Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Lexington Post Acute during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to inform residents about their rights to refuse treatment and formulate advance directives, affecting 11 residents with various medical conditions. Despite the facility's policy, the required sections of the Consent and Authorizations forms were not initialed, indicating a lack of information provided. The administrator confirmed this oversight, highlighting a systemic issue in the facility's process.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in its food service operations, with unsanitary kitchen conditions and inadequate dishwashing practices. Observations revealed dirt, debris, and food particles on containers, a greasy oven and vent hood, and rusty utensil drawers. The dish machine consistently failed to reach the required sanitation temperature, and the facility lacked sufficient emergency food stock. These issues were confirmed by the Dietary Manager and Registered Dietitian.
A resident with multiple diagnoses, including COPD, was left unattended with a running nebulizer, contrary to facility policy requiring nurse supervision during medication administration. The resident, who was cognitively intact, had no evaluation for self-administration of medication, as confirmed by the DON.
A resident reported a sexual assault by a CNA during a bed bath, but the facility failed to report the allegation to the appropriate authorities as required by policy. The Administrator conducted an initial investigation before deciding not to report, contrary to the policy of immediate reporting within two hours.
A resident reported a sexual abuse allegation against a CNA, but the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation as per its policy. The investigation lacked detailed documentation and did not include all required interviews and reviews. The Administrator believed the steps taken were sufficient, despite the incomplete investigation process.
Two residents did not receive scheduled showers as per the facility's policy, leading to a deficiency in care. One resident, moderately cognitively impaired, missed multiple showers over several weeks, while another, cognitively intact, reported receiving showers only every two weeks. The DON confirmed the lapses in scheduled care.
A facility failed to follow infection control practices when a nurse did not wear PPE during medication administration via peg tube for a resident under enhanced barrier precautions, and a CNA did not perform hand hygiene during catheter care for a cognitively impaired resident. The DON confirmed the lapses in protocol adherence.
The facility failed to employ a qualified dietician, leading to deficiencies in kitchen sanitation, staff competencies, and meal delivery. Residents did not receive meals that met their dietary needs, with reports of late, incomplete, or inadequate meals. The kitchen was found in poor sanitary condition, with untrained staff performing duties due to a lack of leadership and consistent staffing.
The facility failed to provide sufficient and properly trained staff for its food and nutrition services, leading to incomplete dish machine logs and late meal deliveries. The Administrator and other non-dietary staff had to work in the kitchen due to understaffing, resulting in disorganized operations. Residents reported receiving meals late, and many staff members lacked the necessary training to perform kitchen duties effectively.
The facility's kitchen was found to be unsanitary, with dietary staff not covering facial hair, dirty floors, and unclean equipment. Dish machine temperatures and sanitizer levels were not consistently checked or recorded, and cleaning schedules were not followed. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of leadership and accountability in maintaining cleanliness.
The facility failed to provide a nourishing and well-balanced diet to its residents, as evidenced by three residents not receiving meals that met their nutritional needs. A resident at risk for weight loss did not receive prescribed double portions, and the facility was unable to provide menu items due to a delay in food delivery. Staff and residents reported issues with meal quality, portion sizes, and late meal delivery, highlighting disorganization and staffing issues in the kitchen.
Failure to Provide Advance Directive Information to Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide information to residents regarding their right to refuse medical or surgical treatment or to formulate an advance directive. This deficiency was identified for 11 out of 24 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility's policy, dated September 2022, requires that the social services director or designee inquire about the existence of any written advance directives upon admission and provide written information concerning the right to refuse or accept treatment and to formulate an advance directive. However, the review of medical records revealed that the required sections of the Consent and Authorizations forms were not initialed or signed, indicating that residents or their representatives were not given the necessary information or assistance regarding advance directives. The deficiency involved residents with various medical conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hypertension, dementia, anxiety, depression, Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, and traumatic brain injury. The cognitive status of these residents varied, with some being cognitively intact and others severely impaired, as indicated by their Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scores. Despite these differences, the facility consistently failed to document that residents or their representatives received education about advance directives, as evidenced by the lack of initials on the Consent and Authorizations forms. During an interview, the facility's administrator confirmed that the Consent and Authorizations forms should have been initialed to indicate that residents or their responsible parties received education about advance directives. This oversight highlights a systemic issue in the facility's process for ensuring that residents are informed of their rights regarding medical treatment and advance directives, as required by their own policy.
Sanitation and Food Service Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in its food service operations, as evidenced by multiple observations and policy reviews. The kitchen was found to have unsanitary conditions, including dirt, debris, and dead insects on food cartons, sticky and dirty containers, and food particles on the outside of containers. The oven and grease trap were observed with significant build-up of grease and food particles, and the vent hood was greasy and dirty. Additionally, utensils were stored in rusty drawers, and food items were undated and unlabeled in dirty containers. These conditions were confirmed by the Dietary Manager and Registered Dietitian, who acknowledged that the kitchen should not be in such a state. Furthermore, the facility's dishwashing practices were inadequate, with the low temperature dish machine consistently failing to reach the required 120 degrees Fahrenheit for proper sanitation. The dish machine logs showed repeated instances of wash temperatures below the required level, and staff failed to cease use of the machine despite these inadequate temperatures. Additionally, the facility did not have sufficient food stock for a 72-hour emergency menu, as confirmed by the Registered Dietitian, who noted missing food items and the need to order additional supplies. These deficiencies indicate a failure to adhere to professional standards for food storage, handling, preparation, and service.
Failure to Supervise Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medication, specifically concerning the use of a nebulizer. The facility's policy on administering medications through a nebulizer requires a nurse to be present during the administration and to ensure the nebulizer is turned off and put away after use. However, observations revealed that the resident was left unattended with the nebulizer running in their lap for an extended period, indicating a lack of supervision and adherence to the facility's policy. The resident involved was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including Rheumatoid Arthritis, Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, and Hypertension, and was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. The resident had a physician's order for Ipratropium/Albuterol inhalation solution to be administered four times a day for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Despite this, the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no evaluation for the resident's ability to self-administer medication, and a nurse should have been present during the administration.
Failure to Report Alleged Sexual Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse involving a resident to all appropriate local and state agencies. According to the facility's policy, any reports of resident abuse must be reported to local, state, and federal agencies within two hours of the allegation. However, the facility did not adhere to this policy when a resident, who was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for personal care, reported a sexual assault by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). The resident alleged inappropriate touching during a bed bath, which was not reported to the necessary authorities as required. The Administrator, who also served as the Abuse Coordinator, confirmed that an initial investigation was conducted before any report was made to the State Agency. The Administrator's interpretation of a 'true allegation' required a suspicion to be confirmed before reporting, which led to the failure to report the incident immediately. The CNA involved denied the allegations, and the resident was appeased by removing the CNA from her care. This approach was contrary to the facility's policy, which mandates immediate reporting of any abuse allegations, regardless of the initial investigation's findings.
Inadequate Investigation of Sexual Abuse Allegation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of sexual abuse involving a resident who was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for various activities. The resident reported to the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had inappropriately touched her during a bed bath. The facility's policy requires a comprehensive investigation, including interviews with the resident, the accused, and any witnesses, as well as a review of the resident's medical records and interactions. However, the investigation was insufficient, as evidenced by the lack of a detailed and dated documentation of the investigation process. The Administrator provided a one-page undated witness statement and additional documents that did not meet the facility's policy requirements for a thorough investigation. The Administrator admitted to interviewing the resident and the CNA and instructed the CNA to avoid the resident's room, but there was no evidence of a complete investigation as outlined in the policy. The Administrator's response indicated a belief that the steps taken were appropriate, despite the lack of comprehensive documentation and adherence to the facility's policy on abuse investigations.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Showers for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL), specifically showering, for two residents. According to the facility's policy, residents who cannot independently perform ADLs should receive necessary services to maintain personal hygiene. However, Resident #41, who was moderately cognitively impaired and required partial assistance with bathing, did not receive showers on multiple scheduled dates in January and February 2025. This was confirmed by the resident, who kept a personal record of her shower dates and reported not receiving a shower for two weeks in January. Similarly, Resident #45, who was cognitively intact and also required partial assistance with bathing, reported receiving showers only every two weeks, contrary to the facility's schedule of three times a week. The Director of Nursing confirmed that residents should receive showers on their assigned dates and acknowledged the missing dates. These findings indicate a failure to adhere to the facility's policy on providing necessary ADL assistance, resulting in a deficiency in resident care.
Infection Control Lapses During Medication and Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its infection control practices during medication administration and catheter care, as observed in two separate incidents. In the first incident, a Registered Nurse (RN) did not wear the required personal protective equipment (PPE) while administering medication via a peg tube to a resident who was under enhanced barrier precautions. This resident had a medical history that included Wernicke's Encephalopathy, Diabetes, Dysphagia, Gastrostomy, and Respiratory Failure, and was assessed for a feeding tube. The facility's policy required the use of gloves and gowns for such procedures, but the RN was observed administering medication without a gown. In the second incident, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) failed to perform hand hygiene during foley catheter care for a resident with a history of Heart Failure, Multidrug-Resistant Organism, Urinary Tract Infection, Malnutrition, and Diabetes. The resident was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for various activities. The CNA was observed removing soiled gloves and donning new ones without performing hand hygiene, contrary to the facility's hand hygiene policy. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the staff should have adhered to the infection control protocols in both cases.
Deficiencies in Dietary Services and Kitchen Sanitation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to employ a Registered Dietician (RD) or Qualified Nutritional Professional to oversee the food and nutrition services, leading to significant deficiencies in kitchen sanitation, staff competencies, and the timely delivery of meals. The absence of a qualified professional resulted in inadequate oversight of kitchen operations, including the failure to maintain proper cleaning and sanitizing protocols, as evidenced by incomplete dish machine temperature logs and unperformed cleaning duties. Additionally, the facility's policies regarding dietary services, such as ensuring meals meet residents' nutritional needs and are delivered on time, were not adhered to. The report highlights several instances where residents did not receive meals that met their prescribed dietary needs. For example, a resident with a history of weight loss and a regular diet order with double portions did not receive the appropriate meal portions due to a lack of food availability and staff shortages. Observations revealed that meals were often late, incomplete, or substituted with inadequate alternatives, such as missing menu items like waffles and chocolate chip cookies. Interviews with residents and staff confirmed ongoing issues with meal quality and timeliness, exacerbated by the facility's inability to maintain consistent kitchen staffing and leadership. Furthermore, the facility's kitchen was found to be in poor sanitary condition, with observations of dirty floors, unclean equipment, and staff not adhering to hygiene protocols, such as wearing facial coverings. The lack of a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and the reliance on untrained staff, including the Administrator and housekeeping personnel, to perform kitchen duties contributed to the disorganization and failure to meet regulatory standards. The facility's inability to provide adequate training and maintain a clean and organized kitchen environment further compromised the quality of care provided to residents.
Staffing and Training Deficiencies in Food and Nutrition Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide sufficient staff with the necessary competencies and skill sets to effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services. This deficiency was observed in 12 out of 17 staff members, including dietary aides, CNAs, housekeepers, and even the Director of Nursing and the Administrator, who were working in the kitchen. The facility had a census of 78 residents, with 76 receiving meal trays from the kitchen. The lack of trained staff led to incomplete dish machine temperature logs and sanitizer checks, as well as late meal deliveries. Observations and interviews revealed that the facility's kitchen was understaffed and lacked proper leadership following the firing of the previous Certified Dietary Manager in September 2024. The Administrator had to step in to work in the kitchen, logging 600 hours, and even purchasing food from Walmart due to delivery issues. Meal times were consistently late, with reports of breakfast being served as late as 9:00 AM, lunch at 2:00 PM, and supper at 6:30 PM. Residents confirmed that their meals were often delayed, with one resident stating that lunch was served as late as 2:00 PM. The deficiency was further compounded by the fact that many staff members working in the kitchen were not officially trained for their roles. Housekeepers and CNAs were asked to assist in the kitchen, but they lacked the necessary training to perform tasks such as checking dish machine temperatures and using sanitizer strips. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator confirmed that the kitchen staff was not fully trained, and the absence of a Certified Dietary Manager led to a lack of leadership, resulting in disorganized operations and late meal services.
Sanitation and Food Handling Deficiencies in Facility Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen, as evidenced by multiple observations of unclean equipment and improper food handling practices. Dietary staff were observed not wearing facial coverings to cover facial hair, and the kitchen floor was consistently dirty with scattered paper and debris. Additionally, cookware, including skillets and pans, had significant black sticky buildup, and the convection oven contained dried food particles and a thick brown sticky substance. Metal storage racks were found to be rusty with peeling metal and dust buildup. The facility also failed to adhere to its own policies regarding dishwashing and sanitation. The dish machine temperature logs for November and December 2024 were incomplete, with numerous instances where temperatures and sanitizer levels were not checked or recorded. This lack of documentation was confirmed by the Administrator, who was unable to locate the kitchen sanitation logs for September and October 2024. Furthermore, the cleaning schedule for the kitchen was not followed, with multiple blank areas indicating that cleaning duties were not performed by the AM aide, cook, and PM aide on numerous days. Interviews with various staff members, including the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) from another facility, the Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor, the Director of Nursing (DON), and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), revealed a lack of leadership and accountability in maintaining kitchen cleanliness. The CDM acknowledged the presence of bad habits and the need for constant supervision to ensure adherence to cleaning schedules. The DON and Administrator confirmed that the kitchen was not clean and that dish machine temperatures and sanitizer levels should be checked and documented regularly.
Failure to Provide Adequate Nutrition and Meal Portions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a nourishing and well-balanced diet that meets the daily nutritional and dietary needs of its residents. This deficiency was observed in three residents who were reviewed for nutrition. The facility's policy on dietary menus and adequate nutrition was not adhered to, as evidenced by the failure to provide meals that met the nutritional needs of the residents. Resident #2, who was at risk for weight loss, did not receive the prescribed double portions of meals, and the facility was unable to provide the menu items due to a delay in food delivery. The resident expressed concerns about the quality and consistency of meals, and the facility's inability to provide the prescribed diet was confirmed by staff observations and interviews. The facility's kitchen operations were disorganized, leading to inconsistencies in meal preparation and delivery. Observations revealed that residents did not receive the menu items as planned, and substitutions were made due to a lack of available food. Staff interviews confirmed that residents received smaller portions than prescribed, and the facility struggled with staffing issues in the kitchen. The lack of a dietary manager and consistent kitchen staff contributed to the failure to meet the residents' nutritional needs. Interviews with staff and residents highlighted ongoing issues with meal quality and portion sizes. Residents reported receiving meals late and expressed dissatisfaction with the food provided. Staff confirmed that the facility did not have enough food to meet the prescribed portions, and the Director of Nursing acknowledged the need for better kitchen management and planning. The Administrator confirmed that there were complaints about food shortages and that efforts were made to address the issue temporarily by purchasing groceries. However, the deficiency persisted, affecting the residents' nutritional intake and overall satisfaction with the facility's dietary services.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 15 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Lexington
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Briarwood Community Living Center | 1.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Decatur County Healthcare | 14.4 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Westwood Nursing And Rehabilitation | 14.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Henderson Health And Rehabilitation Center | 21.6 mi | — | 6 | 0 |
| Laurelwood Health Care Center | 22.9 mi | — | 5 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Lexington Post Acute.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.