Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Avenue At Wooster during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple comorbidities, including hemiplegia, DM2, CHF, and HTN, and an existing buttock pressure injury was ordered specific wound care and use of a low air loss mattress. On observation, the resident was found on a low air loss mattress set at the 600 lb setting, despite the resident weighing significantly less. The wound nurse confirmed the mattress should be set to the resident’s weight and that the setting had not been adjusted after inflation, contrary to manufacturer guidelines and the facility’s skin policy requiring preventive measures based on assessed risk.
A resident with multiple comorbidities, including DM, HTN, kidney disease, and PVD, who required assistance with ADLs, developed impaired skin integrity on the right forearm after spilling hot coffee. Review of the ADL and skin care plans showed no safety interventions related to this injury, and physician orders addressed only wound treatment (cleansing with NS, antibiotic ointment, open to air) without any adaptive equipment or other safety measures. The RNC confirmed that no safety interventions were implemented for the hot liquid spill injury, despite the facility’s skin policy requiring preventive measures based on assessed risk and contributing factors.
A resident with multiple comorbidities, including hemiplegia, prior CVA, type 2 DM, depression, CHF, and HTN, had a physician’s order for buttocks wound care requiring cleansing with NS, application of calcium alginate, and a dry dressing, but there were no corresponding orders or care plan interventions for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Observation showed no EBP signage or PPE outside the room during wound care activities, and an LPN confirmed that EBPs were not implemented, despite facility policy requiring gown and gloves for high-contact care such as wound care for any skin opening requiring a dressing.
The facility failed to maintain kitchen cleanliness and proper food storage, affecting all residents. Observations revealed crumbs and debris on kitchen equipment, missing grill panels, and improperly stored food items without labels or dates. A follow-up visit found additional issues with undated food items in the freezer and refrigerator. The Dietary Manager confirmed these findings, noting prior unclean conditions.
The facility failed to address pharmacy recommendations for GDRs and non-pharmacological interventions for several residents, including a cognitively intact resident and a resident with cognitive impairment. Recommendations for reducing Buspirone and Fluvoxamine were disagreed upon without proper documentation of education or reasons for refusal. Another resident with severe cognitive impairment was receiving multiple psychotropic medications without specific justifications for disagreeing with GDRs. Additionally, an AIMS assessment was not completed upon initiation of Seroquel for a resident with moderately impaired cognition, contrary to facility policy.
A resident with dementia and moderate hearing impairment was not provided with hearing aids, as observed multiple times without the device. Staff interviews revealed the resident often misplaced personal items due to cognitive issues, and the hearing amplifiers had been missing for about a week. The facility's policy requires appropriate treatment to maintain daily living activities, which was not followed.
A facility failed to ensure pressure reducing devices were consistently used for a resident at risk of pressure injuries. Despite physician orders and documentation indicating the use of heel boots every shift, observations showed the resident without the boots. Staff interviews revealed the resident often refused the boots, but this was not documented, leading to a deficiency in pressure ulcer care.
A facility failed to maintain consistent communication with a dialysis center regarding a resident's hemodialysis treatments. The resident, dependent on renal dialysis, had missing dialysis visit notes for 14 out of 30 treatments, lacking documentation of weights, vital signs, medications, and treatment tolerance. The Unit Manager confirmed the communication lapse, violating the facility's policy on dialysis monitoring.
A resident with a history of stroke and moderate cognitive impairment was not provided with a prescribed plate guard during meals, despite having a physician's order and documentation indicating its use. Observations and staff interviews revealed a failure in the process of providing adaptive equipment, as the plate guard was not included on meal trays as required by facility policy.
The facility failed to ensure appropriate antibiotic use for three residents, leading to deficiencies in antibiotic stewardship. A resident received antibiotics for a possible UTI before lab results were available, resulting in multiple changes to the regimen. Another resident experienced a similar issue, with antibiotics started based on symptoms and a positive urine dip. A third resident received duplicate antibiotic therapy, contrary to the facility's medication management policy.
A facility failed to report an alleged abuse incident involving a resident who fell while trying to walk without a walker. The DON was reported to have raised his voice at the resident, causing distress. Despite staff and family concerns, the LNHA did not report the incident to the state agency, believing no abuse occurred. The facility's policy mandates immediate reporting of such allegations.
A facility failed to thoroughly investigate an alleged abuse incident involving a resident with multiple diagnoses, including cerebral infarction and hemiparesis. The resident fell, and concerns were raised about the DON's tone of voice during the incident. The investigation was incomplete as statements were not obtained from all relevant parties, including the nurse who reported the incident and the DON involved.
A resident with multiple health conditions fell out of a shower chair during a transfer due to inadequate fall prevention measures. The resident, who required substantial assistance, was afraid to use the seatbelt and preferred two staff members present during transfers. The facility failed to implement individualized safety measures or educate staff on the resident's needs, leading to a deficiency finding.
The facility failed to implement a comprehensive pressure ulcer prevention and treatment program, resulting in harm to residents. A resident readmitted with an open wound did not receive timely assessment or treatment, leading to a Stage III ulcer. Another resident's wound was not assessed or treated promptly, and a third resident did not receive appropriate interventions for a pressure ulcer. Facility policies on wound care and nutrition were not followed.
A resident with a venous stasis ulcer on the right heel experienced a delay in treatment due to a failure to enter the treatment order into the electronic medical records. The wound was first observed, but the necessary care was not initiated until nine days later, as confirmed by an LPN who forgot to document the order. This incident highlights a lapse in the facility's adherence to its policies on timely wound care management.
The facility failed to notify the physician or NP about significant weight loss and did not ensure the dietitian's recommendations were addressed for two residents. Both residents experienced notable weight loss, and communication lapses between the dietitian and nursing staff led to a lack of medical evaluation and intervention.
Improper Low Air Loss Mattress Setting for Resident With Pressure Injury
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain appropriate pressure-reducing measures for a resident with an existing pressure injury. The resident was admitted with multiple diagnoses including left-sided hemiplegia, history of stroke, type 2 diabetes, depression, congestive heart failure, and hypertension, and weighed 168.3 pounds according to a weight listing. The physician’s order directed specific wound care to the buttocks, including cleansing with normal saline, patting dry, applying calcium alginate, and covering with a dry clean dressing. A progress note documented that the hospice nurse was updated on open areas to the buttock and that an air mattress had been ordered. During observation, the resident was found in bed on a low air loss mattress, but the mattress weight control knob was set at the 600-pound setting, despite the resident’s documented weight of 168.3 pounds. In an interview, the facility wound nurse confirmed that the low air loss mattress was set at 600 pounds and acknowledged that the mattress is supposed to be set according to the resident’s weight, and that once the mattress was inflated, the setting had not been adjusted to the resident’s actual weight. Manufacturer guidelines for the low air loss mattress indicated that the pressure dial is adjustable to the patient’s weight and comfort, and the facility’s skin policy stated that preventive measures would be implemented according to the resident’s assessed risk level and risk factors for skin integrity impairment.
Failure to Implement Safety Measures After Hot Liquid Spill Causing Skin Impairment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement safety measures for a resident who sustained impaired skin integrity after spilling hot liquid on the right forearm. The resident was re-admitted with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, kidney disease, and peripheral vascular disease, and required assistance with ADLs per the quarterly MDS. Review of the resident’s ADL care plan and impaired skin integrity care plan showed no safety interventions related to the right forearm skin impairment caused by the hot liquid spill. The facility’s skin policy stated that preventive measures would be implemented according to the resident’s assessed risk level and risk factors for skin integrity impairment. Progress notes documented that the resident’s family reported a fluid-filled discoloration on the right forearm, and the resident stated she had spilled coffee on her arm but reported no pain. Physician orders were in place for treatment of the right forearm skin impairment, including cleansing with normal saline, applying antibiotic ointment, and leaving the area open to air twice daily and PRN, but there were no orders for adaptive equipment or other safety measures related to the injury. During interview, the Regional Nurse Consultant confirmed that no safety measures or interventions had been implemented for the impaired skin integrity from the hot liquid spill and stated that sippy cups had been ordered for the resident but were not implemented.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a skin wound, despite facility policy requiring gown and gloves for high-contact resident care activities such as wound care for any skin opening requiring a dressing. The resident, admitted with diagnoses including left-sided hemiplegia, history of stroke, type 2 diabetes, depression, congestive heart failure, and hypertension, had a physician’s order dated 02/28/26 for buttocks wound treatment involving cleansing with normal saline, drying, applying calcium alginate, and covering with a dry clean dressing. Record review showed no physician orders for EBPs related to this skin wound and no EBP-related interventions in the resident’s care plan. Observation revealed there was no EBP notification signage or PPE available outside the resident’s room for staff use during care, and during interview an LPN confirmed that EBPs had not been implemented for the resident’s skin wound and acknowledged that EBPs should be in place for a resident with a skin wound. This deficiency was cited under Complaint Number 2726270.
Kitchen Sanitation and Food Storage Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner and did not ensure proper food storage, which had the potential to affect all residents. During a kitchen tour, it was observed that the top of the oven and steamer were covered with crumbs and debris, and the grill had a missing panel. The grease in the fryer contained large clumps of crumbs, and the floor and lower back wall of the stove, oven, steamer, and grill were covered with dirt, debris, and grease. Additionally, the freezer contained open bags of onion rings and hashbrowns without labels or dates, and an unopened bag of chicken tenders and fish filets without labels or dates. These findings were verified by a staff member who acknowledged that the previous day's staff did not clean and strain the fryer. A follow-up visit revealed further issues with food storage. The freezer had an open bag of waffles and onion rings, both undated, and a carton of ice cream with no open date. The refrigerator contained an open container of hummus with an open date of nearly three weeks prior. The Dietary Manager confirmed these findings and noted that the floor and back wall of the grill, steamer, and oven were dirty upon his inspection. The facility's policy on general sanitation of the kitchen, which was undated, stated that food and nutrition services staff are responsible for maintaining kitchen sanitation and that leftovers should be used within seven days or discarded.
Failure to Address Pharmacy Recommendations and Conduct AIMS Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to appropriately address pharmacy recommendations for gradual dose reductions (GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions for several residents. Resident #9, who was cognitively intact, was receiving Buspirone without a GDR, and the pharmacy recommended a reduction. The recommendation was disagreed upon by a Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, citing the resident's refusal, but there was no documentation of the resident being educated about the benefits of a GDR or the reasons for their refusal. Similarly, Resident #41, who had cognitive impairment, was receiving Fluvoxamine without a GDR, and the recommendation for reduction was also disagreed upon due to the resident's refusal, without proper documentation of education or reasons for refusal. Resident #16, with severe cognitive impairment, was receiving multiple psychotropic medications, and the pharmacy recommended GDRs for Depakote and Risperidone. The recommendations were disagreed upon, with one citing family refusal and another lacking any reason. The Nurse Practitioner documented a generic note about the resident's symptoms being well-managed, but it was not specific to the medications in question. The Director of Nursing was unaware that practitioners were not documenting specific justifications for disagreeing with GDRs, contrary to the facility's policy. Additionally, the facility failed to complete an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment for Resident #70 upon the initiation of the antipsychotic medication Seroquel. The resident, who had moderately impaired cognition, was receiving Seroquel for psychosis and delirium, but there were no target behaviors documented for its use. An AIMS assessment was completed over a month after the medication was started, which was confirmed by an MDS LPN as a missed requirement. The facility's policy required monitoring for adverse effects using AIMS upon initiation of psychotropic medications, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Provide Hearing Aids to Resident with Hearing Impairment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident, identified as Resident #16, was provided with necessary hearing aids or amplifiers to assist with their moderate hearing impairment. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including dementia with psychotic and mood disturbance, heart disease, anxiety, and depression, was observed multiple times without wearing a hearing device. The resident's care plan, dated 03/01/25, identified a risk for communication issues due to hearing deficits and dementia but did not include specific interventions regarding hearing devices. Interviews with staff and the resident's daughter revealed that the resident often misplaced personal items, including hearing aids, due to cognitive impairment. Staff members, including an LPN and a CNA, confirmed that the resident's hearing amplifiers had been missing for about a week. The MDS Nurse later found the hearing amplifiers in the resident's room and acknowledged that they had not been applied throughout the week. The facility's policy on activities of daily living mandates that residents receive appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their ability to conduct daily activities, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Ensure Pressure Reducing Devices in Place
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that pressure reducing devices were consistently in place for a resident at risk for developing pressure injuries. The resident, who had a history of stroke with right side hemiplegia, type two diabetes, and vascular dementia, was identified as having impaired cognition and required assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and personal hygiene. The resident's care plan included interventions such as the use of heel boots to prevent pressure injuries. However, observations over several days revealed that the resident did not have the pressure reducing boots on while in bed, despite physician orders and documentation indicating their use every shift. Interviews with staff revealed that the resident would refuse to wear the pressure reducing boots, and the refusal was supposed to be documented by the nursing staff. However, the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) inaccurately reflected that the boots were in place every shift. This discrepancy between the TAR and actual observations, along with the lack of documentation of the resident's refusal, contributed to the deficiency in providing appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevention for the resident.
Inadequate Communication with Dialysis Center
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure consistent communication between the facility and the dialysis center regarding a resident's hemodialysis treatments. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including hemiplegia, aphasia, convulsions, and dependence on renal dialysis, was scheduled to receive hemodialysis three times a week. However, a review of the resident's medical records from January to March revealed missing dialysis visit notes for the last 30 treatments. Specifically, 14 of these visits lacked documentation of the resident's pre-weight and dry weight, vital signs, medications administered, and how the resident tolerated the dialysis treatment. An interview with the Unit Manager confirmed the absence of dialysis communication sheets and acknowledged that adequate communication was not occurring between the facility and the dialysis center. The dialysis center was not providing the necessary visit notes to inform the facility nurse of the resident's pre-weight, dry weight, medications administered, or the resident's tolerance to the treatment. This lack of communication was in violation of the facility's Dialysis Monitoring policy, which mandates ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services.
Failure to Provide Adaptive Dining Equipment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary adaptive dining equipment for a resident who required it to maintain independence with eating. The resident, who had a history of stroke with right side hemiplegia and moderate cognitive impairment, was observed on multiple occasions without the prescribed plate guard during meals. Despite having a physician's order for the use of a plate guard at every meal, and documentation indicating its use, the resident was not provided with this adaptive equipment during observed meal times. Interviews with staff revealed a breakdown in the process of providing adaptive equipment. The CNA confirmed that the plate guard was not available on the meal trays, and the Dietary Supervisor explained that the adaptive equipment should be placed on the tray by the kitchen staff and then attached by floor staff when serving the meal. However, this process was not followed, resulting in the resident not receiving the necessary equipment to aid in self-feeding, as outlined in the facility's policy.
Deficiencies in Antibiotic Stewardship and Medication Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure appropriate antibiotic administration for three residents, leading to deficiencies in antibiotic stewardship. Resident #9 was administered antibiotics for a possible urinary tract infection (UTI) before urinalysis or culture and sensitivity results were available. This resulted in multiple changes to the antibiotic regimen after the results were received, indicating a lack of adherence to the facility's antibiotic stewardship policy. Interviews with staff confirmed that antibiotics were often started based on a positive urine dip without waiting for lab results. Resident #23 experienced a similar issue, where antibiotics were initiated for a suspected UTI based on symptoms and a positive urine dip, without waiting for culture and sensitivity results. This led to a change in the antibiotic regimen once the results were reviewed, highlighting a pattern of premature antibiotic administration. Staff interviews corroborated that this practice was common, despite the facility's policy requiring lab results to guide antibiotic therapy decisions. Resident #46 received duplicate antibiotic therapy for a UTI, with both Macrobid and Ciprofloxacin being administered concurrently for five days. This was contrary to the facility's medication management policy, which requires the interdisciplinary team to review medication regimens for efficacy and potential problems. Interviews with staff confirmed that the existing antibiotic should have been placed on hold during the new antibiotic therapy, but this was not done, resulting in the resident receiving both antibiotics simultaneously.
Failure to Report Alleged Abuse Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving a staff member and a resident to the state survey agency. The incident involved Resident #72, who had a history of cerebral infarction, aphasia, convulsions, major depressive disorder, anxiety, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis. On the day of the incident, Resident #72 attempted to walk without a walker and fell in the lobby. Multiple staff members witnessed the fall and reported that the Director of Nursing (DON) raised his voice at the resident, telling him he could no longer use a walker. The incident was not documented in the medical record, and the allegation was not reported to the state survey agency as required by the facility's abuse prohibition policy. Interviews with staff and family members revealed concerns about the DON's tone and behavior towards Resident #72, who was reportedly crying and scared after the incident. The Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) was informed of the situation but did not report it to the state agency, believing that abuse had not occurred. The facility's policy requires that all alleged violations involving abuse or mistreatment be reported immediately, but this was not done in this case. The deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation under Complaint Number OH00162049.
Failure to Investigate Alleged Abuse Thoroughly
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of possible abuse involving a staff member and a resident. The incident involved a resident who was admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, aphasia, convulsions, major depressive disorder, anxiety, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis. The resident experienced a fall, and multiple staff members provided statements regarding the incident. However, the investigation was incomplete as statements were not obtained from all relevant parties, including the nurse who reported the incident, the staff who provided care before the resident's transfer to the hospital, and the Director of Nursing (DON) involved in the incident. The facility's Abuse Prohibition policy defines abuse as willful infliction of intimidation or punishment resulting in mental anguish, including mental/emotional abuse through verbal or nonverbal conduct. Despite this policy, the investigation into the incident was insufficient. The Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) acknowledged that statements were not collected from all necessary individuals, and the DON was not asked to provide a written statement. The report highlights concerns about the DON's tone of voice during the incident, which was perceived as stern and concerning by a staff member.
Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Measures for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement appropriate fall prevention interventions for Resident #9 after a fall incident. Resident #9, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, peripheral vascular disease, and osteoporosis, fell out of a shower chair while being transferred into the shower. The incident occurred when a CNA attempted to pull the shower chair over the lip into the shower stall. At the time of the fall, Resident #9 was cognitively intact and required substantial to maximum assistance with bathing. The plan of care only included sending Resident #9 to the emergency department after a fall, with no other preventive measures in place. Interviews revealed that Resident #9 was afraid to use the seatbelt on the shower chair due to concerns about tipping and preferred having two staff members present during transfers. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that no additional interventions were implemented, and staff were not educated on individualized safety measures for Resident #9. The DON was unaware of Resident #9's preference for two staff members during showers, and no training was provided to address this need. The deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation, highlighting the facility's failure to provide adequate supervision and fall prevention measures for Resident #9.
Failure to Implement Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention and treatment program, resulting in harm to residents. Resident #54, who was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, was readmitted to the facility with an open area on the left buttock. However, the facility did not assess or describe the wound, notify the physician for treatment orders, or initiate treatment until 15 days later. This delay led to the development of a Stage III pressure ulcer requiring excisional debridement. Interviews with staff confirmed that the wound was present upon readmission, but no action was taken until much later. Resident #82's medical record revealed a similar pattern of neglect. The resident was identified with red and squishy heels and an open area on the buttocks, but there was no evidence of wound assessment, physician notification, or treatment initiation. A treatment order was eventually obtained but not implemented until three days after the wound was first identified. The facility's wound care nurse confirmed that the wound was not assessed or treated in a timely manner, and an in-service was conducted to address the lack of notification and treatment for new wounds. Resident #71 was admitted with no wounds noted, but later developed a Stage III pressure ulcer on the coccyx. The facility's policy indicated that a low air loss mattress would be appropriate for such a condition, but one was not provided. Additionally, the resident's nutritional assessment was not updated to reflect the presence of the pressure ulcer, and the dietitian admitted to copying and pasting information from a previous assessment. The facility's policies on skin measurement, pressure ulcer prevention, and nutrition and wound management were not followed, contributing to the deficiencies observed.
Delayed Wound Care Treatment for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement timely treatment for a venous wound for Resident #56, who was moderately cognitively impaired and required assistance for mobility and personal hygiene. The resident had a venous stasis ulcer on the right heel, first observed on October 30, 2023, with a treatment plan involving the application of adaptic, abdominal pad, and kerlix. However, the treatment order was not entered into the electronic medical records until November 6, 2023, delaying the initiation of wound care until November 8, 2023, nine days after the wound was identified. The delay in treatment was confirmed by LPN #257, who admitted to forgetting to enter the order into the electronic medical records, preventing the nursing staff from administering the necessary care. The facility's policy required documentation and notification of new skin conditions, with treatment orders to be obtained and documented on the Treatment Administration Record. This deficiency was investigated under Complaint Number OH00157487, highlighting a lapse in the facility's adherence to its own policies regarding timely wound care management.
Failure to Address Significant Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the physician or nurse practitioner regarding significant weight loss and did not ensure the dietitian's recommendations for weight loss were addressed for two residents. Resident #63 experienced a significant weight loss over several months, with weights dropping from 118.0 lbs to 96.0 lbs. Despite the Registered Dietitian recommending an appetite stimulant on two occasions, these recommendations were not communicated to the physician or nurse practitioner. Both the Registered Dietitian and the Director of Nursing assumed the other had informed the physician, leading to a lack of medical evaluation and intervention for the resident's weight loss. During a meal observation, Resident #63 required cues to eat from staff, indicating potential issues with food intake that were not medically addressed due to the communication lapse. Similarly, Resident #66 experienced a significant weight loss, dropping from 331.3 lbs to 293.0 lbs. The Registered Dietitian was aware of and monitoring the weight loss and had recommended updating the resident's food preferences. However, this recommendation was not communicated to the physician or nurse practitioner. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the Nurse Practitioner was unaware of the weight loss, again due to a communication failure between the dietitian and nursing staff. The facility's policy required documented clinical basis for any significant weight change, which was not adhered to in these cases.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 155 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Wooster
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smithville Western Care Center | 1.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Wooster Community Hospital Snf | 2.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| West View Healthy Living | 3.3 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Glendora Health Care Center | 3.8 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Wayne County Care Center | 5.2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Avenue At Wooster.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.