Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Ignite Medical Resort San Antonio, Llc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors found a treatment cart left unlocked and unattended in a public hallway, out of view of the nurses' station, with wound cleanser, iodine, and wound care supplies accessible in its drawers. An RN reported he had stepped into a resident’s room briefly and acknowledged he was not supposed to leave the cart unlocked because it contained treatments and medications. Staff in black uniforms, later confirmed by a PTA to be therapists, were present in the hallway but were not attending the cart. The ADON stated that treatment carts are expected to be locked like med carts due to the presence of scissors and medications and that the assigned staff member is responsible for locking the cart when unattended, consistent with the facility’s written medication storage policy requiring medication supplies to remain locked when not in use or not attended by authorized personnel.
Two residents with complex wounds and orders for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) received wound care from an RN who did not follow required infection control practices. The RN entered each resident’s room and performed coccyx and groin wound treatments without donning a gown, and there was no EBP signage or PPE available outside the rooms despite EBP orders and care plans. During wound care, the RN failed to change gloves or perform hand hygiene after cleaning wounds and before applying treatments and dressings, and moved from one wound site to another while wearing the same gloves. In interviews, the RN and ADON acknowledged that EBP, glove changes, and hand hygiene were required by facility policy for wound care and when moving from contaminated to clean body sites.
Both facility elevators were repeatedly observed to bounce and make unusual noises during operation, with staff and maintenance confirming ongoing issues over several months. Service records showed multiple calls for similar problems, but documentation of repairs was incomplete and the facility's policy did not address the specific issue of elevator bouncing. No injuries were reported, but the elevators remained in use by residents and staff despite the deficiencies.
A capsule of Lyrica, a Schedule V controlled substance, was found improperly stored in an unmarked cup in a medication cart drawer rather than in the required double-locked compartment. A CNA had removed the medication from its original packaging and left it unsecured instead of discarding it, contrary to facility policy and federal regulations.
A facility failed to protect the confidentiality of resident records when an LPN left a Vital Signs Flow Sheet Report visible on a medication cart, exposing personal information of 14 residents. Staff interviews confirmed the expectation for confidentiality, but the incident still occurred, affecting residents, including one severely cognitively impaired and another cognitively intact.
The facility failed to implement baseline care plans within 48 hours of admission for three residents, leading to potential risks due to unmet immediate care needs. The care plans lacked necessary information on ADLs and mobility, despite residents having significant impairments. Staff interviews revealed confusion over responsibility for care plan completion and inconsistent communication of residents' needs.
The facility failed to secure medication carts on multiple occasions, leaving them unlocked and unattended in various halls. This included carts containing medications such as insulin, thyroid medications, and prescription creams. Although narcotics were double locked, the accessible medications posed a risk of unauthorized access. Nursing staff admitted to leaving the carts unlocked while attending to residents, contrary to facility policy requiring carts to be locked when not in use.
A resident with a history of surgical aftercare, pneumonia, and schizophrenia did not have his weight monitored as per physician orders, which required weekly checks during the night shift. The facility failed to document any refusal or attempts to obtain the weight on the scheduled date, leading to a lapse in care. The resident was eventually weighed days later, revealing significant weight loss, prompting dietary intervention.
A resident with a pressure ulcer on the left heel did not receive consistent care as ordered, with Prevelon boots not applied while in bed or sitting in a chair. Observations showed the resident without boots on multiple occasions, and documentation was inconsistent. Despite the facility having the boots in stock, there was a delay in providing them, and staff were unaware of the issue. The resident's ulcer showed improvement, but the lack of adherence to care orders could have affected healing.
The facility failed to maintain food safety standards, with expired Osmolite found in a fridge and staff not wearing proper facial hair restraints. Observations showed improper hand hygiene and cross-contamination during meal prep, with trays dried using a hand towel instead of air drying. These practices contradict the facility's policy and could risk foodborne illness.
The facility failed to develop and implement baseline care plans within 48 hours of admission for eight residents, as required by their policy. This deficiency was identified through interviews and record reviews, which revealed that the baseline care plans for these residents were not completed in the specified timeframe. The residents involved had various medical conditions, necessitating timely and effective care planning. The DON admitted to being unable to complete the care plans on time due to other job duties, which resulted in missed or inadequate care planning for the residents.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, with staff not sanitizing equipment or performing hand hygiene between resident interactions. An RN did not sanitize a glucometer between uses for two residents, one on droplet precautions, and failed to wash hands between glove changes. Additionally, a server did not sanitize hands between handling meal trays, despite wearing gloves. These practices were contrary to the facility's infection control policies.
The facility failed to respond promptly to call lights for three residents, leading to distress and unmet care needs. One resident experienced a two-hour delay after vomiting, another faced delays for toileting needs, and a third reported multiple 45-minute waits. Despite these issues, the Administrator believed responses were timely.
A facility failed to accurately assess a resident's functional capacity by omitting a documented anxiety disorder from the Initial MDS Assessment and care plan. The resident, admitted with orthopedic aftercare and diabetes, had a physician-documented anxiety diagnosis and was prescribed hydroxyzine. The DON acknowledged the omission and the potential risk of inadequate anxiety care.
A resident with acute kidney failure, diabetes, and hypertension was unable to use the bathroom call light due to a malfunction, which was not reported to maintenance. The resident, who had decreased vision and was at fall risk, expressed concern after a recent fall. The maintenance director confirmed the issue was due to disconnected wiring, and the facility's policy on call light outages was not followed.
A resident in an LTC facility did not receive scheduled doses of Dexamethasone due to the medication's unavailability. The resident, who was cognitively impaired and had multiple health conditions, missed eight doses over two days. The facility's process for medication ordering failed to ensure timely availability, and the pharmacy did not have the medication in stock during a holiday weekend. The resident was later given IV Dexamethasone and returned to baseline.
Unlocked, Unattended Treatment Cart with Medications and Supplies in Public Hallway
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper controls and that only authorized personnel had access to the keys for a treatment cart. During an observation on 3/25/26 at 1:38 p.m., a state investigator found Treatment Cart #1 unlocked and unattended in the 100 hall, in front of a resident room with the door closed and out of view of the nurses' station. The drawers of the cart contained wound cleanser, iodine, and wound care supplies. Three staff members in black uniforms were assisting residents in the hallway, but none were attending the cart. The facility’s written policy titled “Medication Storage” dated 2007 stated that medication rooms, cabinets, and medication supplies should remain locked when not in use or attended by persons with authorized access. In an interview at 1:40 p.m. on 3/25/26, an RN stated he had gone into a resident’s room for only two minutes and acknowledged he was not supposed to leave Treatment Cart #1 unlocked because it contained treatments and medications. He further stated that unattended carts should be locked to prevent residents from accessing the contents. On 3/26/26 at 1:04 p.m., a PTA reported that facility therapists wore black uniforms, confirming the identity of the staff observed in the hallway. In a separate interview on 4/2/26 at 4:12 p.m., the ADON stated that treatment carts were supposed to be locked because they contained scissors and medications that could be dangerous to guests, staff, and residents, and that the cart should be treated like a medication cart. The ADON also stated that the person assigned to the cart was responsible for ensuring it was locked when unattended, and that any staff member could lock a medication cart if it was seen unlocked and unattended. The DON was not available during the investigation.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Hand Hygiene During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s infection prevention and control program related to failure to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and basic infection control practices during wound care for two residents. One resident was admitted with osteomyelitis, muscle weakness, and a need for assistance with personal care, and had an actual impairment to skin integrity with a care plan intervention to follow facility protocols for treatment of injury. This resident had physician orders for daily and PRN coccyx wound care and an order for EBP. During observed wound care to this resident’s coccyx, the RN entered the room without donning a gown, despite the EBP order, and there was no EBP signage or PPE outside the room. A second resident was admitted with surgical aftercare following circulatory system surgery, sepsis, muscle weakness, and a need for assistance with personal care, and was care planned for EBP related to wounds. This resident had orders for wound care to the coccyx and to bilateral groin surgical incisions, including cleansing, application of betadine, Santyl, nystatin powder, calcium alginate, and dressings. During observed wound care to this resident’s coccyx and groin areas, the same RN entered the room without donning a gown, and there was no EBP signage or PPE outside the room, despite the resident being on EBP for wounds. Additional infection control failures were observed in the RN’s wound care technique. For the first resident, the RN cleaned the coccyx wound, applied treatment, packed the wound, and applied a foam dressing without performing hand hygiene or changing gloves after cleaning the wound and before applying treatments and dressing. For the second resident, the RN cleaned the right groin wound and then the left groin wound without removing gloves, performing hand hygiene, or donning clean gloves between areas, and then applied treatments and dressings to both groin wounds while still wearing the same gloves and without hand hygiene. In interviews, the RN acknowledged that EBP were required for wound care and that she was expected to change gloves and perform hand hygiene when moving from dirty to clean tasks and from one wound to another, and the ADON confirmed that EBP and hand hygiene practices were required per facility policy. Facility policies on hand hygiene, wound care, EBP, and infection control all required appropriate PPE use, glove changes, and hand hygiene, which were not followed in these observed instances.
Failure to Maintain Elevators in Safe Operating Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain both of its elevators in safe operating condition, as evidenced by repeated issues with bouncing, slow travel, and unusual noises during operation. Surveyors observed both elevators exhibiting multiple bounces when moving between floors, with elevator #2 displaying more severe and frequent bouncing, as well as creaking, groaning, and popping sounds. No current inspection certificates were posted in either elevator at the time of observation, although records indicated that both had passed their last annual inspection. Review of service records revealed a pattern of recurring problems with the elevators, including multiple service calls for issues such as bouncing, being stuck, and slow operation. The facility's Maintenance Director acknowledged that one of the elevator shocks was not working and that the issue had been ongoing for an unknown period. He also stated that repairs required corporate approval and that documentation of service calls and repairs was lacking, with no invoices or detailed records available for parts ordered or work completed. Interviews with staff confirmed that the elevators had been bouncing for several months and that residents regularly used them. The Maintenance Director and DON both recognized the potential for falls due to the elevator issues, although no injuries had been reported. The facility's elevator maintenance policy did not address the specific issue of car movement or bouncing, only stating that inoperable elevators should be shut down and serviced.
Improper Storage of Controlled Substance in Medication Cart
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a medication cart on the 100 hallway was found to have a capsule of Lyrica (pregabalin), a Schedule V controlled substance, stored improperly. The capsule, intended for a specific resident, was discovered in an unmarked medication cup in the upper right drawer of the cart, outside of the required double-locked controlled substance compartment. The medication had been removed from its original blister pack and was not labeled. This was observed during a review of the medication cart and confirmed through staff interviews. Further investigation revealed that a CNA had accidentally removed the Lyrica capsule from its packaging earlier and, instead of discarding it, placed it in a cup to the side in the cart. The CNA admitted to this practice and stated that the medication was not labeled. The DON clarified that the facility's expectation was for any unused or accidentally removed controlled substances to be wasted with a witness and co-signed, and that all controlled substances should be stored in a locked narcotic drawer, as per facility policy and federal regulations.
Confidentiality Breach of Resident Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect the confidentiality of personal and medical records for 14 residents, as observed during a survey. An unattended Vital Signs Flow Sheet Report was found on a locked medication cart in the 200-East Hall, displaying personal information such as names, room numbers, vital signs, and dialysis appointment times. This document was left visible and unattended, potentially exposing sensitive information to anyone passing by. The staff member identified in relation to this incident was an LPN, who acknowledged that the vital signs document should not be visible to everyone. Interviews with facility staff, including the ACNO and CNO, revealed that the expectation was for personal protected information to remain confidential and not be visible in public areas. The facility's policy on medical records, last revised in May 2023, emphasized the importance of maintaining the confidentiality of patient records. Despite these policies, the incident occurred, affecting residents, including one who was severely cognitively impaired and another who was cognitively intact, both of whom expressed concerns about their information being exposed.
Failure to Implement Timely Baseline Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident within 48 hours of admission, as required by their policy. This deficiency was identified for three residents who were reviewed for baseline care plans. The absence of a timely baseline care plan meant that the residents' immediate needs, such as activities of daily living (ADLs), mobility, and other care requirements, were not adequately addressed, potentially placing them at risk for inconsistent care. For Resident #1, the baseline care plan lacked selections for functional abilities related to self-care, mobility, and activities of daily living. The resident had multiple diagnoses, including syncope, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis, and required assistance with various ADLs. Despite these needs, the care plan was not initiated until several days after admission. Similarly, Resident #2's baseline care plan did not include necessary information about self-care and mobility needs, despite the resident being bedbound and requiring extensive assistance. Resident #3's care plan also lacked interventions for ADL transfer and mobility needs, even though the resident had significant mobility impairments and required assistance. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of clarity and communication regarding the responsibility for completing baseline care plans. The admissions nurse was believed to be responsible for initiating the care plan, but this was not consistently executed. Direct care staff often did not receive adequate information about new residents' needs, relying instead on verbal reports or their own observations. This inconsistency in communication and documentation contributed to the failure to meet the residents' immediate care needs within the required timeframe.
Medication Carts Left Unlocked and Unattended
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments, as observed in three medication carts located in different halls of the facility. On multiple occasions, medication carts on the 200-East Hall, 200-West Hall, and 300-West Hall were found unlocked and unattended. This was confirmed through observations and interviews with the nursing staff responsible for these carts. The staff members admitted to leaving the carts unlocked while attending to residents, which included administering medications or assisting with personal care tasks. During the observations, it was noted that the unlocked carts contained various medications and supplies, such as over-the-counter medications, insulin, thyroid medications, and prescription creams. Although the narcotics drawers were double locked, the accessible medications posed a risk of unauthorized access. The nursing staff acknowledged the potential risks associated with leaving the carts unlocked, including the possibility of residents accessing medications they should not have. Interviews with the facility's nursing leadership, including the Assistant Chief Nursing Officers and the Chief Nursing Officer, revealed a clear expectation that medication carts should always be locked when not in use or attended by authorized personnel. The facility's policy on medication storage emphasized the importance of securing medication supplies to prevent unauthorized access. Despite these policies, the failure to lock the medication carts when unattended was a recurring issue, as observed during the survey.
Failure to Monitor Resident's Weight as Per Physician Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, specifically regarding the monitoring of the resident's weight as per physician orders. The resident, a male with a history of surgical aftercare, pneumonia, and schizophrenia, was supposed to have his weight taken every Tuesday night shift. However, the facility did not obtain his weight on the scheduled date, and there was no documentation of any refusal or attempts to take the weight at a different time. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident had a history of refusing various interventions, and it was likely that he refused to have his weight taken on the scheduled date. Despite this, the staff did not document any refusal or make further attempts to obtain the weight on that day. The lack of documentation and follow-up meant that the resident's weight was not monitored, which could have implications for his health, especially given his potential for nutritional and hydration alterations. The facility's policy required residents to be weighed weekly, especially with a significant change in condition or as per physician orders. The failure to adhere to this policy and the lack of documentation of the resident's refusal or any subsequent attempts to obtain the weight led to a deficiency in care. The resident was eventually weighed three days later, revealing a significant weight loss, which prompted a dietary intervention. However, the initial failure to follow the physician's order and document the process was a clear lapse in the facility's care standards.
Failure to Apply Prevelon Boots as Ordered for Pressure Ulcer Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate pressure ulcer care for a resident, leading to a deficiency in treatment and care according to professional standards. The resident, a male with a history of surgical aftercare, pneumonia, and schizophrenia, was admitted with a pressure ulcer on his left heel. Despite physician orders for Prevelon boots to be worn while in bed or sitting in a chair, the resident was observed multiple times without the boots, indicating non-compliance with the prescribed treatment. Observations over several days revealed that the resident was not wearing the Prevelon boots as ordered, both while in bed and sitting in a wheelchair. The Treatment Administration Record showed inconsistencies in the documentation of the boots being applied, with some days marked as refused and others left blank. Interviews with staff indicated a delay in providing the boots, despite the facility having them in stock, and a lack of awareness from the Chief Nursing Officer about the resident not having the boots. The resident's pressure ulcer showed signs of improvement over time, with a decrease in surface area, but the failure to consistently apply the Prevelon boots as ordered could have impacted the healing process. The facility's policy on foot care emphasizes the importance of maintaining mobility and good foot health, which was not adhered to in this case, potentially putting the resident at risk for further skin breakdown.
Food Safety and Hygiene Deficiencies in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety, as evidenced by several observations and interviews. Expired Osmolite, a tube feeding formula, was found in the third-floor nutrition fridge, with a best-by date of February 1, 2024. The Director of Nursing confirmed that expired Osmolite should not be present in any nutrition fridge. Additionally, staff members were observed not wearing appropriate facial hair restraints, which could lead to hair contamination in food. One staff member was seen without a beard guard after returning from a break, and another staff member's mustache was not covered while handling dishes and food. Further observations revealed improper hand hygiene and cross-contamination practices during meal preparation. A staff member was seen preparing meals without changing gloves or washing hands after handling various food items and equipment, which could lead to cross-contamination. The use of a hand towel to dry trays, lids, and bases instead of allowing them to air dry was also noted, which could result in contamination. Interviews with staff, including the Executive Chef and Dietician, confirmed that these practices were not in line with the facility's policy on preventing foodborne illness and maintaining hygiene standards. The facility's policy on employee hygiene and sanitary practices was reviewed, highlighting the need for proper handwashing, use of utensils, and wearing of hair restraints to prevent foodborne illness. The U.S. Public Health Service Food Code was also referenced, emphasizing the requirement for food employees to wear hair restraints to prevent hair from contacting food and clean equipment. These deficiencies in food safety practices could place residents at risk for foodborne illness, as noted in the report.
Failure to Implement Timely Baseline Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement baseline care plans within 48 hours of admission for eight residents, as required by their policy. This deficiency was identified through interviews and record reviews, which revealed that the baseline care plans for these residents were not completed in the specified timeframe. The residents involved had various medical conditions, including acute and chronic respiratory failure, sepsis, fractures, and other complex health issues, necessitating timely and effective care planning. The report highlights that the baseline care plans for residents were either initiated late or not completed within the required 48-hour period. For instance, Resident #77's care plan was completed several days after admission, and similar delays were noted for other residents. Interviews with the MDS Coordinator and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed these lapses, with the DON acknowledging the importance of timely care plans to ensure residents' needs are met. The facility's policy mandates that a baseline care plan be developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission, yet this was not adhered to for the residents reviewed. The DON admitted to being unable to complete the care plans on time due to other job duties, which resulted in missed or inadequate care planning for the residents. This failure to meet the policy requirements could potentially affect the quality of care provided to the residents.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Staff Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by several observed deficiencies involving staff practices. RN-E did not sanitize the glucometer between uses for two residents, one of whom was on droplet precautions, potentially risking cross-contamination. Despite acknowledging the oversight, RN-E admitted to not having disinfecting wipes available on the medication cart, which contributed to the failure to sanitize the equipment properly. Additionally, RN-E did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes and when entering or exiting resident rooms, including a room with droplet precautions. This lapse in hand hygiene was confirmed by both RN-E and the Director of Nursing (DON), who acknowledged the risk of spreading germs due to these practices. The facility's policy requires handwashing or sanitizing before and after resident contact and glove removal, which was not adhered to in these instances. Furthermore, Server B, responsible for meal tray distribution, did not sanitize hands between handling trays and entering or exiting resident rooms, despite wearing gloves. The gloves were worn due to having acrylic nails, but Server B admitted that hand sanitization should have been performed regardless. The General Manager (GM) confirmed that hand sanitization is part of infection control, as outlined in the facility's policy, which was not followed during the meal service.
Delayed Call Light Response for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely responses to call lights for three residents, which could affect the care they receive. Resident #201, who was admitted with conditions including spine fusion, type 2 diabetes, and adult T-cell lymphoma, experienced a delay of two hours in response to his call light after feeling nauseous and vomiting. This delay caused significant distress to the resident, who considered self-discharge due to the incident. Resident #67, with diagnoses such as pulmonary embolism and acute respiratory failure, reported a delay in call light response for a toileting need, which was not addressed until after lunch. A family member corroborated this by stating that they observed over an hour delay on several occasions. Resident #203, diagnosed with anemia, UTI, and malignant neoplasm of the endocervix, also reported multiple instances where it took 45 minutes for staff to respond to her call light. The facility's resident council meeting notes and grievance log further indicated concerns about call light response times. Despite these reports, the facility's Administrator believed that staff responded to call lights in a timely manner. The facility's Admission Agreement emphasizes the right of residents to live in an environment that promotes dignity and respect, which was not upheld in these instances.
Failure to Accurately Assess Resident's Anxiety Disorder
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct an accurate comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional capacity, specifically omitting a diagnosis of anxiety disorder. The resident, a male admitted with orthopedic aftercare, infection due to joint prosthesis, and type 2 diabetes, had a documented diagnosis of anxiety disorder and was prescribed hydroxyzine for anxiety management. However, this diagnosis was not reflected in the resident's Initial MDS Assessment under the psychiatric/mood disorder section, nor was it included in the resident's care plan. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the omission and recognized the potential risk of not providing appropriate care related to anxiety.
Inoperable Call Light System in Resident's Bathroom
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a working call system was available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area, specifically affecting one resident. On a specified date, the resident attempted to use the call light, which did not illuminate the nurse call light outside and above the room door. This malfunction could potentially place residents at risk by not receiving timely care and attention. The resident, who had a history of acute kidney failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and primary hypertension, expressed concern about the inoperable bathroom call light, especially after a recent fall in the room. The resident's care plan noted decreased vision, hearing difficulties, and a fall risk, highlighting the importance of a functional call system. During an observation and interview, the resident reported the bathroom call light was not working, and the maintenance director confirmed the issue was due to disconnected wiring. The maintenance director was unaware of the problem as no work order had been submitted. The facility's policy on preventative maintenance and call light outages requires immediate notification to maintenance for repairs, which was not followed in this instance. The lack of awareness and communication among staff contributed to the deficiency, as the LVN assigned to the resident's hallway was also unaware of the malfunction.
Failure to Administer Scheduled Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of a resident, specifically in acquiring and administering the scheduled doses of Dexamethasone, a corticosteroid, on two consecutive days. The resident, a cognitively impaired elderly female with a history of cerebral meningioma, hyperlipidemia, dementia, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and muscle weakness, missed eight doses of the medication due to its unavailability. The medication was not in the facility's emergency supply box, and the pharmacy, which was new to the facility, did not have it in stock during a holiday weekend. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and medical assistants revealed that the facility's process for ordering medications involved checking for a seven-day supply and reordering as needed. However, the Dexamethasone was not reordered in time, and the facility's stock did not include this medication. The DON acknowledged the issue and mentioned working with the pharmacy to prevent future delays. Despite the missed doses, the resident was later started on IV Dexamethasone and returned to baseline, but the initial failure to administer the medication as prescribed was noted as a deficiency.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 625 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 15 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near San Antonio
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huebner Creek Health & Rehabilitation Center | 0.2 mi | — | 25 | 0 |
| Mesa Vista Inn Health Center | 0.4 mi | — | 23 | 0 |
| Northgate Health And Rehabilitation Center | 0.4 mi | — | 25 | 0 |
| Remington Transitional Care Of San Antonio | 0.6 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Sorrento | 0.8 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Ignite Medical Resort San Antonio, Llc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.