Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Cypress Pointe Health & Wellness during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with muscle wasting, impaired gait, low BIMS score, incontinence, and a care plan identifying fall risk and the need for prompt assistance was observed lying in bed with the call light wedged between the bed rail and mattress, out of reach. The resident reported wanting to call staff for water but being unable to reach the call light. Staff interviews (CNA, LVN, DON) confirmed that call lights are expected to be within residents’ reach, checked after care and before leaving rooms, and secured with clips per facility policy, which requires staff to place call lights within reach when leaving the room.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and hemiplegia developed a pressure ulcer between the index finger and thumb due to inadequate skin assessments and monitoring by the facility staff. The resident was at risk for pressure ulcers, but the staff failed to identify or treat the ulcer, which was discovered upon hospital admission. The facility's policies for skin and wound management were not effectively implemented, leading to this deficiency.
A facility failed to ensure a resident received respiratory care consistent with professional standards and the care plan. The resident, with multiple complex medical conditions, was observed receiving oxygen at 5 liters per nasal cannula instead of the prescribed 2 liters. Nursing staff admitted to not checking the oxygen flow rate during their shift, and no documentation of a change in the resident's oxygen needs was found.
A resident with multiple complex medical conditions was not administered Midodrine as ordered by the physician on several occasions due to incorrect interpretation of blood pressure parameters by the administering nurse. The facility's policy on administering medications was not followed.
Failure to Keep Call Light Within Reach for Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure a resident’s call light was within reach as required by the resident’s care plan and the facility’s call light policy. The resident was an older male with diagnoses including muscle wasting, abnormality of gait and mobility, difficulty in walking, and lack of coordination. His most recent Quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 4, use of a wheelchair for mobility, need for partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene and upper body dressing, and always being incontinent of bowel and bladder. His care plan for fall risk, dated 02/05/2025, identified problems related to diabetes, neuropathy, and recurrent falls, with an intervention specifying that his call light must be within reach and that he required a prompt response to all requests for assistance. On 02/06/2026 at 12:40 p.m., surveyors observed the resident lying in bed with his call light located between the bed rail and mattress, out of his reach. During this observation, the resident stated he wanted to call staff to request water but could not reach his call light, and that he usually could reach it but not at that time. In interviews, CNA A stated call lights should be within residents’ reach, that this resident needed the call light to request assistance, and that she checked call lights after providing care. The DON stated she expected all staff to check residents’ call lights when entering and before leaving rooms, to place call lights within reach, and to use clips to keep them attached to beds. LVN A similarly stated call lights should be within reach and that nurses and CNAs should have noticed and clipped the resident’s call light to his bed. The facility’s August 2021 Call Lights Policy required staff to place the call light within reach of the resident when leaving the room.
Failure to Prevent and Treat Pressure Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent the worsening of pressure sores for a resident. The resident, an elderly male with a history of severe cognitive impairment, hemiplegia, and dementia, was at risk for pressure ulcers due to his immobility and contractures. Despite being at risk, the facility did not identify or treat a pressure ulcer that developed between the resident's index finger and thumb, which was discovered upon his admission to the hospital. The resident was supposed to have weekly skin assessments and wear protective geri-sleeves to prevent skin tears from scratching. However, the staff failed to properly assess the resident's skin condition, particularly the area between the index finger and thumb, which was difficult to inspect due to the resident's contracted hand. The geri-sleeves were not consistently checked or changed, and the staff did not adequately monitor for new skin issues or injuries, leading to the development of a pressure ulcer. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of training and understanding regarding the proper use and monitoring of geri-sleeves. The staff, including CNAs and nurses, did not perform thorough skin assessments or report new skin issues, and there was a lack of communication and coordination among the care team. The facility's policies and procedures for skin and wound management were not effectively implemented, contributing to the oversight and subsequent deficiency.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided with such care consistent with professional standards of practice and the resident's care plan. Specifically, the facility did not set the oxygen flow rate at 2 liters per the physician's order for a resident with multiple complex medical conditions, including hypertensive heart disease, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, chronic systolic heart failure, and dyspnea. Observations revealed that the resident was receiving oxygen at a flow rate of 5 liters per nasal cannula, contrary to the prescribed 2 liters as needed for shortness of breath. This discrepancy was noted during multiple observations on the same day, indicating a failure to adhere to the prescribed oxygen flow rate. Interviews with the nursing staff and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the nurses were responsible for ensuring the correct oxygen flow rate according to the physician's orders and for monitoring it every shift. However, the responsible nurse admitted that she had not checked the resident's oxygen flow rate during her shift and acknowledged the risk of CO2 retention due to the higher oxygen flow rate. The DON reiterated that any changes in the resident's oxygen needs should be documented in the chart, but no such documentation was found. This failure to follow the prescribed oxygen flow rate could place residents at risk of incorrect or inadequate respiratory support, potentially leading to a decline in health.
Failure to Administer Medication as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that ensured the accurate administration of Midodrine, a medication for low blood pressure, to a resident. The resident, a [AGE] year-old female with multiple complex medical conditions including rheumatoid lung disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, and hypertension, was not administered Midodrine as ordered by the physician on several occasions. Specifically, the medication was held on three instances despite the resident's blood pressure being within the parameters set by the physician's order, which required the medication to be held only if the systolic blood pressure was greater than 130. The resident's care plan indicated that she had a diagnosis of altered cardiovascular status related to hypotension and required medications to be administered per physician's orders. However, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that the medication was not given on specific dates due to incorrect interpretation of blood pressure parameters by the administering nurse. The Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) both acknowledged that the medication should have been administered as the resident's blood pressure was not outside the specified parameters. Interviews with the DON, ADON, and the pharmacist confirmed that the medication should have been given according to the physician's order. The nurse responsible for the error admitted to possibly confusing the less than and greater than signs, leading to the incorrect decision to withhold the medication. The facility's policy on administering medications, which mandates that medications be administered in accordance with prescriber orders, was not followed in this instance.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 448 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 42 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Houston
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Crest Rapid Recovery | 0.9 mi | — | 26 | 3 |
| Copperfield Healthcare And Rehabilitation | 2.5 mi | — | 17 | 3 |
| Fallbrook Rehabilitation And Care Center | 3.3 mi | — | 16 | 3 |
| Park Manor Of Cyfair | 3.3 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Cypress Creek Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 3.5 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Cypress Pointe Health & Wellness.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.