Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Allegiant Wellness And Rehab during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with a dehisced surgical knee wound and physician orders for NPWT did not have a wound care plan included in their comprehensive care plan. Staff interviews confirmed the omission, and facility policy requiring care plan updates for significant condition changes was not followed.
A CNA and RN failed to prevent an NPO, G-tube-dependent resident with severe cognitive impairment and a swallowing disorder from receiving and consuming a solid food tray, despite clear orders and signage. The CNA, unfamiliar with the resident, did not verify the diet order and provided the tray, which was partially consumed before the error was discovered by the RN.
The facility's kitchen failed to meet food safety standards, with unsealed, undated, and unlabeled food items found in the refrigerator and dry storage. Staff interviews revealed a lack of adherence to the facility's food storage policy, increasing the risk of food-borne illnesses for residents.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions for garbage storage, with observations of uncovered trash receptacles in the kitchen and an open dumpster door outside. Staff interviews confirmed the expectation for trash cans to be covered and dumpster doors to remain closed, as per the facility's policy.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Wound Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan addressing the wound care needs of a resident who was admitted with a dehisced surgical wound on the right knee, following knee surgery. The resident had physician orders for Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) three times per week, with specific care instructions. Despite these orders and the presence of an active wound requiring specialized care, the resident's comprehensive care plan did not include any interventions, goals, or timetables related to wound care. This omission was confirmed through observation, record review, and staff interviews. The treatment nurse, responsible for developing wound care plans, acknowledged that no care plan had been created for the resident's knee wound. The DON also confirmed that wound care should have been included in the care plan and was unaware of its absence. Facility policy required the interdisciplinary team to review and update care plans when there is a significant change in a resident's condition, but this was not followed in this case.
Failure to Prevent NPO Resident from Receiving and Consuming Food Tray
Penalty
Summary
A certified nursing assistant (CNA) and a registered nurse (RN) failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent an accident involving a resident who was designated as NPO (nothing by mouth) and required tube feeding due to dysphagia. Despite clear physician orders, care plan documentation, and signage indicating the NPO status, the CNA provided a solid food tray to the resident, who then consumed approximately 50% of the meal. The RN discovered the error after the meal had been eaten and confirmed that the resident was not supposed to receive any food by mouth. The resident involved had a complex medical history, including metabolic encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes with neuropathy, morbid obesity, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. The resident was assessed as having severe cognitive impairment and a documented swallowing disorder, with specific care plan interventions to monitor for aspiration. The facility's records, including transfer orders, care plan, and physician orders, consistently indicated the resident's NPO status and the need for enteral nutrition via a G-tube. The CNA, who was unfamiliar with the resident and did not notice the NPO sign above the bed, assumed the resident should receive a meal tray and did not verify the diet order with nursing staff. The RN later confirmed the error and notified the physician and family. The incident was documented in progress notes, and subsequent interviews with staff confirmed that the resident was the only NPO and G-tube patient in the facility at the time. The facility's policy required staff to confirm diet orders and be trained on the risks of aspiration, but this protocol was not followed in this instance.
Food Safety Deficiencies in Facility Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food safety in its kitchen, as observed during a survey. Specifically, food items in the refrigerator were not properly sealed, dated, or labeled. An unsealed bag of sliced cheese was found exposed to air, and glasses of milk and juice were undated and unlabeled. This lack of proper labeling and sealing could lead to food spoilage and potential health risks for residents. Additionally, the facility's dry storage area was not maintained according to standards. Used seasoning containers and other food items were found on the floor, and several food packages, including potato chips, breadcrumbs, and tea bags, were unsealed. This improper storage could expose food to contamination and pests, further increasing the risk of food-borne illnesses among residents. Interviews with staff, including a dietary aide, the dietary manager, and the dietician, revealed a lack of adherence to the facility's food storage policy, which is based on the Texas Food Establishment Rules. Staff acknowledged the risks associated with improper food storage and labeling, such as food spoilage and pest infestation, which could lead to residents becoming ill. The dietary manager emphasized that all kitchen staff are responsible for ensuring food safety measures are followed daily.
Improper Garbage Disposal Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain garbage storage receptacles in a sanitary condition, as observed in the kitchen and outside dumpster area. During an observation, a large trash receptacle in the kitchen was found without a lid, despite not being in use. This was confirmed by a dietary aide who acknowledged that trash cans should be covered to prevent attracting flies. Additionally, the facility's only trash dumpster was observed with its door open and a trash bag hanging out, which could attract pests and rodents. Interviews with staff, including a dietary aide, the dietary manager, and the dietitian, confirmed that the expectation was for trash receptacles to be covered when not in use and for the dumpster doors to remain closed. The facility's Garbage Containment and Disposal Policy, based on the Texas Food Establishment Rules, requires that receptacles and waste handling units be durable, cleanable, insect and rodent-resistant, leakproof, and nonabsorbent. The policy also mandates that outside receptacles have tight-fitting lids, doors, or covers, and that refuse be stored in a manner inaccessible to insects and rodents. The failure to adhere to these standards was noted during the survey, with staff acknowledging the importance of keeping trash receptacles covered to prevent pest attraction.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 496 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 21 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Crowley
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crowley Nursing And Rehabilitation | 1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Park Bend Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 1 mi | — | 7 | 2 |
| Avir At Burleson | 3 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Estates Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | 4 mi | — | 29 | 3 |
| Advanced Rehabilitation & Healthcare Of Burleson | 4.2 mi | — | 13 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Allegiant Wellness And Rehab.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.