and dermatological needs in the care plans of three residents, leading to delays in addressing their health issues. One resident required dental extractions and dentures, another needed a new partial denture, and a third had untreated eczema. The lack of documentation and communication among staff contributed to these deficiencies.
A facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for a resident diagnosed with moderate eczema during a dermatology visit. The physician examination record was not uploaded into the electronic health chart, and the diagnosis was not updated. The record was later found in a drawer at the nurse's station, indicating a breakdown in the process. Interviews confirmed that the process for handling physician examination records was not followed, potentially delaying care or treatment.
A facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a dialysis central venous access device and a peritoneal catheter. The resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired, was not placed under EBP, and there was no signage or supplies indicating such precautions. A CNA did not perform proper hand hygiene during incontinence care, leading to potential cross-contamination. Facility staff admitted to a lack of understanding and implementation of EBP for residents with indwelling medical devices.
Deficiencies in Comprehensive Care Plans for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plans for three residents adequately described the services needed to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. For Resident #94, the care plan did not include her dental needs and interventions, despite her moderate cognitive impairment and the family's request for dental services. The resident had a tooth extraction and required additional dental work for dentures, but financial issues delayed the process. The social worker and dental provider were aware of the situation, but the care plan lacked documentation of these needs and interventions. Resident #13 also had deficiencies in her care plan regarding dental needs. She had been without a partial denture due to Medicaid approval delays and had communicated her needs to the social worker. Despite being seen by a dentist and having Medicaid coverage, the process for obtaining a new partial denture was prolonged, and the care plan did not reflect her dental needs or the interventions required. The facility's administrator acknowledged the lack of a tracking system for dental procedures and the need for better documentation and communication among staff. Resident #18's care plan failed to address her eczema diagnosis and the interventions required to manage her condition. Despite ongoing symptoms of itchy skin and a rash, the care plan did not include this chronic condition until much later. The resident had been treated with topical creams and antihistamines, but the lack of documentation and communication about her dermatology visits and diagnosis led to a delay in care planning. The facility's staff, including the MDS nurse and director of nursing, recognized the importance of care planning for chronic conditions to ensure timely interventions and symptom management.
Failure to Maintain Accurate Medical Records for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for a resident, specifically regarding a dermatology visit that occurred on 04/23/2024. The resident, who had a history of hypertension, dementia, osteoarthritis, and allergic rhinitis, was diagnosed with moderate eczema during this visit. However, the physician examination record from this visit was not uploaded into the resident's electronic health chart, and the diagnosis of eczema was not updated in her medical records. The deficiency was identified through observation, interview, and record review, revealing that the resident's face sheet did not list a dermatologist as a care provider, nor did it include a diagnosis of eczema. The resident's care plan indicated she was at risk for skin breakdown, but the necessary updates to her medical records were not made following the dermatology appointment. The transportation CNA responsible for handling the physician examination record was unsure of its location, and it was later found in a drawer at the nurse's station, indicating a breakdown in the process of updating medical records. Interviews with the Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, and Medical Records staff confirmed that the process for handling physician examination records was not followed. The transportation aide was supposed to make copies of the records for nursing and medical records, but this did not occur, leading to the omission of the eczema diagnosis in the resident's medical records. This failure to update the resident's records could potentially delay care or treatment and appropriate interventions for the resident.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident with Indwelling Devices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program, which resulted in a deficiency concerning a resident with a dialysis central venous access device and a peritoneal catheter. The resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired and had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, end-stage renal disease, and a cerebral vascular accident, was not placed under Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as required. The comprehensive care plan and physician orders did not reflect the need for EBP, and there was no signage or supplies indicating such precautions in the resident's room. During an observation, a CNA did not perform proper hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to the resident. The CNA, who was uncertain about the resident's precautionary status, touched the peritoneal catheter with soiled gloves, which could lead to cross-contamination. The CNA admitted to not realizing the mistake and acknowledged the lack of signage and supplies for EBP in the room. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Corporate Nurse confirmed that residents with indwelling medical devices, such as the peritoneal catheter and central venous catheter, should be under EBP, but this was not implemented for the resident. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of understanding and implementation of EBP for residents with indwelling medical devices. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) admitted that the facility was still learning about EBP and had not initially considered the resident's need for such precautions. The facility's policy and communication from the Director of Corporate Compliance indicated that EBP should be in place for residents with indwelling devices, but this was not followed, leading to the deficiency.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 334 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 19 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Princeton
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Park Health And Rehabilitation Center | 5.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Mckinney Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | 6.1 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Park Manor Of Mckinney | 6.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Lexington Medical Lodge | 8.4 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Belterra Health & Rehab | 9.2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Princeton Medical Lodge.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.