Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Ohio Living Swan Creek during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident did not receive appropriate care for existing pressure ulcers, and preventive measures to avoid new ulcers were not consistently implemented. The facility did not follow established protocols for assessment, monitoring, and treatment of pressure ulcers.
The facility failed to follow physician orders for catheter care for two residents. One resident did not receive the prescribed bacitracin ointment and split gauze for their suprapubic catheter, and another resident's urine output was not documented every shift as required. These deficiencies were identified through medical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews.
The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions during catheter care for two residents. Despite specific physician orders and facility policies requiring the use of gloves and gowns, staff did not don gowns while performing catheter care. This was confirmed through observations and staff interviews.
Failure to Provide and Prevent Pressure Ulcer Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate care for pressure ulcers and did not implement effective measures to prevent the development of new ulcers. This deficiency was identified through observations and record reviews that indicated lapses in the assessment, monitoring, and treatment of pressure ulcers for residents at risk. The report notes that necessary interventions to prevent skin breakdown were not consistently applied, and existing pressure ulcers were not managed according to established protocols.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate care for residents with urinary catheters as per physician orders. For Resident #22, who had a suprapubic catheter due to urinary retention and a history of meatus erosion, the facility did not follow the physician's order for catheter care. The care plan required cleansing the catheter site with soap and water, applying bacitracin ointment, and covering it with split gauze every shift. However, during an observation, the RN did not apply bacitracin ointment or split gauze, and the RN later confirmed that these steps were not followed, despite the physician's order being documented as completed. Additionally, the RN noted slight redness and a bump at the catheter insertion site, indicating potential issues with the catheter care provided. For Resident #20, who was severely cognitively impaired and under hospice care, the facility failed to document urine output every shift as ordered by the physician. The resident had an indwelling catheter placed due to urinary retention, and the physician's order required catheter care and urine output documentation every shift. However, the records showed multiple instances where urine output was not recorded, and the Unit Manager confirmed that the documentation was incomplete. This lack of documentation could hinder the monitoring of the resident's condition and the effectiveness of the catheter care. The facility's policies on indwelling catheter care and physician orders emphasize the importance of following physician orders and monitoring urine output. However, the facility did not adhere to these policies, resulting in deficiencies in the care provided to residents with urinary catheters. These deficiencies were identified through medical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, highlighting the need for improved compliance with physician orders and facility policies to ensure proper care for residents with urinary catheters.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions when providing catheter care to two residents, identified as Resident #20 and Resident #22. Resident #22, who had diagnoses including neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and dementia, required a suprapubic catheter and had specific physician orders for enhanced barrier precautions. During an observation, a Registered Nurse (RN) did not don a gown while performing suprapubic catheter care, despite the care plan and physician orders specifying the need for gowns and gloves. The RN confirmed in a follow-up interview that a gown was not worn during the procedure, and the Unit Manager verified that enhanced barrier precautions were required for catheter care. Similarly, Resident #20, who had diagnoses including dementia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and was under Hospice care, required catheter care with specific orders for documentation of urine output every shift. During an observation, a State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) did not don a gown while performing catheter care, using only gloves. The STNA confirmed in an interview that gloves were the only personal protective equipment worn. The facility's policies on indwelling urinary catheter care and infection control required the use of gloves and gowns during catheter care, which were not followed in these instances.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 413 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Toledo
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heatherdowns Rehab & Residential Care Center | 1.3 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
| Lutheran Village At Wolfcreek | 1.5 mi | — | 13 | 0 |
| Continuing Healthcare Of Toledo | 1.8 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
| Spring Meadows Nursing, A Villa Center | 2.2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Foundation Park Care Center | 2.2 mi | — | 29 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Ohio Living Swan Creek.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.