Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Premier Health & Rehabilitation Center Of Lv, Lp during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple medical conditions was discharged against medical advice without documentation of risk discussion, a signed AMA form, or notification of the physician and administrative staff. Staff interviews confirmed that required AMA protocols were not followed, and the medical record lacked evidence of these actions.
A facility failed to administer prescribed free water flushes (FWF) via PEG tube for three residents, leading to potential health risks. One resident received 100 ml instead of 125 ml every 4 hours, another received 100 ml instead of 150 ml, and a third received 60 ml instead of 75 ml. The discrepancies were confirmed by the DON, RD, and CRN, indicating a failure to adhere to physician's orders.
The facility failed to properly administer tube feeding for four residents, leading to discrepancies in prescribed nutritional intake. Residents received less nutrition than prescribed due to late initiation, incorrect infusion rates, and failure to elevate the head of the bed as required. Despite these issues, no significant weight loss was documented for some residents.
The facility failed to maintain cleanliness of the kitchen vent hood, filters, and dish machine as per policy. Observations revealed significant buildup on the vent hood filter and dish machine exterior, with the Kitchen Manager and Maintenance Director providing conflicting information on cleaning responsibilities. The facility's policies required more frequent cleaning than was performed, leading to the deficiency.
A resident admitted with acute kidney failure, hypertension, and dehydration had an IV heplock left in place for over five days without being on IV medications. The heplock was not monitored or discontinued, lacking an order, admission assessment, or care plan. The resident was alert but unaware of the heplock's purpose. Staff confirmed the oversight, noting the risk of infection and the facility's policy requiring a prescriber's order for IV management.
The facility failed to follow TBP and EBP for two residents, leading to potential cross-contamination. A resident on contact isolation for norovirus lacked a proper disposal bin for PPE, and staff entered without PPE or hand hygiene. Another resident with a PICC line had linens changed without a gown, risking contamination.
Failure to Complete Required AMA Discharge Procedures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow required procedures when a resident was discharged against medical advice (AMA). Specifically, there was no documentation that nursing staff discussed the risks associated with leaving AMA, no signed AMA form was present, and there was no evidence that the physician, administrator, or director of nursing were notified as required by facility policy. The incident involved a resident with multiple medical conditions, including narcolepsy, edema, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and morbid obesity, who had been admitted for therapies and ongoing medical management. Prior to the discharge, the resident's family expressed a desire to take the resident home, and caregiver training was scheduled for a later date. On the day of discharge, the family demanded an in-person visit from a provider, which was not accommodated as providers did not come in on weekends unless it was an emergency. The family then called 911, and EMS arrived to transfer the resident. The family informed staff they were leaving, and EMS removed the resident without speaking to facility staff about the discharge. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the expected protocol for AMA discharges was not followed. Staff acknowledged that the AMA form should have been explained and signed, or refusal documented, and that the physician and administrative staff should have been notified. However, there was no documentation of these actions in the resident's medical record. The facility's policy required these steps, but the record lacked evidence that they were completed in this case.
Failure to Administer Prescribed Water Flushes via PEG Tube
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide free water flushes (FWF) via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube as prescribed for three residents, leading to potential health risks. Resident 53, diagnosed with severe protein-calorie malnutrition and dysphagia, was prescribed 125 ml of water every 4 hours via PEG tube. However, observations revealed that the resident was receiving only 100 ml every 4 hours, and the infusions were often delayed. The Director of Nursing (DON) and Registered Dietitian (RD) confirmed that the prescribed FWF was not fully delivered, putting the resident at risk for dehydration and delayed wound healing. Resident 45, with a diagnosis of dysphagia, was prescribed 150 ml of FWF every 4 hours. Observations showed that the resident was receiving only 100 ml every 4 hours, and the infusions were not timely. The DON and RD verified that the resident received significantly less FWF than prescribed, which could lead to dehydration. The Charge Registered Nurse (CRN) confirmed the discrepancy in the FWF delivery. Resident 48, also diagnosed with dysphagia, was prescribed 75 ml of FWF every 4 hours. However, the resident was receiving only 60 ml every 4 hours. The CRN and RD confirmed the insufficient infusion, resulting in a shortage of 825 ml over 72 hours. The facility's policies required adherence to physician's orders for tube feeding and hydration, which were not followed in these cases.
Deficient Tube Feeding Administration in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper administration of tube feeding for four residents, leading to discrepancies in the prescribed nutritional intake. Resident 53, who was diagnosed with severe protein-calorie malnutrition and dysphagia, did not receive the prescribed amount of tube feeding due to late initiation and incorrect infusion rates. The resident's head of the bed was not elevated as required, increasing the risk of aspiration. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the resident received significantly less nutrition than prescribed over a 72-hour period. Resident 45 also experienced issues with tube feeding administration. The resident's feeding was started late, and the head of the bed was not elevated to the required degree during feeding. The total volume of nutrition delivered was less than prescribed, resulting in a deficit in calories and protein. Similarly, Resident 48 received a different formula than prescribed, and the total volume delivered was below the required amount, although no weight loss was documented. Resident 1 faced similar issues with tube feeding administration, receiving less than the prescribed volume over a 72-hour period. Despite the discrepancies, the resident did not experience weight loss. The facility's policies on tube feeding and enteral feeding safety precautions were not adhered to, as staff failed to verify tube feeding orders and did not maintain the required head-of-bed elevation to prevent aspiration.
Failure to Maintain Kitchen Equipment Cleanliness
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain cleanliness and proper maintenance of the kitchen vent hood, filters, and dish machine as per their policy. During an initial kitchen observation, a significant buildup was noted on the kitchen vent exhaust hood filter. The Kitchen Manager indicated that maintenance was responsible for cleaning, but the Maintenance Director later stated that the dietary department should inform maintenance if cleaning was needed between scheduled cleanings. The facility's policy required the hood and filter system to be cleaned at least weekly, but the last cleaning was done several months prior, indicating a lapse in adherence to the policy. Additionally, the dish machine was observed to have a substantial amount of white and lime green buildup on its exterior. The cleaning schedule reviewed with the Kitchen Manager showed that the dish machine had been cleaned the day before the observation, but this cleaning did not include the exterior. The Kitchen Manager acknowledged that the dish machine appeared neglected. The facility's policy required the dish machine exterior to be cleaned weekly with a deliming solution, which was not followed, leading to the observed deficiency.
Failure to Monitor and Discontinue Unused IV Heplock
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper monitoring and discontinuation of an IV heplock for a resident, leading to a deficiency in care. The resident, who was admitted with acute kidney failure, hypertension, and dehydration, had an IV heplock on the back of their left hand. This heplock was covered with an undated dressing and had been in place for over five days without any IV medications being administered. The resident was alert and oriented but did not understand the purpose of the IV heplock. A Licensed Practical Nurse confirmed the heplock was old, with peeling tape and blood residue, and acknowledged that an order was required for any IV line access. The Charge Registered Nurse and the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no order, admission assessment, or care plan completed for the IV heplock. The heplock was identified during a skin assessment, but no order was obtained to discontinue it, as the resident was not on IV medications. The Nurse Practitioner stated that all IV line access should have been assessed, monitored, and removed if not in use, emphasizing the risk of infection. The facility's policy required a prescriber's order for IV management, which was not followed in this case.
Failure to Follow Infection Control Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to transmission-based precautions (TBP) and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for two residents, potentially leading to the spread of infectious diseases. Resident 33, who was on contact isolation due to norovirus, did not have a designated garbage bin for disposing of personal protective equipment (PPE) after use. An LPN removed used PPE without a proper disposal bin available, and an Activities Assistant entered the room without wearing PPE or performing hand hygiene, despite signage indicating the need for these precautions. The Infection Preventionist (IP) confirmed that hand hygiene and PPE were required to prevent cross-contamination, especially given the increasing number of norovirus cases. Resident 69, who had a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line and was on EBP, also experienced a lapse in precautionary measures. A CNA changed the resident's linens without wearing a gown, mistakenly assuming that only the other resident in the room was on precautions. The CNA later acknowledged the oversight, realizing the risk of contamination due to the resident's intravenous line. The IP indicated that a gown was necessary when handling soiled linens to prevent cross-contamination, as outlined in the facility's policy on transmission-based precautions.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 327 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Las Vegas
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Las Vegas Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 0.6 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Trellis Paradise | 2 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Harmon Hospital - Snf | 2.1 mi | — | 14 | 0 |
| Life Care Center Of South Las Vegas | 2.1 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Saint Joseph Transitional Rehabilitation Center | 2.7 mi | — | 28 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Premier Health & Rehabilitation Center Of Lv, Lp.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.