Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Lexington Nursing Home, Inc. during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A facility failed to include diabetic monitoring in a care plan for a resident with type II diabetes mellitus. Despite physician orders for blood sugar monitoring and medication administration, the care plan lacked documentation of these measures. The MDS coordinator was unaware of the need to include diabetic monitoring in the care plan.
A resident with Alzheimer's and balance issues experienced multiple falls, but the facility failed to update the care plan with new fall prevention interventions as required by their policy. Despite several falls, including those with injuries, the care plan remained unchanged, which was acknowledged by the MDS coordinator and DON.
The facility failed to accurately code medications on MDS assessments for two residents. One resident with Alzheimer's was incorrectly documented as receiving an anticoagulant, and another with acute cystitis was incorrectly documented as receiving an antidepressant. The MDS coordinator confirmed the inaccuracies after reviewing the EHR.
Failure to Document Diabetic Monitoring in Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident with type II diabetes mellitus, which was identified during a review of unnecessary medications. The resident was admitted with a diagnosis of diabetes and had several physician orders related to diabetic care, including finger stick blood sugar monitoring and administration of insulin and Trulicity. Despite these orders, the care plan reviewed did not document the resident's diabetic monitoring. The MDS coordinator acknowledged the omission, stating they were unaware that diabetic monitoring needed to be included in the care plan.
Failure to Revise Care Plan After Resident Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise the care plan related to falls for a resident with Alzheimer's disease, seizures, and an overactive bladder. The resident had a documented potential for falls due to balance problems, a history of falls prior to admission, and was on routine antidepressant medication. Despite multiple falls occurring over a period of time, the care plan was not updated with additional fall prevention interventions. Incident reports documented several falls, including those with injuries, but no new interventions were added to the care plan after these incidents. The facility's policy on managing falls and fall risk required staff to implement additional or different interventions if falls recurred, or to document why the current approach remained relevant. However, the care plan for the resident was not revised after each fall, contrary to the facility's policy. The MDS coordinator acknowledged that the care plan should have been updated after every fall, and the DON confirmed that fall prevention interventions should have been documented on the care plan following each incident.
Inaccurate Medication Coding on MDS Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate coding of medications on Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents. Resident #1, diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, was documented as receiving an anticoagulant in a quarterly assessment, but there was no evidence of anticoagulant administration during the look-back period. Similarly, Resident #3, diagnosed with acute cystitis, was documented as receiving an antidepressant, yet there was no documentation of antidepressant administration during the look-back period. On June 27, 2024, the MDS coordinator reviewed the electronic health records (EHR) and confirmed that the MDS assessments for both residents were inaccurately coded regarding their medications. This discrepancy was identified through record review and interviews, highlighting a failure in the facility's process to ensure accurate medication coding on MDS assessments.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 36 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Lexington
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broadway Living Center | 0.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Purcell Care Center | 2.2 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Sunset Estates Of Purcell | 2.3 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Noble Health Care Center | 10.7 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| 24th Place | 16.2 mi | — | 12 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Lexington Nursing Home, Inc..
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.