Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Muskingum Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Two residents with bladder impairments did not receive adequate indwelling catheter care or education upon discharge. One resident was admitted with an indwelling catheter, but the admission assessment inaccurately recorded them as continent and without a catheter. There was no evidence of catheter care or urine sample collection as ordered. The second resident also did not receive documented catheter care or education during their stay. Interviews confirmed the lack of documentation and education, leading to a deficiency identified during a complaint investigation.
The facility failed to provide timely and effective pain management for three residents following falls that resulted in injuries. One resident with a hip fracture was not given adequate pain relief and was sent to the ER nearly 20 hours after the fall. Another resident with a shoulder fracture did not receive pain medication until over four hours later, and no non-pharmacological interventions were initiated. A third resident with a fracture was not provided with any pain management before being transferred to the ER over five hours after the fall. The facility did not develop comprehensive pain management plans for these residents.
A resident with dementia and other conditions was observed lying diagonally in bed due to inadequate bed size, causing discomfort and potential pressure issues. Despite being independent in bed mobility, the resident's feet hung over the edge, and interviews confirmed that repositioning would not resolve the issue.
The facility failed to conduct care conferences in conjunction with MDS reviews for two residents. One resident with heart failure and other conditions did not have a care conference documented for a November MDS. Another resident with dementia and other diagnoses had a care conference scheduled a month late. Interviews revealed scheduling issues and lack of documentation, contrary to the facility's policy requiring timely coordination and invitations for care conferences.
The facility failed to implement fall interventions for two residents, leading to deficiencies in accident prevention. A resident with Alzheimer's and impaired balance was found with their bed not in the low position, contrary to their care plan. Another resident with cognitive impairment lacked a dycem in their wheelchair, as required for fall prevention. These oversights were confirmed by staff, indicating a failure to adhere to prescribed safety measures.
The facility failed to implement proper pressure ulcer interventions for three residents, leading to deficiencies in care. A resident developed Stage II pressure ulcers due to lack of repositioning and incorrect bed settings. Another resident's low air loss mattress was set incorrectly, and a third resident's mattress was unplugged and deflated, compromising pressure ulcer prevention. Staff were unaware of proper mattress operation, and there was a lack of documentation for necessary interventions.
Inadequate Catheter Care and Education for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate indwelling catheter care and education for two residents with bladder impairments. Resident #44 was admitted with a history of metabolic encephalopathy, pneumonia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, bladder neck obstruction, hydronephrosis, generalized anxiety, malignant neoplasm of the prostate, and depression. Despite having an indwelling catheter upon admission, the admission assessment inaccurately recorded the resident as continent of bladder and without a catheter. Additionally, there was no evidence of catheter care being performed from the date of admission to discharge, and a urine sample ordered for collection was not obtained. Furthermore, neither the resident nor the family received education on catheter care upon discharge. Resident #45, admitted with benign prostatic hyperplasia and an indwelling catheter, also did not receive documented catheter care during their stay. The medical records lacked evidence of any orders for catheter care, and there was no documentation of education or instructions provided to the resident or family upon discharge. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed the absence of documented catheter care and education for both residents. The deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation, highlighting the facility's non-compliance with providing necessary catheter care and education. The lack of documentation and failure to follow through with physician orders and discharge instructions contributed to the deficiency, affecting the quality of care provided to the residents.
Inadequate Pain Management After Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide effective and timely pain management for three residents following falls that resulted in injuries. Resident #35 experienced a fall with a hip fracture and was not provided with adequate pain management. Despite showing significant verbal and non-verbal indicators of pain, the resident was not given any pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions until being sent to the emergency room nearly 20 hours after the fall. Upon return from the ER, the resident continued to exhibit signs of pain, but no comprehensive pain management plan was developed or implemented. Resident #22 suffered a fall resulting in a non-displaced fracture of the shoulder. Although the resident reported a high level of pain immediately after the fall, pain medication was not administered until over four hours later. The facility did not initiate any non-pharmacological interventions to address the resident's pain, and no individualized pain management plan was developed following the incident. The resident's pain was not adequately assessed or managed, leading to prolonged discomfort. Resident #24 also experienced a fall resulting in a fracture, and the facility failed to provide timely pain management. The resident was not given any pharmacological or effective non-pharmacological interventions before being transferred to the emergency room over five hours after the fall. The facility did not develop a comprehensive plan of care to address the resident's pain, and there was a lack of documentation and follow-up on the resident's pain management needs.
Inadequate Bed Size for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a bed of appropriate size for a resident, leading to discomfort and potential pressure issues. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including syncope, dementia, hyperlipidemia, and intellectual disabilities, was observed on multiple occasions lying diagonally in bed with his feet hanging over the edge. Despite being independent in bed mobility, the resident expressed discomfort due to the need to lie diagonally, which increased pressure on his right hip. Interviews with the resident and a State Tested Nursing Assistant confirmed that moving the resident further up in the bed would not alleviate the issue, as his toes would still touch the footboard. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the resident always lays diagonally in bed.
Failure to Conduct Timely Care Conferences with MDS Reviews
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure care conferences were offered in conjunction with Minimum Data Set (MDS) reviews, affecting two residents. Resident #2, who was admitted with diagnoses including heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and anemia, had quarterly MDS assessments completed on several dates. However, there was no record of a care conference held in conjunction with the MDS completed in November 2023. An interview with Resident #2 revealed that the resident could not recall having care conferences. Similarly, Resident #39, admitted with diagnoses including syncope, dementia, hyperlipidemia, and intellectual disabilities, had quarterly MDS assessments completed on various dates. The care conference for Resident #39 was not completed in conjunction with the MDS completed in May 2024. Interviews with the social worker and activity director revealed scheduling issues and lack of documentation for the care conferences. The facility's policy indicated that the MDS nurse is responsible for coordinating routine care conferences, and social services should send out invitations two weeks prior, which was not adhered to in these cases.
Failure to Implement Fall Interventions for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement fall interventions for two residents, leading to deficiencies in accident prevention. Resident #3, who was admitted with conditions such as Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and impaired balance, was identified as being at risk for falls. Despite the care plan specifying that the bed should be kept in a low position to prevent falls, observations revealed that the bed was not in the lowest position, and the bed controller was out of the resident's reach. This oversight was confirmed by an LPN, indicating a failure to adhere to the prescribed fall prevention measures. Similarly, Resident #12, who had diagnoses including congestive heart failure and moderate cognitive impairment, was also at risk for falls. The care plan included the use of a dycem in the resident's wheelchair to prevent slipping. However, observations and interviews with a STNA revealed that the dycem was missing from the wheelchair, and attempts to locate it were unsuccessful. This indicates a lapse in ensuring that the necessary fall prevention equipment was in place, as outlined in the facility's fall prevention policy.
Failure to Implement Pressure Ulcer Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper pressure ulcer interventions were in place for three residents, leading to deficiencies in care. Resident #36, who was at risk for skin breakdown, was observed multiple times with heels not elevated and without proper repositioning, despite having a care plan that included these interventions. The resident developed Stage II pressure ulcers on both heels, and there were no documented refusals of care. Additionally, the resident's bed was not set to the correct comfort level as per physician orders, and there was no order to turn and reposition the resident. Resident #26, who had two Stage 4 pressure ulcers, was found to have an incorrect weight setting on their low air loss mattress, which was set to 450 pounds despite the resident weighing less than 200 pounds. This incorrect setting was verified by the Assistant Director of Nursing, who noted that aides frequently bump into beds, potentially altering settings. The facility failed to monitor and adjust the mattress settings appropriately, which is crucial for the resident's skin integrity. Resident #12, who required maximum assistance for bed mobility, had a low air-loss mattress that was not turned on during observations. The mattress was found to be unplugged, and staff were unaware of how to operate it properly. The mattress remained deflated, compromising the resident's pressure ulcer prevention. There was also no physician order for the low air-loss mattress, indicating a lack of proper documentation and oversight in ensuring the resident's care needs were met.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 128 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Beverly
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riverside Landing Nursing And Rehabilitation | 11 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Waterview Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation | 12.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Harmar Place Nursing And Rehabilitation | 13.1 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Arbors At Marietta | 13.1 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Marietta Heights Post Acute | 13.7 mi | — | 10 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Muskingum Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.