Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Embassy Of Woodland Park during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Two residents who were cognitively intact and incontinent of urine were not provided incontinence briefs that matched their assessed needs and the manufacturer’s sizing chart, compromising their dignity. One bariatric resident weighing 400 pounds was found wearing two size 2 briefs taped together instead of the indicated bariatric size, and only chux pads had been supplied despite her care plan calling for use of a power wheelchair and outdoor activity. Another resident weighing 218 pounds was observed in bed with a modified size 2/L brief that did not fit properly, and only that size was available in the room, even though the sizing chart called for size 3/XL. An LPN confirmed the lack of appropriate sizes, and the NHA and DON acknowledged that residents should receive properly fitting briefs and that bariatric residents should be provided briefs rather than just pads.
The facility did not serve hot food at the required temperature, as observed when seasoned broccoli was delivered to a resident at 111.0°F, below the policy standard of 120°F. The broccoli was lukewarm and unappetizing, and the Dietary Manager confirmed it should have been hotter.
A resident with a history of stroke and requiring maximum assistance was found on the floor after a fall, but the emergency contact was not notified until three days later. Documentation and staff interviews confirmed the delay in notification following the incident.
A resident with cognitive impairment and constipation was not administered senna-docusate sodium at the physician-ordered time. Instead, an LPN left the medication at the bedside in the afternoon, and the resident took it unsupervised, contrary to facility policy and the care plan. The DON confirmed that medications should be administered by licensed staff at the prescribed time.
A resident with cognitive impairment and dementia was left with a cup containing three tablets and water at bedside by an LPN, contrary to facility policy requiring staff to observe medication ingestion. The DON confirmed that staff must not leave medications at bedside and must ensure proper administration.
The facility failed to follow its planned menu and recipe instructions, leading to discrepancies in meals served. Residents reported that the kitchen did not always serve the listed menu items. On one occasion, Brussels sprouts were substituted with a vegetable mix without informing residents. Additionally, ground chicken breast was served with poultry gravy instead of the specified citrus glaze, as confirmed by a test tray and the Dietary Director.
The facility did not comply with food storage standards, as observed by surveyors who found coffee boxes on the floor and an unlabeled, undated, and unsealed chocolate cake in the freezer. The Dietary Director confirmed these storage violations.
The facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for two residents. One resident's room had a black and worn carpet that remained dirty despite cleaning attempts. Another resident had a fan blowing on her with visible dirt and debris on the blade cover. Cleaning of resident fans was not part of scheduled duties, but staff would clean them if notified.
The facility failed to verify the nursing licenses of two nurses and the registry status of a nurse aide before their employment, contrary to its abuse prevention policy. The oversight was confirmed by the HR Director, violating state regulations.
A facility failed to develop a care plan for a resident who was cognitively intact and required assistance for daily care needs, including frequent bowel incontinence. Despite the facility's policy requiring a baseline care plan, there was no documented evidence of a care plan addressing the resident's bowel incontinence. The DON confirmed that a care plan should have been developed but was not.
The facility failed to update care plans for two residents, resulting in deficiencies in care management. One resident's care plan did not reflect multiple pain medications prescribed, while another's care plan was outdated, not reflecting a current urinary catheter order. The DON confirmed the need for updates.
A resident, identified as an elopement risk and cognitively intact, repeatedly removed her Wanderguard bracelet and exited the facility without triggering an alarm. Despite being aware of the resident's actions and dissatisfaction, the facility did not implement additional interventions beyond the Wanderguard to prevent her from leaving.
The facility did not verify the registry status of a newly hired nurse aide before she began working. The personnel file lacked evidence of a registry check until several months after her hire date, which was confirmed by the HR Director.
A resident with dementia exhibited behaviors such as hallucinations and anxiety, but the facility failed to document or implement interventions to address these issues. Despite the care plan noting these behaviors, staff did not take further steps to manage the resident's symptoms, and the physician deemed the behaviors as dementia-related without requiring additional psychological services.
A facility failed to document the administration of controlled medications for a resident with a Stage IV pressure ulcer receiving hospice care. Morphine was signed out but not recorded as administered on the MAR, as confirmed by the DON.
A resident's medications were improperly stored at their bedside, and insulin pens on a medication cart were not labeled with opening dates. An LPN left medications on a resident's table, and another confirmed insulin pens should have been dated.
The facility's QAPI committee failed to address recurring deficiencies effectively, leading to repeated citations for issues such as unsafe environments, inadequate abuse and neglect policies, and improper medication management. Despite plans of correction involving audits and committee reviews, the same deficiencies persisted across multiple surveys.
The facility did not provide the required notices to two residents regarding the end of their Medicare coverage. The SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review forms were not issued timely, and the Advanced Beneficiary Notices of Non-coverage were not provided. An interview with the Admissions Director revealed a lack of awareness about the requirement to issue these notices.
A resident sustained a head injury due to improper use of a mechanical wheelchair lift. The lift was not in the correct position, and the alarm system failed to alert the staff. The resident, who required assistance for transfers, fell and suffered a subdural hematoma, necessitating hospitalization.
A resident, who required two-person assistance for transfers, sustained a bruise after a nurse aide attempted a solo transfer, contrary to the care plan. The incident involved discrepancies in staff accounts, with the resident becoming weak during the transfer, leading to the use of a hoyer lift. The facility confirmed neglect due to the failure to adhere to the care plan, resulting in disciplinary action against the nurse aide.
A resident, who was care planned for a two-person transfer, was injured when a nurse aide attempted to transfer her alone, resulting in a large bruise. The resident's care plan required extensive assistance from two staff members, but this was not followed, leading to the incident. The nurse aide was terminated for failing to adhere to the care plan.
Failure to Provide Properly Fitting Incontinence Briefs, Compromising Resident Dignity
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide properly fitting incontinence briefs in accordance with residents’ assessed needs and the manufacturer’s sizing chart, resulting in compromised dignity for two residents. For one resident who was cognitively intact, frequently incontinent of urine, and weighed 400 pounds, surveyors observed that she was wearing two size 2 briefs taped together by staff to fit around her. The facility’s NGB & Bariatric briefs height and weight sizing chart indicated that this resident should have been provided size B/Bariatric briefs for her weight range of 360–440 pounds. Instead of the appropriate bariatric briefs, chux pads were delivered for this resident, despite her care plan indicating that it was very important for her to go outside when the weather was good and that her power wheelchair was to be used when out of bed. During interview, the resident reported embarrassment that her briefs did not fit and expressed concern about potential leakage if she used her new electric wheelchair during an incontinence episode. For a second cognitively intact resident who was always incontinent of urine and weighed 218 pounds, surveyors observed that she was in bed and not wearing a properly fitting brief. Staff had cut the fastening off the side of a size 2/Large brief so it would not scratch her, and only size 2/Large briefs were present in her room. According to the same sizing chart, this resident should have been provided size 3/XL briefs based on her weight. An LPN confirmed that the resident was currently wearing a size 2/Large brief and that no size 3/XL briefs were available at that time. The Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed that the facility should supply appropriately fitting incontinence briefs for residents who require them and that bariatric residents should be ordered briefs rather than only incontinence pads, demonstrating that the facility did not ensure appropriate incontinence products were available and used for these residents.
Failure to Serve Hot Food at Required Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve food items at appetizing temperatures as required by its policy, which states that hot food should be served at a temperature of at least 120 degrees Fahrenheit at the point of service. On August 19, 2025, during lunch service, the food cart left the main kitchen and arrived at the 100 unit within one minute, but the last resident was not served until 13 minutes later. At that time, the temperature of the seasoned broccoli was measured at 111.0 degrees Fahrenheit, which was below the required standard. The broccoli was observed to be lukewarm and unappetizing. The Dietary Manager confirmed during an interview that the broccoli should have been hotter. This deficiency was cited under 28 Pa. Code 211.6(b) Dietary Services.
Failure to Timely Notify Resident Representative After Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify a resident's representative of a significant change in condition following a fall. A cognitively intact resident with a history of stroke, who required maximum assistance for daily care, was found on the floor in front of her wheelchair while attempting to get up. Although this incident was documented in the nursing notes, there was no evidence in the clinical record that the resident's emergency contact was informed of the fall until three days later. Staff interviews confirmed that the notification was delayed, despite the requirement for immediate notification of such events.
Failure to Administer Medication According to Physician's Orders
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that care and treatment were provided in accordance with physician's orders and professional standards of practice for one resident. According to the facility's medication administration policy, licensed nurses are required to administer medications as ordered, verify medication details with the Medication Administration Record, and observe the resident consuming the medication. For a resident with cognitive impairment, constipation, and dementia, the care plan specified administration of medications as ordered to address constipation. Physician's orders directed that the resident receive three tablets of senna-docusate sodium by mouth once daily at 8:00 p.m. However, on the day of observation, a medication cup containing three red pills and a cup of water was left at the resident's bedside in the afternoon, and the resident took the pills at that time. An LPN confirmed leaving the medication at the bedside and identified it as senna-docusate, acknowledging it was to be administered in the evening. The DON confirmed that licensed staff are responsible for administering medications at the physician-ordered time.
Medication Administration Policy Not Followed for Cognitively Impaired Resident
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a licensed nurse failed to properly administer medication to a resident with cognitive impairment, dementia, and constipation. According to the facility's policy, medications are to be administered by licensed nurses who must verify the medication against the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and observe the resident consuming the medication. However, during an observation, the nurse left a medication cup containing three red, round tablets and a cup of water at the bedside of the resident, who was lying in bed on the locked memory unit. The resident later sat up and took the pills without the nurse present. Interviews with both the LPN involved and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the nurse should not have left the medication at the bedside and was required to remain with the resident to observe ingestion. The failure to follow the facility's medication administration policy and professional standards resulted in the medication not being stored or administered appropriately for the resident.
Menu and Recipe Discrepancies in Dietary Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its planned menu, as evidenced by several discrepancies between the written menu and the meals served. According to the facility's policy, menus should be prepared in advance and followed, with any substitutions recorded only in emergency situations. However, an interview with residents revealed that the kitchen did not always serve the items listed on the menu. On September 30, 2024, the kitchen staff prepared and served a vegetable mix of green beans, wax beans, and carrots instead of the Brussels sprouts listed on the menu. The Dietary Manager admitted to forgetting to order Brussels sprouts and substituted them without informing the residents or the resident council president. Further discrepancies were observed on October 1, 2024, when the facility served ground chicken breast with poultry gravy instead of the citrus glaze specified in the recipe. A test tray confirmed that the ground chicken did not have the citrus glaze and tasted different from the regular texture chicken breast. The Dietary Director acknowledged that the ground chicken should have had the citrus glaze, indicating a failure to follow the planned menu and recipe instructions.
Non-compliance with Food Storage Standards
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards for food service safety, as evidenced by improper food storage practices. During an initial tour of the main kitchen, surveyors observed two cardboard boxes of coffee stored directly on the floor, which is against the facility's policy requiring dry storage items to be at least six inches off the floor. Additionally, in the three-door freezer, a box containing approximately two-thirds of a chocolate cake was found without a date, label, or seal, contrary to the facility's policy that mandates all freezer items be labeled, dated, and sealed according to Hazardous Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) guidelines. The Dietary Director confirmed these observations, acknowledging the non-compliance with the established food storage protocols.
Failure to Maintain a Clean and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for two residents. For one resident, who was cognitively intact and used a wheelchair due to cerebral palsy, the carpet in his room was observed to be black and worn. Despite attempts to clean it, the condition of the carpet did not improve. The Director of Maintenance acknowledged the carpet's poor condition and mentioned plans to replace it with vinyl flooring, but no timeline or work schedule was established. Another resident, who was also cognitively intact and had diagnoses including COPD and a history of congestive heart failure, was observed with a fan blowing directly on her. The fan had a moderate amount of visible dirt and debris on the blade cover. The Director of Maintenance and the Director of Housekeeping both stated that cleaning resident fans was not part of their scheduled duties, but they would clean them if notified. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the fan cover should have been clean, but it was not.
Failure to Verify Nursing Licenses and Registry Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the status of nursing licenses was checked with the State Board of Nursing for two nurses and did not complete a Nurse Aide Registry verification for one nurse aide. The facility's policy on abuse prevention, dated March 15, 2024, mandates conducting background checks and not employing individuals with disciplinary actions against their professional licenses. However, the personnel files for a registered nurse and a licensed practical nurse showed no documented evidence of license verification with the State Board until October 2, 2024, despite their start dates being in April and July 2024, respectively. Additionally, the personnel file for a nurse aide revealed no documented evidence of registry verification until October 2, 2024, although the aide started working in July 2024. An interview with the Human Resources Director confirmed these findings, acknowledging the lack of timely verification of licenses and registry status for the involved staff members. This oversight is a violation of the facility's policy and state regulations, specifically 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) and 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1).
Failure to Develop Care Plan for Bowel Incontinence
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a care plan for a resident, identified as Resident 61, who was reviewed during a survey. According to the facility's policy dated March 15, 2024, a baseline care plan should be developed for each resident to provide effective person-centered care and meet professional standards. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident 61, dated September 6, 2024, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance for daily care needs, and experienced frequent bowel incontinence. Task records for September 2024 confirmed that the resident had two or more episodes of bowel incontinence weekly. However, there was no documented evidence of a care plan addressing the resident's bowel incontinence needs. The Director of Nursing confirmed on October 3, 2024, that a care plan should have been developed for this issue but was not.
Failure to Update Care Plans for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update care plans for two residents, leading to deficiencies in their care management. For one resident, the care plan was not revised to include multiple pain medications prescribed over several months, despite significant changes in the resident's medication regimen. This resident, who was cognitively intact and required assistance for daily care needs, had been prescribed morphine sulfate and a fentanyl transdermal patch for chronic pain. However, there was no documented evidence that the care plan was updated to reflect these changes in pain management. Another resident, also cognitively intact and requiring assistance for daily care needs, had a care plan that was outdated and did not reflect current medical orders. The resident had a physician's order for a urinary catheter due to urinary retention, but the care plan still included interventions for bladder incontinence and the use of pantiliners, which were no longer applicable. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the care plans for both residents should have been updated to reflect their current medical needs and interventions.
Failure to Prevent Elopement Risk for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe environment free from accident hazards for Resident 55, who was identified as an elopement risk. The resident, who was cognitively intact, had a history of verbalizing a desire to leave the facility and had previously removed her Wanderguard bracelet, an electronic device intended to alert staff when she approached an exit. Despite this knowledge, the facility did not implement additional interventions beyond the Wanderguard to prevent her from leaving. On two occasions, the resident was able to exit the building without triggering an alarm, as she had removed the Wanderguard. The Director of Nursing confirmed awareness of the resident's actions and dissatisfaction with residing at the facility, yet no further measures were taken to address the risk of elopement.
Failure to Verify Nurse Aide Registry Status
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to verify the registry status of a newly hired nurse aide before allowing her to work. Specifically, the personnel file for Nurse Aide 3 showed that she was hired on July 10, 2024, but there was no documented evidence of a registry check until October 2, 2024. This oversight was confirmed during an interview with the Human Resources Director on October 2, 2024, who acknowledged that the registry check should have been completed prior to the nurse aide's start date.
Failure to Address Dementia-Related Behaviors
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for a resident diagnosed with dementia. The resident, who had a history of cerebrovascular accident/stroke and anxiety, exhibited behaviors such as screaming, yelling, refusal of care, and hallucinations, including seeing snakes and dinosaurs. Despite these behaviors being documented in the care plan, there was no evidence of interventions being implemented to address the resident's delusions or hallucinations. Observations revealed that the resident frequently called out, cried, and looked for her family, indicating a need for additional support and intervention. Staff interviews and record reviews indicated that the facility did not document any new interventions to manage the resident's anxiety, confusion, and hallucinations. The Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the staff were following the existing care plan, but acknowledged the lack of documented interventions to assist the resident. The physician consulted believed the behaviors were related to dementia and did not require outside psychological services, yet the facility did not take further steps to address the resident's ongoing symptoms.
Failure to Document Administration of Controlled Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications for one resident, identified as Resident 12. According to the facility's policy, when administering a controlled medication, both the controlled drug record form and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) must be signed. However, for Resident 12, there were instances where morphine was signed out on the controlled drug record but not signed as administered on the MAR. This discrepancy was noted on specific dates in September 2024. Resident 12 was moderately cognitively impaired, had a Stage IV pressure ulcer, and was receiving hospice care, including opioid medication for pain management. The resident's spouse confirmed that the resident received pain medication prior to dressing changes due to significant pain. Despite this, the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no documented evidence in the clinical records to indicate that the signed-out doses of morphine were administered to the resident, highlighting a failure in the facility's medication administration process.
Medication Storage and Labeling Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly store medications for a resident and did not label multi-dose insulin pens with the date they were opened. During an observation, a resident was found sleeping with a medicine cup full of pills on his bedside table. The medications included various tablets and capsules, and the resident's clinical record did not indicate that he was cleared to self-administer his medications. An LPN admitted to pouring the medications earlier in the shift and leaving them on the table because the resident preferred to take them with lunch, acknowledging that this was not appropriate. Additionally, an inspection of a medication cart revealed that several insulin pens, including glargine, Basaglar, and Toujeo SoloStar, were opened but not dated. These insulin pens have specific discard timelines after being opened, which were not adhered to. An LPN confirmed that the insulin pens should have been dated, and the Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged both the improper storage of the resident's medications and the failure to date the insulin pens.
Repeated Deficiencies in Facility's Quality Assurance
Penalty
Summary
The facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to address recurring deficiencies effectively, as evidenced by repeated citations in multiple surveys. The deficiencies identified include the failure to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment, develop and implement abuse and neglect policies, and create comprehensive care plans. Additionally, the facility was cited for not being free from accident hazards, failing to maintain accurate accounts of controlled medications, and improper labeling and storage of drugs and biologicals. Further deficiencies were noted in the facility's failure to prepare and follow menus that meet residents' needs and to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner. These issues were consistently identified in surveys conducted over several months, indicating a pattern of non-compliance with nursing home regulations. The QAPI committee's role in reviewing audit results and ensuring compliance was ineffective, as the same issues persisted across multiple survey periods. The repeated citations suggest that the facility's plans of correction, which included conducting audits and reporting findings to the QAPI committee, were not successful in achieving compliance. The ongoing deficiencies highlight the committee's inability to implement effective quality assurance systems to maintain regulatory standards and improve the delivery of care and services.
Failure to Provide Required Medicare Coverage Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide the required notice to residents or their representatives regarding the end of Medicare coverage for two residents who remained in the facility for long-term care. For Resident 62, Medicare coverage began on July 11, 2024, and ended on July 30, 2024. The facility did not issue the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form at least 48 hours in advance, and the Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN) was not issued. Similarly, for Resident 95, Medicare coverage started on June 19, 2024, and ended on July 10, 2024, but the ABN was not issued. An interview with the Admissions Director revealed a lack of awareness regarding the requirement to issue the ABN when residents remain in the facility.
Failure to Ensure Safe Transfer on Wheelchair Lift
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure safe techniques were used during a transfer onto a mechanical wheelchair lift, resulting in a head injury for a resident. The manufacturer's directions for the lift indicated that the platform must be at floor level when loading and unloading. However, Nurse Aide/Transporter 1 did not verify that the lift was in the correct position before attempting to transfer the resident. The aide unhooked the safety mechanisms and attempted to maneuver the resident onto the lift, but due to the lift not being in the proper position, both the aide and the resident fell, causing the resident to sustain a head injury. The resident, who was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance for transfers, suffered a subdural hematoma and other injuries as a result of the fall. The incident report and interviews revealed that the alarm system on the lift did not activate to warn the aide that the lift was not in the correct position. The resident was subsequently hospitalized for evaluation and treatment of the head injury, which included reversing her blood thinner medication and starting antiseizure medication. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the failure to ensure the lift was in the correct position led to the fall and injury.
Neglect Due to Failure to Follow Transfer Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect a resident from neglect, as evidenced by an incident involving Resident 4, who was care planned to require extensive assistance from two staff members for transfers. On April 7, 2024, Resident 4, who was cognitively intact and required assistance with care needs, was involved in an incident where she sustained a large bruise on her lower back and buttocks. The bruise was discovered after therapy noted it, and upon assessment, it was found to be firm upon palpation, although the resident denied pain or discomfort. The resident reported that she may have bumped off the arm of her wheelchair when she became weak during a transfer from her wheelchair to her bed. The investigation revealed discrepancies in staff accounts regarding the transfer. Nurse Aide 1 was identified as attempting to transfer Resident 4 alone, despite the care plan requiring two-person assistance. Nurse Aide 1 claimed that she and Nurse Aide 2 attempted the transfer, but Resident 4 became weak, leading to the use of a hoyer lift. However, Nurse Aide 2's statement indicated that she was not present initially and only arrived after being called for help. Nurse Aide 3 corroborated that Nurse Aide 1 sought her assistance after the initial attempt failed, and they used the hoyer lift to complete the transfer. The facility's investigation confirmed that Nurse Aide 1 did not adhere to the care plan, resulting in the neglect of Resident 4. The Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator verified that the resident was indeed care planned for a two-person transfer at the time of the incident. The failure to follow the care plan led to the resident's injury, and the facility took disciplinary action against Nurse Aide 1, who was suspended and later terminated for her inability to follow the care plan despite previous education on the matter.
Failure to Implement Care Plan Leads to Resident Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that staff implemented care-planned interventions for a resident, resulting in injury. The comprehensive care plan policy required a person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's needs. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, required assistance with care needs, and had no fall history. The care plan specified that the resident required extensive assistance from two staff members for transfers. However, an incident occurred where the resident was transferred by one nurse aide, contrary to the care plan, resulting in a large bruise on the resident's back. The resident reported that the nurse aide attempted to transfer her alone, despite the care plan requiring two-person assistance. The resident recalled the incident and stated that her leg gave out during the transfer, causing her to fall onto the wheelchair armrest. Interviews with the Director of Nursing and the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that the resident was care planned for a two-person transfer at the time of the incident. The nurse aide involved was terminated for not following the care plan, despite previous education on the matter.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 52 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Orbisonia
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Embassy Of Huntingdon Park | 18.8 mi | — | 21 | 0 |
| Westminster Woods At Huntingdo | 20.2 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Fulton County Medical Center | 21.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Brookview Health Care Center | 23.4 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Chambers Pointe Health Care Center | 23.6 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Embassy Of Woodland Park.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.