Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Avir At Arbor Terrace during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to ensure accurate PASRR Level I screenings and appropriate PASRR referrals for two residents with documented mental illness diagnoses. One resident’s records showed schizoaffective disorder, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and schizophrenia, yet the PASRR Level I from the referring hospital indicated no mental illness. Another resident had depression, vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance and anxiety, and later a new diagnosis of schizophrenia, but her PASRR Level I also showed no mental illness and she was not referred for a PASRR Level II after the new schizophrenia diagnosis. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the PASRR for one resident should have been positive and corrected, and that she was unaware of the other resident’s new schizophrenia diagnosis and had not notified the local authority, while the DON and Administrator confirmed the MDS Coordinator’s responsibility for PASRR accuracy and follow‑through.
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans addressing psychotropic medication use and key psychiatric diagnoses for three cognitively intact residents with conditions such as schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, PTSD, depression, and anxiety, despite these being documented in their MDS assessments and medication orders. Each resident was receiving multiple psychotropic agents, including antipsychotics, antidepressants, and antianxiety medications, yet their care plans contained no measurable objectives or timeframes related to these medications or mental health conditions. The Interim DON, MDS Coordinator, and Administrator acknowledged that diagnoses and medications were expected to be care planned, and attributed incomplete and non-individualized care plans in part to a change in electronic health record systems and limited MDS staffing.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and comfortable environment in multiple halls, with several resident restrooms showing significant lint buildup on exhaust fan vents and one restroom exhibiting holes in walls, loose baseboards, deteriorating sheetrock, and exposed areas around plumbing pipes. These conditions occurred in areas accessible to residents and were inconsistent with the Maintenance Director’s job description, which requires maintaining interior structures in good repair. The Maintenance Director and the Administrator acknowledged that these environmental issues did not appear homelike and could negatively affect residents’ quality of life.
A resident admitted with CKD stage 5 on dialysis, neuromuscular bladder dysfunction, and anxiety did not have a baseline care plan developed within 48 hours of admission, as confirmed by record review and staff interviews. The Interim DON acknowledged that the baseline care plan was only started several days after admission and stated that her expectation was for an RN to complete it within the first 48 hours. The Administrator similarly reported that nursing was expected to complete the baseline care plan upon admission and recognized that failure to do so could affect quality of care by leaving staff without needed care instructions. When surveyors requested the facility’s baseline care plan policy, no policy was provided before exit.
A resident with Alzheimer’s disease, weakness, moderate cognitive impairment, and documented oxygen therapy had their oxygen nasal cannula tubing observed wrapped around the back of an oxygen tank on a wheelchair without a protective cover or bag after staff removed it during a transfer. The resident reported that staff placed the cannula on the oxygen tank after moving them from wheelchair to bed. The Administrator stated that staff were expected to store cannulas in bags when not in use and acknowledged that failing to do so could possibly lead to respiratory infections, and no facility policy on oxygen administration or nasal cannula storage was provided.
Two residents with severe cognitive impairment were involved in an incident where one inappropriately touched the other in a common area. The event was witnessed by two other residents and reported to an LVN, who removed the alleged perpetrator and assessed the alleged victim for injury but failed to document or report the incident to administration as required by policy.
Staff failed to report an allegation of inappropriate touching between two severely cognitively impaired residents within the required 24-hour period. The incident, witnessed by two other residents and reported to an LVN, was not documented or communicated to facility leadership as required by policy, resulting in a deficiency for not following mandated abuse reporting protocols.
A resident with multiple medical conditions and intact cognition repeatedly requested to be sent to the hospital due to feeling unwell. Despite informing a CNA, who relayed the request to an LVN, no nursing assessment or documentation occurred, and the resident ultimately arranged for her own transport to the ER, where she was diagnosed and treated for a UTI and airway inflammation.
A resident with multiple medical conditions repeatedly requested to be sent to the hospital due to feeling unwell, but staff did not promptly assess her or arrange for her transfer. The resident ultimately arranged her own transport to the ER, where she was diagnosed and treated for a UTI and airway inflammation. Staff interviews and record reviews showed a lack of documentation and follow-through regarding the resident's requests.
The facility failed to secure medications, leaving two medication carts unlocked and unsupervised. One cart was found on F Hall with two residents nearby, and another at the nurses' station with no staff or residents in sight. The facility's policy mandates that medication carts be locked when not in use, as confirmed by the DON.
A LTC facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by improper use of PPE and inadequate infection control practices. An LVN did not wear a gown during dressing changes for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, and a CNA did not change gloves after contamination during incontinent care. Additionally, the LVN did not follow proper infection control principles, such as hand hygiene and appropriate use of gauze, increasing the risk of cross-contamination.
A resident with a history of verbal aggression physically assaulted a CNA, leading to the CNA's injury and the resident's discharge. The facility failed to immediately notify the resident's physician of this significant behavioral change, only doing so the following day, contrary to policy requirements.
The facility failed to protect the confidentiality of residents' records when an LVN and a CMA left their laptops unlocked and unattended, displaying personal and medical information. LVN C's laptop was left unattended on a treatment cart for about five minutes, while CMA D's laptop was left on a medication cart for 2-3 minutes. Both staff members acknowledged the oversight, and the DON confirmed that staff were aware of the requirement to lock computers when unattended.
A resident with a history of cerebral infarction, diabetes, and anxiety disorder was discharged without proper documentation from the physician. The resident, who was cognitively intact, physically assaulted a CNA, leading to an immediate discharge decision by the facility's administrator and DON. The facility failed to document the specific needs that could not be met, efforts to meet those needs, or the services the receiving facility would provide.
The facility failed to ensure the proper disposal of expired medications in two medication carts, with expired docusate sodium and loratadine found during inspections. Staff responsible for checking expired medications did not adhere to the facility's policy, potentially risking residents' safety. The DON stated that monthly inspections are conducted by a contracted pharmacist, with random checks by the DON and ADONs.
A facility failed to notify a hospice provider of a resident's emergency transfer, resulting in a deficiency. The resident, with a history of cerebral infarction and diabetes, was discharged without prior hospice notification. The DON admitted to forgetting to contact the hospice before the resident left, leading to a lack of coordinated care and medication supply for the resident's transition.
A resident with cognitive and mobility impairments was left without access to a call light after being transferred to bed by CNAs. Despite the care plan's requirement to keep the call light within reach, it was left on the floor, violating facility policy and potentially compromising the resident's safety.
Two residents in a facility were involved in unsafe transfers due to inadequate supervision and improper use of assistance devices. A resident with severe cognitive impairment was transferred using a mechanical lift without locking the wheelchair, while another resident with paralysis was transferred using a gait belt without securing both wheelchair wheels. The CNAs involved believed the transfers were conducted correctly, despite these oversights, which were against the facility's policy.
A facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for a resident with COPD, who was left unsupervised during nebulizer treatments. The resident, who was cognitively intact, left the treatment area while the nebulizer was still in operation, and there was no documentation of refusal or a care plan addressing this behavior. The DON stated that nurses should remain with residents during treatments, but this was not implemented.
A facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours for a newly admitted resident with multiple health conditions, as required by their policy. The resident's clinical records lacked a baseline or comprehensive care plan, and interviews with the DON and Administrator confirmed the expectation for timely completion of such plans. The facility's policy mandates a baseline care plan to be developed within 48 hours to meet immediate needs, which was not followed, leading to a deficiency.
A facility failed to maintain proper infection control during wound care for a resident. The WCN did not perform adequate hand hygiene or use a no-touch technique, risking infection. The resident, with multiple health issues, had a wound requiring specific care. The WCN admitted to skipping steps, and the DON confirmed the importance of hand hygiene. The facility's Wound Care program procedures were not followed.
A resident with COPD and other conditions was not administered physician-ordered medications due to failures in the medication ordering and delivery process. The facility staff did not ensure the availability and administration of medications, leading to the resident's hospitalization for shortness of breath and anxiety.
The facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation and handwashing practices, increasing the risk of food-borne illnesses. Observations revealed unclean juice dispenser spigots and lint build-up in the ice machine filter. Additionally, a dietary aide did not follow proper handwashing protocols, potentially leading to contamination. The Dietary Manager acknowledged these lapses, attributing them to her recent absence.
Two resident rooms in the facility were found to have temperatures below the acceptable range, with one room at 69.0 degrees Fahrenheit and another at 68.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents reported feeling cold and had informed the Maintenance Supervisor, who did not document or adequately address the issues. The facility's policy requires maintaining temperatures between 71 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit.
The facility failed to ensure RN coverage for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, on multiple occasions. Time sheets revealed no RN coverage on specific dates, and the DON confirmed the absence of proof for these dates, potentially risking improper care for residents.
A resident with a history of hypertension and heart failure was administered Propranolol and Spironolactone outside of prescribed parameters, despite orders to hold the medications if certain blood pressure and pulse thresholds were not met. The medication aide admitted to not checking the order due to being in a hurry, and the facility's policy on medication administration was not followed.
Failure to Ensure Accurate PASRR Screenings and Required Referrals for Residents With Mental Illness
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that PASRR Level I screenings accurately reflected residents’ mental health status and to coordinate necessary PASRR referrals. For one male resident, the face sheet and MDS documented diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and insomnia, with an MDS BIMS score indicating no cognitive impairment. His active diagnoses on the MDS included anxiety, depression, and schizophrenia. However, the PASRR Level I screening completed by the referring hospital indicated no primary diagnosis of dementia and no indicator of mental illness, despite the documented schizophrenia diagnosis present on admission. For a female resident, the face sheet and MDS documented diagnoses including depression, vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance, and vascular dementia with anxiety, with an MDS BIMS score indicating no cognitive impairment. Her active diagnoses on the MDS included non‑Alzheimer’s dementia, depression, and schizophrenia. The PASRR Level I screening completed by the referring hospital indicated no indicator of mental illness, and the resident reported she had not received PASRR services. The resident was newly diagnosed with schizophrenia on a later date, but this new diagnosis was not followed by a PASRR Level II referral. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the PASRR information was inaccurate and that required follow‑up had not occurred. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the male resident’s mental illness diagnosis should have resulted in a positive PASRR Level I and that a corrected screening should have been completed and sent to the local authority. The MDS Coordinator also stated she was unaware of the female resident’s new schizophrenia diagnosis and had not notified the local authority as required. The DON and Administrator both stated that the MDS Coordinator was responsible for PASRR accuracy and follow‑through, and that inaccurate PASRR screenings could result in residents not receiving needed services or benefits.
Failure to Care Plan Psychotropic Use and Psychiatric Diagnoses After EHR Transition
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s failure to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans that included measurable objectives and timeframes for residents with psychotropic medication use and specific mental health diagnoses. For three residents reviewed, the care plans did not address their psychotropic medications or key psychiatric diagnoses, despite these being documented in their medical records and MDS assessments. The facility’s own policy required that comprehensive, person-centered care plans include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet residents’ highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, be developed within seven days of completion of required MDS assessments, and be revised as residents’ conditions change. One resident, an older female with diagnoses including depression, vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance, vascular dementia with anxiety, and schizophrenia, had a comprehensive MDS showing active diagnoses of non-Alzheimer’s dementia, depression, and schizophrenia, and documented use of antidepressant and antianxiety medications (buspirone and duloxetine). However, her care plan initiated in March did not contain any evidence of psychotropic medication usage or her schizophrenia diagnosis. A second resident, an older male with schizoaffective disorder, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and insomnia, had an MDS reflecting active diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and schizophrenia, and documented use of antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medications (including amitriptyline, aripiprazole, buspirone, duloxetine, and trazodone). His care plan, revised in March, also lacked any reference to psychotropic medication usage or schizophrenia. A third resident, an older male with COPD, PTSD, anxiety disorder, and suicidal ideations, had an MDS showing active diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and PTSD, and documented use of antipsychotic and antidepressant medications (duloxetine, olanzapine, and trazodone). His care plan, initiated more than a year earlier, contained no evidence of antipsychotic medication use or his PTSD diagnosis. During interviews, the Interim DON stated that her expectation was that medications and diagnoses are care planned and acknowledged that inaccurate care plans could result in resident care needs not being met. The MDS Coordinator confirmed responsibility for completing care plans with the IDT and acknowledged that some care plans were not complete, citing a change in electronic health record systems as a reason. The Administrator similarly stated that the facility had changed electronic health record programs, that only one MDS Coordinator was entering all care plans, and agreed that the MDS Coordinator needed to focus on completing care plans, acknowledging that incomplete care plans could result in needs not being met and decreased quality of life.
Failure to Maintain Safe and Homelike Resident Environment
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s failure to maintain a safe, functional, clean, and comfortable environment in 5 of 6 halls (A, B, C, D, and F). Observations showed multiple resident restrooms with significant lint buildup on exhaust fan vents, including in rooms A-2, A-5, B-3, C-7, D-6, and F-7A/B. In room F-7A/B, additional environmental damage was observed in the restroom, including holes in the walls behind the toilet and sink, a baseboard hanging off the wall, deteriorating and crumbling sheetrock, and visible holes around plumbing pipes. These conditions were present in areas accessible to residents and were cited as placing residents at risk of living in an unsafe and uncomfortable environment. Interviews and record review further clarified the scope of the deficiency. The Maintenance Director reported that restroom exhaust vents were cleaned periodically but acknowledged they had not been cleaned recently. The Director also acknowledged understanding that the observed environmental issues did not appear homelike and could affect residents’ quality of life. The Administrator similarly acknowledged understanding that the environmental issues could lead to residents feeling sad and not having a homelike environment. Review of the Maintenance Director’s job description dated 08/2024 indicated responsibility for maintaining and repairing physical structures, including keeping the interior in good repair with tasks such as drywall repair, painting, and cleaning, which were not adequately carried out as evidenced by the observed damage and lack of cleanliness.
Failure to Complete Timely Baseline Care Plan After Admission
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to the facility’s failure to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for one resident. Record review showed that a male resident, identified as Resident #80, was admitted on 4/27/2026 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease stage 5 requiring dialysis, dependence on renal dialysis, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and anxiety. Review of the electronic clinical record on 4/30/2026 revealed that no initial baseline care plan had been developed within the required 48-hour timeframe following his admission. During interviews, the Interim DON confirmed on 4/30/2026 that a baseline care plan had not been completed within 48 hours and stated she had only started the baseline care plan that day. She reported that her expectation was that baseline care plans be completed within the first 48 hours after admission by an RN and acknowledged that not completing the baseline care plan could result in staff not knowing how to care for the resident. In a separate interview, the Administrator stated her expectation that nursing complete the baseline care plan upon admission and acknowledged that failure to complete it timely could affect residents’ quality of care by staff not knowing how to care for them. When surveyors requested the facility’s baseline care plan policy from the DON on 4/30/2026, no policy was provided prior to exit.
Improper Storage of Oxygen Nasal Cannula for Resident on Oxygen Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice when a resident’s oxygen nasal cannula was not stored appropriately when not in use. The resident, an older adult admitted with Alzheimer’s disease and weakness, had a quarterly MDS assessment indicating moderate cognitive impairment (BIMS score of 11) and use of oxygen therapy. During observation, the resident’s oxygen nasal cannula tubing was seen wrapped around the back of the oxygen tank on the back of the wheelchair without any protective cover or bag. The resident stated that staff had removed the nasal cannula after transferring him from his wheelchair to his bed and then placed it on the oxygen tank. In an interview, the Administrator acknowledged that staff were expected to store cannulas in bags when not in use and stated that failure to do so could possibly lead to residents acquiring respiratory infections. No policy regarding oxygen administration or storage of nasal cannula tubing was provided by the facility. These failures could place all residents who use respiratory equipment at risk for respiratory infections, as noted by the Administrator.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Abuse Between Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving two residents within the required 24-hour timeframe. Specifically, one resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of sexually inappropriate behavior was observed by two other residents to have inappropriately touched another cognitively impaired resident in the dining room. The incident was witnessed by two residents, one of whom immediately reported it to an LVN present at the nurses' station. The LVN responded by removing the resident from the dining room and assessing the alleged victim for injury, finding none. Despite being aware of the allegation, the LVN did not document the incident in the progress notes or report it to the facility's Administrator or DON. The LVN stated she did not know why she failed to report the incident, despite having been previously in-serviced on recognizing, preventing, and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The Administrator and DON both confirmed they were unaware of the incident until informed by the surveyor during the investigation. Record reviews confirmed that both residents involved had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with daily activities. The facility's policy required all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment to be reported and investigated within federal timeframes, but this process was not followed in this case. The failure to report the incident as required constituted a deficiency in the facility's abuse reporting procedures.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Resident-to-Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to report an allegation of inappropriate touching between two residents within the required 24-hour timeframe. Specifically, one resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of sexually inappropriate behavior was observed by two other residents placing his hand between the legs, over the clothing, of another resident who was also severely cognitively impaired. The incident was witnessed by two cognitively intact residents, one of whom immediately reported it to an LVN present at the nurses' station. The LVN responded by removing the alleged perpetrator from the dining room and returning him to his room. Despite being informed of the incident, the LVN did not document the event in the progress notes, did not assess for injury beyond a brief check, and failed to report the allegation to the facility Administrator or DON as required by facility policy and federal regulations. The LVN stated she was aware of the reporting requirements and had previously received in-service training on abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE) reporting, but could not explain why she did not report the incident. The Administrator and DON both confirmed they were unaware of the incident until informed by surveyors during the investigation. Record reviews confirmed that both residents involved had significant cognitive impairments and behavioral care plans addressing inappropriate behaviors. The facility's policy required all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment to be reported within 24 hours to the Administrator and to the appropriate state authorities. The failure to report this incident as required resulted in a deficiency, as it prevented timely investigation and appropriate follow-up as mandated by regulations.
Failure to Honor Resident's Request for Hospital Evaluation
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to honor a resident's request to be sent to the hospital for evaluation. The resident, who had diagnoses including acute recurrent sinusitis, shortness of breath, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis, and was assessed as having intact cognition, reported feeling unwell and requested to go to the hospital. The resident used her call light multiple times to communicate her request to CNA A, who relayed the information to LVN B. Despite these repeated requests, there was no documented assessment, vital signs, or progress notes regarding the resident's condition or her request to be sent to the hospital on the date in question. The resident ultimately contacted her significant other to take her to the hospital after several hours without nursing intervention. Interviews revealed that the DON was unaware of the resident's initial request and believed that staff should have evaluated the resident, obtained vital signs, and contacted the physician. LVN B did not recall being informed of the resident's request and stated she would typically assess and obtain vital signs if a resident was unwell. The facility's policy affirms the resident's right to request treatment or care. The lack of timely nursing assessment and response to the resident's repeated requests resulted in the resident leaving the facility to seek care independently, where she was diagnosed and treated for a urinary tract infection and acute airway inflammation.
Failure to Respond to Resident's Request for Hospital Transfer
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with a history of acute recurrent sinusitis, shortness of breath, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis requested to be sent to the hospital due to not feeling well. The resident, who had intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 12, used her call light multiple times to inform a CNA of her request to go to the hospital. The CNA reported the request to the LVN on duty, but the LVN did not promptly assess the resident or arrange for her transfer. The resident continued to request assistance over several hours, but no nurse evaluated her or addressed her concerns during that time. There was no documentation in the progress notes or vital sign log regarding the resident's request or any assessment on the day in question. The resident ultimately contacted her significant other to take her to the hospital after several hours without nursing intervention. Upon evaluation at the hospital, she was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection and acute inflammation of the air passages and was prescribed antibiotics. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness and follow-through regarding the resident's repeated requests, and the DON was not aware that the resident had initially asked staff to be sent to the hospital. Facility policy states that residents have the right to request treatment or care, but in this instance, the resident's request was not addressed according to professional standards or her expressed wishes.
Medication Security Lapse in Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the security and inaccessibility of medications for unauthorized staff and residents, as observed with two of the three medication carts reviewed. On one occasion, an unlocked and unsupervised medication cart was found on F Hall, with two residents in sight of the cart and no staff present. On another occasion, a second unlocked and unsupervised medication cart was noted at the nurses' station, with no staff, residents, or visitors in sight. The facility's policy requires that compartments containing drugs and biologicals be locked when not in use, and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the expectation that medication carts should be locked when not in use.
Inadequate Infection Control Practices in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by multiple instances of improper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and inadequate infection control practices. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) C did not wear a gown during dressing changes for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), including Residents #30, #64, and #331. This oversight occurred despite visible EBP signage and available PPE stations outside the residents' rooms, indicating a lack of adherence to established protocols for preventing the spread of infections. Additionally, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) G did not change gloves after they became contaminated during incontinent care for Resident #63. CNA G continued to perform personal care tasks without changing gloves, which could lead to cross-contamination. This failure to follow proper glove-changing procedures during high-contact activities further highlights the facility's deficiency in maintaining infection control standards. The report also notes that LVN C did not follow appropriate infection control principles while performing dressing changes for Resident #331. LVN C failed to wash hands or use hand sanitizer between glove changes and used the same surface area of gauze multiple times on wounds, increasing the risk of cross-contamination. Despite being aware of the facility's policies, LVN C demonstrated a lack of understanding of EBP and infection control practices, as confirmed in interviews. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that staff had been trained on infection prevention but did not ensure compliance with these protocols.
Failure to Notify Physician of Resident's Behavioral Change
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to immediately consult a resident's physician following a significant change in the resident's behavior, which led to the resident's discharge. The resident, a cognitively intact male with a history of verbal aggression, physically assaulted a CNA, resulting in the CNA being sent to the emergency room with a chest wall contusion. Despite the severity of the incident, the resident's primary physician was not notified until the following day, after the decision to discharge the resident had already been made by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON). The facility's policy requires prompt notification of a resident's physician in the event of significant changes in the resident's condition, including behavioral changes. However, the DON did not notify the physician on the day of the incident, as she believed it was unnecessary since the resident was not harmed. The resident's care plan was revised to include physical aggression, but the lack of immediate notification to the physician represents a failure to adhere to the facility's policy, potentially impacting the resident's medical care and quality of life.
Confidentiality Breach of Residents' Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect the confidentiality of personal and medical records for two staff members, LVN C and CMA D, as observed during a survey. LVN C left her laptop unlocked and unattended on a treatment cart, displaying residents' personal and medical records. This occurred for approximately five minutes, with the cart positioned about 25 feet away from the nurse's station and not within a clear line of sight. When questioned, LVN C acknowledged the oversight and admitted that leaving the computer unlocked could allow unauthorized access to private information. Similarly, CMA D left her laptop unlocked and unattended on a medication cart while she was in a resident's room administering medication. The computer displayed a resident's medication record and was left unattended for 2-3 minutes with the screen facing the hall. CMA D admitted that leaving the computer unlocked was not acceptable practice. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that staff were aware of the requirement to lock computers when unattended and stated that random rounds were conducted to ensure compliance. The facility's policy on Electronic Medical Records, revised in June 2019, emphasizes limiting the use or disclosure of protected health information to the minimum necessary.
Inadequate Documentation for Resident Discharge
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate documentation for the transfer or discharge of a resident, specifically lacking a documented reason from the resident's physician. The deficiency involved a male resident with a history of cerebral infarction, diabetes, hemiplegia, and anxiety disorder, who was cognitively intact. The resident exhibited verbally abusive behavior and physically assaulted a CNA, resulting in the CNA being sent to the emergency room with a chest wall contusion. Following the incident, the resident was given an immediate discharge notice and transferred to another nursing facility. The facility did not document the specific resident needs that could not be met, the efforts made to meet those needs, or the specific services the receiving facility would provide. The resident's primary physician was not notified of the incident until the day after it occurred and only provided a general discharge order without detailing the reasons for the discharge. The facility's administrator and former DON decided on the immediate discharge without the necessary documentation, placing residents at risk of not having the needed records when transferring care and services.
Expired Medications Found in Facility's Medication Carts
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate pharmaceutical services by not ensuring the proper disposal of expired medications in two of the three medication carts inspected. During an observation, a bottle of docusate sodium and a bottle of loratadine, both with expiration dates of January 2025, were found in the medication cart assigned to an LVN. The LVN stated that nurses and medication aides attempt to check for expired medications monthly. In another observation, a bottle of loratadine with the same expiration date was found in a medication cart assigned to a CMA, who mentioned that LVNs and CMAs try to check for expired medications every few months. The Director of Nursing (DON) indicated that all staff assigned to a cart should check for expired medications, and the contracted pharmacist performs monthly cart inspections, with the DON and ADONs conducting random checks. The facility's policy on the storage of medications requires that discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. However, the failure to adhere to this policy resulted in expired medications being present in the medication carts, potentially placing residents at risk of receiving ineffective medications.
Failure to Notify Hospice of Resident Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the hospice provider of an emergency transfer for a resident, which resulted in a deficiency. The resident, a cognitively intact male with a history of cerebral infarction, diabetes, hemiplegia, and anxiety, was discharged from the facility without prior notification to the hospice provider. The Director of Nursing (DON) was responsible for making all necessary notifications but forgot to contact the hospice provider before the resident left the facility. This oversight was acknowledged by the DON, who admitted to notifying the hospice only after the resident was already en route to the receiving facility. The hospice Registered Nurse (RN) expressed the need for prior notification to coordinate care and ensure the resident had a sufficient supply of medications for the transition. The Nursing Facility Hospice Services Agreement required immediate notification to the hospice in the event of a resident's transfer. The failure to notify the hospice provider before the resident's discharge placed the resident at risk of not receiving necessary care and services, as the hospice could not coordinate care with the new facility in advance.
Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of a resident by not ensuring the call light was within reach after a transfer. The resident, who had long and short-term memory impairment, severely impaired cognitive skills, and lower extremity impairment, was dependent on staff for chair to bed transfers. The resident's care plan specifically required that the call light be kept within reach to prevent falls and ensure safety. During an observation, CNAs transferred the resident from a wheelchair to a bed but left the call light on the floor behind the nightstand, out of the resident's reach. A subsequent observation confirmed that the call light was still not accessible to the resident. The facility's policy mandates that call lights be within easy reach to ensure timely responses to residents' needs, which was not adhered to in this instance.
Inadequate Supervision and Assistance Device Use During Resident Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and use of assistance devices during transfers for two residents, leading to potential accident hazards. Resident #2, who has severe cognitive impairment and is dependent on a wheelchair due to lower extremity impairment, was not safely transferred using a mechanical lift. During the transfer, the wheelchair was not locked, causing it to move as the resident was lifted. Both CNAs involved in the transfer believed they performed the procedure correctly, despite the oversight. Resident #63, who has memory impairment and requires substantial assistance for transfers due to paralysis from a stroke, was also involved in an unsafe transfer. The CNAs did not lock both wheels of the wheelchair during a two-person gait belt transfer, which is against the facility's policy. Both CNAs believed the transfer was conducted properly, even though the wheelchair was not fully secured. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the facility's expectations for transfers were not met, as both mechanical lift and gait belt transfers require locked wheelchairs to ensure resident safety. The facility's policy on safe lifting and movement of residents emphasizes the importance of using appropriate techniques and devices to protect both staff and residents, which was not adhered to in these instances.
Failure to Provide Supervised Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for a resident, identified as Resident #28, who required nebulizer treatments for conditions including pulmonary edema and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The resident, who was cognitively intact with a mental status score of 14 out of 15, was observed to have left his room while his nebulizer treatment was still in operation, indicating a lack of supervision during the treatment. There was no documentation in the nurse's notes or Medication Administration Record regarding the resident's refusal or departure from the treatment, and the facility did not have a care plan addressing the resident's tendency to walk away from treatments. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated that if a resident refused a breathing treatment three times, the facility would notify the doctor, and that the administration of breathing treatments depended on the resident's mental status. The DON acknowledged that Resident #28's cognition fluctuated and that the expectation was for nurses to remain with him during treatments if medication was still in the nebulizer. However, this was not care planned, and the facility's policy on medication administration required documentation of medication refusal and prescriber notification, which was not followed in this case.
Failure to Develop Baseline Care Plan Within 48 Hours
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for a newly admitted resident within 48 hours, as required by their policy. The resident, a 62-year-old male with multiple diagnoses including myopathy, insomnia, hypertension, esophageal varices with bleeding, alcoholic liver disease, and Type 2 diabetes, was admitted without a baseline care plan. The absence of this plan was confirmed through a review of the resident's clinical records, which showed no baseline or comprehensive care plan in the electronic health record system. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator revealed that the responsibility for completing the baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission lay with the nursing staff, specifically the DON or the RN on duty. Both the DON and the Administrator acknowledged the expectation for timely completion of the care plan to ensure proper care for the resident. The facility's policy, dated July 2024, also stipulated that a baseline care plan should be developed within 48 hours of admission to meet the resident's immediate needs. However, this was not adhered to, resulting in a deficiency noted by the surveyors.
Inadequate Hand Hygiene During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, specifically in the area of hand hygiene during wound care. During an observation, the Wound Care Nurse (WCN) did not perform adequate hand hygiene by scrubbing hands with soap for at least 20 seconds before and after performing wound care on a resident. The WCN also failed to use a no-touch technique and did not change gloves appropriately during the procedure. This lapse in protocol was observed during the care of a 62-year-old male resident with multiple diagnoses, including myopathy, insomnia, hypertension, esophageal varices with bleeding, alcoholic liver disease, and Type 2 diabetes. The resident had a wound on the calf of the right leg, which required specific wound care orders to be followed. The WCN admitted to forgetting to perform hand hygiene between cleaning and applying a new dressing, acknowledging that this oversight could risk infection or slow the healing process. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that all staff are expected to wash hands for at least 20 seconds to maintain infection control measures. The facility's Wound Care program outlined specific steps for hand hygiene and glove use, which were not followed during the observed procedure. The absence of a Baseline Care Plan or Comprehensive Care Plan in the facility's electronic health record system for the resident was also noted.
Medication Administration Failure Leads to Hospitalization
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from significant medication errors, which led to the resident being transferred to the emergency department and subsequently admitted to the hospital. The resident, who had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, hypertension, hypothyroidism, type 2 diabetes, and other conditions, did not receive physician-ordered medications, including inhalers, nebulizer treatments, nasal sprays, and tablets for respiratory diseases. This lack of medication administration resulted in the resident experiencing shortness of breath and anxiety, necessitating hospital transfer. The deficiency occurred because the facility did not administer the resident's medications due to a failure in the medication ordering and delivery process. The admitting nurse and other staff members did not ensure that the medications were available and administered as ordered. The resident's medications were not delivered from the pharmacy, and the facility staff did not utilize the emergency medication dispenser (EMDS) to provide the necessary medications. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of communication and understanding of the procedures for obtaining and administering medications, particularly for new admissions. The facility's policies and procedures for medication orders were not followed, leading to the resident not receiving any of her medications for two days. The staff failed to notify the physician or administrative staff about the unavailability of medications, and there was a lack of initiative to obtain the medications from alternative sources. This oversight placed the resident at risk of significant harm, as evidenced by the exacerbation of her chronic conditions and the need for hospitalization.
Kitchen Sanitation and Handwashing Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper sanitation and hygiene standards in its kitchen, which could increase the risk of food-borne illnesses among residents. During an inspection, it was observed that the handheld multi-juice dispenser spigot had a dark slime deposit, indicating it had not been cleaned as required. The Dietary Manager (DM) acknowledged that the spigot should have been cleaned every other day but had not been maintained due to her recent absence. Additionally, the ice machine filter was found with lint build-up, which the DM admitted was supposed to be cleaned every two weeks. These oversights in cleaning practices were attributed to the DM's recent return from vacation. Furthermore, improper handwashing practices were observed among the kitchen staff. A dietary aide washed her hands for only seven seconds, turned off the faucet with her bare hands, and then handled food items, which could lead to contamination. The aide admitted to not following the facility's handwashing protocol, which requires washing hands for at least 20 seconds and using a paper towel to turn off the faucet. The DM confirmed that staff are expected to adhere to these handwashing procedures to prevent cross-contamination and the spread of germs. The facility's policies emphasize the importance of maintaining clean and sanitary kitchen facilities to minimize the risk of infection and food-borne illness.
Failure to Maintain Safe and Comfortable Temperature Levels
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a homelike environment with comfortable and safe temperature levels for two resident rooms, F7 and F10, which were found to have ambient temperatures below the acceptable range of 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit. In room F7, the temperature was recorded at 69.0 degrees Fahrenheit, and the resident reported feeling cold, wearing multiple layers of clothing to stay warm. The resident had previously informed the Maintenance Supervisor about the issue, but the thermostat was reportedly only adjustable up to 72 degrees Fahrenheit. Similarly, in room F10, the temperature was 68.5 degrees Fahrenheit, and the resident also reported feeling cold, noting a draft from a window gap. This resident had also informed the Maintenance Supervisor, who acknowledged the complaints but did not follow up with the resident. The Maintenance Supervisor, who had been with the facility for a year, admitted to checking temperatures as needed but did not document them. He was unaware of the specific temperature issues in the two rooms and the draft in one of the windows. The facility's policy, dated February 2021, mandates maintaining a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment with temperatures between 71 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit. The Administrator, new to the facility, was informed of the temperature issues and acknowledged the need to address them, although no corrective actions were detailed in the report.
Failure to Provide RN Coverage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. Specifically, there was no RN coverage on the dates of 08/06/2023, 08/12/2023, 09/10/2023, and 09/17/2023. This deficiency was identified through a review of the facility's time sheets, which confirmed the absence of RN coverage on these specific dates. During an interview conducted on 01/04/2023 at 2:24 PM, the Director of Nurses confirmed the lack of proof of RN coverage for the aforementioned dates. This failure could potentially affect residents and put them at risk of improper care, as the presence of an RN is crucial for maintaining the standard of care required in the facility.
Failure to Administer Medications as Prescribed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from significant medication errors, specifically in the administration of medications as prescribed. The resident, a cognitively intact male with a history of essential hypertension, chronic venous hypertension, acute diastolic heart failure, and acute respiratory failure, was prescribed Propranolol and Spironolactone with specific parameters for administration. The orders indicated that Propranolol should be held if the systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 110, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was less than 60, or pulse was less than 60, and Spironolactone should be held if SBP was less than 110. Despite these parameters, the medication administration record (MAR) showed that Propranolol and Spironolactone were administered on multiple occasions when the resident's vital signs were outside the prescribed limits. On one occasion, a medication aide admitted to administering Spironolactone without checking the order due to being in a hurry. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and other staff confirmed that the medications should not have been given under these conditions, as it could have led to a drop in the resident's blood pressure. The facility's policy on administering medications, which requires verification of the right resident, medication, dosage, time, and method, was not followed in these instances.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 12 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near San Angelo
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sagecrest Alzheimers Care Center | 1.2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Cedar Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 3.1 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
| Park Plaza Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 3.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| St. Juanita Retirement And Rehab | 3.9 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Avir At Meadow Creek | 5.4 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Avir At Arbor Terrace.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.