Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at King David Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors found widespread deficiencies in environmental maintenance and cleanliness, including rusted fixtures, stained and damaged surfaces, and poor housekeeping across multiple units. Staff interviews confirmed awareness of these issues, citing ongoing renovations and staffing shortages as contributing factors. Despite facility policies requiring regular maintenance and cleaning, these standards were not met, resulting in an environment that did not support resident comfort or safety.
The facility failed to report multiple incidents involving unwitnessed falls and injuries of unknown origin to the state health department within the required timeframes. Several residents with cognitive impairments sustained serious injuries, including fractures and lacerations, without clear explanations for the events, and these incidents were not reported as mandated by facility policy and state regulations.
Two residents with significant cognitive and behavioral issues did not have their comprehensive care plans reviewed or updated as required, despite ongoing incidents of behavioral outbursts and wandering. Staff confirmed that care plans were not revised to reflect these changes, contrary to facility policy and regulatory expectations.
Surveyors observed multiple failures in food safety and hygiene, including staff not fully covering facial hair during food preparation, expired and moldy food items stored in the kitchen, and a CNA handling residents' food with bare hands without performing hand hygiene between residents. Facility policies required proper hair restraints, food rotation, and safe food handling, but staff were unaware or did not adhere to these standards.
Failure to Maintain Safe, Clean, and Homelike Environment
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified multiple failures by the facility to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for residents across several units. Observations revealed numerous instances of disrepair and poor housekeeping, including rusty metal legs on closets, chipped paint, holes in wallpaper, ripped chairs, cracked tables, dusty and stained air conditioning units, and gaps between walls and AC units. Dining rooms and resident bathrooms were found with sticky substances, tarnished fixtures, ripped or missing window screens, stained window shades, mismatched and cracked tiles, and non-functioning bathroom lights. In several rooms, radiators and heating/cooling systems were rusted or stained, and vents were clogged or dirty. Floors were observed with debris, and some walls and ceilings had stains, peeling paint, or bubbles. Interviews with facility staff, including the Maintenance Director, Director of Nursing, Housekeeping Director, and Administrator, confirmed awareness of many of these issues. Staff cited ongoing renovations, staffing shortages, and challenges with resident cooperation as reasons for delays in repairs and maintenance. The Maintenance Director acknowledged that some repairs, such as replacing rusted radiators or fixing window screens, were pending due to contractor delays or difficulty accessing resident rooms. Housekeeping staff were responsible for cleaning, but persistent issues with cleanliness and maintenance remained unaddressed in several areas. Documentation reviewed included the facility's Maintenance Policy and Procedure Manual and Cleaning Resident and Non-Resident Area policy, both of which outlined expectations for maintaining the building in good repair and ensuring cleanliness. Despite these policies, the facility failed to uphold the standards, as evidenced by the ongoing environmental deficiencies observed throughout the survey period. No specific resident medical histories or conditions were detailed in relation to the deficiencies.
Failure to Timely Report Injuries of Unknown Origin
Penalty
Summary
During a recertification and complaint survey, it was found that the facility failed to report alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or injuries of unknown source to the New York State Department of Health within the required timeframes. The facility's policy mandates reporting such incidents within 2 hours if serious bodily injury is involved, or within 24 hours if not, but this was not followed for several residents who experienced unwitnessed falls or injuries of unknown origin. One resident with rheumatoid arthritis and dementia was found on the floor with altered mental status and pain to the left hip, later diagnosed with a left intertrochanteric fracture. Despite the unwitnessed nature of the incident and the resident's inability to explain what happened, the event was not reported to the state. Another resident with vascular dementia and a history of traumatic brain injury was found with a head laceration, also unwitnessed and unexplained, and this incident was similarly not reported. In both cases, facility leadership acknowledged that such injuries of unknown origin are reportable but failed to ensure timely notification. A third resident with unspecified dementia experienced two separate unwitnessed falls, both resulting in injuries including facial fractures, lacerations requiring stitches, and a subdural hematoma. The resident was unable to explain the circumstances of the falls, and both incidents were not reported to the Department of Health as required. Interviews with facility administrators and the DON confirmed a lack of awareness or misunderstanding of reporting requirements for injuries of unknown origin, contributing to the deficiency.
Failure to Review and Revise Care Plans for Behavioral and Elopement Risks
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that comprehensive, person-centered care plans were reviewed and revised to address the changing needs of two residents. For one resident with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, schizoaffective disorder, and anxiety disorder, the care plan addressing behavior problems such as screaming, yelling, and cursing was last reviewed in May 2022. Despite multiple documented behavioral incidents between May and June 2025, there was no evidence that the care plan was updated to reflect these ongoing behaviors. Interviews with staff confirmed that the resident continued to display these behaviors and that the care plan had not been reviewed as required. Another resident, admitted with multiple diagnoses including non-Alzheimer's dementia and psychotic disorder, was identified as having severe cognitive impairment and was at risk for elopement, with a wander guard in place. The care plan for elopement risk and wandering was last reviewed in October 2024, despite ongoing documentation of wandering behaviors and quarterly assessments. Staff interviews revealed that while general notes were made in the resident's progress notes, the care plan itself was not updated to reflect the resident's current status or behaviors. Facility policy requires that care plans be reviewed at least quarterly and revised as changes in the resident's condition dictate. However, in both cases, there was no documented evidence that the care plans were reviewed or revised in accordance with policy or regulatory requirements, despite clear indications of changes in the residents' behaviors and needs.
Food Safety and Hygiene Deficiencies in Dietary Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety, as observed during kitchen and dining tasks. Multiple staff members, including kitchen staff and an assistant administrator, were observed with facial hair not fully covered by beard nets or hairnets while preparing and inspecting food. The facility's own policies required proper hair restraints, but staff were unaware or did not notice when these were not properly used. Additionally, expired food items, such as shredded lettuce and moldy cucumbers, were found in the refrigerator, and enteral feedings past their use-by date were stored in the dietary emergency food storage area. Staff responsible for inspecting and rotating food did not identify or remove these expired items as required by facility policy. During meal service, a certified nursing assistant was observed handling residents' food with bare hands, including peeling a banana and unwrapping bread, without performing hand hygiene between residents. Facility policy required food to be served in a manner that prevents foodborne illness, and staff interviews confirmed that hand hygiene and avoiding bare-hand contact with food were expected practices. The infection preventionist emphasized the importance of hand hygiene for all staff. These failures were observed on one of seven units reviewed during the survey.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,019 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 13 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Brooklyn
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haym Solomon Home For The Aged | 0.1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Bensonhurst Center For Rehab And Healthcare | 1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Seagate Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 1.3 mi | — | 3 | 1 |
| Saints Joachim & Anne Nursing And Rehab Center | 1.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Sea Crest Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 1.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for King David Center For Nursing And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.