Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at White House Health Care Inc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to inform three residents about their right to refuse treatment or formulate an advance directive, as required by policy. Two residents with severe cognitive impairment and one cognitively intact resident lacked documentation of advance directives in their medical records. The Administrator confirmed the absence of such documentation.
The facility failed to conduct quarterly care conferences for four residents, as required by policy. Despite being cognitively intact, three residents had no documented care conferences after specific dates, while a fourth resident with severe cognitive impairment also lacked documentation of care conferences with their responsible party. The DON acknowledged the absence of documentation, highlighting a need for improvement.
The facility failed to properly store food items in two nourishment refrigerators, as surveyors found unlabeled and undated food in both Dogwood Hall and Central. Facility policies require labeling and dating of all food items, but these were not followed. The Registered Dietician confirmed the requirement for labeling and dating, highlighting a lapse in adherence to established procedures.
Failure to Provide Advance Directive Information to Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide information to residents regarding their right to refuse medical or surgical treatment or to formulate an advance directive, as required by their policy. This deficiency was identified for three residents during a review of the facility's policy, medical records, and interviews. The facility's policy, dated July 26, 2024, mandates that upon admission, the facility should determine if a resident has an advance directive and offer assistance in formulating one if not. However, for Resident #6, Resident #17, and Resident #36, there was no documentation in their medical records indicating whether they had an advance directive or if they were offered the opportunity to create one. Resident #6, who was admitted with diagnoses including Dementia and Traumatic Brain Injury, had a BIMS score indicating severe cognitive impairment, yet there was no documentation of an advance directive. Similarly, Resident #17, with diagnoses such as Hypertension and Chronic Kidney Disease, also had a BIMS score indicating severe cognitive impairment, with no advance directive documentation. In contrast, Resident #36, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15, also lacked documentation of an advance directive. During an interview, the Administrator confirmed the absence of further documentation regarding advance directives for these residents.
Failure to Conduct Quarterly Care Conferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct quarterly care conference meetings for four residents, as required by their policy. The policy mandates that the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) review and update each resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. However, for Residents #18, #33, #36, and #54, the facility was unable to provide documentation that these quarterly care conferences were conducted with the residents or their responsible parties. This lack of documentation indicates a failure to adhere to the facility's policy and regulatory requirements. Resident #18, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13, had their last care conference documented on 12/22/2023. Resident #33, also cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14, had their last care conference on 1/23/2024. Resident #36, with a BIMS score of 15, had their last care conference on 2/2/2024. Resident #54, who had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 4, was dependent on staff for all care and had no documentation of care conferences with their responsible party. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the absence of documentation for these meetings, indicating an area that requires improvement.
Improper Food Storage in Facility Refrigerators
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper storage of food items in two of its nourishment refrigerators, specifically in Dogwood Hall and Central. During observations, surveyors found an open, unlabeled, and undated bag of radishes in the Dogwood Hall Nutrition Refrigerator. Similarly, in the Central Nutrition Refrigerator, a bag containing undated food was discovered. The facility's policies require that all food brought in from outside sources be labeled with the resident's name, the date of purchase or preparation, and the name of the item. Additionally, the Refrigerator Food Storage Policy mandates that food be stored in tightly sealed containers with labels and dates. During an interview, the Registered Dietician confirmed that all items in the nutritional refrigerators should be labeled and dated, indicating a failure to adhere to the facility's established policies.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 73 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near White House
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stoneridge Health Care, Llc | 7.7 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
| The Waters Of Springfield Llc | 10.6 mi | — | 1 | 1 |
| Nhc Healthcare, Springfield | 10.7 mi | — | 10 | 1 |
| Signature Health Of Portland Rehab & Wellness Cent | 10.8 mi | — | 17 | 0 |
| Nhc Healthcare, Hendersonville | 11.8 mi | — | 4 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for White House Health Care Inc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.