Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Colonial Park Rehabilitation And Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors found that the facility did not consistently provide accurate, palatable meals at proper temperatures. Six residents reported that their food was often cold and did not match the meal tickets. During two observed lunch meals, one resident received hot and cold items measured outside the facility’s required temperature ranges, and another resident’s original tray was missing multiple ordered food items and adaptive equipment. The replacement tray for that resident also lacked ordered gravy, did not have the turkey cut as specified, provided a divided plate instead of a scoop plate, and included regular milk instead of a prescribed diet shake. The Food Service Director confirmed that staff were responsible for checking trays against meal tickets, acknowledged ongoing resident complaints about missing items, and stated the required temperature standards for hot and cold foods.
A resident with serious infections did not receive or have documented several scheduled IV antibiotic doses, as required by physician orders. MAR entries were left blank for multiple administrations, and there was no evidence in progress notes or provider notification regarding the missed doses. Staff interviews revealed confusion about responsibility for IV medication administration and documentation, and facility leadership confirmed that blank MAR entries constituted medication errors, but no investigation or provider notification was documented.
A resident receiving IV vancomycin for serious infections did not have required vancomycin trough levels drawn as ordered, and the only recorded trough was not performed at the correct time. Staff interviews revealed confusion about lab scheduling and timing, and there was no documentation that the necessary labs were completed or communicated to the pharmacy or consultant pharmacist.
A resident with multiple health conditions did not receive critical medications as ordered due to delays in corporate approval and communication failures within the facility. The resident's medications, including those for Parkinson's, diabetes, and respiratory issues, were unavailable on multiple occasions, and there was no evidence that providers were notified. This deficiency in medication management led to worsening symptoms for the resident.
The facility failed to ensure a proper grievance process, as residents were unaware of the grievance officer and did not receive follow-up on grievances. A resident with cerebral palsy reported discomfort with CNAs' behavior, but the grievance resolution was incomplete, with only one CNA re-educated and the resident's care preferences not fully addressed. Staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in grievance handling, highlighting a deficiency in the process.
The facility failed to adhere to food safety standards, with improper cooling of hot food, a malfunctioning dishwasher, and outdated food in the cooler. Observations revealed rice and other items not cooled properly, incomplete cooling logs, and a dishwasher with inadequate temperatures and sanitizer levels. Outdated food items were also found, indicating lapses in monitoring and adherence to protocols.
A survey revealed that a facility failed to properly label and store medications, including insulin pens and eye drops, across multiple medication carts. Medications lacked resident-specific identifiers and opened/discard dates, and some were expired. Staff interviews indicated a lack of knowledge about medication expiration and inadequate documentation of checks, contributing to these deficiencies.
A facility failed to maintain effective infection control practices for a resident with clostridium difficile. Staff did not consistently wear required PPE or perform hand hygiene when entering or exiting the resident's room, despite signage indicating contact precautions. Interviews revealed a lack of understanding and adherence to protocols, with the DON confirming the importance of following isolation room procedures.
A resident with a history of stroke and infections was prescribed antibiotics for an elevated white blood cell count, but the facility failed to notify the resident's representative as required by their policy. Despite the initiation of Doxycycline and Ceftriaxone treatments, there was no documentation of notification, and interviews confirmed the lapse.
A resident with visual impairment and depression was not provided with a large print Bible or glasses, which were necessary for their participation in activities. The resident's care plan documented these needs, but staff were unaware of the missing items. The Activities Director acknowledged the oversight, and the deficiency was noted during the survey.
Two residents with pressure ulcers did not have their low air loss mattresses set according to their current weights, and the settings were not documented in their care plans or physician orders. One resident with a Stage 4 ulcer had their mattress set too firm, while another resident with an unstageable ulcer had unclear mattress settings. Staff interviews revealed confusion about responsibility for setting and monitoring the mattresses.
A resident with dysphagia was observed eating alone in their room without supervision, despite being care planned for line-of-sight supervision during meals. Facility policies required supervision for residents on altered diets to ensure safety, but staff failed to adhere to these protocols, as confirmed by interviews with a CNA, RN Unit Manager, and Speech and Language Pathologist.
A resident requiring BiPAP therapy did not receive proper respiratory care as the facility failed to clean and maintain the equipment per professional standards. Observations showed the mask was dirty and improperly maintained, with no documented cleaning schedule or physician orders. Staff interviews confirmed the lack of proper documentation and adherence to care protocols, potentially leading to respiratory infections.
A resident with end-stage renal disease did not receive proper pre- and post-dialysis evaluations at an LTC facility. The facility failed to document vital signs and access site assessments, and the communication book with the dialysis center was incomplete and outdated. Staff interviews revealed confusion over documentation responsibilities, compromising the resident's safety.
The facility failed to provide meals at appropriate temperatures and with adequate flavor, as observed during a survey. Meals served on two occasions were below temperature standards, bland, and contained foreign substances. Residents reported missing items and unappetizing food. Staff interviews revealed issues with menu changes and communication, leading to inaccurate meal service.
Failure to Provide Accurate, Palatable Meals at Proper Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide residents with nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diets that met their daily nutritional needs, as evidenced by multiple issues with meal temperatures, tray accuracy, and missing adaptive equipment during surveyor observations and resident interviews. Facility policy required that all meals be checked for accuracy against meal tickets, that hot foods be maintained above 140°F and cold foods below 41°F, and that trays be verified before leaving the kitchen. During a resident group meeting, six anonymous residents reported that their food was often cold and that the items on their trays did not match the meal tickets. These resident reports were corroborated by direct observations of two lunch meals. During a lunch observation on one unit, a resident’s tray was the last served and food temperatures were measured and verified with the Regional Director of Food Operations: the ziti was 133°F, the broccoli 110°F and cool to taste, the garlic bread 100°F, the coffee 133°F, and the pineapple 68°F, all outside the facility’s stated acceptable ranges for hot and cold foods. On another unit during a separate lunch observation, a resident’s tray was identified by a CNA as incorrect and missing multiple ordered items, including turkey, gravy, creamed spinach, cottage cheese, chilled peaches, a diet house shake, Mrs. Dash seasoning, margarine, and a scoop plate; measured temperatures showed stuffing at 125.1°F, carrots at 110.2°F, and water at 62.8°F. When a replacement tray was delivered, it was still missing gravy, the turkey was not cut as directed on the meal ticket, the resident received a divided plate instead of the ordered scoop plate, and regular milk was provided instead of the diet house shake. In an interview, the Food Service Director acknowledged that all dietary staff were responsible for meal ticket accuracy, that residents had been complaining of missing items for months, and confirmed the required temperature standards for hot and cold foods.
Failure to Administer and Document IV Antibiotics as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of the thoracic vertebrae, local skin infection, and sepsis did not receive several prescribed intravenous antibiotic doses. Physician orders required administration of cefepime and vancomycin every 12 hours, but the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed blank entries for multiple scheduled doses, indicating they were either not given or not documented. There was no evidence in the nursing progress notes of missed doses or provider notification regarding these omissions. Interviews with nursing staff revealed confusion and inconsistency regarding responsibility for intravenous medication administration and documentation. LPNs and RNs described different processes for being alerted to medication times, and some staff were unsure why MAR entries were left blank. Supervisory staff acknowledged that a blank MAR box meant the medication was unaccounted for, and that this constituted a medication error. However, there was no documentation of any investigation into the missing administrations, nor was there evidence that the provider was notified as required by facility policy. The physician responsible for the resident's care confirmed that they were not notified of any missed antibiotic doses, which they considered a significant medication error. Facility leadership, including the DON and Assistant DON, stated that all MAR entries should be completed and that missed or undocumented doses should be investigated and reported. Despite this, no such actions were documented, and the missed doses remained unaccounted for.
Failure to Obtain Timely and Accurate Vancomycin Trough Levels
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure timely and accurate laboratory services for one resident who was receiving intravenous vancomycin for osteomyelitis, discitis, and sepsis. Physician orders required regular monitoring of vancomycin trough levels and other laboratory tests to assess the effectiveness and safety of the antibiotic therapy. Despite these orders, there was no documented evidence that the required vancomycin trough levels were obtained on the specified dates, and the only recorded trough was not performed at the appropriate time relative to the dosing schedule. Interviews with facility staff, including the Assistant Director of Nursing and the Director of Nursing, revealed that laboratory draws were scheduled on specific days of the week, and there was confusion or lack of clarity regarding the timing of the vancomycin trough draws. The registered nurses were responsible for drawing blood from the resident's peripherally inserted central catheter, but the records did not show that the required labs were completed as ordered. The pharmacy and consultant pharmacist were not contacted with the necessary lab results, and the facility failed to communicate effectively regarding the resident's laboratory needs. The failure to obtain timely and accurate vancomycin trough levels was confirmed through record review and staff interviews. The physician stated that the trough levels should have been drawn every three days and prior to the next scheduled dose, and that delays or missed draws were not acceptable. The lack of appropriate laboratory monitoring was not explained by the staff, and there was no documentation to support that the required tests were performed as ordered.
Medication Management Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Resident #2 received medications as ordered, leading to a deficiency in providing treatment and care according to professional standards and the resident's care plan. Resident #2, who had diagnoses including depression, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and Parkinson's Disease, did not receive several critical medications on multiple occasions. These medications included Rytary for Parkinson's, Novolog for diabetes, Pulmicort for respiratory issues, and vilazodone for depression. The absence of these medications was documented by various Licensed Practical Nurses over several days, with no evidence that a provider was notified about the unavailability of these medications. The facility's policy required that any medication not administered should be documented, and the medical professional should be informed to obtain further orders. However, this protocol was not followed, as there was no documented evidence that the provider was notified about the missing medications. The facility's practice of requiring corporate approval for medications over $50 contributed to delays in medication availability. This process led to significant delays in obtaining necessary medications for Resident #2, who experienced worsening symptoms, including dysarthria and chest pain, potentially related to the missed medications. Interviews with facility staff, including Licensed Practical Nurses, the Corporate Pharmacy Liaison, and the Director of Nursing, revealed systemic issues in medication management and communication. Staff reported that medications were often unavailable for extended periods, and there was confusion about the process for obtaining medications from the Cubex or notifying providers. The Medical Director emphasized the importance of timely medication administration, particularly for conditions like Parkinson's Disease, where missing doses can lead to symptom recurrence. The deficiency highlights a failure in the facility's medication management system, impacting the resident's health and well-being.
Deficiency in Grievance Process and Resident Rights
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a proper grievance process was in place for residents, as evidenced by the lack of awareness among residents about the grievance officer and the handling of grievances. During a Resident Council Meeting, twelve anonymous residents expressed that they were unaware of who the grievance officer was and did not receive follow-up on their grievances. Additionally, the facility did not have visible postings of the grievance officer's contact information, which is a requirement according to their policy. Resident #16, who has cerebral palsy, anxiety disorder, and depression, reported feeling uncomfortable with the behavior of two Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) during care. The resident filed a grievance about the CNAs being inappropriately touchy with each other and not assisting with unlocking the door for visitors. The grievance was documented, but the resolution was incomplete, as only one CNA received re-education, and the resident's request to not be cared for by the involved CNAs was not fully addressed. Interviews with facility staff revealed inconsistencies in the grievance handling process. The Social Worker and Registered Nurse Unit Manager acknowledged the resident's dissatisfaction and the incomplete resolution of the grievance. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator confirmed that grievances should be resolved within 72 hours and that residents have the right to refuse care from certain staff members. However, there was a lack of documentation and follow-through in addressing Resident #16's concerns, highlighting a deficiency in the facility's grievance process.
Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. During the recertification survey, it was observed that hot food was improperly cooled, the mechanical dishwasher was not functioning as designed, and outdated foods were present in the walk-in cooler. Specifically, a pan of rice was found in the walk-in cooler at a temperature of 123 degrees Fahrenheit, which did not meet the required cooling standards. The rice was not properly monitored for temperature reduction, and similar issues were noted with other food items like turkey and pork loin, which had incomplete cooling records. The mechanical dishwasher was also found to be malfunctioning, with wash temperatures recorded below the required 150 degrees Fahrenheit and final rinse temperatures below the necessary 180 degrees Fahrenheit. The chlorine sanitizer levels were also inconsistent, with measurements as low as 10 parts per million, far below the required levels. The Maintenance Director confirmed that the dishwasher had been operating with a broken heating element for an extended period, and the facility had been using chemical sanitization as a workaround. Additionally, outdated food items were found in the walk-in cooler, including a pan of chicken labeled from 7/11 and a bag of cooked potatoes dated 7/3. Staff interviews revealed a lack of a specific person responsible for reviewing cooler contents, leading to the presence of outdated items. The Temporary Food Service Director acknowledged that these items should not have been in the cooler, indicating a lapse in monitoring and adherence to food safety protocols.
Medication Labeling and Storage Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were labeled and stored according to professional principles, as observed during a recertification survey. On Unit 1, medication cart 1 contained several medications, including multidose insulin pens, eye drops, and ointments, that were not labeled with resident-specific identifiers or opened/discard dates. Additionally, an unopened insulin pen was not stored in the refrigerator as required. Licensed Practical Nurse #18 admitted to administering an undated insulin pen to a resident without checking for an opened date, which is necessary to determine expiration. On Unit 2, medication cart 1 had a multidose insulin pen without resident-specific information or an opened/discard date, and another insulin pen for a specific resident also lacked an opened/discard date. Medication cart 2 contained expired stock medications. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 acknowledged that they would not use medications without knowing the intended resident or expiration status. The Assistant Director of Nursing had previously checked the carts for expired medications, but these issues were not identified. Interviews with nursing staff revealed a lack of knowledge regarding the duration insulin is viable after opening and the absence of documentation for weekly expiration checks. The Assistant Director of Nursing stated that night shift nurses were responsible for checking expiration dates weekly, but it was unclear if these checks were documented. The facility lacked an educator, and staff were unsure when they last received education on medication storage, contributing to the oversight of expired and improperly labeled medications.
Inadequate Infection Control Practices for Resident on Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by multiple staff members not adhering to transmission-based precautions for a resident diagnosed with clostridium difficile. The facility's policy required staff to wear gloves and gowns when entering the room of a resident on contact precautions, and to perform hand hygiene before leaving the room. However, observations revealed that staff members, including a Certified Nurse Aide, a Registered Nurse Unit Manager, and a Licensed Practical Nurse, did not consistently follow these protocols. Resident #59, who had a history of recurrent enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, was placed on contact precautions upon readmission to the facility. Despite the presence of signage indicating the need for contact precautions, staff were observed entering and exiting the resident's room without the required personal protective equipment. Additionally, staff failed to perform hand hygiene after leaving the room, and contaminated items were handled inappropriately, increasing the risk of infection transmission. Interviews with staff members revealed a lack of understanding and adherence to the facility's infection control protocols. The Registered Nurse Unit Manager acknowledged the need for gowns and gloves when entering the resident's room and admitted to not following proper procedures. The Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist confirmed that staff were expected to follow the signage and that there was no appropriate time to enter an isolation room without the required protective equipment. This deficiency highlights a significant lapse in the facility's infection control practices, particularly in protecting residents and staff from communicable diseases.
Failure to Notify Resident's Representative of Antibiotic Treatment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to immediately inform the resident's representative about the initiation of a new treatment for a resident, which is a requirement according to their policy. Specifically, a resident with a history of stroke, sacral pressure ulcer, and infections was prescribed antibiotics due to an elevated white blood cell count indicating an infection. Despite the facility's policy mandating notification within 24 hours of a change in the resident's medical condition, the resident's representative was not informed about the antibiotic treatment. The resident's medical records showed that antibiotics, Doxycycline and Ceftriaxone, were prescribed on consecutive days to address the infection. However, progress notes by the registered nurse did not document any signs or symptoms of infection, the use of antibiotics, or the notification of the resident's representative. Interviews with the resident's representative and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the family was not notified about the antibiotic therapy, which was acknowledged as a lapse in procedure.
Failure to Provide Necessary Equipment for Resident Activities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities that met the interests and supported the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of Resident #3. The resident, who had diagnoses including left-sided hemiplegia, unspecified visual loss, and depression, was not provided with a large print Bible or glasses, which were necessary for their participation in activities. The resident's care plan indicated a preference for independent activities and 1:1 visits, and it was documented that they required visual aids to participate in activities. However, during the survey, it was found that the resident's glasses were missing, and they did not have access to a large print Bible, which was part of their documented interests. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of awareness regarding the resident's missing glasses and Bible. The Activities Director and Activity Aide were responsible for ensuring residents' interests were met, but they were not aware of the resident's needs for glasses and a large print Bible. The Activities Director acknowledged that the resident's care plan documented these needs, but the resident did not have glasses in their room, and the Bible provided was not large print. The facility's failure to ensure the resident had the necessary equipment and supplies for their preferred activities led to the deficiency.
Failure to Ensure Proper Pressure Ulcer Care and Mattress Settings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, two residents with pressure ulcers did not have their low air loss mattresses set according to their current weights, and the settings were not documented in their care plans or physician orders. This oversight was observed during a recertification survey, where it was found that the mattresses were not monitored to ensure appropriate settings for the residents' weights. Resident #27, who had a Stage 4 pressure ulcer, diabetes, and morbid obesity, was found to have their low air loss mattress set on static at 325 pounds, despite weighing 211 pounds. The mattress settings were not documented in the physician orders or care plan, and the Treatment Administration Record indicated that checks were not consistently performed every shift. Observations revealed that the resident experienced pain from the pressure ulcer, and the mattress settings were not adjusted to provide optimal pressure relief. Resident #67, who had a history of surgery and an intellectual disability, was at risk for impaired skin integrity and had an unstageable pressure ulcer on the left buttock. The resident's low air loss mattress was set on alternating at 250 pounds, but the settings were not documented in the care plan or physician orders. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of clarity regarding who was responsible for setting and monitoring the mattresses, leading to inconsistencies in ensuring the mattresses were set according to the residents' weights.
Failure to Supervise Resident with Dysphagia During Meals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for a resident with dysphagia, a condition that makes swallowing difficult. The resident was care planned for line-of-sight supervision during meals, with specific strategies to ensure safe swallowing, such as consuming small, single bites and maintaining an upright position during and after meals. Despite these requirements, the resident was observed eating alone in their room without any staff supervision, which was contrary to the care plan and facility policies. The facility's policies on meal observation and assistance with meals required staff to supervise residents during mealtime, especially those on altered diets, to ensure safety and meet individual needs. The resident in question had a comprehensive care plan that included supervision during meals due to their limited mobility and risk of swallowing difficulties. However, during an observation, the resident was found eating lunch alone, with their back to the door, and no staff present to provide the necessary supervision. Interviews with facility staff, including a CNA, RN Unit Manager, and Speech and Language Pathologist, confirmed that the resident should have been supervised during meals. The staff acknowledged that residents on altered diets, like the one in question, were at risk for aspiration or choking and required supervision. The RN Unit Manager and Speech and Language Pathologist both stated that the resident should have been either in the dining room or accompanied by a staff member while eating in their room, highlighting a lapse in following the care plan and facility protocols.
Inadequate Respiratory Care for Resident Using BiPAP
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care for a resident, identified as Resident #19, who required the use of a bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) machine. The facility's policy required the BiPAP machine to be cleaned weekly and the mask, nasal pillow, and tubing to be cleaned daily. However, there was no documentation of a cleaning schedule for the device, and the comprehensive care plan did not include maintenance or cleaning instructions for the BiPAP equipment. Observations revealed that the resident's BiPAP mask was found on the floor and had visible white and black specks inside, indicating it was not cleaned regularly. The mask harness was frayed, and surgical tape was used to secure the tubing, suggesting inadequate maintenance. Interviews with staff, including a Licensed Practical Nurse and a Registered Nurse Manager, confirmed that there were no physician orders for cleaning the equipment, and the task was not consistently documented in the treatment administration record. The Director of Nursing and a physician acknowledged the lack of proper orders and documentation for cleaning and changing the BiPAP equipment. They noted that the resident had experienced respiratory infections, which could have been linked to the unclean equipment. The facility's failure to adhere to professional standards of practice for respiratory care resulted in a deficiency, as the resident's equipment was not maintained or cleaned as required, potentially compromising the resident's health.
Deficiency in Dialysis Care and Communication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident requiring dialysis services received care consistent with professional standards. Resident #59, who had end-stage renal disease and required hemodialysis, did not receive ongoing assessments and oversight before and after dialysis treatments. The facility's policy required pre-dialysis evaluations, including vital signs and access site assessments, to be documented in a communication book and the resident's medical chart. However, there was no documented evidence of these evaluations being completed for the resident during the specified period. The resident's communication book, which was supposed to facilitate information exchange between the facility and the dialysis center, was incomplete and outdated. It lacked current medication lists and recent evaluations, and there was no documentation of pre-dialysis or post-dialysis evaluations for several dates. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of clarity and responsibility regarding the documentation and communication process, leading to incomplete records and potential gaps in care. The facility's failure to document and communicate essential information about the resident's dialysis treatments and access site assessments compromised the resident's safety. Staff interviews highlighted the importance of monitoring vital signs and the dialysis access site for signs of infection or complications, yet these evaluations were not consistently documented. The lack of proper documentation and communication between the facility and the dialysis center raised concerns about the resident's care and the facility's adherence to professional standards.
Deficiency in Meal Quality and Temperature
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food and drink provided to residents were palatable, flavorful, and served at appetizing temperatures. During the recertification survey, it was observed that meals served on two separate occasions were not at the appropriate temperatures and lacked flavor. Specifically, the lunch meals on 7/16/2024 and 7/18/2024 were served at temperatures below the required standards, with hot foods not being hot enough and cold foods not being cold enough. Additionally, the meals were described as bland and unappetizing by residents and staff. The survey also revealed that the facility's meal service was inconsistent and inaccurate. During a Resident Council meeting, 12 anonymous residents reported that their meals often had missing items and were not served at the correct temperatures. A test tray on 7/18/2024 contained a foreign substance, identified as parchment paper, which was mixed with the food, posing a potential choking hazard. The facility's policies on dining experience and tray line service were not adhered to, as meals were not checked for accuracy and quality before being served. Interviews with staff highlighted issues with menu changes and communication. The Acting Food Service Director and Dietary Supervisor acknowledged that the menu was changed without proper updates to meal tickets, leading to missing items like apple slices. The Registered Dietitian was unaware of the availability of certain foods and did not conduct test trays to ensure meal quality. The facility's failure to maintain proper food temperatures and ensure meal accuracy resulted in a deficiency in providing a satisfactory dining experience for residents.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 47 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Rome
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Grand Rehabilitation And Nursing At Rome | 0.9 mi | — | 5 | 1 |
| Rome Memorial Hospital, Inc - R H C F | 1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Bethany Gardens Skilled Living Center | 1.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Betsy Ross Rehabilitation Center, Inc | 2 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Trustees Of Eastern Star Hall & Home Of The N Y S | 6.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Colonial Park Rehabilitation And Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.