Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Harmony Care At Floresville during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility did not provide enough dietary staff to ensure meals were served on time, resulting in repeated delays and cold food. Observations and interviews confirmed that meals were often late, with residents expressing hunger and dissatisfaction, and staff acknowledging ongoing issues with meal timing and food temperature.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, with staff not adhering to hand hygiene and enhanced barrier precautions. A CNA did not sanitize hands between assisting residents, an RN misunderstood precautions for G-tube care, and a medication aide failed to sanitize a blood pressure cuff between uses. Additionally, CNAs did not use proper precautions during catheter care, indicating gaps in training and understanding of infection control protocols.
The facility failed to ensure the proper completion of DNR forms for two residents, as both forms lacked the required second physician's signature. This oversight could result in the residents' end-of-life wishes being dishonored, as confirmed by the Social Work Designee.
A resident's quarterly MDS assessment inaccurately documented the absence of antipsychotic medication, despite records showing the administration of Seroquel for Bipolar Disorder. The MDS coordinator confirmed the error, acknowledging that Seroquel should have been coded as an antipsychotic, highlighting a failure in accurately reflecting the resident's medication status.
The facility failed to implement baseline care plans for two residents, leading to deficiencies in care. One resident with epilepsy and a history of falls did not have these risks addressed in his care plan, despite having two falls since admission. Another resident with congestive heart failure and COPD lacked a care plan for his oxygen therapy and wound care needs. The facility's policy requires baseline care plans to meet immediate care needs, but this was not followed, potentially impacting resident care.
A facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident with an indwelling catheter. The resident, with multiple diagnoses including dementia and hypertension, was observed to have a catheter, but their care plan lacked provisions for catheter care. The MDS coordinator confirmed the oversight, which could lead to inadequate care, contrary to the facility's policy requiring comprehensive, person-centered care plans.
A facility failed to manage oxygen equipment properly for a resident with Congestive Heart Failure and COPD. Used oxygen tubing and a humidifier bottle were left in the resident's room, contrary to the facility's policy requiring weekly changes to prevent infection. The resident resisted removal of the equipment, contributing to the deficiency.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment was found with a jar of mentholated ointment at his bedside, which was not prescribed or authorized for self-medication. The ointment was accessible, contrary to the facility's policy requiring secure storage of medications. The DON confirmed that such medications should not be left unsecured.
The facility's kitchen failed to meet food service safety standards, with a handwashing sink blocked by rolling carts and a sand-like substance on the dish sanitizing machine. The Dietary Manager confirmed these issues, and the Administrator noted the absence of a dietary services policy.
The facility's beauty shop was found unlocked with potentially dangerous materials accessible, including a disinfectant and hair dye with severe warning labels. Staff confirmed these materials should not be accessible, and the Administrator acknowledged the lack of a policy regarding the physical environment.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of amputation and osteoporosis was injured during a transfer when a CNA failed to use a mechanical lift as required by the care plan. The resident sustained a left tibia/fibula fracture after being transferred using a standing pivot transfer by one staff member instead of the mechanical lift with two staff. The CNA admitted to not following the care plan, leading to the resident's injury.
The facility failed to maintain RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours daily, 7 days a week, missing coverage on 24 specific days, particularly on weekends. The DON acknowledged the absence of a designated weekend RN, and the Administrator was unaware of the extent of the issue. The facility's policy requires an RN onsite daily, but no nursing waivers were in place.
A facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was within reach, despite the resident's severe cognitive impairment and fall risk. The call light was found wrapped around the bed rail and hidden, contrary to the care plan and facility policy. Staff interviews confirmed the importance of call light accessibility to prevent falls and injuries.
A resident's privacy was compromised when a medication aide left a computer screen unlocked, exposing the resident's medication list. The aide was unaware of the need to lock the screen, and the DON emphasized the importance of adhering to HIPAA regulations. The resident had multiple sclerosis, hypertension, and depression, with intact cognition.
A facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for a resident with severe cognitive impairment, resulting in the resident's call light being inaccessible. Despite the care plan's intervention to keep the call light within reach to prevent falls, it was found wrapped around the bed rail and hidden. Staff interviews confirmed the importance of following care plan interventions to ensure resident safety.
A resident with a history of stroke and other conditions did not receive proper gastrostomy tube care in an LTC facility. The nursing staff failed to check tube placement and gastric residual volume before administering medications and flushes, contrary to the care plan and facility policy. The medications were administered using a syringe instead of gravity, and the staff lacked specific training on PEG tubes. The facility was also without a Director of Nursing.
The facility failed to protect residents' confidential information, as it was found in clear trash bags outside the Medical Records office and on a printer in a public area. LVN A confirmed the presence of confidential data, and both LVN A and LVN B acknowledged the responsibility of all staff to maintain confidentiality. The Administrator was unaware of the papers on the printer, despite facility policies emphasizing the protection of PHI.
A resident's medications, including Morphine, Tramadol, and Lorazepam, were left unattended by an LVN in the resident's room, contrary to the facility's policy requiring secure storage. The resident had multiple health issues and impaired cognitive skills. The facility lacked a DON at the time, potentially impacting adherence to medication security protocols.
Two residents with cognitive impairments eloped from a facility due to inadequate supervision and malfunctioning door alarms. One resident, with dementia, was found near a busy street, while another, with Alzheimer's, was taken by a family member without consent. The facility lacked proper care plans and monitoring, contributing to these incidents.
Two residents with dementia eloped from the facility without proper reporting to authorities. One resident was found near a busy street, while the other was taken by a family member without authorization. The facility failed to document these incidents and did not adhere to policies for monitoring and reporting.
Insufficient Dietary Staffing Leads to Delayed and Cold Meal Service
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient support personnel in the food and nutrition service, resulting in meals not being served according to the posted start times for both dinner and lunch on multiple occasions. Observations revealed that there was only one cook and two dietary aides working, with one aide in each building. Meal service was consistently delayed, with dinner and lunch being served significantly after the scheduled times. Residents and staff reported that meals were often late and sometimes cold, with grievances and resident council meeting minutes documenting repeated complaints about cold and late food across several months. On specific days, direct observation showed that meal trays were not ready at the scheduled times, and residents expressed hunger and frustration due to the delays. For example, lunch service was delayed by up to an hour, with residents voicing their hunger and requesting food. A test tray provided to the state investigator was found to be at room temperature, confirming concerns about food temperature. Staff interviews corroborated that meal service was frequently late, and some staff had to assist with meal preparation due to short staffing. The dietary manager and other staff acknowledged the ongoing issues with meal timing and food temperature, noting that grievances had been received about these problems. The dietary manager also stated that late meal service was a recurring issue, particularly when certain staff were working, and that delays sometimes occurred due to food not being at the correct temperature at service time. The administrator confirmed that meals were sometimes delayed, particularly when food was not fully cooked at the scheduled time.
Infection Control Deficiencies in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by multiple instances of non-compliance with hand hygiene and enhanced barrier precautions. On one occasion, a CNA did not sanitize her hands between assisting different residents during mealtime, potentially spreading germs among them. The CNA, who was agency staff and working her first day at the facility, acknowledged the lapse and attributed it to the lack of readily available hand sanitizer. In another instance, an RN administering medication via a G-tube to a resident did not adhere to enhanced barrier precautions, wearing only gloves without a gown. The RN misunderstood the requirements for enhanced barrier precautions, believing they were only necessary for wounds or Foley catheters, not G-tubes. This misunderstanding highlights a gap in the RN's knowledge regarding infection control practices for residents with indwelling devices. Additionally, a medication aide failed to sanitize a blood pressure cuff between uses on different residents, despite being aware of the requirement. This oversight could lead to cross-contamination between residents. Furthermore, two CNAs providing catheter care to a resident did not use enhanced barrier precautions, lacking gowns and proper signage or PPE outside the resident's room. One CNA was unaware of the need for enhanced barrier precautions when working with indwelling catheters, indicating a potential gap in training or understanding of infection control protocols.
Failure to Ensure Proper Completion of DNR Forms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the proper completion of advance directives for two residents, specifically regarding their Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders. Resident #20's DNR form was not signed twice by the physician as required, with the physician's signature missing from the bottom of the form, which is necessary to acknowledge that the document has been properly completed. This oversight was confirmed during an interview with the Social Work Designee, who acknowledged that the missing signature invalidated the document. Similarly, Resident #62's DNR form also lacked the required second physician's signature at the bottom of the form. The resident and two witnesses had signed the form, but the physician's signature was missing from the section that confirms the document's completion. The Social Work Designee confirmed this deficiency as well, noting that the absence of the signature could result in the residents' end-of-life wishes being dishonored. The facility's policy and the Texas Department of State Health Services guidelines both emphasize the necessity of all required signatures for the validity of a DNR form.
Inaccurate MDS Assessment of Antipsychotic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment of a resident's medication status, specifically regarding the administration of antipsychotic medication. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident inaccurately documented that the resident did not receive an antipsychotic medication, despite records showing that the resident was prescribed and administered Seroquel, an antipsychotic, for Bipolar Disorder. This discrepancy was identified during a review of the resident's face sheet, physician orders, and medication administration records, which confirmed the resident's receipt of Seroquel in February 2025. During an interview, the MDS coordinator acknowledged the error, confirming that the resident's MDS was incorrectly coded and that Seroquel should have been documented as an antipsychotic. The coordinator admitted to not knowing why the medication was not coded correctly, despite having access to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) for reference. This oversight in the MDS assessment could potentially lead to inadequate care due to the inaccurate reflection of the resident's medication regimen.
Failure to Implement Baseline Care Plans for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for two residents, which resulted in deficiencies in providing effective and person-centered care. Resident #188, a man with epilepsy and a history of falls, was admitted without a baseline care plan addressing his risk for falls and epilepsy. Despite having two falls since admission, his care plan did not reflect these issues, and the MDS Coordinator and ADON acknowledged that his care plan should have been updated to include these risks. Resident #195, a man with congestive heart failure and COPD, was admitted without a baseline care plan that included his oxygen therapy and wound care needs. Although his care plan mentioned his resistance to care, it did not specifically address his need for oxygen therapy and wound care. The MDS Coordinator admitted that these needs should have been included in his baseline care plan, and the oversight could result in unmet healthcare needs. The facility's policy requires the interdisciplinary team to review healthcare practitioner's orders and implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate care needs. However, the facility failed to adhere to this policy, resulting in deficiencies in the care plans for Residents #188 and #195, potentially impacting their care and treatment.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plan for Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident who required indwelling catheter care. The resident, who was admitted and readmitted with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and hypertension, was found to have an indwelling catheter. Despite this, the resident's care plan, revised shortly before the observation, did not include any provisions for indwelling catheter care. During an interview, the MDS coordinator confirmed the oversight, acknowledging that the resident should have been care planned for indwelling catheter care. The facility's policy mandates that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timetables be developed and implemented for each resident, addressing their physical, psychosocial, and functional needs. The failure to include catheter care in the resident's care plan could result in the resident not receiving necessary care.
Failure to Properly Manage Oxygen Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for a resident, specifically in the management of oxygen equipment. Resident #195, who has diagnoses of Congestive Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, was observed with used oxygen tubing and a humidifier bottle left in his room. The resident was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula set at 2L, and the used equipment was found on his chest of drawers, with the tubing hanging towards the floor. This situation was identified during an initial tour and was confirmed by an interview with LVN-G, who acknowledged that the equipment should have been changed weekly and not left in the resident's room. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the facility's policy requires oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles to be changed weekly and when visibly contaminated to prevent infection. The failure to change and properly dispose of the used equipment could lead to the growth of organisms and pose a risk of infection. Despite the policy, the used equipment remained in the resident's room, partly due to the resident's resistance to having it removed. The facility's policy on oxygen administration emphasizes the importance of keeping residents free from infection, highlighting the deficiency in adhering to these standards.
Medication Storage Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments, as evidenced by the presence of a jar of mentholated ointment at the bedside of a resident. This resident, a man with moderate cognitive impairment, was observed with the ointment in plain view on his pillow and later on his bedside table. The resident had no order for the mentholated ointment and was not assessed as being able to self-medicate. The Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) confirmed that the ointment should not have been accessible to the resident, as it was not one of his prescribed medications. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that over-the-counter medications should not be left unsecured where residents could access them, as this could lead to misuse by the resident or access by other residents. The facility's policy on the storage of medications requires that all drugs and biologicals be stored in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. The source of the ointment was unknown, but it was suggested that it might have been brought in by the resident's family.
Food Service Safety Deficiencies in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety in the kitchen, as observed during a survey. The handwashing sink was obstructed by two rolling carts, one with plate covers and the other with food trays, making it inaccessible for staff to use. The Dietary Manager acknowledged that the carts should not have been placed in a way that blocked the sink and admitted that staff moved the carts only when they needed to wash their hands, subsequently returning them to their obstructive positions. Additionally, a sand-like substance was found on top of the dish sanitizing machine, which could potentially contaminate dishes and utensils used for meal preparation and service. The Dietary Manager confirmed the presence of these particles and their potential to come into contact with items used for serving residents. The facility lacked a policy regarding dietary services, as confirmed by the Administrator, which may have contributed to these deficiencies.
Unsafe Environment in Beauty Shop
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment in the beauty shop, which was found unlocked and contained potentially dangerous materials. During an observation, a container of liquid labeled as a disinfectant, fungicide, and virucide with a warning to keep out of reach of children, along with an open tube of hair dye labeled as a combustible liquid causing severe skin burns and eye damage, were found on the counter. Interviews with staff confirmed that these materials should not be accessible to residents, staff, and the public. The Administrator acknowledged the responsibility of staff to ensure the beauty shop was locked and confirmed the lack of a policy regarding the physical environment.
Failure to Use Mechanical Lift Results in Resident Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and use of assistive devices for a resident, leading to an accident. A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of right below-knee amputation, osteoporosis, and vitamin D deficiency was care planned to require a mechanical lift with two staff for transfers. However, on a specific date, a CNA transferred the resident using a standing pivot transfer with only one staff member, contrary to the care plan. During the transfer, the CNA heard a popping noise, and the resident expressed pain in her leg. The resident was subsequently found to have sustained a left tibia/fibula fracture and was transferred to the hospital for treatment. The CNA admitted to not using the mechanical lift as required by the resident's care plan, despite being aware of the necessity for such equipment. The incident was identified as past non-compliance, with the Immediate Jeopardy beginning and ending within a few days. The facility had addressed the non-compliance before the survey began, but the failure to follow the care plan and use the appropriate transfer method resulted in significant injury to the resident.
Facility Lacks Required RN Coverage on Weekends
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the presence of a registered nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, as required. This deficiency was identified through interviews and record reviews, which revealed that the facility lacked RN coverage for 24 specific days. The absence of RN coverage was particularly noted on Saturdays and Sundays over several months, including October, November, December, and January. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the lack of a designated weekend RN and mentioned that Assistant Directors of Nursing (ADONs), who are RNs, covered some weekend shifts but not all. The Administrator was unaware of the extent of the missing RN coverage and confirmed that an ADON was covering some weekend shifts. The facility's policy mandates that an RN must be onsite for 8 consecutive hours daily, 7 days a week, but the facility did not have any nursing waivers in place. The DON stated that the facility was actively seeking an RN for weekends, and a job posting was online, but there was no confirmation of an active recruitment effort at the time of the interviews.
Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's call light was within reach, which is a necessary accommodation for the resident's needs and preferences. The resident, a female with severe cognitive impairment and a history of falls, was observed sitting in a chair next to her bed with the call light wrapped around the bed rail and hidden behind linens, making it inaccessible. This oversight occurred despite the resident's care plan, which identified her as a fall risk and included an intervention to keep the call light within reach following a previous fall that resulted in a hip fracture. Interviews with facility staff, including an LVN and the DON, confirmed the importance of having the call light within reach to prevent further falls and injuries. The facility's policy on answering call lights also mandates that call lights be within reach at all times. The failure to adhere to this policy and the resident's care plan placed the resident at risk of not being able to call for assistance, potentially leading to further falls and injuries.
Resident Privacy Breach Due to Unlocked Computer Screen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of a resident's personal and medical records. This deficiency was observed when a medication aide left a computer screen unlocked and unattended, exposing the resident's morning medication list. The resident involved was a female with multiple sclerosis, hypertension, and depression, who had been admitted to the facility with intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15. During an interview, the medication aide admitted to not being aware of the need to lock the computer screen, mistakenly believing that minimizing the screen was sufficient. The Director of Nursing (DON) was unaware of the incident but emphasized the expectation for nursing staff to adhere to HIPAA regulations by locking computer screens when unattended. The facility's policy on HIPAA training includes guidelines on sharing passwords and user ID codes, but the incident suggests a gap in staff awareness and compliance with these protocols.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident, which included ensuring the call light was within reach as an intervention for fall risk. The resident, an elderly female with severe cognitive impairment and a history of falls resulting in a hip fracture, was observed with her call light wrapped around the bed rail and hidden behind linens, making it inaccessible. This was contrary to the care plan intervention designed to prevent further falls by allowing the resident to call for assistance when needed. Interviews with facility staff, including an LVN and the DON, confirmed the importance of having the call light within reach to adhere to the care plan and provide necessary assistance to the resident. The facility's policy on comprehensive person-centered care plans emphasized the need to prevent or reduce decline in the resident's functional status, which was not followed in this instance, potentially compromising the resident's safety and care.
Improper Gastrostomy Tube Management in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper management of a gastrostomy tube for a resident, leading to potential health risks. The resident, who had a history of stroke, hypertension, neurogenic bladder, type 2 diabetes, and was dependent on tube feeding due to dysphagia, did not receive appropriate care. The care plan required checking the tube placement and gastric residual volume, but these steps were not followed by the nursing staff. During an observation, LVN A did not check the placement of the resident's PEG tube or the gastric residual volume before administering medications and flushes. Additionally, LVN A did not follow the prescribed order for flushes and administered medications using a syringe instead of gravity, which is against the facility's policy. LVN A admitted to not receiving specific training on PEG tubes at the facility and was unaware of the requirement to check residuals or placement. Interviews with LVN A and LVN B revealed a lack of adherence to the facility's policy, which mandates checking tube placement and residual volume before administering anything via a PEG tube. The facility's policy and external guidelines emphasize the importance of these checks to prevent potential harm to residents. The absence of a Director of Nursing (DON) at the facility was noted during the interviews.
Failure to Maintain Confidentiality of Resident Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' personal and medical records, as observed during a survey. Confidential information was found in three clear plastic trash bags outside the Medical Records office and on top of a printer in a T.V. lounge accessible to staff, residents, and visitors. LVN A confirmed the presence of confidential information in both locations during interviews conducted at the time of the observations. The area where the printer was located was accessible to residents, staff, and visitors, and LVN A acknowledged that all staff were responsible for ensuring the confidentiality of resident information. Further interviews revealed that LVN B also recognized the importance of maintaining confidentiality, stating that resident information is privileged and must be protected by law. The Administrator admitted that the trash bags had been moved for shredding but was unaware of the papers left on the printer. The facility's policies on resident rights and the management of Protected Health Information (PHI) emphasize the responsibility of all personnel to protect such information from unauthorized disclosure, aligning with federal and state laws.
Medication Security Lapse in Resident's Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medications for a resident were stored securely, as required by state and federal laws. During an observation, an LVN prepared medications for a resident, including Morphine, Tramadol, and Lorazepam, and left them unattended on the bedside table while she went to wash her hands. This action was against the facility's policy, which mandates that medications should not be left unattended to prevent unauthorized access by staff, visitors, or other residents. The resident involved had a comprehensive medical history, including acute respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, bradycardia, deep vein thrombosis, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension, with severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision-making. The facility's policy on medication storage and controlled substances requires that all drugs be stored in a safe, secure, and orderly manner, and the nursing staff is responsible for maintaining this standard. However, the facility did not have a Director of Nursing at the time, which may have contributed to the oversight in ensuring compliance with medication security protocols.
Inadequate Supervision Leads to Resident Elopements
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopements for two residents, both of whom had cognitive impairments. The first resident, who had dementia, eloped from the facility and was found walking near a busy street, visibly perspiring and expressing thirst and confusion. The facility's records indicated that this resident was at high risk for elopement, yet there was no care plan in place, and the door alarm system was not functioning properly at the time of the incident. The second resident, diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease, was taken from the facility by a family member without the consent of the responsible party. The facility's records showed no care plan for this resident, and the elopement risk assessment was not adequately addressed. The resident was later found safe with the family member, but the incident highlighted a lack of supervision and monitoring at the facility's entrance, as the front door was not being monitored during the time of the elopement. Interviews with staff and record reviews revealed that the facility had systemic issues with monitoring and supervision, particularly regarding door alarms and the identification of residents at risk for elopement. The facility's failure to ensure that door alarms were armed and functioning, combined with inadequate staff training and monitoring, contributed to the residents' ability to leave the facility unsupervised.
Failure to Report Resident Elopements
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report two incidents of resident elopement to the appropriate authorities, as required by state law. The first incident involved a resident with a high risk of elopement due to dementia and tachycardia, who left the facility unsupervised. The resident was found by a staff member several blocks away, near a busy street, and was returned to the facility. The facility's records did not document this incident, and the administrator confirmed the elopement occurred when the front door was left unattended during resident smoking time. The second incident involved another resident with dementia and other medical conditions, who was taken from the facility by a biological family member without proper authorization. The resident's belongings were removed, and the facility was unable to locate her until the police confirmed she was safe with her family member. The facility's records also lacked documentation of this incident, and the administrator acknowledged the resident left without staff knowledge or adherence to facility policies. Interviews with staff revealed lapses in monitoring the facility's entrance and a lack of awareness of new residents' identities. The facility's policy required immediate notification to authorities in cases of suspected abuse or neglect, but this was not followed in these incidents. The administrator and other staff members confirmed the deficiencies in reporting and monitoring, which could place residents at risk for continued neglect and diminished quality of life.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 129 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 9 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Floresville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank M. Tejeda Texas State Veterans Home | 0.5 mi | — | 11 | 0 |
| Prairie Meadows Rehabilitation And Healthcare Cent | 0.6 mi | — | 8 | 3 |
| Country Care Manor | 15 mi | — | 6 | 0 |
| Bluebonnet Nursing And Rehabilitation | 22.2 mi | — | 7 | 0 |
| Southeast Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 23 mi | — | 16 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Harmony Care At Floresville.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.