Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Lincoln Crawford Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A facility failed to keep a shower room clean and safe, with observations of wound dressing material on the floor, thick grime, a broken shower chair, dirty benches, unlabeled personal care bottles, hair-clogged drains, and unsanitary toilet and sink conditions. Interviews with the Administrator, HD, and DON confirmed the room was not maintained according to policy, with unclear responsibilities for certain cleaning tasks.
A cognitively impaired resident was treated in an undignified manner when a dietician offered him a banana and made a comment comparing him to a monkey. The incident was reported by an STNA who observed the resident's confused and disappointed reaction. The dietician expressed remorse, stating the phrase was commonly used with her grandchildren. The facility's investigation into the incident was questioned by the reporting STNA, who claimed her initial statement was lost.
A resident with chronic osteomyelitis and diabetes did not receive the ordered wound care treatment for their right heel. An LPN failed to perform the treatment due to time constraints and falsely documented it as completed. The dressing observed was not as ordered, and the facility's wound care policy was not followed.
A facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions and proper hand hygiene during wound care for a resident with chronic osteomyelitis and diabetes. An LPN used a different dressing than ordered and did not perform hand hygiene after removing gloves, only wearing gloves as PPE. The facility's policies on wound care, enhanced barrier precautions, and hand hygiene were not followed, as confirmed by the DON.
A facility failed to provide appropriate incontinence and catheter care for a resident with multiple diagnoses, including neurogenic bladder. An STNA did not follow proper procedures, such as changing gloves and cleaning the catheter area correctly, as per facility policies. This deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation.
Failure to Maintain Clean and Safe Shower Room Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the 300 hall shower room in a clean and safe condition, as required by its own policy and regulatory standards. Observations revealed the presence of cotton from a wound dressing on the shower floor, thick brown grime on the tiles, a large shower chair with a broken and jagged seat, a shower bench with dirty areas and a white substance on the seat, rusty metal legs, and multiple open and unlabeled bottles of personal care products. The shower nozzle was hanging down, and thick black hair was covering all the drains in the three shower stalls. Additionally, a toilet in the common area lacked a privacy curtain, contained feces and brownish rings, and the handwashing sink had rust-colored rings with a large puddle of water on the floor between the toilet and sink. Interviews with the Administrator, Housekeeping Director (HD), and Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the shower room's condition was not in compliance with facility expectations. The Administrator acknowledged the issues, including the presence of dressing material, unclean toilet, broken chair, standing water, and dirty sink. The HD stated that the assigned housekeeper was responsible for daily cleaning but was unsure who was responsible for removing hair from the drains, and noted that the water puddle was due to a leak. The DON indicated that aides were expected to tidy up after each resident's use, with housekeeping responsible for mopping and sanitizing the area at least once or twice daily. The deficiency was identified during an investigation under two complaint numbers.
Failure to Treat Resident with Dignity
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to treat a resident in a dignified manner, as evidenced by an incident involving a dietician and a resident with cognitive impairment. The resident, who had vascular dementia, type two diabetes, and lumbago with sciatica, was approached by the dietician who offered him a banana and made a comment comparing him to a monkey. This comment was reported by a State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) who witnessed the interaction and noted the resident's confused and disappointed reaction. The dietician later expressed remorse, stating that the phrase was a common refrain used with her grandchildren and that no harm was intended. The incident was reported to the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the Administrator, who spoke with the dietician about the situation. However, the STNA who reported the incident claimed that the facility did not properly investigate the concern and that her initial written statement was lost. The facility's document on resident rights emphasizes the importance of treating residents with respect, kindness, and dignity, which was not upheld in this instance. This deficiency was investigated under a specific complaint number, indicating non-compliance with resident rights.
Failure to Complete Ordered Wound Treatment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that wound treatment was completed as ordered for a resident, leading to a deficiency. Resident #81, who was cognitively intact and had diagnoses including chronic osteomyelitis and diabetes mellitus, was affected by this failure. The physician's order specified a detailed wound care regimen for the resident's right heel, which included cleansing with normal saline, applying betadine, calcium alginate with silver, and covering with specific dressings. However, during an observation, it was found that the dressing applied was not as ordered, and the treatment had not been performed for a couple of days. An interview with the resident confirmed that the dressing had not been changed in a couple of days. Further investigation revealed that an LPN had not completed the treatment as ordered on a specific day due to time constraints and had falsely signed off the treatment as completed. The Director of Nursing confirmed that it was unacceptable to not complete treatments as ordered by the physician. The facility's wound care policy outlined the proper procedure for wound care, which was not followed in this instance.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Hand Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions and proper hand hygiene during wound care for a resident. The resident, who was cognitively intact, had diagnoses including chronic osteomyelitis and diabetes mellitus. A physician's order specified a particular wound care treatment for the resident's right heel, which included cleansing with normal saline, applying betadine, and using calcium alginate with silver. However, during an observation, an LPN was seen using a different dressing than ordered and did not perform hand hygiene after removing gloves, which is against the facility's policy. The LPN only wore gloves as personal protective equipment, failing to use the required gown and gloves for enhanced barrier precautions. The facility's policies on wound care and enhanced barrier precautions were not followed, as confirmed by the Director of Nursing. The facility's hand hygiene policy also mandates handwashing before and after certain tasks, which was not adhered to during the wound care procedure.
Inadequate Incontinence and Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for a resident who was incontinent of bowel and had an indwelling urinary catheter. The resident, who had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, contractures to his bilateral lower extremities, and neurogenic bladder, required substantial assistance from staff for toileting. During an observation of incontinence care, a State tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) did not follow proper procedures for catheter care and incontinence care. The STNA did not change gloves during the process, did not clean around the penis or the tubing coming out of the penis, and did not follow the facility's policy for perineal and catheter care. The STNA confirmed these lapses in procedure during an interview, stating that this was not her normal practice. The facility's policies for perineal care and catheter care were reviewed and found to include specific steps for cleaning the perineal area and catheter, which were not followed by the STNA. The policies emphasized the importance of cleanliness to prevent infections and skin irritation. The failure to adhere to these policies resulted in inadequate care for the resident, who was at risk for developing complications due to bowel incontinence and the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. This deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation and affected one of three residents reviewed for incontinence and catheter care, with the facility having a total of 48 residents who were incontinent of bowel and five residents with indwelling catheters.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 584 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Cincinnati
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carecore At Margaret Hall | 0.8 mi | — | 12 | 0 |
| Beechwood Home For Incurables | 1.1 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Garden Park Health Care Center | 1.3 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Astoria Place Of Cincinnati | 1.5 mi | — | 10 | 0 |
| Norwood Towers Post-acute | 2.1 mi | — | 15 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Lincoln Crawford Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.