Avir At New Braunfels
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in New Braunfels, Texas.
- Location
- 821 Us Hwy 81 W, New Braunfels, Texas 78130
- CMS Provider Number
- 455020
- Inspections on file
- 52
- Latest survey
- April 24, 2026
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 36 (2 serious)
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Avir At New Braunfels during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and lack of coordination attempted to sit near the nurse’s station with a chair. An aide tried to take the chair away, leading to a struggle in which, according to an LPN and another CNA, the aide pried the resident’s fingers from the chair, grabbed the resident’s wrists, pushed the resident to the floor, and then pushed the resident into a wall. The resident was later found to have redness on both wrists and the back and was evaluated in the ER, where no fractures or other injuries were identified. The aide denied willful abuse and claimed self‑defense, but the facility’s documentation and staff statements supported a finding that the resident was subjected to physical abuse, constituting noncompliance with abuse‑prevention requirements at the Immediate Jeopardy level.
The facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment when four bathrooms in a secured women’s unit were rendered inaccessible for about six months after an incomplete shower renovation, leaving multiple residents without access to their own toilets and showers. A resident with Alzheimer’s disease, psychotic disorder, anxiety, major depressive disorder, moderate cognitive impairment, and frequent incontinence reported disliking the need to use other residents’ bathrooms and required staff to lead her to designated toilets. Another resident with intellectual disability, dementia, bipolar disorder, and moderate cognitive impairment, who needed supervision to extensive assistance with toileting, stated she hated not having her own bathroom and that the residents whose bathrooms she used did not like it either. A third resident with age-related cognitive decline, severe cognitive impairment, and unsteadiness on her feet described the long walk down a cold hallway to use distant bathrooms and showers as an inconvenience. Staff confirmed that bathroom doors had been screwed shut since the contractor stopped work, that affected residents were directed to use toilets in other resident rooms and the main shower room, and that both affected residents and those sharing their bathrooms frequently complained about inconvenience and privacy issues.
A resident with Alzheimer’s disease, moderate cognitive impairment (BIMS 12), frequent incontinence, and a need for supervised toileting was unable to use the toilet in her own room because the bathroom door had been screwed shut for an extended period after an unfinished shower renovation. Staff directed her and other affected residents to use toilets in other resident rooms or distant common bathrooms, which residents disliked, particularly at night. On multiple occasions, the resident could not reach these alternate toilets in time, urinated on the floor, and became very upset, stating she felt embarrassed and ashamed. Staff and a family member confirmed that the resident needed to be led to designated bathrooms, that other residents questioned why strangers were entering their rooms, and that the situation created ongoing inconvenience, privacy concerns, and dignity issues.
Surveyors found that the facility did not have a written contract with an outside dental provider, despite facility policy requiring a contract with a licensed dentist and outlining how routine and 24-hour emergency dental services should be provided. The Administrator and regional leaders were responsible for obtaining such contracts, but the Administrator could not explain why no agreement was in place, even though a local dentist had recently visited and provided care and physicians might select community dentists. The DON stated that residents could receive dental services through community providers but acknowledged that the absence of a formal contract created a potential risk that residents might not receive needed dental care.
The facility did not ensure that all dietary staff maintained their competencies through regular in-service training, relying instead on undocumented group text reminders, and failed to provide documentation of a current Food Handler's Certificate for one staff member, as required by state regulations.
A deficiency was identified when a resident with multiple diagnoses reported receiving cold, unappetizing food, and direct observations confirmed several food items were served below the required temperature. Despite grievances from residents and family, staff only documented food temperatures before service, not at the point of consumption, and did not consistently monitor or record tray temperatures. This failure to ensure food was served at safe and appetizing temperatures was contrary to facility policy and led to resident dissatisfaction.
Surveyors found that food items in the kitchen refrigerator were not labeled or dated, food temperatures were not consistently checked or documented for multiple meals, and staff used non-food-safe wipes to sanitize thermometer probes between food items. These failures were confirmed by staff interviews and record reviews, with leadership acknowledging lack of formal training and ongoing issues despite previous reports.
A resident with severe cognitive and physical impairments was found with the call light out of reach, despite care plan instructions to keep it accessible at all times. Staff acknowledged the call light was not within reach and cited the resident's inability to use it, but no alternative communication method was documented as required by facility policy.
A resident with severe cognitive and physical impairments had a portable oxygen tank present in their room without the required 'Oxygen in Use' signage posted, despite facility policy mandating such signage whenever oxygen is present. Staff interviews confirmed that all staff are responsible for ensuring signage is posted, but this was not done.
Surveyors found four expired supplemental shakes stored in the medication room of a secure Co-ed unit. Staff interviews revealed confusion over responsibility for supplement orders and removal of expired items, resulting in the expired supplements remaining accessible in the medication storage area.
The facility did not consistently post required daily nurse staffing and census information for multiple days due to confusion over staff responsibilities and lack of training following a staffing coordinator's sudden departure. Staff interviews revealed uncertainty about the posting process, and the required information was not updated as mandated.
Eight bottles of Acetaminophen 325 mg were stored in a central supply room where the temperature was observed to be 84°F, exceeding the recommended storage range of 68-77°F. Staff, including a CNA, MS, and DON, noted the excessive heat and reported it to administration, but no policy or corrective action was provided during the investigation.
A resident's room and restroom remained in disrepair for over two months due to an incomplete shower remodeling project, resulting in a sealed-off shower, an uneven and sunken floor, brown stains, and a mildew odor. The resident, who was independent but at risk for falls, continued to use the room despite these hazards. Staff confirmed the project was halted after a contractor withdrew, and maintenance acknowledged the floor as a trip hazard.
A resident with severe intellectual disabilities and physical impairments did not receive a recommended specialized motorized wheelchair because the facility failed to submit a completed NFSS application. The application was denied due to the absence of a hospice plan of care signed by a physician, and the issue persisted for months without escalation or resolution, leaving the resident without the necessary equipment.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment was found living in a room and bathroom with unrepaired damage, including missing linoleum, splintered baseboards, uneven floor tiles, and deteriorated equipment. Facility staff and administration acknowledged the poor condition and delays in repairs, citing recent ownership changes and competing priorities.
Surveyors found multiple environmental deficiencies, including missing light bulbs, dirty and unattached ceiling vents, mold in shower rooms, and detached floor molding across all resident hallways. These issues were observed during rounds with the Maintenance Director and Administrator, who confirmed that the repairs had not been reported or completed as required by facility policy.
A resident with paraplegia and bowel incontinence did not have a care plan addressing bowel incontinence, despite staff awareness and documentation of the condition. The care plan included interventions for bladder and catheter care but omitted guidance for managing bowel incontinence, contrary to facility policy and assessment findings.
A CNA failed to provide complete perineal and catheter care to a male resident with bowel incontinence and an indwelling urinary catheter, omitting cleaning of the suprapubic area, groin areas, and scrotum as required by facility policy. The resident had a history of UTI, dysuria, neuromuscular bladder dysfunction, and paraplegia, and required substantial assistance for care. The care plan addressed bladder and catheter care but lacked a plan for bowel incontinence.
The facility failed to provide organized activities for residents in the men's secure unit, with observations showing no current activity calendar and no formal group activities occurring. Staff interviews revealed that bingo was the only consistent activity, but it was not always held as expected. The lack of activities was attributed to the Activities Director's schedule and insufficient staff engagement. Facility policy required multiple daily activities, but records showed no documentation of activities for a 90-day period, risking residents' quality of life.
A facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with an indwelling catheter and stage 4 pressure ulcers. The CNA providing care did not wear a gown, and there was no signage or PPE available outside the resident's room. The CNA was unaware of EBP requirements, and the DON confirmed a lack of training on EBP, leading to a potential risk of infection spread.
A resident with a history of mental health issues exhibited aggressive and sexually inappropriate behaviors towards other residents, leading to multiple incidents of abuse. Despite having a care plan, the facility failed to effectively manage the resident's behavior, resulting in physical and sexual misconduct. The facility's inaction placed residents at risk, leading to an Immediate Jeopardy situation.
A resident with multiple health conditions missed several doses of critical medications due to the facility's failure to reorder them timely and update insurance information. Additionally, a medication aide improperly administered Gabapentin from another resident's supply. The facility's communication and documentation processes were inadequate, leading to delays in addressing the medication shortages.
The facility failed to implement comprehensive care plans for four residents, neglecting to address specific needs such as depression management, independent facility exit, and hospice admission. Despite having physician orders and resident feedback, these critical aspects were omitted from care plans, as confirmed by staff interviews.
The facility failed to employ a Dietary Manager with the necessary qualifications and certifications, as the DM lacked national certification and relevant experience. The DM had only completed a Texas Food Safety Manager Certification, which does not meet national standards. The facility's RD was contracted, not a full-time employee, and both the DM and Administrator acknowledged the certification gap.
The facility failed to maintain food safety standards, with issues including improper facial hair restraints, inadequate food labeling and storage, and malfunctioning freezer temperatures. The Dietary Manager and staff did not adhere to policies, leading to potential foodborne illness risks.
A malfunction in Freezer #1 at the facility led to unsafe food storage conditions, with temperatures fluctuating between 40 and 42 degrees Fahrenheit and food items completely thawed. Despite awareness of the issue with the freezer door seal, timely repairs were not made, and the freezer continued to be used, contrary to facility policy and food safety guidelines.
The facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment, with issues such as a 4-foot wall gap in a resident's room, non-functional lights, and mold in a shower stall. The Maintenance Director was unaware of these issues due to a lack of work order requests.
A facility failed to include a resident's prescribed diet, food allergies, and code status in their baseline care plan. The resident, admitted with conditions like Type 2 diabetes and diverticulitis, required specific dietary considerations. Staff interviews revealed the omission was an oversight, and the facility's template lacked sections for these critical details.
A facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when an LVN did not sanitize or wash her hands between glove changes during wound care for a resident with a surgical amputation and diabetes-related conditions. The LVN acknowledged the oversight, and the DON confirmed the risk of infection due to this lapse, which violated the facility's hand hygiene policy.
A LTC facility failed to provide adequate supervision and safety measures, resulting in two significant incidents. A resident with dementia eloped from the Men's Secured Unit due to a lack of monitoring at the front door, while another resident with a high fall risk suffered a severe head injury from an unwitnessed fall in the Women's Secured Unit. The facility's lack of effective supervision and monitoring systems contributed to these deficiencies.
A resident's personal belongings were lost after discharge to the hospital, as the facility failed to inventory or return the items to the responsible party. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment, passed away, and the facility did not follow its procedures for documenting personal effects, resulting in a misappropriation of property.
Physical abuse during chair struggle with cognitively impaired resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves a failure to ensure a resident’s right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. A male resident with Alzheimer’s disease, bipolar disorder, anxiety, schizophrenia with mania and depression, cognitive impairment, lack of coordination, and severe cognitive impairment (BIMS score of 3) was involved. His care plan identified needs for assistance with ADLs, especially transfers, due to muscle weakness, impaired cognition, lack of coordination, and Alzheimer’s disease, and included behavioral interventions such as redirection, structured activities, and moving the resident to a quiet area when agitated. The resident was ambulatory, a wanderer, and incontinent of bowel and bladder. On the night of the incident at approximately 10:25 p.m., the resident picked up a chair to sit near the nurse’s station in a secure men’s unit. According to an LVN’s nurse note and written statement, as well as a CNA witness statement, CNA A attempted to take the chair away from the resident, telling him he could not sit near the nurse’s station. A struggle or “tug of war” over the chair ensued. The LVN reported seeing CNA A peel the resident’s fingers from the chair, and the CNA witness reported seeing CNA A remove the chair from the resident. Both the LVN and the CNA witness stated that during this interaction, CNA A grabbed the resident by the wrists and pushed him to the floor, and when the resident got up and approached CNA A again, CNA A pushed the resident into or against the wall. The LVN documented that the resident was assessed afterward and had redness to both wrists and his back, and the resident was sent to the ER for evaluation, where no injuries were found and x‑rays were negative. Law enforcement was contacted and responded, and no arrest was made. In a subsequent email and interview, CNA A stated he was defending himself, that he took the chair to protect residents and staff, held the resident’s hands because the resident tried to hit him, and denied pushing the resident to the floor or wall or willfully abusing him. The facility’s abuse policy defined abuse as the negligent willful infliction of injury resulting in physical or emotional harm or pain to an elderly or disabled person by the person’s caregiver. Based on the eyewitness accounts, documentation, and the physical findings of redness to the resident’s wrists and back following the struggle, surveyors determined that the resident was subjected to physical abuse by CNA A, constituting noncompliance with the requirement to protect residents from abuse. During a later observation, the resident was seen wandering the halls in the secure unit without visible injuries such as skin tears or bruises and stated he felt safe but could not recall details of the incident and declined further interview. Review of logs showed no prior incidents involving this resident and CNA A, and no prior grievances or incidents involving CNA A with other residents in the preceding 90 days. The facility’s own HHS 3613‑A form documented a finding of confirmed abuse related to this event. The survey identified this as past noncompliance at the Immediate Jeopardy level, based on the incident in which CNA A physically handled and pushed the resident during the chair struggle, resulting in the resident’s fall to the floor and contact with the wall and requiring ER evaluation for redness to the wrists and back. The noncompliance was determined to have begun on the date of the incident and ended on a later specified date, with the surveyors noting that the facility had already corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. The report explicitly states that this failure could result in residents suffering injury, a diminished quality of life, and/or death. The nursing home is disputing this citation, but the survey findings, including staff statements, documentation, and the facility’s own internal abuse investigation form, support the conclusion that the resident was not protected from physical abuse during the incident with CNA A.
Failure to Maintain Resident Bathroom Access and Homelike Environment During Prolonged Shower Renovation
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment by not ensuring that resident bathrooms and showers were maintained in usable condition for an extended period. Four bathrooms in the women’s secured unit had their doors screwed shut after a contractor began but did not complete shower renovations around July or August 2025. The Maintenance Supervisor reported that the contractor discovered more damage than expected, requested additional funds, and when that request was denied, the renovation work stopped. To address the unfinished and potentially unsafe showers, the facility screwed the bathroom doors shut, leaving multiple residents without access to the toilets and showers in their own rooms for about six months. Resident #1, who had Alzheimer’s disease, a psychotic disorder with delusions due to a known physiological condition, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, had moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 12/15 and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. She required supervision and setup or clean-up assistance with toileting. Her bathroom door was observed to be screwed shut, and she stated she could not use her own toilet because it was locked and that she did not like having to use a different bathroom. Her family member reported that Resident #1 could not remember where the designated bathrooms were and had to be led there by CNAs, and that Resident #1 disliked using another resident’s bathroom. The family member described feeling awkward entering other residents’ rooms, noted that other residents stared at them, and stated this had been an ongoing issue since at least October 2025. Resident #2, who had unspecified intellectual disabilities, unspecified dementia of unspecified severity without behavioral, psychotic, mood, or anxiety disturbance, and bipolar disorder, had a BIMS score of 9/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment and was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. She required supervision to extensive assistance with toileting, and her care plan called for routine and PRN toileting assistance. She stated she hated not having her own bathroom and having to go to another resident’s room to use the toilet, and reported that the residents whose bathrooms she used did not like it either. Resident #3, with age-related cognitive decline, lack of coordination, and unsteadiness on her feet, had a BIMS score of 8/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment, was continent of bowel and bladder, and required supervision or setup assistance with toileting. She stated it was an inconvenience to use another resident’s bathroom and to walk down a cold hallway to the shower carrying her toiletries, and that it had been a long time since her bathroom had been locked and she wished they would fix her shower. CNA A, who had worked at the facility for about one year, confirmed that four bathrooms in the women’s secured unit had been inaccessible since July or August 2025 because their doors were screwed shut after the incomplete shower remodeling. She stated that affected residents, including Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3, were instructed to use toilets in specific other resident rooms (rooms 36 and 38), the main shower room, and the room across from the shower room, which were at a distance and not liked by residents, especially at night when it was cold. She reported that residents in the designated rooms questioned why others were using their bathrooms and that affected residents and some family members complained frequently about when the bathrooms would be fixed. CNA A described the situation as inconvenient for the affected residents and a privacy issue for the residents sharing their bathrooms. The ADON and Maintenance Supervisor acknowledged that the four bathrooms were locked down and that residents were directed to other bathrooms, and the ADON stated he understood all residents should have their own bathroom and that it was an inconvenience, but said he could not do anything because approval for renovations rested with upper management. The Administrator and DON reported that corporate had requested bids for the shower renovations, that bids were obtained and sent to corporate, and that the matter was stalled with the main owner, while acknowledging that the situation had been ongoing for months, that affected residents should have their own bathrooms, and that it created inconvenience and privacy issues. The facility’s Homelike Environment policy stated that staff should provide person-centered care emphasizing residents’ comfort, independence, and personal needs and preferences, and that management should maximize characteristics reflecting a personalized, homelike setting.
Inaccessible Resident Bathrooms Resulting in Loss of Dignity During Toileting
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to treat a resident with respect and dignity and to provide care in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of quality of life, specifically by not providing an accessible toilet in the resident’s room. The resident was admitted with Alzheimer’s disease, psychotic disorder with delusions due to a known physiological condition, anxiety disorder due to a known physiological condition, and major depressive disorder. A quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 12/15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, frequent bowel and bladder incontinence, and a need for setup or clean assistance with toileting. Her care plan documented moderate cognitive impairment and a need for supervision with toileting. During observation, the bathroom door in her room was found screwed shut and nonfunctional. The resident reported she could not use the toilet in her own bathroom because it was locked, resulting in accidents when she could not reach another bathroom in time. She stated she felt “yucky” and embarrassed when she had accidents and did not like having to use a different bathroom. Staff interviews revealed that four bathrooms in the secured women’s unit had doors screwed shut after a contractor began but did not complete shower remodeling, and that these bathrooms had been inaccessible since around July or August of the prior year. CNAs reported that the resident was redirected to use toilets in other resident rooms, the shower room, or a bathroom across from the shower room, which were located down the hall, and that affected residents disliked going to these distant areas, especially at night when it was cold. A CNA described an incident where she was leading the resident to the room next door to use the toilet, but the resident did not make it in time and urinated on the floor, became very upset, and started crying. The CNA stated that the resident and other affected residents complained frequently about the bathroom situation, and that some residents questioned why others were entering their rooms. The resident’s family member reported that the resident could not remember which bathrooms were designated for her use and had to be led by CNAs. The family member also described an episode where the resident urinated on the floor in another room, cried frantically with tears falling down her face, and said, “I feel ashamed.” Facility leadership, including the ADON, ADM, DON, and maintenance staff, acknowledged that four bathroom doors in the women’s secured unit were screwed shut for months, that residents from those rooms were directed to use other residents’ bathrooms or common bathrooms, and that this was an inconvenience, a privacy issue, and, if it led to accidents, a dignity issue for the residents.
Lack of Written Contract for Dental Services with Outside Provider
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that agreements with outside professional resources for dental services were in place and specified in writing that the facility assumed responsibility for obtaining services that meet professional standards. Record review of the facility’s contract binder on 01/30/2026 showed there was no contract with the dental service provider. The Administrator reported that a new company purchased the facility in November 2025 and should have contracted with a local dental facility to provide dental services to residents who needed dental care, but she did not know why a contract had not been established. She stated that a local dentist had visited the facility and provided dental care to residents on 01/27/2026, and that residents’ doctors might choose the dental provider. The Administrator and regional company leaders were identified as responsible for obtaining contracts with outside resources, and the Administrator acknowledged that without a contract, residents might not have dental care. The DON stated that residents received dental services if needed because their doctors might choose community dentists, but also acknowledged that without a contract with a dental facility there was a potential risk of residents not receiving dental care. Review of the facility’s policy titled “Dental Services,” revised 12/2016, indicated that routine and 24-hour emergency dental services were to be provided through a contract agreement with a licensed dentist who comes to the facility monthly, or by referral to the resident’s personal dentist, community dentists, or other health care organizations that provide dental services. Despite this policy, the facility did not have the required written agreement with a dental service provider at the time of the survey.
Failure to Maintain Competent Dietary Staff and Required Food Handler Certification
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, as evidenced by a lack of regular in-service training for all kitchen staff reviewed. Interviews revealed that instead of formal training, staff received group text reminders regarding procedures such as food temperature logging, food labeling, and sanitation, with no documentation of the frequency or content of these reminders. The Registered Dietitian Nutritionist (RDN) expressed concerns about food temperatures and indicated that ongoing staff education was expected but not documented. The Administrator was unable to provide any in-service training records for the food service staff within the requested three-month period, and it was noted that a change in the contracted food service company had occurred two months prior. Additionally, one staff member did not have documentation of a current and valid Food Handler's Certificate, as required by state regulations. The facility's policies on food preparation, service, and sanitation did not specify training expectations or qualifications for food service staff. Review of state requirements confirmed that food service employees must complete accredited food handler training within 30 days of employment. These findings were based on interviews, record reviews, and policy examinations, and involved all ten kitchen staff reviewed.
Failure to Serve Food at Safe and Appetizing Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature, as observed during meal service and confirmed through interviews and record reviews. Food items such as oatmeal, grits, pureed bread, pureed sausage, and pureed egg were served below the minimum required temperature, with some items significantly under the standard. The dietary staff checked food temperatures on the service line after the last meal was served, revealing several items below the required 135 degrees Fahrenheit. The dietary manager admitted to only occasionally checking tray temperatures and not documenting these checks, while the cooks only recorded temperatures before service, not after food was plated or delivered to residents. A resident with moderate intellectual disabilities, GERD, and dementia, who was cognitively intact and required supervision with eating, reported that the food was cold, unappetizing, and made her feel unwell. Resident council and family grievances were documented regarding cold food and poor meal presentation, with concerns raised about food being served too cold or not edible. Despite these complaints, the dietary manager and administration believed that food temperatures were within required standards based on logs, but these logs only reflected temperatures at the point of service, not at the point of consumption. The facility's policy required that potentially hazardous foods be maintained at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit to prevent the growth of pathogens, and that food temperatures be monitored throughout meal service. However, the lack of consistent and documented temperature checks after food was plated and delivered, combined with multiple complaints and direct observations of food served below safe temperatures, led to the deficiency. Staff interviews confirmed that there was no systematic process to ensure food remained at safe and appetizing temperatures up to the point of resident consumption.
Deficient Food Storage, Temperature Monitoring, and Probe Sanitization
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified multiple failures in the facility's food service operations, specifically regarding the storage, preparation, and serving of food. During an observation, three sealed plastic containers containing cheesecake, mashed potatoes, and carrots were found in the walk-in refrigerator without any labels or dates. Staff confirmed these items were from the previous day's service and acknowledged the lack of labeling and dating. The dietary manager was not aware of these unlabeled items until after the surveyors' discovery, and subsequent inspection by the dietary manager revealed additional unlabeled food items. Record reviews showed that food temperatures were not documented for several meals over multiple days. The temperature logs lacked staff names, initials, signatures, or times, making it unclear who was responsible for checking and recording food temperatures. Staff interviews revealed that food temperatures were sometimes not taken due to being busy, and there was a habit among staff to write temperatures on separate pieces of paper without transferring them to the official log. The dietary manager admitted to not providing formal training on labeling food or logging temperatures, instead relying on reminders. Additionally, improper sanitization practices were observed. A staff member was seen using Sani-Cloth germicidal wipes, which are not food-safe, to clean the food thermometer probe between food items. Both the dietary manager and the registered dietitian confirmed that Sani-Cloths should not be used for this purpose, as they are not food grade and could contaminate food. The registered dietitian had previously reported issues with unlabeled food and incomplete temperature logs to facility leadership, but these issues persisted at the time of the survey.
Failure to Ensure Accessible Call Light for Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's right to reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences was met, specifically regarding access to the call light system. On the date of observation, the resident was found asleep in bed with the call light lying across the footboard and onto the floor, making it inaccessible. The resident did not have a roommate, and the second call light in the room was also observed on the floor. The resident was unresponsive and unable to demonstrate whether he could reach or use the call light. According to the care plan, the call light was to be kept within reach at all times due to the resident's risk for falls and impaired mobility. The resident had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent for self-care and mobility, and had a history of falls and attempts to self-transfer. Staff interviews revealed that the CNA was aware the call light was out of reach and stated that the resident often threw items, including the call light, off the bed. The CNA also indicated that the resident was not impacted by the call light being out of reach because he was not capable of using or understanding it, so staff were expected to monitor him. Facility leadership confirmed that if the care plan required the call light to be within reach, it should have been so, regardless of the resident's cognitive status. Facility policy required that each resident be provided with a means to call for assistance, and if unable to use the standard system, an alternative should be documented in the care plan. No alternative means of communication was documented for this resident.
Failure to Post Oxygen Signage in Resident Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to post required cautionary and safety signage indicating the presence of oxygen in a resident's room, as mandated by facility policy. Observation on 12/29/2025 revealed a portable oxygen tank in the resident's room with no oxygen tubing attached and no signage posted on or around the door. Interviews with nursing staff and administration confirmed that facility policy requires an 'Oxygen in Use' sign to be posted whenever oxygen is present in a room, regardless of whether it is actively in use or scheduled. Record review of the resident's care plan and physician orders did not reflect an active order for oxygen therapy, but the oxygen tank was still present in the room without appropriate signage. The resident involved was a male with severe cognitive impairment, multiple physical disabilities, and a history of falls, who was dependent on staff for self-care and mobility. Staff interviews indicated that all staff members are responsible for ensuring the signage is posted, but this was not done in this instance. Facility policies reviewed included requirements for clear identification of oxygen storage areas and the posting of 'No Smoking' and 'Oxygen in Use' signs, which were not followed at the time of the survey.
Expired Supplements Found in Medication Storage Room
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to store over-the-counter medications and supplements in accordance with accepted professional principles in the medication storage room of the secure Co-ed unit. Specifically, four expired supplemental shakes with expiration dates of 09/10/2025 were found on the counter during an observation. When questioned, a CMA indicated that expired liquids are usually removed and stored elsewhere, but acknowledged the expired date on the supplements and stated they would notify a nurse. Further interviews revealed that the supplements remained in the medication room because there was uncertainty between the dialysis clinic and the primary physician regarding who would write the order for the resident's supplements, resulting in an unfilled order. The RN confirmed that medication aides are responsible for removing expired medications, and the RNC stated that all expired medications, including over-the-counter items and supplements, should be pulled from medication rooms and disposed of properly. The presence of expired supplements in the medication room was directly observed and confirmed by staff.
Failure to Post Daily Nurse Staffing and Census Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to post daily nurse staffing and census information as required for 13 out of 15 days reviewed. Observations on 12/29/2025 revealed that the most recent posting was dated 12/16/2025, and interviews with staff indicated confusion and lack of clarity regarding responsibility for updating and posting this information. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated that the new Staffing Coordinator (SC) may not have been trained on the process, and the previous SC had left suddenly, resulting in a lapse in the daily posting routine. The Wound Care (WC) Nurse and the new SC both confirmed uncertainty about the procedure for posting the required information, with the SC stating she was learning her responsibilities day by day and had only recently been informed about the posting procedure. Further interviews with the Registered Nurse Consultant (RNC) and the Administrator (ADMIN) confirmed that the SC was responsible for the postings, but there was a breakdown in communication and procedure following the prior SC's departure. The RNC and ADMIN both indicated that, although the staffing book was available for review, the daily posting requirement was not consistently met during the period in question. No specific residents or patient conditions were mentioned as being directly affected in the report.
Improper Storage Temperature for Medications in Central Supply Room
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store over-the-counter medications, specifically eight bottles of Acetaminophen 325 mg, within the recommended temperature range of 68 to 77 degrees Fahrenheit in the central supply storage room. Observations and interviews revealed that the storage room was hot, stuffy, and lacked proper ventilation, with a thermometer indicating a temperature of 84 degrees Fahrenheit. Staff, including a CNA responsible for organizing the storage room, the maintenance supervisor (MS), and the Director of Nursing (DON), all noted the excessive heat and acknowledged that the temperature exceeded the recommended storage conditions for medications. The thermometer in the room was not functioning properly, and the area was described as being in the 'danger' zone for temperature. Multiple staff members, including the CNA, MS, and DON, reported concerns about the high temperature to facility administration and corporate staff. The MS and DON both stated they were aware of the temperature requirements for medication storage, and the DON confirmed that the acetaminophen bottles were labeled to be stored at 68-77 degrees Fahrenheit. Despite these concerns, the Administrator (ADM) had not yet discussed the issue with current corporate staff and was unable to provide a policy on the storage of over-the-counter medications during the investigation period. No corrective actions or follow-up plans were mentioned in the report.
Failure to Maintain Safe and Homelike Resident Environment During Prolonged Construction
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary maintenance services to ensure a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for a resident whose room and restroom were under prolonged construction. The resident's shower was sealed off with plastic, with drywall and tile removed, leaving the area in a state of disrepair for over two months. The floor in the resident's room had a large, uneven, sunken area with a lip, and there were brown stains on the linoleum under the vanity. The room and restroom also had a noticeable mildew odor. These conditions were directly observed by surveyors and confirmed by interviews with both the maintenance staff and the resident. The resident involved had a history of dementia, lack of coordination, right hip pain, and difficulty walking, but was alert, oriented, and independent in most activities of daily living. She had no history of falls and used a rolling walker. Despite the environmental hazards, she reported no issues walking over the uneven floor and had not experienced any falls. The resident expressed dissatisfaction with the ongoing construction and lack of access to her own shower, though she was able to use a main shower room nearby. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the shower remodeling project was halted when the original contractor withdrew, citing additional plumbing issues and seeking to renegotiate the contract. The project remained at a standstill for about two months, coinciding with a change in facility ownership. The maintenance staff acknowledged the uneven floor as a trip hazard and noted that the building required significant repairs. Facility policies reviewed by surveyors required maintenance to keep the building in good repair and free from hazards, which was not met in this instance.
Failure to Provide Specialized Wheelchair Due to Incomplete PASARR Coordination
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to incorporate recommendations from the PASARR Level II determination and evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care. Specifically, the facility did not submit a completed Nursing Facility Specialized Services (NFSS) application to ensure a resident with severe intellectual disabilities, muscle weakness, and dementia received a specialized motorized wheelchair (CMWC) as recommended by her rehabilitation assessment. The resident was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living and used a manual wheelchair, despite being assessed as needing a tilt-in-space wheelchair with custom support to improve posture and participation in daily activities. The deficiency was due to the facility's inability to obtain a current hospice plan of care signed by the physician, which was required for the NFSS application. The Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) stated he submitted the application, but it was denied for lack of the signed plan of care. Despite repeated requests to hospice staff, including the nurse manager, the required documentation was not provided for several months. The DOR discussed the issue in morning meetings but did not escalate the matter to the Administrator (ADM), his immediate supervisor, for further assistance. The PASARR representative confirmed that the facility was notified and reminded to submit the NFSS request but failed to follow up after the initial denial. Observations showed the resident continued to use a manual wheelchair and was unable to communicate or maintain proper posture. The ADM was unaware of the ongoing issue until much later and acknowledged that the delay in obtaining the necessary documentation resulted in the resident not receiving the recommended specialized equipment.
Failure to Maintain Sanitary and Comfortable Resident Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for a resident with moderate cognitive impairment, as evidenced by multiple unresolved maintenance issues in the resident's room and bathroom. Observations revealed holes in the wall covered with an unspecified material, missing linoleum exposing black/brown glue, chipped and splintered baseboards, and uneven floor tiles at the entrance to the shower stall. The bathroom contained two unused shower curtain rods, no shower curtains, and a shower chair with a peeling seat wedged under a safety bar. The maintenance supervisor confirmed these deficiencies, noting that the room and restroom were in poor condition and could pose an accident hazard due to the uneven floor. The supervisor also stated that the facility was old, had many areas needing repair, and that work orders had been submitted but not yet completed. Interviews with the resident indicated confusion and moderate cognitive impairment, with the resident stating that the room's condition did not bother him and that he continued to use the shower despite staff recommendations. The administrator acknowledged the facility's age and the need for extensive repairs and painting, attributing delays to recent changes in ownership and prioritization of other issues. Facility policies reviewed indicated a requirement to maintain the building in good repair and to treat residents with dignity, but these standards were not met in this instance.
Environmental Deficiencies Across Resident Hallways
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified multiple environmental deficiencies across all four resident hallways, including the A hallway, Women's Unit, C-hall, and Men's Unit. Observations revealed missing overhead light bulbs and a dirty ceiling air vent in the therapy bathroom at the end of the A hallway. Additional issues included a rusted ceiling vent fan, a ceiling vent panel not fully attached, and visible dirt and water stains on ceiling panels in various locations. Mold was observed on shower floors in both the Women's Unit and C-hall, and a bedside light in a C-hall room was not functioning. In the Men's Unit, a bathroom floor molding was found detached from the wall. Interviews with the Maintenance Director and Administrator confirmed that these repairs had not been completed, and the Maintenance Director stated he had not received work orders for the noted deficiencies. Review of the facility's maintenance policies indicated that routine inspections are required to ensure cleanliness and proper repair, but these procedures were not followed, resulting in the identified environmental concerns.
Failure to Address Bowel Incontinence in Resident Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a resident with multiple medical conditions, including major depressive disorder, urinary tract infection, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and paraplegia. The resident was always incontinent of bowel, as documented in the Minimum Data Set (MDS), and required substantial to maximal assistance for transfers and toileting. Despite these documented needs, the resident's care plan did not include any interventions or guidance for managing bowel incontinence, although it did address bladder and catheter care. This omission was confirmed through record review, staff interviews, and direct observation of care. Staff interviews revealed that both the CNAs and the MDS nurse were aware of the resident's bowel incontinence and the need for staff to check and clean the resident. The MDS nurse acknowledged missing the inclusion of bowel incontinence care in the resident's care plan upon readmission. The Director of Nursing also confirmed that the care plan should have addressed bowel incontinence, as the care plan serves as a blueprint for care. The facility's own policy requires that all areas of concern identified during assessment be evaluated and addressed in the care plan, but this was not followed in this case.
Incomplete Perineal and Catheter Care for Resident with Incontinence
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a certified nursing assistant (CNA) failed to provide complete perineal and catheter care to a male resident who was incontinent of bowel and had an indwelling urinary catheter. During observed care, the CNA cleaned only the resident's penis, indwelling catheter, and buttock areas, omitting the suprapubic area, left and right groin areas, and scrotum. The CNA acknowledged forgetting to clean these areas due to nervousness, and both the CNA and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that facility policy required cleaning all specified areas to prevent possible infection. The resident involved had a history of major depressive disorder, urinary tract infection, dysuria, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and paraplegia, and required substantial assistance for transfers and toileting. The resident's care plan addressed bladder and catheter care but did not include a plan for bowel incontinence. Facility policy specified thorough cleaning of the perineal area, including the penis, scrotum, inner thighs, and under the scrotum, anus, and buttocks, which was not followed during the observed care.
Failure to Provide Organized Activities in Secure Unit
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities, and independent activities. Observations revealed that the activities board in the men's secure unit (MSU) did not display a current calendar of activities for March, and no formal group activities were observed during scheduled times. Nursing staff were unaware of any planned activities, and residents were often found sitting quietly or resting in their rooms. Interviews with staff, including a CNA and an LVN, indicated that organized activities were rarely hosted within the unit, and bingo was the only consistent activity, although it was not always held as expected. The LVN noted that residents became aggressive due to boredom and lack of stimulation. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) acknowledged the lack of activities and attributed it to the Activities Director's (AD) schedule, which limited his availability to conduct activities. The AD confirmed that activities were planned daily but admitted to delays in posting the monthly calendar and challenges in engaging staff to assist with activities. The facility's policy required at least two group activities per day on weekends and holidays and four on weekdays, but records showed no documentation of group or individual activities for a 90-day period. The AD's documentation consisted only of quarterly progress notes, with no routine records of attendance or individual activities. This lack of organized activities and documentation placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life, isolation, and lack of stimulation.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, specifically in implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident. The resident, a woman with a history of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, stage 4 pressure ulcers, and an indwelling catheter, was observed receiving peri and catheter care without the necessary precautions. The CNA responsible for the care did not wear a gown, and there was no signage or personal protective equipment (PPE) available outside the resident's room, as required by the facility's policy. The CNA was unaware of the EBP requirements, indicating a gap in training, as confirmed by the Director of Nursing (DON). The facility's policy mandates EBP for residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices to prevent the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. However, the lack of signage, PPE, and staff awareness led to a failure in implementing these precautions, potentially putting residents at risk for infection spread.
Failure to Protect Residents from Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect residents from abuse, specifically involving a resident who exhibited aggressive and sexually inappropriate behaviors towards other residents. This resident, who had a history of mental health issues including schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder, was involved in multiple incidents of physical and sexual misconduct. Despite having a care plan that acknowledged his potential for disruptive behavior, the facility did not effectively address or prevent these incidents, leading to multiple residents being affected. One resident reported being sexually assaulted by the aggressive resident, who invited him to his room under false pretenses and then engaged in inappropriate physical contact. Another resident was physically assaulted in the dining room, resulting in a bruise on his forearm. Additional reports indicated that the aggressive resident made sexually inappropriate comments and gestures towards other residents, further highlighting the facility's failure to manage his behavior effectively. The facility's inaction in addressing these behaviors placed residents at risk of harm. The aggressive resident's behavior was documented in progress notes and event reports, but interventions such as medication and 1:1 supervision were deemed ineffective. The facility's inability to prevent these incidents led to an Immediate Jeopardy situation, although it was later removed, the facility remained out of compliance due to ongoing monitoring of the situation.
Removal Plan
- Staff re-education
- Resident re-education
- Police notified
- State notified
- Administrator notified
- DON notified
- Immediate intervention implemented: Resident placed on 1:1 supervision
Failure in Pharmaceutical Services Leads to Missed Medication Doses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of a resident, resulting in missed doses of critical medications. The resident, a male with a history of vascular dementia, type 2 diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, anxiety disorder, and depression, did not receive timely reorders of Lyrica, Gabapentin, and Clonazepam. This led to the resident missing multiple doses of these medications, which were essential for managing his conditions. The facility's staff did not reorder the medications in a timely manner, and there was a failure to update the resident's insurance information promptly, which contributed to the delay in medication delivery. Additionally, there was an incident where a medication aide administered Gabapentin from another resident's supply to the affected resident, which is against the facility's policy. The aide admitted to borrowing medications from other residents when necessary, despite being aware that this practice was not allowed. This action was taken without proper documentation or notification to the appropriate nursing staff, further complicating the situation and potentially risking medication errors. The facility's communication and documentation processes were inadequate, as evidenced by the lack of timely notification to the Director of Nursing (DON) and other supervisory staff about the medication shortages and billing issues. The DON was not informed until after the resident had already missed several doses, and there was a lack of coordination among the staff to resolve the issue promptly. The failure to administer medications as prescribed and the improper handling of medication orders and documentation highlight significant deficiencies in the facility's pharmaceutical services.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plans for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for four residents, which were necessary to address their specific medical and psychosocial needs. Resident #24, diagnosed with dementia, depression, and a cognitive communication deficit, did not have a care plan addressing depression, despite having a physician's order for fluoxetine to manage this condition. Similarly, Resident #59, with severe intellectual disabilities, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder, also lacked a care plan focus on depression, even though they were prescribed Prozac for this condition. Interviews with the LVN and DON confirmed that depression should have been included in the care plans for both residents. Resident #88, who has type 2 diabetes, an amputation below the knee, and hypertension, was not care planned for their ability to leave the facility independently, despite having a BIMS score indicating intact cognitive function. The resident expressed confidence in their ability to leave the facility independently, as evidenced by a recent trip to a grocery store. The MDS LVN acknowledged that this aspect of the resident's care should have been addressed in the care plan. Resident #97, diagnosed with vascular dementia, type 2 diabetes, and a history of drug-induced dyskinesia, was admitted to hospice care, but this was not reflected in their care plan. The MDS LVN and DON recognized that the resident's hospice status should have been included in the care plan. The facility's policy mandates the development of comprehensive care plans that include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet residents' needs, which was not adhered to in these cases.
Inadequate Qualifications for Dietary Manager
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets necessary for the food and nutrition service, as required by regulations. The Dietary Manager (DM) did not possess the necessary certification, education, or qualifications to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services. Specifically, the DM was not a certified dietary manager, a certified food service manager, nor did they have a similar national certification for food service management and safety. Additionally, the DM did not have an associate's or higher degree in food service management or hospitality, nor did they have two or more years of experience in the position of director of food and nutrition services in a nursing facility setting with completed coursework in food safety management. The DM was hired in early 2023 and had completed a Texas Food Safety Manager Certification Examination, which is not recognized as a national certification. The facility's Registered Dietitian (RD) was contracted and not a full-time employee. During interviews, both the DM and the Administrator acknowledged the lack of appropriate certification for the DM's position. The Administrator noted that the DM was hired before his arrival at the facility. This deficiency could potentially place residents at risk of foodborne illness and inadequate nutrition due to the lack of qualified oversight in the food and nutrition services.
Food Safety and Storage Deficiencies in Facility Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety in several areas, as observed during a survey. The Dietary Manager (DM) was noted to wear a facial hair restraint that did not adequately cover all facial hair, specifically leaving hair on the upper lip and sides of the face exposed. This was observed on two separate occasions, and the DM initially did not provide a reason for the inadequate restraint but later adjusted the covering. Additionally, two dietary aides were observed preparing food without wearing hair restraints, which is against the facility's policy and the U.S. Food Code requirements. In the walk-in cooler and dry storage room, food items were improperly stored, labeled, and dated. An opened package of ham, a gallon of milk, and a container of cooked vegetables were found without proper sealing, labeling, or dating. The DM acknowledged these lapses and attributed the responsibility to the cooks, indicating a lack of oversight. Furthermore, an opened bag of cornbread mix was found in the dry storage room without being sealed or dated, posing a risk of spoilage and pest infestation. The facility also failed to maintain appropriate temperatures in one of the reach-in freezers, resulting in thawed food items. The DM and Maintenance Director were aware of the issue with the freezer door seal but did not take timely corrective action, leading to the thawing of food that was supposed to remain frozen. Additionally, in the dish room, plastic cups were stored without air-drying nets, which could lead to microbial growth. These deficiencies collectively posed a risk of foodborne illness to residents receiving meals from the facility's kitchen.
Freezer Malfunction Leads to Unsafe Food Storage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain Freezer #1 in safe operating condition, which could place residents at risk of foodborne illness due to food not being stored at a safe temperature. Observations revealed that the analogue thermometer inside Freezer #1 fluctuated between 40 and 42 degrees Fahrenheit, and several food items were completely thawed. The temperature log showed inconsistent readings, and the Maintenance Director acknowledged that the middle door gasket was not sealing properly, which had been reported multiple times over the past month. Despite a work order being placed, the issue was not resolved in a timely manner, and the freezer continued to be used. Interviews with staff, including the Dietary Manager (DM), Corporate RN, and Maintenance Director, confirmed awareness of the problem with the freezer door seal. The Maintenance Director stated that the part needed for repair had arrived but had not been installed, and he did not have access to check the freezer's contents. The Administrator acknowledged that the freezer should not have been used once the door seal issue was identified. The facility's policy and the U.S. Food Code require freezers to maintain a temperature of 0 degrees Fahrenheit or below to ensure food safety, which was not adhered to in this case.
Environmental Deficiencies in Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for its residents, staff, and the public. Observations revealed several environmental deficiencies, including a 4-foot gap in the wall surface behind a resident's headboard in room #51 and a 6-inch round wall penetration in the bathroom of the same room. Additionally, the hallway shower room had two out of three non-functional lights above the sink vanity and a cracked surface measuring approximately 2x4 inches on the lower right section of the shower stall. Further observations in the men's secure unit identified dust and dirt particles on the bathroom ceiling vents in two resident rooms, and mold was found around all sections of the floor surface in a shower stall with a 4-foot perimeter. The Maintenance Director acknowledged responsibility for these areas but stated that no work order requests had been received for the necessary repairs. The facility's policy on providing a homelike environment, dated February 2021, emphasizes the importance of maintaining a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents.
Failure to Include Essential Information in Baseline Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for a resident that included essential information such as the prescribed diet, food allergies, and code status. This deficiency was identified during a review of the resident's care plan, which was missing these critical elements despite being necessary to meet the resident's basic needs. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including Type 2 diabetes mellitus, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and diverticulitis, had specific dietary requirements and allergies that were not documented in the baseline care plan. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the baseline care plan was created by a team effort involving floor nurses, ADONs, the DON, and MDS nurses. However, the staff member responsible for creating the care plan confirmed the omission of the necessary information, attributing it to an oversight. Additionally, the facility was using a template for baseline care plans that did not include sections for prescribed diet, food allergies, or code status, contributing to the deficiency.
Infection Control Lapse During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by an incident involving a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) during wound care for a resident. The resident, a cognitively intact female with a history of osteomyelitis, surgical amputation of toes on the right foot, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic peripheral angiopathy with gangrene, was receiving wound care. During the procedure, the LVN did not sanitize or wash her hands between changing gloves, which is a critical step in preventing cross-contamination and infection. The incident was observed during a wound care session, where the LVN cleansed the surgical wound, changed gloves, and continued the care without performing hand hygiene. In an interview, the LVN acknowledged the lapse, admitting that she should have sanitized or washed her hands between glove changes. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that failing to perform hand hygiene between glove changes could lead to infection or contamination. The facility's hand hygiene policy, revised in January 2023, clearly states that hand hygiene must be performed before donning and after doffing gloves.
Inadequate Supervision and Safety Measures in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision for two residents, leading to significant incidents. One resident, diagnosed with dementia and severe cognitive impairment, was found outside the facility near a busy street after eloping from the Men's Secured Unit. The facility lacked a monitoring mechanism for the front door, and staff did not maintain eye contact or follow the resident when he exited. The resident's care plan included frequent staff rounding and redirection for wandering behaviors, but these measures were not effectively implemented, resulting in the resident's unsupervised departure. Another resident, an 84-year-old female with dementia and a high risk for falls, suffered a severe head injury from an unwitnessed fall in the Women's Secured Unit. The resident was agitated and left unsupervised in the dining room, where she fell from a rolling stool, resulting in a large subdural hematoma. Despite being identified as high risk for falls, the resident did not receive the necessary supervision, and staff failed to monitor her movements adequately, leading to the fall and subsequent hospitalization. The facility's internal investigations revealed that staff were not adequately trained or prepared to handle these situations, contributing to the incidents. The lack of proper supervision and monitoring systems, such as alarms or doorbells, allowed residents to be at risk of elopement and falls. The facility's policies on wandering, elopement, and fall prevention were not effectively enforced, leading to these deficiencies.
Failure to Protect Resident's Personal Belongings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident's personal belongings from being lost when the resident was discharged to the hospital. The resident, a 79-year-old male with severe cognitive impairment, was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and mood disorder. Upon the resident's death, the facility did not document or return his personal belongings, which included six blankets and all his clothes, to the responsible party (RP) or the mortuary. Interviews revealed that no inventory of the resident's belongings was conducted at admission or discharge, and the facility could not locate any inventory documentation. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the procedure for inventorying personal items was not followed, as no inventory sheet was completed or found in the electronic medical record (EMR). The facility's policies required documentation of personal effects during transfer or discharge, but this was not adhered to in the case of the resident. The lack of inventory documentation and failure to return the resident's belongings to the RP constituted a misappropriation of property, violating the resident's rights as outlined in the facility's policies.
Latest citations in Texas
Surveyors found that kitchen staff failed to follow facility policy and professional standards for food storage, leaving dry items such as spaghetti noodles, garlic powder, and salt unsealed, and refrigerated items such as a prepared drink, salad, and turkey lunch meat uncovered or undated. The DM and ADM both stated that all food should be sealed, labeled, and dated, that all staff are responsible for these tasks, and that staff had been trained, but observations showed food in both dry and refrigerated storage was not properly sealed or dated as required by the facility’s food receiving and storage policy.
The facility failed to enforce its smoking policy and safe smoking assessments for three residents who used tobacco. One resident with mild cognitive impairment and two residents without cognitive impairment were assessed as smokers who required the facility to store their cigarettes and lighters, yet they reported keeping these items in their rooms, and surveyors observed cigarettes and lighters in bedside furniture. An LVN and the housekeeping supervisor stated that all smoking was to be supervised and that supplies were to be kept at the nurse’s station, and the DON and ADM confirmed that residents were not supposed to keep smoking articles in their rooms. However, residents reported they had not been told they could not keep smoking supplies in their rooms, and the facility’s written policy stated residents may not have or keep smoking articles except under direct supervision.
A resident with dementia, severe cognitive impairment, limited lower extremity range of motion, and a need for assistance with ADLs was twice observed lying in bed without an accessible call light, which was either hanging under the head of the bed or tucked between the mattress and bedframe. An LVN confirmed the resident could use the call light if available, and a CNA, another LVN, the DON, and the ADM all stated that call lights should always be within reach, that all staff are responsible for ensuring access, and that they were unaware this resident’s call light was not in reach. This was inconsistent with the facility’s policy requiring each resident to have a means to call staff directly for assistance from the bed and other areas.
A resident reported that bedroom hand sinks did not provide warm water, requiring handwashing with cold water and causing discomfort. Surveyors observed that in two rooms, the hot water remained cold despite running for several minutes, and thermometer readings at shared hand sinks showed temperatures in the 70°F range on the hot side, below the facility’s stated 100–110°F expectation. Further observation with the MD revealed that in one room the hot and cold valves were transposed, with hot water only available from the cold side. The MD, ADM, and DON each stated the MD was responsible for monitoring and maintaining water temperatures, but none were aware of recent issues, and the DON did not know the required temperature range. The facility’s maintenance request policy was requested twice but was not provided.
A resident with documented Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), including recurrent severe and mild forms, was identified in multiple records such as the face sheet, MDS, care plan, physician orders, and diagnosis report, and was receiving Cymbalta for MDD. However, the resident’s PASRR Level I screening indicated no mental illness. The ADM stated the MDS nurse was responsible for PASRR accuracy and updates when mental illness diagnoses were made, and acknowledged the resident’s active MDD should have been reflected on the PASRR, but he was unaware of the inaccuracy. This resulted in an inaccurate and non-updated PASRR Level I for a resident with a mental illness diagnosis.
Two residents’ care plans were not accurately updated to reflect their assessed needs and physician orders. One resident with dementia, diabetes, and malnutrition had an active MD order and meal tickets for a large-portion, double-portion diet and was observed receiving double portions at meals, yet the care plan continued to list only a regular diet with thin liquids and did not specify the ordered double portions. Another resident with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder had a positive PASRR Level 1 for mental illness and a completed PASRR Level 2 evaluation, but the care plan, while listing the psychiatric diagnoses, contained no focus areas addressing the PASRR findings or related services. The ADM and DON acknowledged that care plans should have been updated to reflect these orders and PASRR results and were unaware that this had not occurred.
A resident with severe dementia, psychiatric comorbidities, and protein-calorie malnutrition had a physician order for weekly weights, but the facility failed to consistently obtain and document these weights over several months. Although the resident appeared adequately nourished and was observed eating most of a meal, multiple ordered weekly weights were missing from the treatment records. Facility leadership, including the DON and ADON, were unaware that the weekly weight order had not been followed, despite policies requiring adherence to physician orders and documentation of weights in the EHR.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and COPD, receiving oxygen therapy via nasal cannula, was observed twice with the cannula lying on the floor beside the bed instead of stored in the bag on the oxygen concentrator as required. A CNA later picked up the cannula from the floor, wiped it with a non-disinfectant incontinent wipe, and reapplied it to the resident, despite having been trained that a cannula found on the floor should be replaced. An LVN, the DON, and the Administrator all confirmed that oxygen cannulas must be stored properly, replaced if found on the floor, and that incontinent wipes are not disinfectants, indicating a failure to follow the facility’s infection prevention and control policy.
Surveyors found loose pills in drawers on two medication carts, indicating medications were not stored in their original packaging or assigned resident-specific areas as required by facility policy. On one cart, two loose tablets later identified as Carbidopa-Levodopa and Zofran were discovered with a medication aide who stated she was responsible for checking the cart at the start of her shift. On the second cart, four loose tablets identified as Allopurinol, Metoprolol, Lasix, and Amlodipine were found with another medication aide, who also reported routinely checking the cart for cleanliness and loose medications. The DON and ADM both reported they were unaware of the loose medications and stated that medication aides, nurses, and charge nurses were responsible for proper medication storage, monitored through administrative and pharmacy cart audits.
A resident with CHF, COPD, morbid obesity, chronic wounds, and total bowel/bladder incontinence was discharged home by stretcher despite being a mechanical-lift resident who could not walk or toilet independently. Home health was not in place, the family reported difficulty reaching SW, and the resident was discharged without an AMA notice or Ombudsman notice. She soiled herself at home, could not clean up, and was hospitalized shortly after for CHF exacerbation and fluid overload.
Improper Sealing, Dating, and Storage of Dry and Refrigerated Foods
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s food storage and handling practices in the kitchen, based on observations, interviews, and record review. During a kitchen tour, they observed multiple instances of improperly stored food in dry storage and refrigerated areas. In dry storage, spaghetti noodles were kept in an unsealed zip lock bag, garlic powder was stored with its lid open, and salt was stored with its spout open. In refrigerated storage, a prepared drink was placed on a metal sheet pan without a cover, a plate of salad had no date, and a package of turkey breast lunch meat was undated and not sealed. In interviews, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated that all food in the refrigerator should be sealed and dated, and all dry storage food should be sealed and closed, explaining that sealing stored food keeps it fresh and prevents contaminants from entering. The DM also stated that all staff were responsible for dating and sealing stored food and that all staff had been trained in food storage. The Administrator (ADM) reported he was not aware that food was not properly stored, and stated that dating and sealing stored food was to maintain sanitary conditions, with everyone responsible for this task and all staff trained in food storage. Review of the facility’s “Food Receiving and Storage” policy, revised November 2022, showed that dry foods stored in bins must be removed from original packaging, labeled, and dated with a use-by date, and that all refrigerated and frozen foods must be covered, labeled, dated, and monitored so they are used, frozen, or discarded by their use-by date.
Failure to Enforce Smoking Policy and Control Resident Smoking Supplies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its established smoking policy for three residents who used tobacco. Record review showed that one resident with hepatic encephalopathy, anxiety, depression, and hypertension had an annual MDS indicating tobacco use and a BIMS score of 09 (mild cognitive impairment), but there was no smoking care plan in her care plan report. Her safe smoking assessment indicated she required the facility to store her lighter and cigarettes and that she was safe to smoke without supervision. Two other residents, one with heart failure, diabetes, anxiety, and hypertension, and another with a history of cerebral infarction, depression, and hypertension, had MDS assessments indicating tobacco use and BIMS scores of 14 and 13 respectively (no cognitive impairment). Their care plans identified them as smokers, and their safe smoking assessments also indicated the facility should store their lighters and cigarettes and that they were safe to smoke without supervision. Staff interviews and observations revealed inconsistencies between the facility’s smoking policy and actual practice. An LVN stated that all resident smoking was to be supervised, that smoking supplies were kept in a box at the nurse’s station, and that staff supervised residents according to a smoking schedule, with the housekeeping supervisor assigned to supervise at a specific time. Observation confirmed the housekeeping supervisor was outside observing residents while they smoked. The housekeeping supervisor reported she was scheduled to supervise smoking, that all residents had their own cigarettes and lighters, and that she did not hand out smoking supplies, believing residents obtained them from the nurse’s station. Both the LVN and housekeeping supervisor stated they had been trained on the facility’s smoking policy. Resident interviews and room observations showed that residents were keeping smoking supplies in their rooms despite the policy and safe smoking assessments requiring facility storage. One resident reported keeping cigarettes in his nightstand and a lighter in his pants pocket and stated he had not been told he could not keep smoking supplies in his room. Another resident stated he kept cigarettes and a lighter in his nightstand, and the surveyor observed cigarettes and a lighter in the top drawer of the nightstand; he also stated he had not been told he could not keep supplies in his room. A third resident stated she kept her cigarettes and lighter in her room and that if you gave the nurses your cigarettes and lighter they would take them; she did not remember being told she could not have supplies in her room. The DON and ADM both stated that the policy required all residents to be supervised while smoking and that smoking supplies were to be kept at the nurse’s station, and they were not aware that residents had smoking supplies in their rooms. The written smoking policy stated that residents may not have or keep any smoking articles except when under direct supervision.
Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure a resident’s call light was within reach, as required by facility policy and staff training. An elderly female resident with dementia, severe cognitive impairment (BIMS score of 03), limited range of motion in both lower extremities, and a need for partial/moderate assistance with ADLs was observed on two separate occasions without accessible call light access. On one observation, the resident was lying in bed with the call light hanging on the bed frame under the head of the bed; on another, the call light was tucked between the mattress and bedframe at the head of the bed, making it unavailable for use. Multiple staff interviews confirmed that the call light should always be within reach of residents and that there was no reason this resident should not have had access to it. An LVN stated the resident was able to use the call light if it was available and that it should always be in reach. A CNA, another LVN, the DON, and the ADM each stated that the purpose of the call light was for residents to call for assistance, that all staff had been trained on call light placement, and that all staff were responsible for ensuring residents had access to the call light. None of them were aware that this resident’s call light was not within reach. The facility’s written policy on the resident call system stated that each resident is to be provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from the bed and toileting/bathing areas, which was not followed in this case.
Failure to Maintain Adequate Hot Water Temperatures at Resident Hand Sinks
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure residents had access to safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable handwashing facilities in their rooms. A resident reported that there was no warm water in the hand sinks in residents’ bedrooms and that they often had to wash their hands with cold water, which made their hands feel cold. The resident also stated they felt the facility did not take the cold water issues seriously and expressed a desire to have warm water available to wash their hands and face. Surveyor observations confirmed that the hot water in two resident rooms remained cold even after running the water for several minutes. Subsequent temperature checks with a thermometer at the shared hand sinks in these rooms showed water temperatures of 73.6°F and 70.5°F on the hot water side, which were below the facility’s stated expected range of 100–110°F for resident room sinks. During a later observation with the Maintenance Director (MD), the hot water at one shared hand sink again measured 70°F on the hot side, and when the cold side was turned on, the water became warm, with a measured temperature of 100°F, indicating the hot and cold valves had been transposed after a plumbing repair. In interviews, the MD stated he was responsible for ensuring adequate water temperatures and that he conducted weekly spot checks of shared hand sinks, maintaining temperature logs, but he was not aware of any recent issues or reports regarding water temperatures. The Administrator (ADM) confirmed that the MD was responsible for water temperatures and that the expected range was 100–110°F, and acknowledged that a recent toilet repair in one of the rooms could have resulted in the hot and cold valves being transposed. The DON stated the MD was responsible for regular water temperature checks and repairs, was not aware of any concerns about hot water temperatures, and was unsure of the required temperature range. When the facility’s maintenance request policy was requested from the ADM on two occasions, it was not provided.
Failure to Maintain Accurate PASRR Level I for Resident With Mental Illness
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an accurate and updated PASRR Level I assessment for a resident with a diagnosed mental illness. The resident, a female with hemiplegia following a cerebral infarction, had documented diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), recurrent, severe without psychotic features, and MDD, recurrent, mild, as reflected on her electronic face sheet, MDS, care plan, physician orders, and diagnosis report. Her Annual MDS identified active psychotic/mood disorders of anxiety and depression, and her care plan and physician orders both documented active MDD diagnoses and treatment with Cymbalta (duloxetine) for MDD. The diagnosis report showed onset dates for MDD recurrent severe without psychotic features and MDD recurrent mild well before the survey. Despite these documented mental health diagnoses, the resident’s PASRR Level I screening dated 07/28/2024 indicated "NO" for both primary diagnosis of dementia and mental illness. During an interview, the Administrator stated that the MDS nurse was responsible for ensuring PASRR Level I screenings were accurate upon admission and for requesting updates when new mental illness diagnoses were made, and acknowledged that the resident did have an active MDD diagnosis that should have been reflected as a mental illness on the PASRR. The Administrator reported he was unaware that the PASRR Level I was inaccurate and noted that PASRR screenings were supposed to be reviewed during the admission process and updated with any changes. The report states that this failure could place residents with inaccurate PASRR Level I screenings and no PASRR Level II evaluation at risk for not receiving needed care and services.
Failure to Maintain Accurate Care Plans for Dietary and PASRR-Related Needs
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s development and implementation of comprehensive, person-centered care plans with measurable objectives and timeframes for residents’ identified needs. For one male resident with dementia, type 2 diabetes, malnutrition, and vitamin deficiency, the admission MDS showed moderate cognitive impairment and independence in eating, with no diet restrictions or weight loss documented in Section K. His care plan included focus areas for diabetes management and potential nutritional problems, with goals to avoid complications related to diabetes and malnutrition and to maintain weight. Interventions listed included dietary consults, monitoring meal intake percentages, providing a regular diet with thin liquids, monitoring for signs and symptoms of malnutrition, and having the RD evaluate and recommend diet changes as needed. Record review showed that this resident had an active physician order for a “Large Portions diet Regular texture, Regular consistency, Double Portions” starting in early February, and his weights increased from 132 lbs to 158 lbs over several months. His lunch meal ticket reflected a regular diet with double portions, and observations confirmed he was receiving double portions at meals, sometimes requesting additional items such as a salad when still hungry. However, the resident’s care plan did not reflect the physician’s order for large/double portions; it continued to reference a regular diet and thin liquids without specifying the ordered double portions. During interviews, the resident reported he sometimes asked for more food because he was hungry but was able to get second portions and felt full after meals. The ADM and DON both stated that the MDS nurse was responsible for updating care plans when diet orders changed, acknowledged that the care plan should have reflected the double-portion order, and were unaware that it had not been updated. For a female resident with hypertensive emergency, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, the annual MDS documented moderate cognitive impairment and active diagnoses of anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. Her active physician orders also listed schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. PASRR Level 1 screening indicated no primary diagnosis of dementia and a positive finding for mental illness, and a PASRR Level 2 evaluation had been completed, documenting that she was not interested in enrollment in a community-based program. Despite these PASRR findings and active mental health diagnoses, the resident’s current care plan, while listing schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder as active diagnoses, contained no focus areas addressing the PASRR Level 1 screening or the PASRR Level 2 evaluation. In interviews, the ADM and DON both stated that the resident’s positive PASRR findings should have been reflected in the care plan and did not know why they were not. The facility’s policy on interdisciplinary care planning stated that resident care plans are to be developed according to the timeframes and criteria established by §483.21, but the care plans for these two residents were not accurate, consistent, or complete with respect to their dietary and PASRR-related needs.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Weekly Weights
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to obtain and document weekly weights as ordered by the physician for one resident with significant nutritional risk factors. The resident was an elderly female with severe dementia with agitation, depression, schizoaffective disorder–bipolar type, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Her Quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 0, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and documented a weight of 120 pounds. A physician order dated 05/14/26 directed that weekly weights be obtained every Wednesday starting 01/21/26. Record review showed that, despite this standing order, multiple weekly weights were not obtained or recorded over several months. The Treatment Administration Records from 01/01/26 through 05/13/26 reflected missing weekly weight assessments on at least six ordered dates: 01/28/26, 02/11/26, 03/11/26, 03/25/26, 04/08/26, and 04/22/26. Progress notes documented weights on some dates (01/19/26, 01/21/26, 02/23/26, and 03/18/26), but these did not fulfill the requirement for consistent weekly weights as ordered. The facility’s own policy on Physician Orders stated that such orders are essential for comprehensive care, and the Weight Assessment and Intervention policy required that weights be recorded in the electronic health record. During observations, the resident appeared well-groomed, did not appear underweight or emaciated, and was seen consuming approximately 75% of a meal with staff assistance. However, interviews with the DON, ADON, and Administrator confirmed that they were not aware that the weekly weight orders had not been consistently followed for this resident. The ADON reported that the resident had significant cognitive impairment and often refused to be weighed, but there was no documentation in the report that these refusals were linked to the missed ordered weight dates or that alternative measures were taken to comply with the physician’s order. The deficiency centers on the facility’s failure to follow the physician’s weekly weight order and to ensure weights were consistently obtained and recorded in accordance with professional standards, the care plan, and facility policy.
Improper Handling and Storage of Oxygen Nasal Cannula
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to follow its infection prevention and control program related to oxygen therapy equipment for one resident. The resident was an elderly female with dementia, COPD, depression, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, who had a comprehensive MDS indicating severe cognitive impairment and use of oxygen therapy. Her care plan identified risk for respiratory infections/distress related to COPD with an intervention to administer oxygen as ordered, and physician orders directed oxygen at 2–3 liters via nasal cannula to maintain oxygen saturation above 90% as needed for shortness of breath. On two separate observations, the resident’s nasal cannula was seen lying on the floor beside the bed instead of being stored in the bag on the oxygen concentrator when not in use, as required by facility practice. During interviews, an LVN, a CNA, the DON, and the Administrator all stated that oxygen nasal cannulas should be stored in a bag on the oxygen concentrator when not in use and that if a cannula is found on the floor it should be replaced. The CNA reported that she was unaware the tubing was on the floor until she entered the room to assist with the noon meal, then picked up the nasal cannula, wiped it with an incontinent wipe that did not contain disinfectant, and placed it back on the resident. She acknowledged she had been trained on oxygen tubing storage and should have replaced the cannula. The LVN, DON, and Administrator confirmed that incontinent wipes are for skin use and are not disinfectant wipes, and that staff had been trained on oxygen use and storage. The facility’s Infection Prevention and Control Program policy stated that the program is to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, including instituting measures to avoid complications or dissemination, which was not followed in this instance.
Loose Medications Found on Two Medication Carts
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored properly on two medication carts. During an observation of the Station 1 medication cart with a medication aide, surveyors found two loose pills in a drawer. The medication aide acknowledged that the cart should not contain loose pills and stated she was responsible for the cart once she received the keys, usually checking it at the beginning of her shift for loose or expired medications and cleaning it prior to medication pass. The Director of Nursing (DON) later identified the loose pills as Carbidopa-Levodopa 25-100 and Zofran 4 mg. The facility’s policy on Medication Labeling and Storage, revised February 2023, states that medications and biologicals are to be stored in the packaging or dispensing systems in which they are received, and that medications are to be stored in an orderly manner with each resident’s medications assigned to an individual cubicle or drawer to prevent mixing. A similar issue was identified on the Station 2 medication cart, where four loose pills were found in the drawers during an observation with another medication aide. The DON identified these pills as Allopurinol 100 mg, Metoprolol 25 mg, Lasix 20 mg, and Amlodipine 5 mg. The second medication aide also stated that the cart should not contain loose pills and that she was responsible for checking the cart for cleanliness and loose medications at the beginning of each shift. In interviews, the DON and the Administrator both stated they were not aware that there were loose medications on the carts, and each indicated that medication aides and nurses or the charge nurse were responsible for proper storage of medications on the carts. Both referenced that nursing administration and the pharmacy consultant conducted periodic or monthly cart audits, and the DON and Administrator described potential negative outcomes such as residents missing medications or inventory control issues. These findings demonstrate that medications were not consistently stored in accordance with the facility’s policy and accepted professional principles.
Unsafe discharge without needed supports
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation for the discharge of a resident with significant functional and medical needs. The resident had diagnoses including acute on chronic diastolic CHF, acute pulmonary edema, obesity, COPD, chronic lower-leg ulcer, and bowel and bladder incontinence. Her admission assessment showed a BIMS score of 15, but her functional status was highly limited: bed mobility required dependent to maximal assistance, transfers were not attempted due to medical/safety concerns, walking 10 feet was not attempted, and she was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Therapy documentation identified her as a mechanical lift resident, and progress notes described persistent debility, high fall risk, and ongoing counseling about unsafe home discharge. Despite these limitations, the resident was discharged home by stretcher with no home health services in place. The discharge summary listed home care and durable medical equipment, including a wheelchair, hospital bed, and 3-in-1 commode, but the home health agency later reported that the referral was declined because of insurance denial. Facility staff and the resident’s family reported that the resident could not walk and could not get to the bathroom by herself. The resident’s family also reported difficulty reaching social services and stated they did not know who would care for her at home. The resident was discharged without an AMA discharge notice and without notice to the Ombudsman, despite facility policy describing requirements for facility-initiated discharge and resident notification. After discharge, the resident arrived home by EMS on a stretcher and was unable to ambulate. Within less than 24 hours, she urinated and defecated on herself and was unable to change her clothing or clean her body. She was then hospitalized for CHF exacerbation and fluid overload. Interviews with facility staff showed conflicting accounts about the discharge process, the availability of home health, and whether the discharge was safe. The attending MD stated she did not recommend the resident go home and recommended long-term care, while other staff stated the resident wanted to go home and that the discharge was insurance driven.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 24, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.



