Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Rolling Hills Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A nurse aide took a photo of a resident with severe cognitive impairment, who could not provide consent, and shared it electronically with other staff. Although the resident's face was obscured, the individual was still identifiable as a facility resident. The facility confirmed the unauthorized taking and sharing of the photo.
A resident with obstructive uropathy had physician orders for a coude foley catheter to be changed monthly by an RN, but documentation showed an LPN performed a catheter change and changes occurred outside the prescribed schedule without evidence of medical necessity. The facility did not ensure catheter care was provided by the appropriate licensed staff or according to the physician's orders.
The facility did not ensure that a resident received necessary dental services, resulting in a deficiency related to the provision or arrangement of dental care.
A resident who required extensive staff assistance with hygiene was repeatedly observed with long, unclean fingernails and evidence of dried blood, despite having a care plan for staff-assisted hygiene and grooming. The deficiency was confirmed through observation, record review, and staff interviews.
A resident with a history of cardiac disease and a surgically inserted pacemaker did not have a physician's order for pacemaker monitoring, and there was no evidence that pacemaker checks were being performed as required by the care plan. Facility leadership confirmed the absence of both an order and documentation of monitoring until the issue was identified by surveyors.
A resident's bed system was found to have a significant gap between the mattress and headboard, with no footboard present and the mattress having slid within the frame. Facility staff did not assess or document the risk of entrapment related to this gap, and leadership could not provide evidence of a review of mattress stability or changes to the bed system.
A resident's medication regimen review was not properly documented or communicated by the consultant pharmacist, who failed to provide separate written reports of irregularities to the physician and DON. Recommendations for medication changes and lab monitoring were directed to nursing staff instead of the physician, and the physician's response to a pharmacist's recommendation for a medication dose reduction was not documented in a timely manner.
Surveyors were unable to independently access a resident's nurse aide documentation in the EHR, requiring staff intervention to obtain records related to care tasks. The facility did not provide surveyors with the same read-only access to medical records as staff, resulting in a deficiency.
Failure to Protect Resident Privacy and Confidentiality
Penalty
Summary
A facility failed to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of a resident's personal and medical records. Clinical record review showed that a resident with severe cognitive impairment, who was unable to make decisions or provide consent, was photographed by a nurse aide. The photo, although the resident's face was obscured by a filter, was still identifiable as a facility resident and was electronically shared with other staff members. The facility's investigation confirmed that the photo was taken and disseminated without the resident's consent, and staff interviews corroborated these findings.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Indwelling Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician orders regarding the care and management of an indwelling urinary catheter for a resident with obstructive uropathy. Physician orders specified that a 24 French coude foley catheter was to be changed monthly and as needed for blockage or obstruction, and that only a registered nurse (RN) was permitted to perform the catheter change. However, documentation revealed that a licensed practical nurse (LPN) changed the resident's coude catheter on one occasion, contrary to the physician's order. Additionally, the resident's catheter was changed by an RN on a date that did not align with the monthly schedule, and there was no documented evidence of a complication, such as blockage or obstruction, that would have warranted an earlier change. The clinical record also showed inconsistencies in documentation regarding who performed the catheter changes and when they occurred. The Director of Nursing (DON) performed a scheduled monthly catheter change, but previous changes were not consistently documented as being performed by an RN as required. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed these findings during an interview. The facility did not ensure that the resident's indwelling urinary catheter was managed according to physician orders, both in terms of the appropriate licensed staff performing the procedure and adherence to the prescribed schedule.
Failure to Provide or Obtain Dental Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide or obtain necessary dental services for each resident as required. This deficiency indicates that at least one resident did not receive appropriate dental care or access to dental services during their stay. The report specifically notes the lack of provision or arrangement for dental services, but does not provide further details about the residents involved or their medical conditions at the time of the deficiency.
Failure to Provide Nail Hygiene Assistance to Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
A dependent resident who required substantial to maximal staff assistance with personal hygiene and grooming was observed on two separate occasions to have long fingernails extending beyond the fingertips, with darkened material and dried blood present under several nails. The resident also had a skin injury with dried, smeared blood on the left forearm. These observations were made despite the resident having a care plan in place since October 2024, which identified a self-care deficit and a risk for skin integrity issues, and included interventions for staff to assist with daily hygiene and grooming. Clinical record reviews and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments confirmed the resident's need for extensive assistance with hygiene. Interviews with facility leadership and clinical staff acknowledged the concern regarding the resident's nail hygiene. The failure to provide adequate assistance with nail care and hygiene for this dependent resident constituted a deficiency under the cited nursing services regulation.
Failure to Ensure Pacemaker Monitoring for Resident with Cardiac History
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the highest practicable care for a resident with a cardiac pacemaker. Upon admission, the resident had diagnoses including coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and a surgically inserted pacemaker. The resident's care plan included instructions for pacemaker checks, but there was no specified intervention or method for performing these checks. Clinical record review showed no evidence of a current physician's order for pacemaker monitoring, and no documentation that pacemaker checks were being completed. This deficiency was identified when the surveyor discovered the lack of a physician's order and absence of documented pacemaker checks during a review and interviews with facility leadership. The facility confirmed that prior to the surveyor's inquiry, there was no order in place and no evidence that the required pacemaker monitoring was being conducted for the resident.
Failure to Assess and Address Bed System Entrapment Hazard
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly assess and address potential accident hazards in a resident's bed system, specifically regarding the risk of entrapment. Observations revealed that a resident's bed had assist bars at the head, a trapeze device, and a significant gap of six to eight inches between the top of the mattress and the headboard, with no footboard present. Further measurement by an LPN confirmed a 10-inch gap between the mattress and the headboard, and the mattress appeared to have slid distally within the bed frame. The facility's prior assessment documentation only addressed gaps between head/foot boards and bed rails, stating they were within FDA limits, but did not evaluate the space between the mattress and the headboard or the stability of the mattress positioning. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed that there was no documentation regarding when the bed system was changed or whether a footboard had been removed. Additionally, the facility was unable to provide evidence of an assessment that considered the risk of mattress sliding and the resulting gap size, which could present a potential entrapment hazard. The deficiency was cited under 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) for failing to ensure the area was free from accident hazards and that adequate supervision and assessment were provided to prevent accidents.
Failure to Ensure Proper Pharmacist Irregularity Reporting and Physician Response
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the consultant pharmacist reported medication regimen irregularities to the attending physician and Director of Nursing on a separate, written report, as required by policy. For one resident, the consultant pharmacist's recommendations regarding medication adjustments and laboratory monitoring were included in lists with other residents' information and directed to nursing staff, rather than being provided to the physician on a separate report. The recommendations included updating a Seroquel order and ensuring periodic labs for Cholestyramine, but these were not referred directly to the physician, nor was a separate report documented in the resident's medical record for several months. Additionally, when the consultant pharmacist did request a physician review of Hydroxyzine for a possible gradual dose reduction, the physician did not document a review and response until more than a month later. The only evidence of the pharmacist's review for that month was a report listing multiple residents, without a separate report for the physician. The Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of required separate reports in the resident's chart for the months in question, and that the physician's response to the pharmacist's recommendation was not timely documented.
Failure to Provide Surveyors Independent Access to EHR Documentation
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors were unable to independently access three months of nurse aide documentation for a resident during a survey, despite being provided with the facility's federal Entrance Conference Worksheet and instructions for accessing the Electronic Health Record (EHR). The surveyors required read-only access to the same information available to staff, specifically documentation related to the completion of care tasks such as bathing, toileting assistance, bowel elimination records, incontinence care, behavior monitoring, oral hygiene, and application of medical devices. When the surveyors requested instructions for accessing this documentation, the Nursing Home Administrator responded that she would print the requested records, rather than providing direct access. A licensed practical nurse later printed the documentation for the surveyor, but the surveyor was still unable to independently view the information without staff intervention. This failure to provide surveyors with the same read-only access to residents' EHRs as staff constitutes a deficiency in maintaining and making medical records readily accessible for health oversight activities.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 147 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Millmont
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oak Glen Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | 14.9 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Richfield Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | 14.9 mi | — | 13 | 0 |
| Buffalo Valley Lutheran Villag | 15.2 mi | — | 19 | 0 |
| Manor At Penn Village, The | 17.2 mi | — | 16 | 0 |
| Milton Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 19.7 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Rolling Hills Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.