Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Legacy Nursing And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Kitchen staff failed to properly thaw, store, label, date, and discard food items, and surveyors observed trash cans without lids, expired and unlabeled foods in the refrigerator, freezer, and pantry, and raw chicken thawing improperly in the sink. Staff also failed to perform hand hygiene after glove removal and after handling raw chicken, a dishwasher wore no beard restraint, and an ADON fed a resident with severe cognitive impairment after touching contaminated surfaces and the resident’s food without washing or sanitizing hands.
Resident Council Meetings Not Held Monthly: The facility failed to ensure Resident Council met on a monthly basis for six confidential residents reviewed. Record review showed the council did not meet in two months, and residents stated they wanted to be invited to council and have monthly meetings but were not given a reason for the missed meetings. The Activity Director was unsure of the meeting requirement, and the Administrator stated the facility policy required monthly meetings and that the Activity Dept was responsible for ensuring they occurred.
Failure to provide individualized activity programming: Three residents with anxiety, depression, and dementia-related diagnoses did not receive group, in-room, or independent activities despite care plans and MDSs identifying activity preferences and the need for person-centered programming. Staff stated they had not asked the residents about preferences, no participation records showed activities were provided, and observations showed one resident repeatedly yelling in her room, one resident lying in bed requesting in-room interaction, and one resident agitated and yelling in the common area.
Unlocked Medication Carts Left Medications Accessible: Two medication carts were observed unlocked and unattended, with the locking mechanisms protruding outward while staff were nearby but not monitoring the carts. The ADON, RN Supervisor, and DON all stated medication carts should be locked when not in use, and the facility policy required medication compartments to be locked when not in use.
MDS Did Not Reflect Active Dialysis A resident with ESRD, CKD, DM, and heart disease had active dialysis on M/W/F, but the MDS did not document dialysis in Section O. The care plan included dialysis, yet the 802 Resident Matrix also did not list the resident for dialysis because it pulled from the MDS. The DON, corporate MDS nurse, and Administrator all stated they did not know why the dialysis information was missing.
Dirty, rough fingernails were observed on three residents who required ADL assistance. One resident had hemiplegia and intact cognition, another had severe cognitive impairment with dementia, and a third had dementia and diabetes; all required staff help with hygiene and grooming, and one required nursing nail care due to diabetes. Staff and the DON stated the residents did not refuse care, and the facility policy required nails to be clean, clipped, and filed smoothly.
A cook was hired and allowed to prepare meals without a current Texas food handler certificate, contrary to facility policy requiring food service staff to be trained and competent before handling or serving food. The cook believed a prior certificate was still active but had not confirmed its validity and had no certificate on file. The Dietary Manager did not verify the cook’s credential when she began overseeing the department and acknowledged the cook had been preparing meals without the required license. HR had scheduled a food handler class shortly after the cook’s hire but did not confirm attendance or completion and failed to ensure the certificate was obtained and filed, while the ADM stated the Dietary Manager and HR shared responsibility for verifying and filing the required credential.
A resident was not provided with hospice services, nor was assistance given to transfer the resident to a facility that could arrange for hospice care, resulting in a deficiency related to the provision of end-of-life services.
Three residents experienced misappropriation of their controlled medications when an ADON removed discontinued narcotics from a medication cart without proper documentation or following required procedures, resulting in missing doses for each resident. The ADON did not count or sign out the medications, and the narcotic logs showed discrepancies and unrecognized signatures. Staff interviews and record reviews confirmed that facility policies for handling and securing discontinued narcotics were not followed.
A resident experienced a significant weight loss of 10.98% in less than 60 days due to inadequate monitoring and intervention by the facility. Despite being at risk for weight loss, the resident's nutritional needs were not addressed, and staff were unaware of the severity of the situation. Communication gaps and a lack of timely evaluation by the dietitian contributed to the deficiency.
A facility's medication error rate was found to be 9.68%, exceeding the acceptable threshold of 5%. This involved two residents and one medication aide who failed to check vital signs before administering medications as per physician orders. The residents had severe cognitive impairments and conditions requiring specific medication parameters, which were not adhered to, leading to the deficiency.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in its kitchen and nourishment room, with unlabeled and undated food in the walk-in cooler, improperly stored scoops in bulk food bins, and expired items in the nourishment room refrigerator. Interviews with the DM, DON, and Administrator confirmed these practices could lead to foodborne illnesses, violating the facility's Food Safety and Sanitation Policy.
A facility failed to update a resident's care plan after an arterial status ulcer on the right great toe was resolved. The MDS Coordinator did not revise the care plan, which could lead to errors in care. The DON emphasized the importance of updating care plans to ensure proper resident care.
Two residents in an LTC facility did not receive necessary assistance with ADLs, leading to deficiencies in personal hygiene. A male resident with diabetes had dirty and rough fingernails despite requesting care, while a female resident with intact cognition was embarrassed by facial hair she could not remove. Staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding these residents' needs, highlighting systemic issues in the facility's care provision.
A resident identified as a fall risk did not have a fall mat placed beside her bed as required by her care plan. Despite being severely cognitively impaired and having a history of falls, the fall mat was found against a chest of drawers instead. Staff interviews confirmed the oversight, acknowledging the mat's necessity as per the resident's care plan and Kardex. The facility's fall protocol was not followed, leading to a deficiency in accident prevention measures.
Kitchen Food Safety and Hand Hygiene Failures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly store, prepare, and distribute food in the kitchen. During the initial kitchen tour on 02/10/2026, surveyors observed 3 trash cans without lids, large bins of sugar and flour in the food preparation area without discard or use-by dates, and multiple food items in the walk-in refrigerator and freezer that were unlabeled, undated, or missing discard dates. These included deli turkey, shredded cheese, sliced cheese, boiled eggs, an unknown product resembling icing, tortillas, enchilada sauce, coleslaw dressing, chicken, and a breaded item resembling biscuits. The dry pantry also contained expired cereal and dented cans of carrots. Surveyors also observed improper thawing and handling of food. On 02/10/2026, two large turkey breasts and a storage bag of ground beef were sitting in a sink thawing with no running water. On 02/11/2026, raw chicken was observed thawing in the sink without a container. The dietary aide stated she thought that was how meat was thawed, and the dietary manager later stated that raw chicken should have been placed in a container or thawed in the walk-in refrigerator. The dietary manager also stated that food labeling should include the received date and that cooked food is labeled with the received date, opened or prepared date, and discard date. The report also documented hand hygiene and hair restraint failures. A cook was observed not washing or sanitizing her hands after removing gloves and after handling raw chicken before touching another food item. A dishwasher with a beard of approximately 2 inches was observed without a beard restraint, despite stating he knew hair restraints should be worn in the kitchen. In addition, the ADON was observed touching a chair, the resident’s clothing, wheelchair, plate, spoon, napkin, and food while feeding a resident with severe cognitive impairment and without washing or sanitizing her hands. The resident had a BIMS score of 1, required staff assistance with eating, and had diagnoses including dementia, osteoporosis, and anxiety disorder.
Resident Council Meetings Not Held Monthly
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure residents had the right to organize and participate in Resident Council meetings for six of six confidential residents reviewed. Record review of Resident Council minutes from 09/2025 through 02/2026 showed the council did not meet during October 2025 and January 2026. During a confidential group interview, six residents stated they wanted to be invited to Resident Council and wanted meetings held once a month. They also stated they had not been having monthly Resident Council meetings and were not given a reason why the meetings were not held on a regular basis. During an interview on 02/11/2026, the Activity Director stated she was unsure how many times Resident Council was required to meet and said she would review the facility policy, but she did not complete the interview with the surveyor before exit. During an interview on 02/12/2026, the Administrator stated the facility policy required Resident Council to meet monthly and that this was his expectation. He stated the Resident Council President was not feeling well when the meeting was scheduled in January 2026, that the meeting could have been changed to another date, and that someone in the Activity Department could have informed residents of the change. He stated it was the Activity Director's responsibility to ensure Resident Council meets monthly.
Failure to Provide Individualized Activity Programming
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program that supported residents’ choices of activities, including facility-sponsored group activities, individual activities, and independent activities, for 3 of 8 residents reviewed for activities. Resident #41, Resident #50, and Resident #69 did not receive activities during January and February 2026, despite care plans and assessments reflecting activity preferences and the need for individualized programming. Resident #41 had diagnoses including anxiety disorder, depression, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and chronic pain syndrome. Her baseline care plan stated she preferred to attend activities of her choice and should be encouraged to attend different activities. However, activity participation records showed she had not been provided any activity by activity staff in her room or in a group since admission. During observations, she was repeatedly seen in her room in a wheelchair yelling for help, pulling on her hearing aids, and not responding appropriately to questions about her needs or preferences. The Activity Director stated she had not asked Resident #41 about her activity preferences, had not asked the resident or family what activities she enjoyed, and had not provided any type of activity item or activity program. Resident #50 had diagnoses including major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. His MDS reflected a BIMS score of 7, indicating severely impaired cognition, and his care plan stated he preferred activities of his choice and should be encouraged to attend different activities. During observation, he was lying in bed with the television off and stated he did not enjoy group activities and would prefer someone to come to his room to talk with him and maybe play cards. The Activity Director stated she had not asked Resident #50 about his activity preferences and that there were no participation records showing he received any activities in January or February 2026. Resident #69 had diagnoses including anxiety disorder, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with kidney complication. His MDS reflected a BIMS score of 9, indicating moderately impaired cognition, and his assessment identified several activities as very important to him, including reading, listening to music, being around pets, keeping up with the news, going outside, and participating in religious services. His care plan directed staff to encourage different activities, remind him of upcoming activities, and review his preferences. However, he was observed in the common area yelling, attempting to remove his clothes, trying to stand from a recliner, and continuing to yell and display agitation over multiple observations. The Activity Director stated he was not aware of him attending group activities during January and February 2026, that he did not receive in-room activities, and that no activity item was provided to divert his attention from yelling and removing his clothes in the public area.
Unlocked Medication Carts Left Medications Accessible
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to keep medication carts locked and medications secured in 2 of 5 medication carts reviewed. On 02/10/2026 at 9:00 a.m., Medication Cart #1 was observed with the locking mechanism protruding outward, indicating it was unlocked, while it was partially in the hallway on 200 hall and partially behind the nurse’s desk on South Wing. The ADON was seated at the nurse’s desk with her back turned to the cart and stated she did not realize it was unlocked. She stated medication carts were to be locked except when a nurse was obtaining medications and reported that Medication Cart #1 contained all types of physician-prescribed medications except narcotics. On 02/11/2026 at 9:45 a.m., Medication Cart #2 was also observed unlocked, with the locking mechanism protruding outward, between the nurse’s desk on South Hall and the medication room. RN Supervisor E was about 50 feet away in a foyer and could not view the cart from where he was standing. He stated the cart was to always be locked except when dispensing medications. The DON stated on 02/12/2026 that all medication carts were expected to be locked when not in use and that residents, other staff, and visitors would have access to medications in an unlocked cart. Facility policy stated medications were to be stored in a safe, secure, and orderly manner and that compartments containing medications are locked when not in use.
MDS Did Not Reflect Resident’s Active Dialysis
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident #64’s MDS accurately reflected his status by not documenting active dialysis in Section O on the resident’s latest MDS assessments. Resident #64 was a cognitively intact male with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, stage 5 chronic kidney disease/end stage renal disease, type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, and acute osteomyelitis of the left ankle and foot. His care plan dated 2/10/2026 included a focus area for dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, and the resident stated he was receiving dialysis at admission and continued to attend dialysis on those days. Record review also showed the facility’s 802 Resident Matrix dated 2/10/2026 did not list Resident #64 for dialysis. The DON stated the corporate MDS nurse was responsible for updating the MDS and that the MDS should reflect current, correct resident information, but she did not know why dialysis was missing. The corporate MDS nurse stated she updates the MDS, typically verifies dialysis by reviewing the MAR and chart, and acknowledged she did not have a better answer for why dialysis was not included. The Administrator stated he did not know why the resident was not listed on the 802 or why dialysis was not documented on the MDS.
Dirty, Rough Fingernails Not Addressed for Residents Needing ADL Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents who required assistance with activities of daily living received nail care that kept their fingernails clean and free of rough edges. During observation on 02/10/2026, Resident #10, Resident #50, and Resident #69 were each found with blackish/brownish substance underneath fingernails and with rough edges on their nails. Resident #10 was observed lying in bed with rough edges on the right hand fingernails and blackish/brownish substance under the middle and fore fingernails. Resident #50 was observed lying in bed with blackish/brownish substance under fingernails on both hands and rough edges on the right hand fingernails. Resident #69 was observed sitting in a recliner in the common area with blackish/brownish substance under fingernails on the left hand and rough edges on those nails. Record review showed that Resident #10 had diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, cerebral infarction, and lymphedema. His MDS reflected intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15, no refusal of care, and substantial to maximal assistance needed for personal hygiene and other ADLs. His care plan included assistance with hygiene and grooming tasks and bathing. Resident #50 had diagnoses including major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. His MDS reflected a BIMS score of 7, no refusal of care, and supervision or touching assistance needed for personal hygiene, showers, and transfers. His revised care plan stated he required staff assistance for all ADLs, including hygiene, grooming, bathing, and adjusting clothing. Resident #69 had diagnoses including anxiety disorder, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with other diabetic kidney complication. His MDS reflected a BIMS score of 9, no refusal of care, and supervision or touching assistance needed for personal hygiene, toileting hygiene, and oral hygiene, with partial to moderate assistance needed for showers, dressing, and shower transfers. His care plan stated he required assistance with personal hygiene. Interviews with the DON, charge nurse, and CNAs showed that CNAs were responsible for nail care for residents without diabetes, while nurses were responsible for residents with diabetes. Staff stated the residents did not refuse nail care, and the facility policy stated fingernails should be clean, clipped, and filed smoothly as part of bath care.
Cook Worked Without Required Food Handler Certification
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified dietary staff by allowing a cook to work without a current Texas food handler certificate. Record review showed that the cook was hired as a cook on 11/25/2025, and there was no food handler certificate in her personnel file. The cook reported she began working at the end of November 2025 as a cook and believed her prior food service certificate was still active, but she could not recall when it expired and had not verified its status. She acknowledged it was expected that she have an active food handler license while preparing food. Interviews with facility staff revealed multiple missed checks related to the cook’s required credential. The Dietary Manager, who returned to the facility on 01/26/2026, stated she was unaware the cook did not have a food handler license and that the cook had been preparing meals in the kitchen; she acknowledged it was her responsibility to verify the license and that the cook should have had it before preparing food. The HR staff stated the cook’s orientation occurred on 11/26/2025 and that a food handler class had been scheduled shortly after hire, but she did not know why the cook did not attend and had failed to verify course completion or obtain the certificate. The Administrator stated the Dietary Manager was responsible for ensuring the cook had the license and HR was responsible for filing it. The facility’s “Preventing Foodborne Illness Food Handling Policy and Procedure” stated that all employees who handle, prepare, or serve food must be trained in safe food handling and demonstrate competency prior to working with or serving food to residents.
Failure to Arrange Hospice Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to arrange for the provision of hospice services for a resident or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that would provide such services. This deficiency indicates that the necessary steps were not taken to ensure the resident received appropriate hospice care as required.
Failure to Prevent Misappropriation of Controlled Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect three residents from the misappropriation of their controlled medications. One resident, who was cognitively intact and being discharged, had her Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen medication removed from the medication cart by the ADON without proper documentation or following established procedures. The ADON did not count the medication upon removal, did not sign it out, and placed it in a locked drawer in her office instead of the designated discontinued medication storage. The medication count was later found to be off by 10 tablets, and the narcotic log contained three entries with an unrecognizable signature after the last documented administration. During an audit prompted by this incident, the facility discovered that two additional residents had missing discontinued narcotics: one had 120 ml of hydromorphone liquid unaccounted for, and another had 56 tablets of Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen missing. The facility's investigation determined that the ADON was the last in the chain of custody for at least one of the missing medications and had not followed the facility's narcotic policies and procedures. The charge nurse who released the medication to the ADON did so without ensuring proper procedures were followed, despite feeling uncomfortable with the situation. Interviews with staff confirmed that the ADON did not follow the required process for handling discontinued medications, and that the facility's policy required two nurses to sign for narcotics and for discontinued medications to be placed in secure storage. The ADON admitted to removing the medication and not following procedure, but denied taking any of the medication. The facility's review of narcotic logs and interviews with the DON and other nurses corroborated the discrepancies and the failure to adhere to established protocols for controlled substances.
Failure to Address Significant Weight Loss in Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, as evidenced by a significant weight loss of 10.98% in less than 60 days. The resident, a female with multiple health conditions including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, ulcerative colitis, and end-stage renal disease, experienced a severe weight loss without appropriate interventions being implemented. Despite being at risk for weight loss due to dialysis, the resident's care plan did not adequately address her nutritional needs, and there was a lack of timely evaluation and intervention by the dietitian. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident had a decreased appetite and poor intake following an injury sustained in October 2024, which was not adequately addressed by the facility staff. The resident's breakfast tray was observed untouched, and staff interviews indicated a lack of awareness and action regarding the resident's weight loss. The Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) and Dietary Manager (DM) were unaware of any new nutrition interventions, and the Director of Nursing (DON) and Registered Dietitian (RD) had not evaluated the resident for weight loss or made any new recommendations. The facility's failure to monitor and address the resident's nutritional status was further compounded by communication gaps among staff. The DON stated that weight loss should be discussed daily, yet the resident's significant weight loss had not been flagged. The RD admitted to not being aware of the weight loss due to a failure in updating the weight records. This lack of coordination and timely intervention placed the resident at risk for further health decline, as her nutritional needs were not being met adequately.
Medication Error Rate Exceeds Acceptable Threshold
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, with an observed rate of 9.68% during a survey. This deficiency involved two residents and one medication aide (MA D) who did not adhere to physician orders requiring vital sign checks before administering medications. Specifically, MA D did not check the vital signs of Resident #39 and Resident #63 before administering their prescribed medications, which included Lisinopril, Metoprolol Tartrate, and Midodrine HCL. Resident #39, a female with severe cognitive impairment, essential hypertension, and tachycardia, had physician orders for Lisinopril and Metoprolol Tartrate that required holding the medication if blood pressure or pulse fell below specified parameters. However, MA D administered these medications without documenting or checking the resident's vital signs, as required by the orders. Similarly, Resident #63, also with severe cognitive impairment and a history of traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, had an order for Midodrine HCL that required holding the medication if blood pressure exceeded a certain threshold. MA D again failed to check the resident's blood pressure before administration. The medication aide, MA D, stated that the medication administration record (MAR) did not indicate the need for vital sign checks, which led to the oversight. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that staff should check vital signs for residents with specific medication parameters and acknowledged the potential for negative outcomes if these checks are not performed. The facility's policy on medication regimen review did not address the need for vital sign parameters in medication administration.
Sanitation Deficiencies in Kitchen and Nourishment Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in its kitchen and nourishment room, as observed during a survey. In the kitchen, food and beverages stored in the walk-in cooler were not labeled or dated, including salad dressing, juice, and milk. Additionally, scoops were improperly stored in containers of sugar, flour, and thickener powder, which could lead to contamination. In the nourishment room refrigerator on the 100 hallway, expired yogurt and an unlabeled bag with a brown substance were found, indicating a lack of proper food management. Interviews with the Dietary Manager (DM), Director of Nursing (DON), and Administrator revealed that the facility's staff did not adhere to the policy of labeling and dating foods, and improperly stored scoops in bulk food bins. The DM and DON acknowledged that these practices could expose residents to foodborne illnesses. The facility's Food Safety and Sanitation Policy requires that all time and temperature control for safety (TCS) leftovers be labeled, covered, and dated, and used within 72 hours. The FDA Food Code 2022 also specifies that scoops should be stored in a clean, protected location.
Failure to Update Resident Care Plan for Resolved Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident with a history of hemiplegia, hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, and an unstageable pressure ulcer. The resident's care plan did not reflect a revision of care for his current skin condition and wound care, specifically regarding an arterial status ulcer on his right great toe. Although the ulcer was resolved, the care plan was not updated to reflect this change, which could lead to errors in care and wound tracking. Observations and interviews revealed that the MDS Coordinator, responsible for updating care plans, did not update the resident's care plan after the ulcer healed. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated that staff are expected to update care plans with any changes to resident care, and failure to do so could result in residents not receiving proper care. The facility's policy requires that each resident's care plan remain current and inform staff of the resident's needs, strengths, goals, and approaches, and be reviewed quarterly and as needed.
Deficiencies in ADL Assistance and Personal Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) to two residents, leading to deficiencies in personal hygiene and grooming. Resident #34, a male with type 2 diabetes, diabetic polyneuropathy, and peripheral vascular disease, required staff assistance for all ADLs. Despite this, observations on two consecutive days revealed that his fingernails were dirty and had rough edges. Resident #34 reported that he had requested nail care from staff but resorted to biting his nails due to lack of assistance, which he feared could lead to infection due to his diabetic condition. Resident #75, a female with intact cognition, required assistance with personal hygiene and grooming tasks. Observations showed that she had noticeable facial hair, which she found embarrassing. Despite requesting assistance from staff to remove the hair, she did not receive the help she needed, leading to feelings of humiliation and a reluctance to socialize. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness regarding her requests for facial hair removal, indicating a breakdown in communication and care provision. Interviews with nursing staff and CNAs highlighted a systemic issue in the facility's approach to ADL care, particularly for residents with specific medical conditions like diabetes. The facility's policy required nurses to handle nail care for diabetic residents, but there was a failure to ensure this was consistently done. Additionally, the staff's lack of awareness of residents' requests and needs for grooming assistance contributed to the deficiencies observed. The facility's policy on nail care was not effectively implemented, leading to potential risks for the residents involved.
Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Measures for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a fall mat was placed beside the bed of Resident #61, who was identified as a fall risk. This oversight was observed on 11/13/2024, when the fall mat was found against the chest of drawers instead of beside the resident's bed. Resident #61, a female with severe cognitive impairment and a history of falls, required supervision and assistance with transfers. Her care plan included the use of a low bed and a fall mat as interventions to prevent falls. Interviews with staff, including RN A, CNA B, and CNA C, confirmed that Resident #61 was a fall risk and required a fall mat beside her bed. The staff acknowledged that the fall mat was part of the resident's care plan and Kardex, which they referred to for guidance on the care needed. Despite this, the fall mat was not in place, posing a risk of injury if the resident attempted to get out of bed unassisted. The Director of Nurses also confirmed that the fall mat was a necessary intervention for Resident #61 and that it was the responsibility of the nurse supervisor to ensure all fall devices were in place. The facility's policy on fall protocol emphasized the importance of identifying residents at risk for falls and implementing preventative strategies, including the use of fall mats. However, the failure to adhere to this protocol resulted in a deficiency in providing adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for Resident #61.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 26 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Cameron
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie L Nursing & Rehabilitation | 0.5 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Heritage House Nursing And Rehabilitation | 14.2 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Rockdale Estates & Rehabilitation | 16.1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Crossroads Nursing & Rehabilitation | 22.5 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
| Avir At Caldwell | 24.8 mi | — | 12 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Legacy Nursing And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.