Park Health Center
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in St Clairsville, Ohio.
- Location
- 100 Pine Avenue, St Clairsville, Ohio 43950
- CMS Provider Number
- 365975
- Inspections on file
- 21
- Latest survey
- March 23, 2026
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 8 (1 serious)
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Park Health Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A cognitively impaired resident with dementia and depression reported that a male CNA attempted a sexual act during personal care, identifying him by name and clothing. An LPN, social worker designee, and HR director were involved in the initial response, and the CNA was told to leave the building that day. However, the facility’s investigation consisted only of brief, non-witness staff statements, lacked detailed accounts from key involved staff and the CNA, and included no documentation of the allegation in the medical record. The facility concluded no abuse occurred based largely on the resident’s son’s comments, did not report the allegation to the state agency as required by policy, and allowed the CNA to return the next shift as a shower aide, providing care to multiple other residents before being removed from duty when a later formal allegation was made.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple comorbidities alleged that a male CNA attempted to force sexual contact during personal care, identifying him by name and description. A social worker designee and the HR director interviewed the resident, confirmed the description matched a CNA on duty, and notified the Administrator by phone, but the incident was not documented in the medical record and was not promptly reported to the state as a sexual abuse allegation per facility policy. The internal investigation for that day lacked detailed witness statements from key staff and concluded no abuse occurred, relying in part on the resident’s son’s belief that no investigation was needed. When an SRI was later submitted, it was entered as physical abuse rather than sexual abuse, and a subsequent police report reflected conflicting information about when the facility became aware of the allegation.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, depression, dementia, and multiple medical conditions alleged sexual abuse by a CNA and exhibited upset and guarded behavior when questioned about the incident. Although a social worker designee and another staff member interviewed the resident and the social worker designee reported multiple follow-up contacts to assess emotional and cognitive status, there was no documentation of the allegation, the psychosocial change, or any social services assessments or notes in the medical record for the period following the event. This failure to document conflicted with the social worker designee’s job responsibilities to accurately record psychosocial needs, interactions, and follow-up actions.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, dementia, depression, and significant functional dependence reported that a male CNA attempted a sexual act during care, identifying him by name and description. An LPN, a social worker designee, and the HR director promptly learned of the allegation, interviewed the resident, confirmed the CNA’s description, and notified the Administrator by phone while the resident’s statements were audible on speaker. The Administrator instructed the CNA to leave but did not timely report the allegation of sexual abuse to the state as required, later entered it as physical abuse in the reporting system, and told police that facility leadership first learned of the allegation from the resident’s son days later, contrary to multiple staff accounts. This constituted a failure of effective facility administration in handling an abuse allegation.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, depression, and multiple chronic conditions alleged that a male CNA attempted a sexual act during care and became agitated and combative. An LPN assessed the resident and noted increased delusions, wrist discomfort, and a report from the resident’s son about similar behavior with UTIs, but did not document the resident’s specific statements, gestures, or emotional status. A social worker designee and HR staff also interviewed the resident, who described a man by name and clothing and complained of wrist pain, and the social worker designee reported multiple follow-up visits to assess emotional and cognitive status. However, there was no documentation in the medical record of the alleged sexual abuse incident, the detailed behaviors, or any social services follow-up, resulting in an incomplete and inaccurate record related to the abuse allegation.
A deficiency occurred when a resident did not receive treatment and care in accordance with physician orders and their own preferences and goals, resulting in care that was not individualized or consistent with regulatory requirements.
A resident with cognitive impairment and physical care needs had an authorized video camera in their room for monitoring. An RN intentionally blocked the camera with her hand and body, preventing it from recording the resident during care, in direct violation of facility policy prohibiting obstruction of electronic monitoring devices.
A resident with impaired cognition and mobility requested assistance to use the bathroom but was instructed by a CNA to urinate in her incontinence brief instead of being assisted to the toilet, despite a care plan that included a toileting program. The CNA did not follow the care plan interventions, resulting in the resident not being given the opportunity to maintain her ability to perform activities of daily living related to toileting.
Surveyors identified multiple failures in food storage and preparation, including unsealed frozen foods, expired and undated items in the refrigerator, unsanitary storage of utensils, and dusty kitchen surfaces. These deficiencies affected all residents receiving nutrition from the kitchen.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions had a discrepancy between their electronic and paper records regarding advance directives, with the paper chart not reflecting a physician-ordered change in code status. This inconsistency was confirmed by an RN and was not in accordance with facility policy.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions and intact cognition reported $500 missing from her purse, which was kept in her room. Despite an internal investigation and police involvement that found no evidence of staff misappropriation, the facility did not reimburse the resident for the missing money, as confirmed by interviews with the resident, Ombudsman, and staff.
A resident with multiple diagnoses, including anxiety and schizoaffective disorder, was prescribed antipsychotic and antianxiety medications without a comprehensive or measurable care plan addressing the use of these psychotropic drugs. No targeted behaviors were identified for monitoring, and staff confirmed the absence of a care plan or policy for psychotropic medication use.
The facility did not update or individualize care plans for two residents with complex medical needs and changing preferences. One resident's dialysis care plan lacked details about their fistula access, while another resident's care plan was not revised to reflect significant changes in condition, care refusals, and personal preferences, including religious activities. These deficiencies were confirmed through record review, observation, and staff interviews.
Two dependent residents did not consistently receive necessary ADL care, including routine nail care and scheduled showers. One resident was observed with long, dirty fingernails despite documentation of care, and another did not receive showers as preferred, with staff sometimes deferring decisions to the resident's family. These failures were confirmed through observations, interviews, and record reviews.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions and a new diagnosis of pulmonary embolism did not receive an ordered dose of Eliquis because the nurse did not retrieve the medication from the facility's contingency box, despite its availability. The DON confirmed the medication was not administered as ordered.
A resident at high risk for pressure ulcers, with multiple comorbidities and limited mobility, was not provided with a properly functioning low air loss mattress as ordered. Despite documentation that the mattress was working, observations showed the mattress panel indicated low pressure and the alarm was muted, and staff were unaware of the malfunction. The required checks and responses to the alarm were not performed, resulting in a failure to provide care consistent with professional standards for pressure ulcer prevention.
A resident admitted with a UTI did not receive prescribed Cefpodoxime as ordered due to the medication not being available in the facility. Multiple doses were missed over several days, and there was no documentation that the physician was notified about the continued unavailability of the antibiotic. The resident experienced an episode of unresponsiveness during this period, and the DON confirmed the delay in medication delivery and lack of contingency stock.
A resident with a dialysis fistula did not have an individualized care plan or appropriate physician orders for fistula monitoring, such as checking for bruit and thrill or avoiding blood pressure measurements in the affected arm. Staff documented dressing care that was not actually provided, and the care plan remained generic, failing to address the resident's specific dialysis access and needs.
Pharmacy service failures led to delayed or missed administration of critical medications and vaccines for three residents, including a diabetic resident missing a scheduled Ozempic injection, a resident not receiving the Prevnar 20 vaccine despite multiple orders, and another resident missing several doses of an antibiotic for a UTI due to unavailability and delayed pharmacy delivery.
A resident with complex cardiac and pulmonary conditions was given Midodrine for hypotension even when their systolic blood pressure exceeded the ordered threshold, as documented in the MAR and confirmed by the DON. The medication was administered multiple times outside the prescribed parameters.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions developed respiratory symptoms and tested positive for Influenza A. Despite not meeting established clinical criteria for antibiotic use and without evidence of pneumonia, the resident was prescribed and administered doxycycline and prednisone. Facility records and CDC guidelines indicated that antibiotics were not appropriate for influenza, and the facility's own protocols for antibiotic stewardship were not followed.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment suffered a severe leg laceration while being repositioned in a geri chair by an STNA. The chair malfunctioned, causing the resident's leg to get caught and injured. The facility's investigation lacked evidence of proper assessment and training for staff on the use of geri chairs, and the facility's policy on resident handling and transfers was not adequately followed.
Failure to Thoroughly Investigate Sexual Abuse Allegation and Protect Residents from Alleged Perpetrator
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to thoroughly investigate an allegation of staff-to-resident sexual abuse and to protect residents after the allegation. A cognitively impaired resident with severe dementia, depression, and a history of occasional delusional thinking reported that a male staff member attempted to put his "thing" in her mouth, gesturing toward her own and the nurse’s private areas. The resident identified the alleged perpetrator by name and described his clothing, which matched that of a male CNA on duty. The resident appeared upset and was yelling when initially interviewed by the social worker designee and human resources director, and later became guarded and defensive when asked by surveyors about the incident, stating she had been told she was safe and that the man would no longer care for her, and that she was told not to discuss the incident. Staff actions and documentation on the date of the allegation were incomplete and did not meet the facility’s own abuse policy. The LPN caring for the resident was informed by the CNA that the resident was combative during care and, upon assessing the resident, heard the resident’s statements about the attempted sexual act. The LPN reported the concern to the social worker designee because administration was not yet on site. The social worker designee and human resources director interviewed the resident, confirmed the description of the CNA’s clothing, and notified the Administrator by phone. The Administrator, via speaker phone, directed that the CNA leave the facility pending investigation, and the CNA clocked out that morning. However, the facility’s internal investigation file for that date contained only brief, non-witness statements from other staff attesting that they had never seen the CNA be abusive, and lacked detailed statements from the social worker designee, human resources director, the LPN who received the allegation, or the CNA accused. There was no documentation in the medical record regarding the resident’s allegation or the events of that day. The facility’s investigation summary for the date of the allegation concluded that the resident was confused and combative during personal care and that no abuse occurred, relying in part on the resident’s son’s statement that the resident behaves that way when she has a UTI and that he did not think an investigation was warranted. The assistant DON confirmed that no deeper investigation was conducted and that the incident was not reported to the state agency, despite facility policy requiring reporting of any allegations or suspicions of abuse prior to investigation. Furthermore, after being sent home the day of the allegation, the CNA was allowed to return to work on the next scheduled shift and was assigned as a shower aide on a different unit, providing care to eight other residents while the initial allegation had not been fully investigated or reported. The DON and ADON verified that the CNA worked that full shift with resident care responsibilities before being placed on leave when a formal allegation was later made by the resident’s son.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will continue to report and investigate allegations of abuse thoroughly ensuring the safety and wellbeing of their residents. Resident #171 continues to reside at the facility and seen by CNP on 3/12/26 with no noted injuries or negative effects. Psych nurse practitioner assessed residents #171 on 3/19/26 with no changes noted to psychosocial wellbeing. Resident #171 denied any complaints and appeared calm and relaxed stating to the NP that she feels safe. CNA # 340, was suspended on 3/12/26 pending investigation. The Police department was called on 3/12/26 and reported to the facility. All residents were interviewed and/or assessed for signs of abuse including Resident #102, #111, #121, #124, #134, #142, and #143. No negative findings noted. A thorough investigation completed and submitted on 3/19/26. Conclusion of abuse investigation noted no evidence that abuse occurred. HRD conducted new background check on CNA #340 on 3/26/26, no negative findings noted. Resident #171 care plan was reviewed by the IDT on 4/8/26. The regional Clinician conducted an Audit of last 3 months of incidents and progress notes ensuring allegations of abuse were reported timely and thoroughly investigated. Initial audit was completed on 4/6/26 which included alleged preceptors were removed from facility when necessary. No negative findings noted. On 4/6/26, the Administrator, Nurse Management team, SSD and HRD were reeducated on the facility policies and procedures for reporting allegations timely, conducting a thorough and factual investigation and ensuring perpetrators are removed from the facility for resident's safety to prevent further abuse. Reeducation was conducted by the Regional Clinician. A QA committee meeting was held on 4/8/26 reviewing survey results and findings, investigation and medical record documentation requirements, policy and procedures for abuse prevention and reporting abuse, SS policy and procedure, and facilities change in condition policy and procedure. Weekly for 2 weeks, or as directed by the QA committee, audits will be conducted by the regional clinician ensuring abuse allegations are investigated thoroughly, factually documented and reported, and ensuring identified perpetrators are removed from the facility as indicated. Negative findings will be corrected immediately by reporting allegation and conducting a thorough investigation and providing reeducation. Negative findings will be reported to the QA committee for review. The Regional Administrator will ensure the completion of the weekly audits. The Administrator is responsible for the ongoing compliance.
Failure to Timely Report and Properly Classify Allegation of Sexual Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to timely report an allegation of staff-to-resident sexual abuse to the state agency as required by policy. A resident with severe cognitive impairment, dementia, depression, and multiple medical conditions, who required extensive assistance of two staff for mobility and transfers, alleged that a male CNA attempted to put his genitalia in her mouth. The resident identified the alleged perpetrator by name and physical description, which matched a male CNA on duty. The social worker designee and the human resources director interviewed the resident the same morning, confirmed the description, and contacted the Administrator by phone while in the resident’s room, placing the Administrator on speaker so she could hear the interview and reported events. Despite the Administrator being made aware of the allegation on the same morning it occurred, the facility did not document the incident in the resident’s medical record and did not report the allegation of sexual abuse to the state agency at that time. The internal investigation file for that date contained only brief, non-witness statements from staff attesting generally to the CNA’s behavior, with no detailed statements from the social worker designee, the human resources director, the LPN caring for the resident, or the CNA accused. The investigation summary concluded that the resident was confused and combative during personal care and that no abuse occurred, and the facility relied in part on the resident’s son’s opinion that an investigation was not needed and that the resident might have a urinary tract infection. Subsequently, when an SRI was entered into the state’s reporting system, it was categorized as physical abuse rather than sexual abuse, and there was no SRI entered for the original date of the allegation. A police report later documented that the Administrator reported the incident as sexual in nature and stated that the facility was not made aware of the allegation until the resident’s son reported concerns, which conflicted with staff interviews confirming the Administrator’s awareness on the date of the incident. The facility’s own abuse policy required that any allegation or suspicion of all types of abuse be reported to the state agency prior to investigation, but the allegation of staff-to-resident sexual abuse was not reported as such when initially known, and the investigation was incomplete and poorly documented.
Plan Of Correction
This plan of correction does not constitute an admission to any of the allegations contained within the State of Deficiency. Rather, this plan of corrections has been prepared and executed because state and federal law require it, and not because Park Health Center agrees with the citation. The facility maintains that the alleged deficiency does not individually or collectively jeopardize the health and safety of the residents. This plan of correction is not meant to establish any standard of care contract, obligation or position, and Park Health Center reserves all rights to raise all possible contentions and defenses in any civil or criminal claim, action or proceeding. This plan of correction shall also operate as the facilities credible allegation of compliance. Please accept 4/10/2026 as our date of compliance. The facility will continue to report and investigate allegations of abuse thoroughly ensuring the safety and wellbeing of their residents. Resident #171 continues to reside at the facility and seen by CNP on 3/12/26 with no noted injuries or negative effects. Psych nurse practitioner assessed residents #171 on 3/19/26 with no changes noted to psychosocial wellbeing. Resident #171 denied any complaints and appeared calm and relaxed stating to the NP that she feels safe. CNA # 340, was suspended on 3/12/26 pending investigation. The Police department was called on 3/12/26 and reported to the facility. A thorough investigation completed and submitted on 3/19/26. Conclusion of abuse investigation noted no evidence that abuse occurred. HRD conducted new background check on CNA #340 on 3/26/26, no negative findings noted. Resident #171 care plan was reviewed by the IDT on 4/8/26. The regional Clinician conducted an Audit of last 3 months of incidents and progress notes ensuring allegations of abuse were reported timely and thoroughly investigated. Initial audit was completed on 4/6/26. No negative findings noted. On 4/6/26, the Administrator, Nurse Management team, SSD and HRD were reeducated on the facility policies and procedures for reporting allegations timely, conducting a thorough and factual investigation and ensuring perpetrators are removed from the facility for resident's safety to prevent further abuse. Reeducation was conducted by the Regional Clinician. A QA committee meeting was held on 4/8/26 reviewing survey results and findings, investigation and medical record documentation requirements, policy and procedures for abuse prevention and reporting abuse, SS policy and procedure, and facilities change in condition policy and procedure. Weekly for 2 weeks, or as directed by the QA committee, audits will be conducted by the regional clinician ensuring abuse allegations are investigated thoroughly, factually documented and reported, and ensuring identified perpetrators are removed from the facility as indicated. Negative findings will be corrected immediately by reporting allegation and conducting a thorough investigation and providing reeducation. Negative findings will be reported to the QA committee for review. The Regional Administrator will ensure the completion of the weekly audits. The Administrator is responsible for the ongoing compliance.
Failure to Provide and Document Medically Related Social Services After Alleged Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide and document medically related social services for a resident who experienced a significant psychosocial event related to an allegation of staff-to-resident sexual abuse. The resident, admitted with multiple diagnoses including stroke, depression, dementia, and severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance with mobility and had a care plan for mood and behavioral alterations, including delusional thinking and yelling out. Despite this, there was no documentation in the medical record of the alleged sexual abuse incident, no social services notes, and no psychosocial assessments entered between 03/10/26 and 03/19/26. The quarterly MDS showed severe depression with no documented change since the prior assessment, and the behavior and mood assessments reflected no behaviors since the prior annual assessment, despite the reported allegation. During an interview, the resident became guarded and defensive when asked about the alleged abuse, reported being told by the Administrator and police officers that she was safe and that the male staff member would no longer care for her, and refused to elaborate further. The social worker designee reported being informed of the allegation by an LPN, interviewing the resident when she was upset and yelling about a man trying to put his “thing” in her mouth, and confirming the description of the alleged perpetrator matched a CNA on duty. The social worker designee stated she met with the resident several times after the alleged incident to follow up on her emotional and cognitive status and to check in with her, but acknowledged she did not document the resident’s behaviors or allegations on the date of the incident, nor any follow-up visits or updated psychosocial assessments. This lack of documentation and failure to accurately record psychosocial needs and interactions conflicted with the written job responsibilities for the social worker designee.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will continue to provide SS support and document in medical record accordingly to ensure emotion needs and support of their residents. Resident #171 continue to reside at the facility. SSD followed up with resident #171 on 3/18/26 and documented in the medical record. Psych nurse practitioner assessed residents #171 on 3/19/26 with no changes noted to psychosocial wellbeing. Resident #171 denied any complaints and appeared calm and relaxed stating to the NP that she feels safe. Further SSD follow up was conducted on 3/27/26 with resident #171, no negative findings noted. On 4/6/26, the SSD conducted a psychosocial assessment on resident. On 4/8/26, Resident #171 care plan was reviewed by the IDT team. An initial audit was conducted of all current facility residents, by the Regional LISW-S, of the last 30 days ensuring SSD has proper follow up and documentation in medical record for changes in condition related to mood and behavior. Initial audit was completed on 4/6/26. The DON reviewed the facilities change in condition policy with SSD on 3/27/26. The Regional LISW-S, reviewed facility expectations for support of a resident with a change in condition and documentation requirements to ensure the psychosocial well-being of residents. Reeducation for facility SSD was completed on 3/31/26. A QA committee meeting was held on 4/8/26 reviewing survey results and findings, investigation and medical record documentation requirements, policy and procedures for abuse prevention and reporting abuse, SS policy and procedure, and facilities change in condition policy and procedure. Weekly for 2 weeks, or as directed by the QA committee, audits will be conducted by the Regional LISW-S all aspects of the resident's medical record including but not limited to: clinical and social service documentation, behavioral alerts and Point Click Care dashboard ensuring changes in condition are addressed by the SSD and documented accordingly. Negative findings will be corrected by reeducation and providing immediate support to residents. Negative findings will be reported to the QA committee for review. The Regional Administrator will ensure the weekly audits are completed. The Administrator is responsible for the ongoing compliance.
Failure to Report and Accurately Disclose Alleged Staff-to-Resident Sexual Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility Administrator’s failure to effectively administer the facility by not properly reporting and characterizing an allegation of staff-to-resident sexual abuse and by providing false information to police. The resident involved had multiple medical conditions including stroke, dementia with severe cognitive impairment, depression, and functional dependence requiring extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation. Her care plan noted alterations in mood and behaviors, including occasional delusional thinking and yelling out. On the morning in question, the resident reported that a male staff member tried to put his “thing” in her mouth, gesturing toward her own and the nurse’s private areas, and identified the alleged perpetrator by name and description, which matched a CNA on duty. Staff interviews showed that the allegation was promptly brought to facility leadership on the same morning it occurred. An LPN, after hearing the resident’s statements, reported the concern to the social worker designee because administration was not yet on site. The social worker designee and the Human Resources Director jointly interviewed the resident, who remained upset and repeated the allegation, and they confirmed that the CNA she identified matched the description she gave. The Human Resources Director called the Administrator on speaker phone during this interview so he could hear the resident’s statements and the reported events. The Administrator then spoke with the CNA by phone, in the presence of the social worker designee and Human Resources Director, and directed the CNA to leave the facility pending investigation. Despite being made aware of the allegation on the day it occurred, the Administrator did not report the allegation of sexual abuse to the state agency as required by the facility’s abuse policy, which mandates reporting all allegations or suspicions of abuse prior to investigation. Review of the state reporting system showed no self-reported incident for sexual abuse on the date of the allegation, and when an incident was later entered, it was reported as physical abuse rather than sexual abuse. Additionally, in a subsequent police report for a sex offense, the Administrator told law enforcement that the facility was not made aware of the allegation until the resident’s son reported concerns two days after the incident, which conflicted with consistent staff statements that the Administrator had been immediately informed on the day of the alleged abuse. These actions and omissions constituted a failure of effective facility administration.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will continue to report allegations of abuse timely. Resident #171 continues to reside at the facility. Initial self-reported incident for resident #171 allegation was filed on 3/12/26 by the Administrator. Facility CNP assessed resident #171 on 3/12/26 with no noted injuries or negative effects. Psych nurse practitioner assessed residents #171 on 3/19/26 with no changes noted to psychosocial wellbeing. Resident #171 denied any complaints and appeared calm and relaxed stating to the NP that she feels safe. A thorough investigation was completed and submitted on 3/19/26. State reported incident conclusion was that abuse did not occur, there was no evidence to substantiate abuse. CNA #340, was suspended on 3/12/26 pending investigation. Police department called on 3/12/26. Final summary of State reported incident was reported to police department by the Regional Clinician on 3/19/26. HRD conducted new background check on CNA #340 on 3/26/26, no negative findings noted. The regional Clinician conducted an Audit of last 3 months of incidents and progress notes ensuring allegations of abuse were reported timely, factually documented and thoroughly investigated. Initial audit was completed on 4/6/26. No negative findings noted. On 4/6/26, the Administrator, Nurse Management team, SSD and HRD were reeducated on the facility policies and procedures for reporting allegations timely, conducting a thorough and factual investigation and ensuring perpetrators are removed from the facility for resident's safety to prevent further abuse. Reeducation was conducted by the regional clinician. On 4/6/26, Administrator was reeducated on providing accurate information when reporting allegations of abuse including date of alleged occurrence. On 4/6/26, Administrator was reeducated on obtaining all information from all eye witness and staff with knowledge of allegation to ensure thorough and accurate investigation. A QA committee meeting was held on 4/8/26 reviewing survey results and findings, investigation and medical record documentation requirements, policy and procedures for abuse prevention and reporting abuse, SS policy and procedure, and facilities change in condition policy and procedure. Weekly for 2 weeks, or as directed by the QA committee, audits will be conducted by the regional clinician ensuring abuse allegations are investigated thoroughly, factually documented and reported, and ensuring identified perpetrators are removed from the facility as indicated. Audits will include but not limited to progress notes, incident reports and clinical alerts. Negative findings will be corrected immediately by reporting allegation and conducting thorough investigation and providing reeducation. Negative findings will be reported to the QA committee for review. The Regional Administrator will ensure the completion of the weekly audits. The Administrator is responsible for the ongoing compliance.
Failure to Accurately Document Resident’s Allegation of Sexual Abuse and Related Behaviors
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain an accurate and complete medical record for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple medical diagnoses, including stroke, dementia, depression, lung disease, and hypertension. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation, and had documented severe depression and a history of altered mood/behaviors with delusional thinking and yelling out. Despite this, the medical record contained no documentation of events related to an allegation of staff-to-resident sexual abuse that occurred on a specific date. On the morning of the alleged incident, a CNA reported to an LPN that the resident was combative when being assisted off a bedpan. When the LPN assessed the resident, the resident was very agitated and reported that a man tried to put his “thing” in her mouth, gesturing toward her own and the nurse’s private areas. The LPN acknowledged that not everything the resident said made sense but recognized the need to report the concern and informed the social worker designee. The LPN later entered a note in the medical record describing the resident as having increased delusions and false beliefs, with discomfort to the left wrist after becoming combative, and that the son stated the resident behaves this way with a UTI. However, the LPN did not document the resident’s specific statements, gestures, or emotional status from that assessment. The social worker designee reported being notified of the allegation that morning and, along with the human resources director, interviewed the resident, who was upset and yelling about a man trying to put his “thing” in her mouth, and identified a man by name and clothing description that matched the CNA. The social worker designee also noted the resident complained of right wrist pain and stated she had multiple follow-up contacts with the resident to assess emotional and cognitive status and to check in. Despite these interactions, the social worker designee confirmed that she did not document the resident’s behaviors, allegations, or any follow-up visits or psychosocial assessments in the medical record. The ADON verified that there was no documentation in the medical record of the incident, the nature of the delusions, or what led to the resident becoming combative, and that social services had made no entries for the resident during the period in question, resulting in an incomplete and inaccurate medical record related to the abuse allegation.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will continue to maintain accurate resident medical records. Resident #171 continues to reside at the facility and seen by CNP on 3/12/26 with no noted injuries or negative effects. Psych nurse practitioner assessed residents #171 on 3/19/26 with no changes noted to psychosocial wellbeing. Resident #171 denied any complaints and appeared calm and relaxed stating to the NP that she feels safe. Further SSD follow up was conducted on 3/27/26 with resident #171, no negative findings noted. On 4/8/26, Resident #171 care plan was reviewed by the IDT team on 4/8/26. On 3/18/2026, care conference was completed with son and Administrator reviewing allegation of sexual abuse discussing everything done throughout investigation. Son voiced understanding and was appreciative of the thoroughness of reviewing the matter. On 4/9/26, care conference was conducted with son and IDT team reviewing resident's medical record. Son voiced understand and had no concerns at this time. An initial audit was conducted, by the Regional LISW-S, of the last 30 days ensuring SSD has proper follow up and documentation in medical record for changes in condition related to mood and behavior. Initial audit was completed on 3/30/26. The DON reviewed the facilities change in condition policy with SSD on 3/27/26. The Regional LISW-S, reviewed Facility expectations for support of a resident with a change in condition and documentation requirements to ensure the psychosocial well-being of residents. Reeducation for facility SSD was completed on 3/31/26. The regional Clinician conducted an Audit of last 3 months of incidents and progress notes ensuring proper documentation is noted in resident's medical record related to incidents. Initial audit was completed on 4/6/26. No negative findings noted. On 4/6/26, the Administrator, Nurse Management team, and SSD were reeducated on the facility procedures for maintaining an accurate and complete record related to allegations of abuse, accidents and incidents and current changes in mood and behavior by the Regional Clinician. A QA committee meeting was held on 4/8/26 reviewing survey results and findings, investigation and medical record documentation requirements, policy and procedures for abuse prevention and reporting abuse, SS policy and procedure, and facilities change in condition policy and procedure. Weekly for 2 weeks, or as directed by the QA committee, the Regional Clinician or designee will audit facility incidents and accidents and allegations of abuse, ensuring accuracy in the medial record. Negative findings will be corrected immediately and reported to the QA committee for review. Weekly for 2 weeks, or as directed by the QA committee, audits will be conducted by the Regional LISW-S. Negative findings will be corrected by reeducation and providing immediate support to residents. Negative findings will be reported to the QA committee for review. The Regional Administrator will ensure the completion of the audits. The Administrator is responsible for the ongoing compliance.
Failure to Provide Care According to Orders and Resident Preferences
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when treatment and care were not provided in accordance with physician orders, as well as the resident's preferences and goals. The report notes a failure to ensure that care was individualized and aligned with the documented directives and wishes of the resident, as required by regulation.
Obstruction of Electronic Monitoring Device by RN
Penalty
Summary
A resident with impaired cognition, muscle wasting, and a recent right femur fracture was re-admitted to the facility and required assistance with personal care. The resident's power of attorney had authorized and installed a fixed-position, motion-activated video camera in the resident's room for electronic monitoring. On the date in question, video footage showed a registered nurse exiting the resident's bathroom, raising her hand to block her face from the camera, and then standing in front of the camera, which obscured the view of the resident as she was brought out of the bathroom. The camera, being motion-activated, stopped recording due to the obstruction. Facility policy on electronic monitoring explicitly prohibits intentional obstruction, tampering, or destruction of any electronic monitoring device or its recordings. The registered nurse later stated that her action was a reaction to the camera's recording light, as she disliked cameras. The Director of Nursing confirmed the incident after reviewing the video. This event demonstrated a failure to treat the resident with respect and dignity, as required by facility policy and resident rights.
Failure to Provide Resident Opportunity for Toileting
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a history of right femur fracture, muscle wasting, atrophy, and cognitive impairment was re-admitted to the facility and required moderate assistance for transfers. The resident was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel and had a care plan in place that included a toileting program and interventions to maintain cleanliness and monitor elimination. On the evening in question, video footage showed the resident requesting to use the bathroom, but the assigned CNA did not assist her to the toilet. Instead, the CNA instructed the resident to urinate in her incontinence brief, stating it was difficult for her to use the toilet due to her leg injury and that she would be cleaned up afterward. The CNA later confirmed in an interview that he did not redirect the resident appropriately and opted to have her use the brief because he was about to change her. The care plan interventions, which included providing opportunities for toileting, were not followed, and the resident was not given the chance to maintain her ability to perform activities of daily living related to toileting. This incident was identified through record review, policy review, video evidence, and staff interviews, and it affected one resident out of four reviewed for change in condition.
Deficient Food Storage and Sanitation Practices Identified
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed multiple failures in food storage and preparation practices within the facility's kitchen. During an initial tour, it was found that a bag of mixed vegetables and Charbroil burgers in the walk-in freezer had been opened and not resealed, leaving the contents exposed. In the walk-in refrigerator, 58 individual cartons of whole milk were present with a sell-by date that had already passed. Additionally, leftover chili was found without any date, and a five-pound carton of sour cream was discovered to be expired. A scoop was observed resting on the lid of a thickener container, not stored in a sanitary manner. Dust was noted on all four pipes over the stove cooktop on the ansel system, and the shelf above the cooktop was both dusty and greasy. An interview with the cook confirmed the presence of outdated, unsealed, and undated food items, as well as the unsanitary storage of the scoop and the dusty kitchen surfaces. Review of the facility's Food Storage-Labeling and Dating policy indicated that all food must be dated upon entry and after opening, with leftovers to be held for no more than seven days unless the manufacturer's expiration date is sooner. These observations and confirmations demonstrate that the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions, affecting all residents who receive nutrition from the kitchen.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will continue to ensure food is stored properly and prepared under sanitary conditions. Dietary Manager immediately threw away a bag of mixed vegetables, charbroil burgers, 58 cartons of Bordon whole milk, leftover chili, and a five-pound carton of Gordon Choice sour cream noted in the facility's initial tour on 3/24/2025. The Dietary Manager immediately cleaned the scoop on the lid of the thickener container, dust on all four pipes over the stove cooktop on the Ansul system, and dust/grease on the shelf over the cookout noted on the initial tour on 3/24/2025. An initial walk-through of the kitchen and storage areas was conducted by the Administrator on 3/28/2025, to ensure proper storage, labeling, and cleanliness of the kitchen. No negative findings were noted. The Administrator reeducated all dietary staff on the facility's food storage-labeling and dating policy, as well as the cleaning schedule, on 3/24/2025. Weekly, for two weeks, the Dietary Manager and/or designee will conduct an audit three times per week to ensure dietary staff is following facility policy regarding proper food storage and the cleaning schedule. Negative findings will be corrected immediately by reeducating dietary staff and reported to QA for review and recommendation. The Administrator will ensure the completion of weekly audits. The Administrator is responsible for ongoing compliance.
Inconsistent Advance Directive Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that advance directives were accurate and consistent for one resident. Upon review, the resident's electronic medical record indicated a change in code status from Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA) to Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) as ordered by the physician. However, the paper chart for the same resident still contained a signed DNRCCA form, which did not reflect the updated code status. This discrepancy was confirmed during an interview with a registered nurse, who acknowledged that the advance directives in the electronic and paper records did not match. The facility's policy required that copies of advance directives be placed on the chart, but the records were not updated to reflect the most current physician orders. The resident involved had multiple diagnoses, including epilepsy, atherosclerotic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, hyperlipidemia, COPD, schizoaffective disorder, angina, Parkinson's disease, and adult failure to thrive.
Plan Of Correction
This plan of correction does not constitute an admission to any of the allegations contained within the State of Deficiency. Rather, this plan of corrections has been prepared and executed because state and federal law require it, and not because Park Health Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center agrees with the citation. The facility maintains that the alleged deficiency does not individually or collectively jeopardize the health and safety of the residents. This plan of correction is not meant to establish any standard of care contract, obligation or position, and Park Health Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center reserves all rights to raise all possible contentions and defenses in any civil or criminal claim, action or proceeding. This plan of correction shall also operate as the facility's credible allegation of compliance. Please accept 4/22/2025 as our date of compliance. The facility will continue to ensure accurate advanced directives are maintained. On 3/25/2025, the unit nurse verified with resident #2 she wanted his advanced directives to remain a DNRCC. Order verified in her electronic medical record and the current DNRCCA form was replaced with signed DNRCC in her hard chart. An initial audit was conducted on 3/31/2025, by the facility DON with no negative findings noted on current residents' charts. The Regional clinical manager reviewed current facility process with Medical Records clerk, DON and ADON on 4/14/2025. By 4/17/2025, the DON and or designee will reeducate licensed nursing staff on facility process for obtaining advanced directives, maintaining advanced directives records, and managing changes to desired code status/advance directives. Weekly for 2 weeks, the DON and or designee will audit 5 random residents ensuring proper documentation and record keeping for current desired advanced directives. Negative findings will be corrected by ensuring proper records/orders, and reeducating staff. Negative findings will also be reported to the QA committee for review and recommendations. The DON is responsible for the ongoing compliance and the Administrator will review the weekly audits ensuring completion.
Failure to Reimburse Resident for Missing Cash
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with chronic atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease, who was cognitively intact, reported approximately $500 in cash missing from her purse, which she kept in her room. The resident's representative had recently cashed a check for $545, of which $500 remained in a banker's envelope. The resident stated she did not leave her purse unattended and always took it with her when leaving the room. The missing money was reported to facility staff, and a police report was filed at the resident's request. Staff interviews and a facility investigation did not reveal evidence of staff involvement or additional missing items among other residents or staff. Despite the investigation being unsubstantiated for staff misappropriation, the facility did not reimburse the resident for the missing $500. Interviews with the resident, the Ombudsman, and staff confirmed that the money was not returned or reimbursed. The facility administrator verified that no reimbursement was provided, as the investigation did not find evidence implicating staff in the misappropriation.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will continue to ensure residents are free of misappropriation. On 3/27/2025, the facility Administrator reimbursed resident #10 $500.00. The Regional Administrator reviewed and educated the Abuse/Misappropriation policy with the Administrator on 3/28/2025. An initial audit was conducted on 3/28/2025 by the facility Administrator to ensure no other misappropriation of residents' funds, with no negative findings noted. By 4/17/2025, the Administrator and/or designee will reeducate all staff on the facility's abuse/misappropriation policy. Weekly for 2 weeks, the Administrator and/or designee will review the missing item log, ensuring no additional misappropriation was reported. Negative findings will be corrected by ensuring missing items are investigated with resolution and staff reeducated. Negative findings will also be reported to the QA committee for review and recommendations. The Administrator is responsible for the ongoing compliance, and the Regional Administrator will review the weekly audits ensuring completion.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Care Plan for Psychotropic Medication Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for a resident who was receiving psychotropic medications. The resident, admitted with diagnoses including epilepsy, anxiety disorder, Parkinson's disease, and adult failure to thrive, was assessed as moderately impaired for daily decision making and was prescribed both antipsychotic and antianxiety medications. Despite these factors, the care plan did not include a measurable or comprehensive approach to the use of psychotropic medications, nor did it identify specific behaviors to be monitored in relation to the administration of antipsychotic drugs. A review of the resident's medical record and care plans confirmed the absence of targeted behaviors or monitoring parameters for the effectiveness of the antipsychotic medications. An interview with a registered nurse further verified that no care plan had been developed for the use of psychotropic medications and that there were no identified behaviors being tracked. Additionally, the facility did not have a policy in place regarding the use of psychotropic medications.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will continue to develop and implement comprehensive care plans. Resident #2 continues to reside in the facility. No negative effects noted. The comprehensive care plan was constructed by the MDS nurse for alteration in mood and behavior on 3/25/2025. Resident #2's current psychoactive care plan was reviewed and modified on 3/25/2025 by the facility MDS nurse. An initial audit of psychoactive care plans was completed by the MDS nurse on 4/15/2025, ensuring facility monitoring of the effectiveness of psychoactive drugs for targeted behaviors identified. Negative findings were corrected by updating care plans. The Interdisciplinary team, responsible for creating and revising a comprehensive care plan, was reeducated by the Regional Clinical Manager on 4/14/2025 to ensure the care plans meet the current needs of the resident. Weekly, for 2 weeks, the DON or designee will conduct a random audit of 5 residents who are taking psychoactive medications, ensuring monitoring for medication effectiveness for targeted behaviors is reflected on the care plan. Negative findings will be corrected immediately by updating the current care plan and reeducating staff. Negative findings will also be reported to the QA committee for review. The Administrator will ensure the completion of the weekly audits. The DON is responsible for ongoing compliance.
Failure to Update and Individualize Resident Care Plans
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect residents' current medical needs and preferences, as required by regulation. For one resident with multiple complex diagnoses, including morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, and dependence on dialysis, the care plan for dialysis was not individualized and did not specify the presence of a fistula used for hemodialysis access. This omission was confirmed by both the resident and a registered nurse, who acknowledged that the care plan lacked details about the specific type of dialysis access and the services required. Another resident, with a history of metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis, had care plans that were not revised to reflect significant changes in condition or preferences over an extended period. Despite a significant change assessment indicating moderate cognitive impairment, increased behavioral symptoms, and new medical interventions such as continuous tube feeding, the care plan was not updated to address these changes. Observations and staff interviews revealed ongoing refusals of care, changes in activity participation, and the importance of religious activities, none of which were reflected in the care plan until after the surveyor's inquiry. The deficiency was identified through record review, observation, and staff interviews, which demonstrated that the interdisciplinary team did not consistently review and revise care plans after assessments or significant changes in residents' conditions. The lack of timely and individualized updates to care plans affected the delivery of person-centered care for at least two residents reviewed during the survey.
Plan Of Correction
The Facility will continue to implement and revise care plans to meet the needs of each resident. Resident #26 and #133 continue to reside at the facility. Resident #26 Care plan for dialysis was revised by the MDS nurse on 3/26/2025 to ensure proper care for dialysis treatments. Resident #133 was reassessed by the Activities Director on 3/26/2025 and revised activities care plan on 3/26/2025. An initial audit was conducted by the MDS Nurse to ensure accuracy of current activity care plans for residents who are bed bound and did not participate in many activities. 9 residents were identified and reviewed. No negative findings were noted. Resident #26 is the facility's only dialysis patient at this time. No initial audit was needed to be completed at this time. The Interdisciplinary team, who are responsible for creating a comprehensive care plan, and revising care plans were reeducated by the Regional Clinical Manager on 4/14/25, to ensure the care plans meet the current needs of the resident. Weekly for 2 weeks, or as directed by the QA committee, the MDS nurse will audit care plans for residents on dialysis and 5 random residents for activities, ensuring care plans are meeting the needs of the residents. Negative findings will be reported to the QA committee. Negative findings will be corrected by updating the care plans and reeducating staff. The Administrator will ensure weekly completion of audits and the DON is responsible for the ongoing compliance.
Failure to Provide Routine Nail Care and Showers for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors found that the facility failed to provide necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), specifically routine nail care and showers, for two residents who were dependent on staff for these services. One resident, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and diabetes, was documented as dependent for bathing and required assistance with personal hygiene. Despite records indicating that showers and nail care were provided on specific dates, observations revealed the resident had long, dirty, and untrimmed fingernails on multiple occasions. The resident reported that staff did not cut or clean her fingernails, and a CNA confirmed the nails were untrimmed and unclean, stating that nail care should be completed with each shower. Another resident, diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, psychotic disorder, diabetes, and other conditions, was also dependent for bathing and had a documented preference for three to four showers per week. Interviews with the resident's wife indicated that the resident was not consistently receiving showers or oral care as preferred, sometimes receiving fewer than two showers per week. Review of records showed missed showers on several scheduled days, and on one occasion, a bed bath was provided instead of a shower without explanation. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident did not receive showers as scheduled and that decisions about showering were sometimes left to the resident's wife.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will continue to offer showers and nail care to dependent residents. Resident #9 and #70 continue to reside at the facility. On 3/25/2025, direct care staff offered nail care to resident #9 and resident #70, and both residents accepted. CNA #80 was reeducated on offering nail care if nails appear soiled or jagged in between shower frequency. Resident #2's care plan for ADLs was reviewed by the IDT. Resident #70 was offered a shower on 3/26/2025 and accepted. STNA #80 was reeducated by the Nurse Manager on 3/25/2025 to ensure offering showers per the resident's preference and proper documentation of showers and refusals of showers. An initial audit of residents' shower preferences was conducted on 4/10/2025 by the DON. Shower schedules were reviewed and updated as needed. An initial observation audit of residents' fingernails was conducted on 4/9/2025 by the DON. Negative findings were corrected by offering/performing nail care. By 4/17/2025, facility direct care staff and licensed nurses will be reeducated by the DON and nurse management team. Reeducation will consist of expectations of staff offering/providing daily grooming and hygiene care, such as but not limited to; showers per preference, hair care, oral care, dressing, shaving, and nail care. Weekly, for 2 weeks, or as directed by the QA committee, the DON and/or designee will audit 5 random residents, ensuring showers and nail care are provided. Negative findings will be corrected by offering the resident a shower and/or nail care and reeducating the staff. Negative findings will be reported to the QA committee for review. The Administrator will ensure the completion of the audits. The DON is responsible for the ongoing compliance.
Failure to Administer Ordered Anticoagulant After Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with a history of chronic atrial fibrillation, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was not administered an ordered anticoagulant medication (Eliquis) following a new diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. The resident had recently returned from the hospital, where conservative management with Eliquis was recommended due to a history of hematuria with the medication. Upon return to the facility, an order for Eliquis 5 mg twice daily was placed. Despite the order, the bedtime dose of Eliquis was not administered on the day of the resident's return because the medication was reportedly not available and was being delivered from the pharmacy. However, the Director of Nursing later confirmed that Eliquis was available in the facility's contingency medication box, but the nurse did not retrieve it. This failure to administer the medication as ordered was confirmed through medical record review and staff interview.
Plan Of Correction
The Facility will continue to ensure anticoagulants are administered as ordered. Resident #76 continues to reside at the facility. The DON reported missing doses to PCP, with no further recommendations needed. Nurse identified as marking medication as unavailable and not given was reeducated regarding the pharmacy contingency box that allows nurses to pull medications without waiting on pharmacy to deliver. An initial audit of residents on anticoagulant medication was conducted by the DON on 4/1/2025, ensuring medication was given timely and as ordered. No negative findings were noted. By 4/17/2025, licensed nurses will be reeducated by the DON on the pharmacy contingency box, ensuring medications such as anticoagulants are given timely and as ordered. Weekly for 2 weeks or as directed by the QA committee, the DON will randomly review 5 residents who are on an anticoagulant, ensuring they are receiving their medications as prescribed. Negative findings will be corrected immediately by reporting findings to the PCP for recommendations and reeducating the licensed nurse. Negative findings will be reported to the QA committee for review. The Administrator will ensure the completion of the weekly audits. The DON is responsible for the ongoing compliance.
Failure to Ensure Proper Functioning of Low Air Loss Mattress for Pressure Ulcer Prevention
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with multiple risk factors for pressure ulcers, including peripheral vascular disease, anemia, edema, and limited mobility, was not provided with a properly functioning low air loss mattress as ordered. The resident's care plan and physician orders specified the use of a low air loss mattress with perimeters, set according to weight and alternating pressure, with functionality checks required every shift. Despite these orders, observations on two consecutive days revealed that the mattress panel was blinking red, indicating low pressure, and the alarm had been muted. Staff had documented on the treatment administration record that the mattress was functioning, but direct observation contradicted this documentation. Multiple staff, including a registered nurse, wound nurse, and wound nurse practitioner, were either unaware of the malfunction or did not notice the low-pressure indicator and muted alarm during their assessments and rounds. The mattress remained in use while malfunctioning, and the issue was not identified or addressed until it was brought to the attention of staff during the survey. The resident was observed lying in bed on the malfunctioning mattress, and staff were unable to confirm whether all air cells were properly inflated due to the mattress cover and the resident being in bed. The facility's operational manual for the mattress clearly states that a low-pressure indicator and alarm are designed to alert staff to malfunctions, and the facility's policy requires monitoring and revising interventions as appropriate. However, the required checks and responses to the alarm were not performed, resulting in the resident not receiving care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will continue to ensure low air loss mattresses are functioning properly. Resident #240 continues to reside at the facility. On 3/25/2025, the Administrator removed the mattress and pump and replaced it with a functioning mattress and pump. Resident #240's skin was assessed and noted with no new identified areas. RN #60 was reeducated by the facility wound nurse on properly monitoring the low air loss mattresses for proper functioning. An initial audit of current residents with low air loss mattresses was conducted for function on 3/27/2025 by the DON. No negative findings were noted at the time of the audit. By 4/17/2025, the DON and/or designee will reeducate the licensed nurses and direct care staff on ensuring proper function of low air loss mattresses and how to troubleshoot alarms to pumps per manufacturer guidelines. Weekly, for 2 weeks, or as directed by the QA committee, the facility wound nurse and/or designee will randomly audit 5 residents, ensuring the low air loss mattress is set properly, functioning, and not alarming. Negative findings will be immediately corrected by assessing the mattress and resident and replacing the mattress as appropriate. Negative findings will also be reported to the QA committee for review. The facility Administrator will ensure the completion of the weekly audits. The DON is responsible for the ongoing compliance. F 0686
Failure to Administer Ordered Antibiotic for UTI Due to Medication Unavailability
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident admitted with a urinary tract infection (UTI) did not receive prescribed antibiotic treatment as ordered. The resident, who had diagnoses including UTI, low back pain, muscle weakness, dementia, and depression, was ordered Cefpodoxime 200 mg, two tablets by mouth twice daily for three days. Medical record review showed that the medication was not administered as scheduled on multiple occasions due to its unavailability. Specifically, doses were missed on the evening of admission and on both scheduled times the following two days. The first dose was not given until three days after admission, and the antibiotic course was completed late. Documentation revealed that while the physician was notified on the day of admission that the medication was not available and had been ordered from the pharmacy, there was no evidence that the physician was notified on subsequent days when the medication continued to be unavailable and not administered. The DON confirmed the medication was not in the facility's contingency medication box and that pharmacy delivery was delayed. The resident experienced an episode of unresponsiveness during this period, and the physician was updated about the resident's condition, but not specifically about the ongoing lack of antibiotic administration.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will continue to ensure antibiotics are administered as ordered to treat urinary tract infections. Resident #236 continues to reside at the facility and has completed her round of ATB for UTI. Resident assessed by 4/10/2025 and was noted to be free of s/s of UTI. Immediate reeducation on transcribing orders was conducted by the DON with licensed nurse who readmitted resident #236 for hospital. An initial audit of antibiotic use in the last 30 days was conducted by DON on 4/17/2025. The DON reviewed ATB for proper administration and timely administration of antibiotics. No negative findings were noted. By 4/17/2025, the DON and or designee will reeducate licensed nurses on proper transcription of antibiotic orders, ensuring timely administration, and notifying PCP when medications are not available to be given. Weekly for 2 weeks, or as directed by the QA committee, the DON or designee will audit antibiotic orders ensuring proper transcription of orders and that they were administered timely and as prescribed. Negative findings will be corrected by notifying the practitioner and reeducating staff. Negative findings will be reported to the QA committee for review. The Administrator will ensure completion of the weekly audits. The DON is responsible for the ongoing compliance.
Failure to Provide Individualized Dialysis Care and Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified in the care of a resident requiring dialysis services. The resident, who had multiple complex diagnoses including chronic kidney disease stage 4, dependence on renal dialysis, and a right arm fistula for dialysis access, did not have an individualized dialysis care plan. The care plan was generic and failed to specify the presence of a fistula or the specific care required for it. Physician orders did not include instructions to check for bruit and thrill in the fistula or to avoid taking blood pressure in the affected arm. Additionally, orders referenced a vascath, which the resident did not have, and included instructions for dressing care that were not consistent with the resident's actual needs. Staff interviews and record reviews revealed that nurses were signing off on dressing changes for the fistula site even though the resident reported and was observed not to have a dressing in place after dialysis. Nurses also confirmed that the care plan and orders were not updated to reflect the resident's current dialysis access and required monitoring. The lack of specific orders and individualized care planning resulted in the resident not receiving appropriate monitoring and care for the dialysis fistula, as required by professional standards and the resident's care needs.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will continue to ensure appropriate care is provided for residents receiving dialysis. Resident #26 continues to reside at the facility and receive dialysis services. On 3/26/2025, the licensed nurse reviewed orders with the PCP and updated orders to reflect current care needs and emergency care needs for his fistula. Resident #26's care plan was reviewed by the MDS nurse on 3/26/2025, to ensure we are addressing care needs for the fistula. Resident #26 is the facility's only dialysis patient at this time. No initial audit was needed to be completed at this time. On 4/14/2025, the Regional clinician reviewed facility practices for ensuring proper treatment for dialysis patients with the nursing IDT. This review included comprehensive care planning and revision, order sets to ensure the facility is meeting the needs of current dialysis patients, and reviewing dialysis notes to ensure awareness of treatment changes and orders. By 4/17/2025, licensed nurses will be reeducated regarding transcribing and monitoring for different types of dialysis access such as a fistula and/or vascath to ensure proper monitoring and proper documentation of a medical record to meet the needs of the patient. Weekly, for 2 weeks, or as directed by the QA committee, the DON or designee will audit residents receiving dialysis, ensuring proper orders are in place and care plans are updated to manage care needs. Findings will be corrected by reporting to the PCP and obtaining orders. Reeducation will be provided to licensed nursing staff. Negative findings will also be reported to the QA committee for review. The Administrator will ensure weekly completion of the audits. The DON is responsible for the ongoing compliance.
Delayed Medication and Vaccine Administration Due to Pharmacy Errors
Penalty
Summary
The pharmacy failed to ensure timely availability of medications for multiple residents, resulting in missed or delayed administration of prescribed drugs and vaccines. One resident with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease did not receive their scheduled Ozempic injection because the medication was not available at the time of administration. The registered nurse confirmed that the medication should have been reordered and available, but a pharmacy error led to the delay. Another resident, admitted with obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and overactive bladder, consented to receive the Prevnar 20 pneumococcal vaccine. Despite multiple orders and documentation attempts, the vaccine was not received from the pharmacy and was not administered as scheduled. The directors of nursing were unaware of the reason for the delay and had to follow up with the pharmacy, which repeatedly failed to deliver the vaccine as expected. A third resident, admitted with a urinary tract infection and other conditions, was prescribed Cefpodoxime, an antibiotic, to be administered twice daily for three days. The medication was not available in the facility's contingency box, and the pharmacy did not deliver it until several days after the initial order. As a result, the resident missed multiple doses, and there was no documented evidence that the physician was notified of the missed doses on two of the days.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will continue to ensure medications are available timely for administration. Resident #64 continues to reside at the facility and received his Ozempic on 3/26/2025. Resident #236 continues to reside at the facility and has completed her round of ATB for UTI without negative effects. Resident #238 continues to reside at the facility and received her Prevar 20 vaccine on 3/27/2025. Resident #236 was assessed by facility nurse on 4/10/2025 and was noted to be free of s/s of UTI. An initial audit of all medications to ensure timely availability for administration was conducted by DON 4/10/2025. No negative findings were noted. The DON and Administrator reviewed survey findings with facility pharmacist on 4/18/2025. The Administrator, DON and IDT reviewed facility processes for pharmacy orders and deliveries on 4/17/2025. Infection preventionist will monitor deliveries and administration of vaccinations and antibiotics ensuring they are provided timely. Admission orders will be reviewed in clinical meetings ensuring medications are available and given timely. By 4/17/2025, the DON and or designee will reeducate licensed nurses on proper transcription of pharmacy orders, ensuring timely administration, and notifying PCP when medications are not available to be given. Weekly for 2 weeks, or as directed by the QA committee, the DON or designee will audit medication orders ensuring proper transcription of orders and that they were administered timely and as prescribed. Negative findings will be corrected by notifying practitioner and reeducating staff. Negative findings will be reported to the QA committee for review. The Administrator will ensure completion of the weekly audits. The DON is responsible for the ongoing compliance.
Failure to Administer Medication per Ordered Parameters
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with multiple diagnoses, including chronic atrial fibrillation, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pulmonary embolism, was administered Midodrine outside of the prescribed parameters. The physician's order specified that Midodrine 10 mg should be given three times daily for hypotension, but only if the resident's systolic blood pressure was 110 or less. Despite this, the medication was administered on several occasions when the resident's systolic blood pressure was above 110, as documented in the Medication Administration Record. Specifically, the medication was given on multiple dates when the resident's systolic blood pressure readings ranged from 112 to 120, contrary to the order. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the medication was administered outside the specified parameters on several occasions, based on both the MAR and staff interviews. The nurse responsible acknowledged that if the medication was signed off as administered, it was indeed given, despite the blood pressure readings being above the ordered threshold.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will continue to ensure medications are administered per physician order. Resident #76 continues to reside at the facility. On 4/1/2025, the DON reviewed the current medication order for midodrine and parameters with resident’s Dr. Chiu. Dr. Chiu reviewed current blood pressures and ordered midodrine to be given daily and to discontinue blood pressure parameters to hold medication. An initial audit was conducted by the DON reviewing medications to treat hypertension and hypotension to ensure current medications with parameters are being followed. Negative findings were reported to the PCP for review and further recommendations. By 4/17/2025, the DON and/or designee will reeducate licensed nursing staff on ensuring they are following the direction in the electronic MAR when completing a medication administration. Ensuring notifications are conducted timely when blood pressure results are outside the parameters given by the prescriber, following those parameters, and properly documenting in the medical record. Weekly for 2 weeks or as directed by the QA committee, the DON will randomly audit residents on hypertensive or hypotensive medications ensuring parameters are being followed, prescribers are notified as directed, and proper documentation is recorded in the medical record. Negative findings will be reported to the QA committee for review. Negative findings will be corrected by notifying the prescriber and reeducating staff. The Administrator will ensure completion of weekly audits. The DON is responsible for the ongoing compliance.
Failure to Follow Antibiotic Stewardship Protocols for Influenza Case
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident met the appropriate criteria for antibiotic treatment as part of its antibiotic stewardship program. A resident with a history of obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and overactive bladder was admitted and later developed respiratory symptoms, including cough and slight dizziness. Diagnostic studies were ordered, and the resident tested positive for Influenza A. Despite this, the resident was prescribed doxycycline, an antibiotic, and prednisone, a steroid, for treatment of Influenza A, and received these medications for several days. Medical record review showed that the resident did not meet the McGeer criteria for antibiotic treatment of influenza, as the required combination of symptoms was not documented. The resident had a fever and cough, but there was no evidence of at least three additional symptoms such as chills, headache, myalgias, malaise, or sore throat, as required by the criteria. Additionally, although a chest x-ray was ordered to rule out pneumonia, there was no evidence in the records that this diagnostic test was completed. The infection control log indicated that the resident met criteria for antibiotic treatment, but this was not supported by the documented clinical findings or by CDC guidelines, which state that influenza should not be treated with antibiotics. The facility's own policy required the use of McGeer and Loeb criteria to determine the necessity of antibiotics, and prescriptions were to be reassessed for appropriateness based on diagnostic results and clinical status. These protocols were not followed in this case, resulting in the inappropriate use of antibiotics.
Plan Of Correction
The facility will continue to ensure criteria for antibiotic use is being met. Resident #238 continues to reside at the facility. The resident has completed antibiotic treatment with no adverse effects. An initial audit of the last 30 days of antibiotic (ATB) use was conducted by the DON and infection preventionist on 4/17/2025. No negative findings were noted. On 4/14/2025, the Regional Clinician met with the Senior DON, Facility DON (infection preventionist), and Nurse Managers to review current policies and procedures for ATB stewardship. By 4/17/2025, the licensed nursing staff will be reeducated on ATB stewardship, criteria for antibiotic use, and clarifying antibiotic orders when they don't meet criteria, ensuring the rationale is documented in the medical record. Weekly, for 2 weeks or as directed by the QA committee, the DON and/or designee will audit 3 residents on ATB to ensure symptom criteria are met to treat with antibiotics. Negative findings will be reported to the QA committee, and the prescriber will be notified for clarification and rationale for treatment if continuing ATB. The Administrator will ensure the completion of the weekly audits. The DON is responsible for ongoing compliance.
Failure to Provide Adequate Assistance and Proper Positioning in Geri Chair
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided adequate and proper assistance, following manufacturer's guidelines to reposition in a geriatric (geri) chair, which led to an accident with injury. Resident #1, who had severe cognitive impairment and required physical assistance with activities of daily living, suffered a deep laceration on the right inner leg while being repositioned in a geri chair by an STNA. The incident occurred when the STNA attempted to change the resident's position from reclining to sitting, and the chair malfunctioned, causing the resident's leg to get caught and injured. The facility's investigation did not provide conclusive evidence on the cause of the chair malfunction or whether the STNA had ensured proper positioning of the resident before attempting to change the chair's position. The resident's medical record indicated multiple diagnoses, including heart failure, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and osteoarthritis. The care plan required staff assistance with activities of daily living and interventions to maintain proper body alignment and reposition the resident for comfort. On the day of the incident, the STNA transported the resident in a reclined position to the dining room and attempted to place the resident in an upright position. The chair malfunctioned, causing the resident's leg to get caught between the leg rest and the frame of the chair, resulting in a severe laceration that required emergency medical attention and 28 sutures. Interviews with staff and family members revealed that the chair used during the incident had not been approved by facility therapy staff for the resident prior to use. Additionally, the STNA did not reposition or check the resident's positioning before transporting or attempting to change the chair's position. The facility's investigation lacked evidence of proper assessment and training for staff on the use of geri chairs, and there was no documented evidence of employee training related to resident safety and positioning. The facility's policy on resident handling and transfers was not adequately followed, leading to the incident and injury of Resident #1.
Latest citations in Ohio
Surveyors found that multiple hazardous storage areas, including a closet near medical records, a beauty salon used to store chemical cases, a supply room in one nursing station, a room leading to a smoking area, a housekeeping room near therapy, and a lobby storage room, lacked required self-closing or automatic-closing doors. These conditions did not comply with NFPA 101 requirements for hazardous area enclosure and had the potential to affect all residents and staff in an emergency.
Surveyors found that the facility did not conduct fire drills on every shift each quarter and did not vary drill conditions as required by NFPA 101. Record review showed that one shift lacked a documented drill for an entire quarter, and the pattern of drill times and dates did not demonstrate varied conditions. The Maintenance Director confirmed the incomplete and noncompliant fire drill schedule, which affected all residents and staff emergency preparedness.
Surveyors found that the facility did not maintain clear egress corridors as required by NFPA 101, with a TV/video cart plugged into a corridor outlet and multiple unsecured chairs placed in the hallway near resident rooms and the secured unit dining room, including directly in front of a fire extinguisher. These items projected about 29 inches into an approximately eight-foot-wide corridor and were located in front of the handrail, potentially affecting 28 residents and staff’s ability to assist in an emergency. The Maintenance Director confirmed these corridor obstructions during the survey.
A resident with intact cognition receiving Medicare Part A skilled services for metabolic encephalopathy had services discontinued while benefit days remained, but the facility did not issue the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN). The Social Services Director later confirmed that no SNF ABN was provided and reported she believed only a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was needed when all skilled services were stopped. This practice conflicted with the facility’s written policy, which required SNF ABNs to be issued when extended care items or services were initiated, reduced, or terminated due to expected non-coverage by Medicare.
Surveyors identified that the facility exceeded the acceptable medication error rate when two residents with type 2 DM received insulin doses that were not administered according to orders or manufacturer instructions. In two separate observations, an LPN administered Novolog and another LPN administered insulin glargine and insulin lispro without priming the insulin pens, and the insulin lispro and Novolog were given after the residents had already consumed a significant portion of their breakfast meals, despite orders for administration before meals. Manufacturer information for both insulin products required priming before each injection to ensure accurate dosing, and facility policy required medications, including insulin, to be administered safely, timely, and in accordance with prescriber orders and specified time frames.
A cognitively intact resident with behavioral issues, including physical aggression and noncompliance with care, was in a secured unit and was observed tapping on the window/door. A dietary aide, despite being told by a CNA and an RN not to enter the secured unit and that the resident’s assigned aide could assist, went onto the unit and interacted with the resident, including offering to buy a soda after seeing money in the resident’s hand. The resident struck the aide in the face, and the aide responded by punching the resident in the face; a CNA reported hearing the aide say, “I will hit you again,” and then observed the resident bleeding. The resident was later found at the hospital to have an open mandibular fracture and non-restorable teeth requiring extraction, and the facility’s investigation and policy definitions led to the incident being substantiated as staff-to-resident physical abuse.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, osteoporosis, and total dependence for transfers was being moved from bed to wheelchair with a mechanical lift when CNAs reported that an undersized sling and a forceful pull on the lift caused the resident to fall feet‑first from the sling, with staff catching the upper body while both legs struck the floor and one leg bent behind. Witnesses heard a loud pop and observed immediate pain, bruising, swelling, and deformity of the leg, yet the responding LPN did not complete a thorough musculoskeletal assessment, did not document a fall, and the physician and resident representative were not promptly informed of a suspected injury. Through the night and into the next day, staff and the roommate reported the resident crying out in pain and an obviously abnormal leg, but nursing notes only reflected intermittent acetaminophen administration without clear pain documentation, and the physician was contacted primarily about yelling and behavior. Mobile X‑rays obtained later showed a displaced distal femur fracture, which was not reviewed until the following day, when hospital imaging confirmed a closed displaced comminuted femur fracture and a hand fracture. The facility’s internal investigation was incomplete and inaccurate, with leadership denying a fall, preparing a single typed statement minimizing the event, and having multiple staff sign it despite later testimony that the statement was false and that staff were told not to discuss the incident.
Surveyors found multiple instances of improper food storage and labeling, including undated and unlabeled opened dairy products, beverages, and prepared foods in the main walk-in cooler and freezer, as well as a serving scoop left resting directly on stored pasta. Additional issues included covered but undated pre-poured juices, milk, and thickened beverages in a reach-in cooler used for tray line, and a nurses' station refrigerator containing a dated bag of a resident’s food from over a week prior and three undated half-sandwiches. In a resident’s personal refrigerator, staff confirmed three undated bags of grapes with visible mold. These conditions did not comply with facility policies requiring cold foods to be stored off the floor, wrapped or covered, labeled, dated, and for resident refrigerators to be monitored daily with unsafe or moldy food discarded.
Surveyors found unsanitary kitchen conditions, including a dirty tray holding clean pitchers, soiled storage carts containing clean dishware and disposables, and multiple trays of open juice in a reach-in refrigerator that were unlabeled and undated. In a walk-in refrigerator, they observed a bag of bologna marked only with a freeze date, lacking a thaw or use-by date, and appearing slimy and discolored. Observation of the high-temp dishwasher showed rinse temperatures below the 180°F minimum required for hot water sanitizing, and review of several months of temperature logs revealed repeated sub-minimum wash and rinse temperatures and numerous missing entries. Facility policies required dishwashing to meet specified temperature standards and all refrigerated foods to be covered, labeled, and dated with a use-by date, but these requirements were not consistently followed.
Surveyors found that the facility did not maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment as required by its policy. In one shared bedroom, wallpaper was peeling in several areas, including behind each bed, below a window, and near baseboards, and a black substance was present around the base of the toilet. A CNA confirmed these conditions. In addition, three cracked or broken light covers were observed in a hall restroom. These environmental issues affected two residents and had the potential to affect all residents.
Failure to Maintain Self-Closing Doors for Multiple Hazardous Storage Areas
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to hazardous area protection and door requirements under NFPA 101, 2012 Edition. During facility tours, they observed that multiple hazardous storage areas did not have self-closing or automatic-closing doors as required for hazardous areas such as combustible storage and chemical storage. These areas included a closet next to medical records, a beauty salon being used to store cases of chemicals, a supply room in Station #2, and the room leading to the smoking area in Station #3. On a subsequent tour, surveyors observed additional hazardous areas without self-closing doors. The housekeeping room across from therapy and the lobby storage room were both noted to lack self-closing door mechanisms. The facility census at the time was 59 residents, and the surveyors stated that this deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and staff's ability to assist in an emergency. The Maintenance Director verified these findings at the time they were observed.
Plan Of Correction
K 0321 This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be admissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as its allegation of substantial compliance as of 06/12/2026 K-0321 Doors with Self-Closing Devices Corrective action for resident/s: 1. The closet door next to medical records was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add self-closing device to closet door next to medical records on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 2. The beauty salon had chemicals stored in it on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director moved chemicals from beauty salon on 05/20/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 3. The supply room on station 2 was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add self-closing door to supply room on station 2 on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 4. The room to the smoking area on station 3 was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add a self-closing door to the smoking are on station 3 on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 4. The housekeeping room across from therapy was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add a self-closing door to the housekeeping room across from therapy gym on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 5. The lobby storage room was lacking a self-closing door on 5/19/2026. Maintenance director to add a self-closing door to the lobby storage room on or before 06/12/2026 in accordance with applicable code. Identification of other residents who may be affected: LNHA and Maintenance director/designee completed a full facility audit for doors with self-closing devices on 05/26/2026. Any corrective action, including, doors identified as needing self-closures will be added on or before 06/09/2026 in accordance with applicable code. Measures for systemic change: LNHA educated Maintenance Director on 05/26/2026 regarding NFPA 101-2012 sections 19.3.2.1 and 19.3.5.9 specifically regarding doors with self-closing devices. How Corrective Action will be monitored Ongoing "Doors with Self-Closing device audit" to be completed weekly x 2 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 06/12/2026
Failure to Conduct Required Quarterly Fire Drills on All Shifts
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct fire drills in accordance with NFPA 101, 2012 Edition, sections 19.7.1 through 19.7.1.8, specifically by not holding drills every shift each quarter and not varying drill conditions as required. Record review on 06/09/25 at approximately 10:32 A.M. showed there was no fire drill conducted for the first shift during the third quarter. The documented first-shift fire drills occurred on 01/30/26 at 2:42 P.M., 04/30/26 at 1:51 P.M., and 10/31/25 at 10:58 A.M., indicating a missed quarter. Second-shift fire drills were recorded on 02/26/26 at 5:20 P.M., 06/03/25 at 4:35 P.M., 08/29/25 at 3:46 P.M., and 11/25/25 at 5:09 P.M., and third-shift drills on 02/28/26 at 11:47 P.M., 05/30/25 at 12:18 A.M., 07/22/25 at 11:34 P.M., 09/26/25 at 11:40 P.M., and 12/15/25 at 5:17 A.M. The surveyor determined that drills were not conducted under varied conditions and that the required quarterly drill on each shift was not consistently performed. The Maintenance Director confirmed these findings at the time they were identified, and the deficiency had the potential to affect all 59 residents and staff response in an emergency. No specific residents, medical histories, or clinical conditions were described in the report; the deficiency related to facility-wide emergency preparedness practices and documentation of fire drills.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as an allegation of substantial compliance as of 05/29/2026 K-0712 Fire Drills Corrective action for resident/s: There were no records of a fire drill for the first shift of the third quarter of 2025. First shift fire drill completed on 5/24/2026 by maintenance director/designee with no findings or corrective action necessary. Identification of other residents who may be affected: On 5/26/2026 Maintenance director/designee completed 100% audit of the scheduled fire drills to ensure a drill is scheduled quarterly each shift with no findings or corrective action necessary. Measures for systemic change: LNHA educated Maintenance Director on 05/26/2026 regarding NFPA 101-2012 section 19.7.1.4 through 19.7.1.7. specifically including fire drill frequency requirements. How Corrective Action will be monitored Ongoing "Fire Drill Audit" to be completed weekly x 2 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 05/29/2026
Obstructed Egress Corridors Due to Equipment and Chairs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain required clear egress widths in corridors in accordance with NFPA 101, 2012 Edition, sections 19.2.3.4 through 19.2.3.5 and 7.3.2 through 7.3.2.3, creating projections into the egress corridor that exceeded allowable limits. Surveyors observed that on one day in Station #3, a cart with a television and video equipment was plugged into an outlet in the corridor by room 38, and five activity room chairs were placed in the corridor near the secured unit dining room directly in front of a fire extinguisher. On the following day, surveyors again observed chairs in the Station #3 corridor, with four by room 35 and four by the activities room, and the same television cart still in the corridor; the chairs were not secured. The corridor was approximately eight feet wide, and the projections extended approximately 29 inches into the corridor in front of the handrail. These conditions had the potential to affect 28 residents in the facility and the staff’s ability to assist in an emergency, and the Maintenance Director confirmed the observations at the time of discovery. No specific resident medical histories or conditions were described in the report, only that 28 residents were potentially affected and the facility census was 59.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be subsequent remedial measures and should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as an allegation of substantial compliance as of 05/29/2026 K-0232 Clear path of egress Corrective action for resident/s: 1. On 05/18/2026 station 3 had a cart with a television parked in the corridor by room 38 that exceeded allowable limits. Maintenance director/designee moved the TV cart into the activity room, out to the corridor on 05/18/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 2. On 5/18/2026 station 3 had 5 chairs in the corridor near the dining room directly in front of the fire extinguisher. Maintenance director/designee moved the chairs into the dining room, out of the corridor on 5/18/2026 in accordance with applicable code. 3. On 5/19/2026 station 3 had 4 chairs by the activity room and 4 by room 35. In addition, the TV cart was in the corridor. The maintenance director/designee moved the chairs and TV cart into the dining room, out of the corridor on 5/19/2026 in accordance with applicable code. Identification of other residents who may be affected: Maintenance director/designee completed a 100% facility audit for clear paths of egress on 5/26/26 with no findings or corrective action necessary. Measures for systemic change: Maintenance Director/designee educated staff on 5/26/2026 regarding NFPA 101-2012 section 19.2.3.4 and 19.2.3.5 specifically including maintaining a clear path of egress. How Corrective Action will be monitored Ongoing "Path of Egress Audit" to be completed weekly x 2 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 05/29/2026
Failure to Issue Required SNF ABN When Discontinuing Medicare Part A Services
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to issue a Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) when Medicare Part A services were discontinued for a resident who still had available benefit days. The resident was admitted with a diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy and had intact cognition per the Minimum Data Set assessment. The facility’s own SNF Beneficiary Notification Review documented that Medicare Part A skilled services began on 02/11/26 and the last covered day was 03/11/26, and that the facility initiated discharge from Medicare Part A services before the resident’s benefit days were exhausted. Despite this, no SNF ABN was provided to the resident or the resident’s representative. During interviews, the Social Services Director stated that the SNF ABN was issued hours prior to the last covered day but, upon reviewing her files, confirmed that no SNF ABN had actually been issued for this resident. She further explained that she believed an SNF ABN was only required if one skilled service remained and that if all skilled services were being discontinued, only the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) needed to be issued. The Administrator, however, stated that a resident should always receive both a SNF ABN and a NOMNC when Medicare Part A services are discontinued and benefit days remain. Review of the facility’s written policy dated 03/28/23 showed that the facility was required to issue SNF ABNs for initiation, reduction, or termination of extended care items or services when Medicare payment was not expected, which did not occur in this case.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as its allegation of substantial compliance as of 05/29/2026 F-0582 Corrective action for resident/s: On 5/14/26 Resident #34 was informed of rights and responsibilities related to Advanced Beneficiary Notice and voiced understanding of information for future reference by administrator. Identification of other residents who may be affected: Any resident receiving skilled services from nursing or therapy services. The Administrator audited all residents who were discharged from skilled services in the past 30 days to ensure they were issued a Notice of Non-Coverage and Advanced Beneficiary Notice on 5/29/26. No non-compliance was noted. Measures for systemic change: On 5/14/2026 Business Office Manager, Director of Rehab, Minimum Data Set nurse, Director of Nursing and Social Services Director were educated on proper procedure of issuing of Notice Of Medicare Non Coverage and Advanced Beneficiary Notice by administrator. All upcoming discharges from skilled services will be reviewed weekly at Utilization Review meeting to ensure notices will be delivered timely. How Corrective Action will be monitored: Administrator or designee to complete audits of all residents being discharged from skilled services to ensure they were issued a Notice of Non-Coverage and Advanced Beneficiary. This audit will be completed weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance 5/29/26
Insulin Administration Errors and Failure to Prime Insulin Pens
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, with surveyors identifying 3 errors out of 28 medication administration opportunities, resulting in a 10.71% error rate. For one resident with type 2 diabetes mellitus and moderate cognitive impairment, the physician’s order directed Novolog insulin 10 units via subcutaneous pen-injector to be given before meals. During an observed medication pass, the LPN administered 10 units of Novolog insulin without priming the pen and did so after the resident had already consumed approximately 50% of the breakfast meal. The LPN later confirmed she did not prime the pen and acknowledged that the insulin was ordered to be administered prior to meals. Manufacturer instructions for the Novolog FlexPen specified that an air shot (priming) must be performed before each injection to ensure proper dosing. Another resident, also diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and with intact cognition, had orders for insulin glargine 35 units subcutaneously twice daily and insulin lispro 20 units subcutaneously before meals, plus 12 units subcutaneously if blood glucose was between 251 mg/dL and 300 mg/dL. During an observed medication administration, an LPN administered 35 units of insulin glargine and 32 units of insulin lispro without priming the insulin pens and after the resident had consumed approximately 90% of the breakfast meal, despite orders for insulin lispro to be given before meals. The LPN later stated she could not remember if she had primed the pen and acknowledged that the insulin was ordered to be administered prior to meals. Manufacturer information for insulin lispro stated that the pen must be primed before each injection to confirm insulin delivery and remove air, and that failure to prime could result in too much or too little insulin. The DON confirmed the expectation that insulin be administered as ordered, including priming each pen with two units before dialing the prescribed dose, and facility policy required medications, including insulin, to be administered safely, timely, and in accordance with prescriber orders and required time frames.
Plan Of Correction
This Plan of Correction is submitted as required under State and Federal law. This Plan of Correction does not constitute an admission on the part of the Facility that the findings cited are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency or that the scope and severity regarding the deficiency cited are correctly applied. Any changes to the Facility's policies and procedures should be inadmissible in any proceeding on that basis. Without admitting or denying the validity or the existence of the alleged noncompliance, the Facility submits this Plan of Correction with the intention that it be inadmissible by any third party in any civil or other action against the facility or any employee, agent, officer, director or shareholder of the Facility. The Facility is utilizing this Plan of Correction as an allegation of substantial compliance as of 5/29/2026. F-0759 Corrective action for resident/s: Residents #21 and #22 were assessed and evaluated by nurse and Director of Nursing 5/14/26. Resident #21 and #22 both denied any adverse effects and none were noted upon assessment by the Director of Nursing on 5/14/2026. Notification made to physician on 5/14/2026. LPN # 2 competency Eval on insulin administration with the Director of Nursing completed 5/14/2026. Identification of other residents who may be affected: Diabetic residents on assignment of LPN #2/station 2 have the potential to be affected and were assessed by the DON/Designee on 5/14/26 and found to be within normal limits. Measures for systemic change: All Nurses were educated by the Director of Nursing on the steps for Insulin administration per competency, diabetes clinical protocol policy, Medication and treatment orders policy, administering medications policy, and Obtaining fingerstick Glucose Level policy On 5/14/2026. How Corrective Action will be monitored: Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing will complete insulin administration audits on 5 nurses. This audit will be completed weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Corrective action will be initiated for any noted non-compliance. Audit findings will be reviewed as part of the monthly quality assurance process to determine the need for further monitoring. Date of Compliance: 5/29/2026
Staff-to-resident physical abuse resulting in jaw fracture and tooth loss
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to protect a resident from staff-to-resident physical abuse, resulting in serious injury. A dietary aide entered a secured unit where a cognitively intact resident with a history of behavioral issues, including physical aggression and noncompliance with care and medications, was located. The resident had been tapping or knocking on the window/door of the secured unit, drawing the attention of the dietary aide. Multiple staff, including a CNA and an RN, told the dietary aide not to go onto the secured unit, noting that the resident’s assigned aide could assist and that the resident had been agitated the previous day. Despite these instructions, the dietary aide went onto the secured unit. Witness statements and interviews indicate that upon entering the unit, the aide interacted with the resident, including offering to buy the resident a soda after seeing the resident holding money. According to staff statements and the aide’s own account, the resident then struck the aide in the face. The aide responded by punching the resident in the face. A CNA on the unit reported stepping between the two to attempt to deescalate the situation and then calling for the nurse due to the resident’s aggression. The CNA also reported hearing the aide tell the resident, “I will hit you again,” and then observed that the resident was bleeding. Following the punch, the resident was noted by staff to be bleeding from the nose and mouth. The resident was assessed by nursing and subsequently transported to the hospital. Hospital records documented that the resident sustained an open fracture of the right jaw, with a loose right lateral mandibular incisor and bleeding from the socket at the fracture site. The resident’s remaining 11 teeth were extracted because they could not be restored. A police report documented that staff reported the incident as an assault in which a staff member punched a resident after the resident had punched the staff member. The facility’s policy defined abuse as the willful infliction of injury resulting in physical harm, including physical abuse such as hitting and punching, and the facility substantiated that the dietary aide had physically abused the resident.
Failure to Ensure Safe Mechanical Lift Transfer, Timely Assessment, and Pain Management After Traumatic Injury
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure safe mechanical lift transfers, adequate assessment, timely physician and representative notification, and appropriate pain management for a severely cognitively impaired, non‑ambulatory resident who required a mechanical lift with two‑person assistance for all transfers. The resident had multiple relevant diagnoses, including vascular dementia, osteoarthritis, a right hip prosthesis, chronic kidney disease, and a history of fractures and osteoporosis/osteopenia. On the morning of 04/22/26, during a mechanical lift transfer from bed to wheelchair, multiple CNAs reported that the sling appeared too small, the lift was pulled forcefully from under the bed, and the resident fell feet‑first out of the sling, with staff catching her upper body while both legs hit the floor and one leg bent behind her. A loud popping sound was heard, the resident screamed and cried out in pain, and witnesses observed immediate bruising, swelling, and apparent misalignment of the left knee/leg. Despite this, the nurse who responded did not perform a complete head‑to‑toe or range‑of‑motion assessment focused on the leg, and the incident was not documented as a fall from the lift. Following the incident, nursing staff actions and documentation were incomplete and inconsistent with the resident’s presentation. Progress notes on 04/22/26 documented only a skin tear to the left forearm and a head‑to‑toe assessment with no new areas, and there were no notes describing a fall, leg injury, or significant pain. Multiple CNAs and the resident’s roommate reported that the resident cried out in pain throughout the night and that her left leg appeared swollen, bruised, and deformed, yet nursing notes from the night shift only recorded administrations of acetaminophen without documenting the reason for administration, pain assessment findings, or any musculoskeletal concerns. One RN reported being asked to look at the resident on 04/22/26, noting swelling of the left leg but performing no further assessment. The physician was not notified within one hour of a suspected musculoskeletal injury as required by facility policy, and the resident’s representative was not informed that the resident had fallen from the mechanical lift. On 04/23/26, staff continued to report the resident’s ongoing pain and abnormal leg appearance, but the physician was contacted only about increased yelling and behavior, with a focus on agitation and prior hip/groin pain history rather than a new traumatic event. The DON later documented that a loud popping noise occurred during a Hoyer lift transfer with three staff present and that no abnormalities or signs of pain were noted, and the physician was asked to order bilateral hip and knee X‑rays as a precaution, without documenting a fall. Mobile X‑rays were obtained on 04/23/26, but the results, which showed a displaced distal femur fracture on a limited lateral view, were not reviewed until 04/24/26. Only then was the fracture acknowledged and discussed with the physician and resident representative. Subsequent hospital evaluation identified a closed displaced comminuted supracondylar fracture of the left femur and a distal fifth metacarpal fracture of the left hand. The facility’s internal investigation was incomplete and inaccurate: the DON denied a fall on 04/22/26, prepared a single typed statement describing only a popping sound while the resident was suspended over the bed, and had multiple staff sign it, even though at least two CNAs and an agency DON later reported that the statement was false and that staff felt intimidated and were told not to talk about the incident. The facility also failed to adequately manage the resident’s pain following the injury. Although the MAR shows acetaminophen administrations on 04/22/26 and early 04/23/26, there was no associated documentation of pain scores or clinical rationale in the progress notes for some doses, and staff interviews and the roommate’s account described the resident crying out in pain whenever touched and throughout the night. The physician later stated he was under the impression the fracture was non‑displaced and that, because the resident was bedbound, he did not feel she needed pain medication, and he was unaware of the severity of the femur fracture or the additional hand fracture. Overall, the facility did not follow its own physician communication policy for falls with musculoskeletal deformity or leg pain, did not perform and document thorough assessments at the time of the incident and during the subsequent night, did not promptly review diagnostic imaging, and did not conduct a complete, accurate investigation into the circumstances of the mechanical lift transfer and resulting injuries.
Improper Food Storage and Labeling in Facility and Resident Refrigerators
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a failure to store food in accordance with professional standards and facility policy, creating the potential for foodborne illness for nearly all residents who received food from the kitchen. In the walk-in cooler, they observed multiple items that were opened and partially used without any open dates, including two cartons of heavy whipping cream, bins of individually poured and covered beverages, and a tray of covered fruit cocktail bowls. A large pan of pasta with ground meat was stored with the serving scoop resting directly on the food, covered with plastic wrap and not dated. A cart in the cooler held a 22-quart container of dark liquid with no label or date, and a pink plastic pitcher resting directly on the cart surface, which was coated with a dark unidentified material. A box of bacon was stored directly on the floor. The Director of Dietary Services confirmed the presence of undated, unlabeled, and improperly stored food items in the walk-in cooler. In the walk-in freezer, surveyors found an unsealed and undated bag of frozen chicken breasts and an unsealed and undated bag of pork pizza topping, which the Director of Dietary Services also confirmed. The reach-in cooler used for tray line contained a variety of pre-poured juices, milk, thickened beverages, and tea that were covered but not dated. At a nurses' station refrigerator, surveyors observed a plastic bag of food labeled with a resident’s name and dated more than a week earlier, along with three half-sandwiches wrapped in plastic without dates; the LPN present verified these findings. In a resident’s personal refrigerator, three undated bags of grapes with visible mold were found, and a CNA confirmed the grapes were moldy and undated. Facility policies required cold foods to be stored at least six inches above the floor, wrapped or in covered containers, labeled, and dated, and required resident refrigerators to be monitored daily, with food appropriately labeled and unsafe or moldy food discarded. These practices were not followed, resulting in the cited deficiency under the complaint investigation.
Unsanitary Kitchen Practices and Improper Dishwashing Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s food service operations related to unsanitary kitchen conditions, improper food labeling and dating, and failure to operate the dishwasher according to manufacturer and policy requirements. During an initial kitchen tour, they observed a plastic tray holding clean pitchers with a brown-like substance on it, and three open, three-shelf carts with crumbs and debris on the shelves where clean insulated plate lids and sleeves of disposable bowls, cups, and lids were stored. Multiple trays of juice in a reach-in refrigerator were open, unlabeled, and undated. In the walk-in refrigerator, surveyors found a plastic bag of bologna with only a freeze date and no thaw or use-by date; the bologna appeared slimy and lighter in color. The facility census was 67, with one resident identified as not receiving meals from the kitchen, and the deficiency was noted as having the potential to affect all residents receiving food from the kitchen. Surveyors also observed the high-temperature dishwasher in use and recorded a wash temperature of 168°F and rinse temperatures of 160°F, 176°F, 178°F, 178°F, and 178°F over five cycles, despite the machine label and facility policy requiring a minimum wash temperature of 150°F and a minimum rinse temperature of 180°F for hot water sanitizing. A staff member confirmed the dishwasher had not been running earlier that morning, verified it was a high-temperature machine that should rinse at a minimum of 180°F, and acknowledged the observations regarding the dirty tray, soiled carts, unlabeled juice, and improperly dated bologna. The staff member stated that items in the reach-in refrigerator were normally prepped the night before and asserted that the bologna always had that color before discarding it. Review of the dishwasher temperature logs for January through April 2026 showed repeated failures to meet required wash and rinse temperatures and numerous instances of missing documentation. In January, multiple wash temperatures were below the 150°F minimum, and several meals lacked recorded wash and rinse temperatures. February logs showed at least one sub-minimum wash temperature and many missing wash and rinse entries for various meals. March logs included at least one meal with no documented wash or rinse temperatures. April logs documented several wash temperatures below 150°F and rinse temperatures below 180°F, along with multiple days and meals where wash and/or rinse temperatures were not recorded at all. Facility policies on sanitation, kitchen infection control, and food receiving and storage required dishwashing to meet temperature and sanitation standards and refrigerated foods to be covered, labeled, dated, and used, frozen, or discarded by their use-by date, which was not consistently followed according to the survey findings.
Environmental Maintenance and Cleanliness Deficiencies in Resident Room and Common Restroom
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment as required by its “Homelike Environment” policy. Observation of a shared bedroom for Residents #46 and #56 showed wallpaper peeling from the wall in multiple locations, including behind each resident’s headboard, below the window, and near the baseboards. In the same room’s bathroom, a black substance was observed around the base of the toilet. During an interview conducted concurrently with these observations, CNA #175 confirmed the presence of the peeling wallpaper and the black substance around the toilet base. Further observation with CNA #175 in the C hall restroom revealed that three light covers in that restroom were cracked or broken. The facility’s written policy, revised in February 2021, states that residents are to be provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The conditions observed in the residents’ bedroom, bathroom, and the C hall restroom were inconsistent with this policy and affected two identified residents, with the potential to affect all residents in the facility.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 24, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.



