Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Riverside Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to provide palatable, attractive meals at safe, appetizing temperatures and to serve food items consistent with meal tickets. Observations of multiple meals showed missing food components, dry and unseasoned vegetables, and hot and cold items served at inappropriate temperatures, with some foods described as bland or unidentifiable in taste. Several residents reported routinely receiving cold, poor-tasting food, small portions, and meals that did not match what they ordered, including being served spicy items they could not tolerate and not receiving requested alternatives. Resident Council members echoed concerns about unappealing menu choices, lack of fresh produce, incorrect trays, and improper temperatures, and an LPN confirmed ongoing resident complaints about taste and portion sizes.
Failure to Provide Palatable, Proper-Temperature Meals and Accurate Trays
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide food and drink that were palatable, attractive, and at safe and appetizing temperatures during multiple observed meals. Policy required that residents receive nourishing, palatable, attractive meals, with accurate meal tickets and alternatives offered when meals were refused. During a lunch meal observation, three sampled plates from the South unit steam table showed missing items and unappealing food: dry cauliflower without gravy or seasoning, one plate missing pork gravy and penne with marinara, a mechanical soft plate missing soft salad and pudding, and another plate missing cauliflower and tossed salad. During breakfast and lunch tray samplings for one resident, condiments were missing, hot items such as bacon, pancakes, pasta bake, squash, and coffee were served at various temperatures, and cold items such as milk, juice, and applesauce were measured in the 57–64 degrees Fahrenheit range. The pasta bake and applesauce were described as bland and unappetizing or unidentifiable in taste. Multiple resident interviews corroborated problems with food temperature, taste, accuracy of orders, and portion sizes. One resident reported receiving cold tater tots and soup for dinner and being told their food could not be reheated; when they requested a sandwich, it was of such unclear content that they did not eat it. Another resident stated the food was not good, they did not regularly eat facility food, they did not receive what they ordered, portions were small, and on one occasion they did not receive the cheeseburger they were supposed to get but were instead served tacos and beans, which they could not eat due to an inability to tolerate spicy foods; they reported that a requested alternate meal was never received. A third resident reported poor food quality, small portions, and receiving a full plate of rice for dinner at one time, leading them to request sandwiches for most meals because the food was always cold and tasted bad. Resident Council members stated that food choices were undesirable, vegetables and fruits were never fresh, food was not served at the right temperature, and meal tickets did not match what was served. An LPN also reported that residents complained about the food, describing it as lacking taste and served in small portions.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 95 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Castleton On Hudson
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evergreen Commons Rehabilitation And Nursing Ctr | 5.9 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Rosewood Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 7.2 mi | — | 55 | 2 |
| Delmar Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing | 7.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| St Margarets Center | 8.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| The Grand Rehabilitation And Nursing At Barnwell | 8.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Riverside Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.