Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Lodge Nursing & Rehab Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Two residents were not treated with dignity and respect in staff communications. One resident with cancer, anxiety, delusional disorder, and moderate cognitive impairment was observed agitated and argumentative at her doorway while staff attempted to assist her, and an RN remarked to a surveyor that the resident’s behavior made it seem her cancer had spread to her brain. Another cognitively intact but deaf resident, who uses lip reading and other methods to communicate, requested an ASL interpreter for an interview; afterward, the same RN told the surveyor that the resident only wanted an interpreter because she loves attention. These comments were acknowledged by facility leadership as inappropriate and inconsistent with the facility’s dignity policy.
The facility failed to provide adequate ADL care, including grooming, nail care, and bathing, to three cognitively intact residents who were dependent on staff. One resident who required extensive assistance for mobility and was dependent for toileting and bathing was observed with long chin hairs, reported embarrassment, and stated staff had not offered shaving. Another resident needing substantial assistance for mobility and personal care had overgrown, painful toenails that curved into adjacent toes, reported having requested nail care over a month earlier, and an LPN and corporate QA nurse confirmed the toenail condition was unacceptable and should have been addressed. A third resident, totally dependent for showering per care plan, reported going about two weeks without a shower, and task records over multiple months showed numerous scheduled bathing days documented as not attempted or left blank, with the corporate QA nurse confirming no showers were provided on those days despite a policy requiring ADL assistance based on individual needs.
A resident with dementia and other health issues fell during a transfer, resulting in skin tears. The LTC facility failed to document the incident, investigate it thoroughly, or implement new fall prevention interventions. The facility's policies on fall management and care plan updates were not followed.
The facility failed to accurately reconcile narcotics for two residents. One resident's morphine bottle contained less medication than recorded, and another resident's Lorazepam bottle also showed a discrepancy. The facility's policy requiring narcotic counts at shift changes was not followed.
Failure to Treat Residents With Dignity and Respect in Staff Communications
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves failure to honor residents' rights to dignity and respect in interactions by facility staff. One resident with malignant neoplasm of the base of the tongue, generalized anxiety disorder, delusional disorder, and moderate cognitive impairment was observed standing in her doorway, visibly agitated and argumentative with staff who were attempting to assist her. During this observation, a registered nurse (RN #418) commented to the surveyor that, based on the resident's behavior, it appeared the cancer had spread to her brain. This remark was made in reference to the resident's condition and behavior and was determined to be inconsistent with the facility's dignity policy, which requires care that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. A second resident, who is cognitively intact but highly hearing impaired due to nerve damage in the ears and relies on lip reading, writing, communication boards, gestures, sign language, and picture cards, requested an American Sign Language interpreter for an interview with the surveyor. Later that morning, the same RN (RN #418) asked the surveyor how the interview went and, upon being told that the resident had requested an interpreter, stated that the resident only requested an interpreter because she loves the attention. These comments about both residents were confirmed by the corporate quality assurance nurse as not appropriate when speaking about a resident, and they conflicted with the facility’s written dignity policy dated 02/28/20. The deficiency was cited under residents’ rights to dignity, respect, and self-determination and was investigated under a specific complaint number.
Failure to Provide Adequate ADL Care, Grooming, and Bathing
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide adequate ADL care, including grooming, nail care, and bathing, to cognitively intact residents who were dependent on staff. One resident with a history of right femur fracture, type 2 diabetes, depression, and breast cancer required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility and transfers and was dependent for toileting and bathing. On observation, this resident was found lying in bed with multiple chin hairs 1 to 1.5 inches long. In interview, she emphatically stated she did not prefer to have chin hairs, reported that in the community she had dermaplaning at a spa, and expressed embarrassment about her chin appearance, adding that staff had not offered to shave her. An LPN confirmed the presence of several long chin hairs and that staff had not yet cleaned her up. Another resident with type 2 diabetes, right knee effusion, and hyperlipidemia, who required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and bathing, was observed sitting in a chair with long, overgrown toenails. The great toenails on each foot curved into the adjacent toenails, causing irritation. This resident emphatically reported pain from the toenails rubbing and catching on things and stated she had requested nail care over a month earlier. An LPN confirmed the toenails were unacceptably long and stated a podiatry consult would be entered, and a corporate QA nurse confirmed staff should have addressed the toenail length. A third resident, admitted with a displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur, muscle weakness, dementia, and intervertebral disc degeneration, was cognitively intact and care planned as totally dependent for showering and ADLs. He reported not receiving showers regularly and stated he had gone about two weeks without a shower. Bathing tasks were scheduled twice weekly, but documentation for one month showed all scheduled days marked as not attempted, the following month showed only four of nine scheduled days with bathing assistance provided, and the current month showed one blank day and one day marked not attempted. The corporate QA nurse verified that on days marked not attempted or left blank, the resident did not receive a shower, contrary to the facility’s ADL care policy requiring staff to assist with bathing based on individual needs.
Failure to Investigate Fall and Implement Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate a fall incident involving Resident #42 and did not implement new fall interventions to prevent future falls. Resident #42, who was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and hypotension, was at risk for falls due to impaired safety awareness and resistance to care. On 08/29/24, the resident sustained large skin tears and bruising during a transfer with a State tested Nurse Aide (STNA), but the incident was not documented in the facility's incident log, and no new interventions were added to the resident's fall care plan. The incident was initially reported as an injury of unknown source, and the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRI) indicated that the resident had skin tears on the left upper extremity. The investigation concluded that the resident fell during a transfer, but the facility did not suspect abuse or neglect. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that the facility failed to investigate the fall thoroughly and did not meet as a team to discuss the incident or update the resident's care plan with new interventions. The facility's policy on fall management requires a comprehensive plan of care with interventions monitored for effectiveness, but this was not followed. The policy also mandates notifying the physician and family, reviewing and updating the care plan, and documenting all assessments and actions, which were not completed in this case. The deficiency was investigated under Complaint Number OH00157672.
Failure to Accurately Reconcile Narcotics
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate reconciliation of narcotics for two residents. Resident #64, who had severe vascular dementia and other chronic conditions, was prescribed Morphine sulfate for pain management. During an observation, it was found that the morphine bottle contained an immeasurable amount of medication between the 24 ml and 28 ml marks, despite the Controlled Drug Record indicating there should be 28 ml remaining. Interviews with the LPN and DON confirmed the discrepancy, and it was noted that the narcotic counts were not accurately performed at the beginning of each shift as required by the facility's policy. Similarly, Resident #404, who had moderately impaired cognition and was on Hospice, was prescribed Lorazepam Intensol for anxiety. An observation revealed that the Lorazepam bottle measured at the 20 ml mark, although the Controlled Drug Record indicated there should be 21 ml remaining. The discrepancy was verified by the DON and two LPNs. The facility's policy required two licensed nurses to count and verify narcotics at the change of shift, and any discrepancies were to be resolved before the nurse on duty could leave. This policy was not followed, leading to the identified deficiencies.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 561 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Loveland
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meadowbrook Care Center | 2.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Loveland Care Center | 2.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Majestic Care Of Cedar Village. | 3.2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Otterbein At Maineville | 3.6 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Brookwood Care Center | 3.7 mi | — | 16 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Lodge Nursing & Rehab Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.