Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Grand The during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with Alzheimer's disease, bilateral hearing loss, and a primary language barrier was not provided with appropriate communication aids as outlined in her care plan and facility policy. Staff inconsistently used translation apps, often relied on hand gestures or the resident's daughter for communication, and failed to ensure the resident could effectively express her needs, leading to ongoing frustration and unmet care needs.
Two residents experienced significant medication errors when one received an antibiotic as intermittent infusions instead of a continuous IV infusion as ordered, and another had insulin doses administered late on multiple occasions. Errors resulted from incorrect order entry, lack of proper verification, and failure to document medication administration in real time, contrary to facility policy.
The facility failed to report and investigate allegations of physical abuse in a timely manner, affecting two residents. An altercation between two residents resulted in injuries, and the incident was not immediately reported to the Administrator. Additionally, a resident's representative reported staff-to-resident abuse during a care conference, but these allegations were not investigated or reported. The facility did not adhere to its policy on abuse reporting, leading to a deficiency under two complaint numbers.
The facility failed to investigate allegations of staff-to-resident physical abuse involving two residents. One resident was reportedly held down and flipped during incontinence care, causing pain, while another was allegedly dragged down the hallway by staff. Despite these reports being made during a care conference, no investigation was initiated, and the incidents were not reported to the Administrator, violating the facility's abuse policy.
A facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below five percent, resulting in a rate of 6.89%. A resident was affected when an LPN administered medications incorrectly, including crushing an enteric-coated Aspirin and omitting part of a prescribed Senna-S dose. The errors were confirmed by the LPN and reported to the DON.
The facility did not have a registered nurse (RN) on duty for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, as required. This was confirmed through staffing schedules and staff interviews, revealing several dates without RN coverage. The Director of Nursing (DON) and unit managers were unaware of this regulatory requirement, potentially affecting all 92 residents.
The facility did not designate a licensed charge nurse for the 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. shift on weekends and holidays, directing staff to an on-call list instead. The DON confirmed that the nightshift supervisor and unit manager cover other shifts, but on weekends and holidays, the on-call manager is only available by phone. There is no specific job description for a charge nurse, and any nurse could be considered in charge of their unit.
The facility failed to maintain safe flooring on the 200 hall, affecting 25 residents, with torn and loose carpet sections identified but not repaired. Additionally, a resident with cognitive impairments had clothing improperly stored in the shower instead of the closet, which was not in line with the facility's policy for a homelike environment.
A resident with multiple health conditions did not receive timely Beneficiary Notices regarding Medicare/Medicaid coverage, leading to a lack of awareness about potential liability for non-covered services. The facility's policy requires advance notice, but the SNF ABN was issued after coverage ended, confirmed by staff interviews.
A resident, who was cognitively intact and had multiple diagnoses, made an abuse allegation against a staff member. The facility's receptionist reported the allegation to the administrator, but it was not reported to the state agency until the next day, violating the facility's policy requiring immediate reporting.
A facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident with significant weight loss and nutritional risk. Despite losing 76.8 pounds in three months, no care plan addressed the resident's nutritional status. The clinical dietitian confirmed the absence of an active nutrition care plan, contrary to facility policy requiring timely and updated care plans.
A resident with multiple health conditions, including Parkinson's disease and dementia, experienced a significant delay in receiving podiatry services due to the podiatry group's poor availability. Despite a request made in April for podiatry care due to painful and thickened nails, the resident was not seen until July, leading to frustration and concerns from the resident and their family about the facility's communication and service timeliness.
A resident with multiple medical conditions requiring maximum assistance for transfers was inadequately assisted during a sit-to-stand lift transfer. Despite facility policy requiring two staff members, an STNA conducted the transfer alone, risking the resident's safety. The STNA cited unavailability of other staff as the reason for proceeding alone.
A resident experienced a significant weight loss of 22.6 pounds over six months without proper re-assessment, monitoring, or physician notification. Despite meal intakes being documented as adequate, no root cause analysis was conducted. The resident, who disliked the facility's food, purchased his own meals and refused supplements. The facility's dietitian and DON confirmed the lack of documentation and physician notification.
A resident with dementia and other medical conditions experienced unmanaged pain over two days, despite vocalizing discomfort. Observations and interviews confirmed the absence of pain relief interventions, contrary to the facility's pain management policy.
The facility failed to follow its medication administration policy, which requires dispensing and documenting medications for one resident at a time. Observations revealed LPNs administering medications to multiple residents simultaneously, with one LPN stacking cups of pills and another preparing multiple unlabeled cups. This affected residents with complex medical conditions, and the DON confirmed the policy violation.
A facility failed to secure medications from dispensing to administration, as observed when a resident's medications were left unattended at the bedside. The resident, with multiple diagnoses including Parkinson's and dementia, was not assessed for self-medication. An LPN confirmed this was against standard practice, and the DON stated medications should not be left unless self-medication is approved. Facility policy requires medications to be secured unless under direct nurse supervision.
A facility failed to document communication between hospice and facility staff for a resident on hospice care. Despite the resident's complex medical history, there was no record of hospice visits or communication since admission to hospice. Staff interviews confirmed the absence of documentation, although verbal communication was reported.
A facility failed to adhere to its antibiotic stewardship program, resulting in inappropriate antibiotic use for a resident. Despite the absence of microorganisms in the urine culture and not meeting the criteria for a UTI, the resident was prescribed Bactrim. The decision was based on a change in mental status, but the urinalysis showed only yeast presence. The DON confirmed the resident did not meet the criteria for antibiotic initiation, indicating a lapse in policy adherence.
The facility failed to provide written notification of transfers to an acute care facility to the family and/or LTC Ombudsman for two residents. One resident with moderate cognitive impairment was transferred to the hospital without Ombudsman notification. Another resident, who was cognitively intact, experienced a change in condition and was also transferred without proper notification. Interviews confirmed the lack of evidence for written notifications, despite facility policy requiring such notices.
Failure to Provide Dignified Communication for Resident with Language and Hearing Barriers
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when the facility failed to provide a dignified experience for a resident with communication barriers, specifically by not utilizing alternate communication methods as outlined in the resident's care plan and facility policy. The resident, who had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, bilateral hearing loss, and a language barrier due to primarily speaking Russian, was observed to lack access to a communication board in her room. Staff interactions with the resident were limited, with some staff not speaking to her or relying solely on hand gestures and simple English phrases, despite her care plan recommending the use of translation applications and communication aids. Interviews with staff revealed inconsistent use of translation applications, with some staff not having the app on their phones and others only using it if hand gestures were ineffective. The resident and her daughter both reported ongoing difficulties in communication, with the resident expressing frustration and stress due to her needs not being understood or met, including issues with medication administration timing and requests for assistance. The facility often relied on the resident's daughter to translate, rather than consistently using professional translation aids or services as required by policy. Review of the facility's policy confirmed that communication assistance should be provided through various aids and that family members should not be used as interpreters unless specifically requested by the resident after being offered a professional interpreter. Despite this, the facility's practice did not align with policy requirements, resulting in the resident experiencing daily struggles to communicate her needs and participate meaningfully in her care.
Significant Medication Errors in Antibiotic and Insulin Administration
Penalty
Summary
Two residents experienced significant medication errors due to failures in medication administration and order entry. One resident, admitted with multiple complex diagnoses including pseudomonas infection and a history of urogenital implants, was prescribed cefepime as a continuous 24-hour IV infusion. However, upon admission, the antibiotic order was incorrectly entered as a twice-daily short infusion rather than a continuous infusion. This error persisted for several days, with the medication being administered incorrectly each shift. The discrepancy was eventually identified after the resident's infectious disease physician and family raised concerns, revealing that the facility had not followed the hospital's discharge prescription for continuous infusion. Another resident with a history of diabetes mellitus and other chronic conditions was prescribed sliding scale insulin to be administered subcutaneously before meals. Review of the medication administration record for this resident showed that insulin was administered late on 22 occasions within a single month. The scheduled times for insulin administration were not adhered to, with doses being given significantly after the prescribed times. Staff interviews indicated that some nurses believed they had a window of time for administration, and some attributed the discrepancies to delayed documentation rather than actual late administration. The facility's policies required that medications be administered and documented in real time, and that orders be accurately entered and verified by nursing staff. Despite these policies, the errors occurred due to incorrect order entry, lack of proper verification, and failure to document medication administration at the time it was given. These actions and inactions led to significant medication errors affecting two residents.
Failure to Timely Report and Investigate Abuse Allegations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report allegations of physical abuse to the Ohio Department of Health in a timely manner, affecting two residents. An altercation occurred between two residents, resulting in bruises and scratches. The incident was not reported immediately to the Administrator, and the Self-Reported Incident (SRI) was initiated approximately five hours after the event. This delay in reporting violated the facility's policy on timely reporting of abuse. Additionally, a representative of one of the residents reported incidents of staff-to-resident abuse during a care conference. The representative alleged that staff members held a resident down by the wrists and dragged another resident down the hallway. Despite these serious allegations being reported during the care conference, the Director of Nursing (DON) and Unit Manager present did not report or investigate these claims, and no SRIs were initiated for these allegations. The facility's policy on abuse requires immediate reporting of all allegations to the administration and the state survey agency. However, the facility did not adhere to this policy, as evidenced by the lack of timely reporting and investigation of the reported incidents. This deficiency was investigated under two complaint numbers, indicating a failure to comply with state regulations regarding abuse reporting.
Failure to Investigate Allegations of Staff-to-Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to investigate allegations of staff-to-resident physical abuse involving two residents. Resident #77, who has severe cognitive impairment and other medical conditions, was reportedly held down by the wrists by one staff member while another staff member flipped the resident back and forth to remove soiled clothing, causing the resident to scream in pain. This incident was reported by the resident's representative during a care conference attended by the Director of Nursing (DON), Unit Manager (UM) #54, and a hospice nurse. Additionally, the representative reported witnessing two staff members dragging Resident #78, who has Lewy body disease and other conditions, down the hallway by the arms while the resident screamed. Despite these reports being made during the care conference, the DON and UM #54 confirmed that no investigation was initiated, and the incidents were not reported to the Administrator. The facility's Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs) records showed no entries related to these allegations. The facility's policy on abuse, which mandates investigation and protective actions, was not followed. This deficiency was investigated under Complaint Numbers OH00162859 and OH00162858.
Medication Error Rate Exceeds Acceptable Threshold
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below five percent, resulting in a rate of 6.89% based on 29 medication opportunities and two errors. This deficiency affected one resident, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease, hypertension, and type two diabetes mellitus. The errors involved the administration of medications that did not align with the physician's orders. Specifically, the resident was prescribed chewable Aspirin 81 mg and Senna-S 8.6-50 mg. However, during medication administration, an LPN administered an enteric-coated Aspirin tablet crushed in applesauce, which is contraindicated, and a Senna 8.6 mg tablet, omitting the 50 mg Docusate component. The LPN confirmed these errors, and the DON was notified. The facility's policy on medication administration emphasizes the importance of adhering to physician orders and professional standards, which was not followed in this instance.
Failure to Maintain RN Coverage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a registered nurse (RN) was on duty for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, as required by regulations. This deficiency was identified through a review of staffing schedules and confirmed by staff interviews. Specifically, there were no RNs scheduled on several dates, including Sundays and Saturdays, as well as a Friday when the RN unit manager was on vacation. The Director of Nursing (DON) and unit managers were unaware of the regulatory requirement for RN coverage, which has the potential to affect all 92 residents residing in the facility.
Failure to Designate Charge Nurse on Weekends and Holidays
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to designate a licensed charge nurse for all tours of duty, specifically for the 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. shift on weekends and observed holidays. The daily staffing postings for June and July 2024 did not identify a charge nurse for these times, instead directing staff to an on-call list at the front desk. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the nightshift supervisor acts as the charge nurse from 7:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M., and the unit manager is the charge nurse during weekdays. However, on weekends and holidays, the on-call manager is considered the charge nurse and is only available by phone. The DON also revealed that there is no specific job description for a charge nurse, and any nurse could be considered in charge of their unit. An interview with a state tested nursing assistant (STNA) indicated that if there were concerns not addressed by the unit nurse, she would contact the unit manager directly, as she was not aware of a designated charge nurse.
Deficiencies in Flooring Maintenance and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the flooring in good condition on the 200 hall, affecting all 25 residents residing there. Observations revealed torn, frayed, and loose carpet sections, creating potential tripping hazards. Despite identifying the issue in March 2024 and obtaining a quote for repairs in May 2024, no repairs or replacements had been completed by July 2024. The Maintenance Director confirmed that the facility was working on a staged approach, prioritizing other areas first, and had not yet planned for the full replacement or repair of the 200 hall. Additionally, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for a resident with cognitive impairments and multiple health conditions, including hemiplegia and vascular dementia. Observations showed that the resident's clothing was hung in the shower rather than the closet, which was mostly empty and had ample space. Staff interviews confirmed uncertainty about why the clothing was not stored in the closet, and the situation was acknowledged as not providing a homelike environment. The facility's policy on maintaining a homelike environment was not adhered to, as unresolved environmental concerns were not reported to the administrator.
Failure to Provide Timely Beneficiary Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely Beneficiary Notices to a resident, affecting their awareness of Medicare/Medicaid coverage and potential liability for services not covered. The resident, who had diagnoses including congestive heart failure, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and acute respiratory failure, was admitted and discharged within a specific period. The review of the medical records showed that the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was given with the last day of coverage specified, but the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) was not provided in a timely manner. Specifically, the SNF ABN was issued after the resident's covered days had ended, which was confirmed by staff interviews. The facility's policy on Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage requires that the notice be provided in advance to allow the beneficiary or their representative to make an informed decision. However, in this case, the SNF ABN was provided after the coverage had ended, and in one instance, only verbal notification was given on the last covered day. The staff confirmed these lapses during interviews, indicating a failure to adhere to the facility's policy, which mandates that the notice be delivered, signed, and a copy provided to the beneficiary with enough time for consideration.
Delayed Reporting of Abuse Allegation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency in a timely manner, affecting one resident. The resident, who was cognitively intact, had a range of diagnoses including pain in the left leg, morbid obesity, and anxiety disorder. On the day of the incident, the resident made an abuse allegation against a staff member, which was reported to the facility administrator by the receptionist. However, the administrator did not report the allegation to the state agency until the following day, despite the facility's abuse policy requiring immediate reporting, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made if it involves abuse or results in serious bodily injury.
Failure to Develop Comprehensive Nutrition Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident who was at nutritional risk and had experienced significant weight loss. The resident, who had a history of severe protein calorie malnutrition and was at risk of malnutrition due to dysphagia and the need for alternative nutrition, lost 76.8 pounds in three months, equating to a 29.3% weight loss. Despite these significant changes, there was no care plan addressing the resident's nutritional status or weight loss. The clinical dietitian confirmed that the resident did not have an active nutrition care plan since a specified date, despite the facility's policy requiring a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to be developed within seven days of the completion of the required MDS assessment. The policy also mandates that care plans be revised as the resident's conditions change, which did not occur in this case.
Failure to Provide Timely Podiatry Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely podiatry services to a resident, identified as Resident #67, who was admitted with diagnoses including muscle weakness, Parkinson's disease, dementia, unsteadiness on feet, and acute kidney failure. The resident, who was cognitively intact and required assistance for mobility, had requested podiatry services due to thickened, dystrophic, and painful nails, which increased the risk of infection. Despite a request for podiatry services being made at the end of April, the resident was not seen until July 10, 2024, after being rescheduled multiple times due to the podiatry group's lack of availability. Interviews with the resident and their family members revealed frustration and concerns about the lack of timely ancillary services and poor communication from the facility. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the resident did not receive timely podiatry services due to the podiatry group's poor availability, resulting in a delay of 10 weeks from the initial request. Observations noted that the resident's toenails were protruding, indicating the need for the requested podiatry care.
Inadequate Assistance During Mechanical Lift Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate assistance during a transfer involving a sit-to-stand lift for a resident with multiple medical conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Parkinson's disease, hemiplegia, unsteadiness on feet, visual disturbances, and heart failure. The resident required maximum assistance for transfers and had a physician's order for a mechanical lift with two-person assistance. However, a video recording showed that a State tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) conducted the transfer alone, almost causing the resident to hit his head on the lateral bar. Interviews with staff confirmed that the facility's policy required two staff members for such transfers, but the STNA proceeded alone due to the unavailability of other staff members. The STNA explained that the nurse was occupied with medication administration, and the other STNA was engaged in other duties. The facility's policy and the Kwikpoint safety guide both indicated that two or more caregivers are necessary for safe operation of the lift, highlighting a breach in protocol during the incident.
Failure to Address Significant Weight Loss in Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to re-assess, monitor, and notify the physician following a significant weight loss in a resident. The resident, who was cognitively intact and had multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes, and depression, lost 22.6 pounds over six months, equating to a 16.7% weight loss. Despite documented meal intakes between 76-100%, there was no evidence of physician notification or a root cause analysis to determine the reason for the weight loss. The resident confirmed the weight loss and stated a preference for purchasing his own food due to disliking the facility's meals. Interviews with the dietitian and corporate dietitian revealed concerns about the accuracy of weight measurements and a lack of documentation regarding the weight loss. The dietitian noted that the resident refused supplements and medications that could stabilize his weight. The Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of physician notification and documentation of the weight loss, despite offering interventions that the resident declined. The resident was scheduled for discharge to an assisted living facility, where he could have more control over his eating patterns.
Failure to Manage Resident's Pain
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to manage a resident's complaints of pain, affecting one resident out of three reviewed for pain management. The resident, who had a history of dementia with agitation, anxiety disorder, and other medical conditions, was admitted with a care plan that included interventions for pain management. Despite the resident's complaints of left shoulder pain on two consecutive days, there was no documentation of any pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for pain relief during this period. Observations noted the resident vocalizing and grimacing, indicating discomfort, yet no caregivers addressed these pain concerns. Interviews with the resident's representative and facility staff confirmed the resident experienced pain and did not receive any pain medication during the specified time. The facility's policy on pain management emphasizes recognizing and managing residents' pain to maintain their well-being. However, the staff failed to adhere to this policy, as evidenced by the lack of pain management interventions and communication regarding the resident's non-verbal pain indicators.
Medication Administration Policy Violation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its medication administration policy, which mandates that medications be dispensed, administered, and documented for one resident at a time. During observations, it was noted that an LPN was administering medications to multiple residents simultaneously by stacking cups of pills labeled with room numbers. This practice was confirmed by the LPN, who admitted to not knowing the specific medications in each cup, although they were documented as given in the computer system. This affected several residents, including those with complex medical conditions such as chronic kidney disease, heart failure, multiple sclerosis, and cognitive impairments. Further observations revealed another LPN preparing and carrying multiple medication cups without labeling them, intending to administer them to different residents. This was done while waiting for residents to come out for breakfast, and the LPN confirmed the practice of preparing multiple cups at once. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the facility's policy requires medications to be dispensed and documented one resident at a time. The failure to follow this policy was observed in residents with various medical conditions, including dementia, heart failure, and chronic pain syndrome.
Medication Security Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications were secure from the time they were dispensed until administered, as observed during an annual survey. This deficiency was identified when medications were left unattended at the bedside of a resident diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, dementia, depression, and anxiety. The resident, who was cognitively intact according to a recent assessment, did not have orders for self-administration of medications. Despite this, medications including carbidopa-levodopa and citalopram hydrobromide were found left at the resident's bedside. An interview with an LPN confirmed that leaving medications unattended was not part of standard nursing practice. The Director of Nursing also confirmed that medications should not be left in a resident's room unless the resident has been assessed and approved to self-medicate. The facility's policy on medication and treatment storage, dated August 2023, mandates that all medications must be kept secured in a locked compartment unless under direct supervision of the nurse administering them.
Lack of Hospice Communication Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure timely communication between hospice staff and facility staff for a resident receiving hospice care. The resident, who was admitted to hospice services, had multiple diagnoses including malignant neoplasms, chronic kidney disease, and a history of transient ischemic attack. Despite being on hospice care, there was no documentation of communication or hospice visits in the resident's medical record or the hospice communication book since the admission to hospice. Interviews with facility staff, including a registered nurse and the Director of Nursing, confirmed the lack of documentation. The RN acknowledged that the hospice RN visited the resident but agreed that there was no documentation to reflect any hospice visits. The DON confirmed the absence of hospice notes in both the communication book and the resident's chart, although verbal communication with hospice staff was reported. The DON had requested that the hospice notes be faxed to the facility.
Inappropriate Antibiotic Use Due to Lapse in Stewardship Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement its antibiotic stewardship program effectively, leading to inappropriate antibiotic use for a resident. The resident, who had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, muscle weakness, anxiety, and diverticulitis, was admitted with a care plan that included monitoring for urinary tract infection (UTI) symptoms. Despite the absence of microorganisms in the urine culture and not meeting the criteria for a UTI requiring antibiotics, the resident was prescribed Bactrim for a UTI. The decision to start antibiotics was based on a change in mental status and increased confusion, but the urinalysis showed only yeast presence without any bacterial infection. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the resident did not meet the criteria for antibiotic initiation, as there were no additional symptoms such as fever or blood in the urine. The facility's policy required the use of specific criteria for initiating antibiotics, which were not met in this case. The resident remained on antibiotics due to transitioning to hospice care, highlighting a lapse in the facility's adherence to its antibiotic stewardship policy.
Failure to Notify Ombudsman of Resident Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written notification of transfer to an acute care facility to the family and/or long-term care Ombudsman for two residents. Resident #87, who had a moderate cognitive impairment and was her own responsible party, was transferred to the hospital and did not return. There was no documentation indicating that the Ombudsman was notified of this discharge. The facility's Administrator confirmed the lack of evidence for written notification to the Ombudsman. Similarly, Resident #51, who was cognitively intact, experienced a change in condition and was transferred to the hospital. The facility also failed to provide evidence of Ombudsman notification for this resident's discharge. Interviews with the Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of written notifications to residents' representatives. The facility's policy required that a copy of the transfer/discharge notice be provided to the resident/representative and Ombudsman, which was not adhered to in these cases.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 549 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Dublin
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dublin Post Acute | 0.9 mi | — | 34 | 0 |
| Friendship Village Of Dublin | 0.9 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| The Sanctuary At Tuttle Crossing | 1.6 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| The Convalarium Of Dublin | 2.5 mi | — | 21 | 0 |
| Mayfair Village Nursing Care Center | 2.6 mi | — | 13 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Grand The.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.