Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Fort Bayard Medical Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident who used portable O2 requested assistance when her tank needed refilling before attending an activity. A CNA refilled the portable O2 tank and returned it, but the resident reported that the oxygen was not flowing properly. Although the CNA believed the O2 was flowing and informed a nurse of the resident’s concern, the CNA did not return to the resident’s room to stay with her until she felt comfortable that the oxygen was working and the issue was resolved, resulting in a failure to respect the resident’s dignity and right to feel assured about her care.
A resident experienced multiple injuries of unknown origin, including bruises, scratches, and skin tears, and was unable to explain how these occurred. Although incident and investigation reports were completed, there was no documentation that these reports or their follow-up results were submitted to the state agency as required, and the state agency confirmed not receiving most of the necessary notifications.
A resident was given Lorazepam for anxiety and agitation without documented informed consent, as required for psychotropic medications. The DON confirmed that staff did not obtain written consent prior to starting the medication, and the resident's medical record lacked documentation of consent.
Two residents received psychotropic medications without proper medical justification: one was given Lorazepam for anxiety without a documented anxiety diagnosis, and another had an indefinite PRN Lorazepam order for restlessness, anxiety, or insomnia without provider rationale for use beyond 14 days, as confirmed by the DON.
A resident's medical record was not updated to include a newly documented diagnosis of moderate dementia with anxiety, despite staff expectations to update diagnoses lists when new conditions are identified. The omission was confirmed by the DON during an interview.
The facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints unless medically necessary, as three residents had alarms attached to their wheelchairs or beds without proper assessments or physician orders. Staff confirmed the absence of necessary documentation, and an anonymous complaint suggested alarms were removed due to surveyor presence. The administrator acknowledged incomplete assessments for alarm use.
A facility failed to update a resident's care plan with current information, leading to discrepancies in the use of alarms. The care plan indicated the use of various alarms, but observations and staff interviews revealed that these alarms had been discontinued. The DON confirmed that the care plan had not been revised to reflect these changes.
The facility failed to post daily nurse staffing information, including the facility name, date, total number, and actual hours worked by RNs, LPNs, and CNAs, as well as the resident census per shift. Instead, staff names were written on whiteboards inside each unit. The facility also did not retain 18 months of staff posting records, as required.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, specifically in managing Legionella risk in the water system. The Infection Control RN could not provide necessary documentation, such as checklists for water flushes or facility maps, indicating a lack of oversight. This deficiency potentially affects all 105 residents, increasing the risk of infection spread.
The facility failed to maintain resident dignity by using disposable dishware for meals due to a broken dishwasher, causing dissatisfaction among residents. Additionally, a resident was subjected to a belt alarm without a physician's order, despite expressing discomfort and the ability to remove it, indicating a disregard for her self-determination.
The facility failed to maintain a homelike environment with comfortable sound levels, as loud alarms were disruptive to residents. Alarms, including bed, chair, and bathroom door alarms, were audible throughout the facility, causing distress and sleep disturbances. Despite residents' complaints, the noise issue remained unaddressed.
The facility improperly used alarms as physical restraints on residents without necessary assessments or physician orders. Alarms were placed on wheelchairs, beds, and bathroom doors for all new admissions, as confirmed by staff, without individualized assessments to determine their necessity. Medical records lacked documentation justifying the use of these alarms, indicating a systemic issue in the facility's approach.
A facility failed to assess a resident for the risk of entrapment from bed rails. The resident, in a comatose state, had bilateral half side rails without a physician's assessment or orders since admission. Nursing assessments were completed, but the reason for side rail use was marked as Not Applicable, and the MDS did not indicate bed rail use. Interviews revealed that the bed rails were not considered restraints and were not coded on the MDS, with no confirmation of assessments from PT or OT.
The facility failed to ensure that pharmacist recommendations were reviewed and implemented by physicians for two residents. One resident continued receiving omeprazole without documented evaluation, while another's recommendations to adjust ferrous sulfate and fluoxetine dosages were not reviewed. The DON confirmed the lack of documentation and was unsure of the review process.
The facility failed to obtain consent for psychotropic medications for two residents. One resident was prescribed Sertraline for depression without consent, despite having diagnoses of unspecified psychosis, dementia, and PTSD. Another resident received Quetiapine, Divalproex, and Sertraline for aggression and agitation without consent, with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, Alzheimer's, and severe vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance. The DON confirmed the lack of consent and the need for specific diagnoses for medication use.
A facility failed to provide a resident with the CMS-10055 ABN of Non-Coverage, which informs about potential non-coverage and financial liability for services. The form was not completed due to the absence of the Office Manager and her backup.
A facility failed to include a DNR order in a resident's baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission. This omission was confirmed by the DON and could result in the resident not receiving appropriate care, potentially placing them at risk of an adverse event.
The facility failed to update care plans for six residents, resulting in discrepancies between documented care and actual interventions. Alarms on wheelchairs, beds, and bathroom doors were not reflected in care plans, and one resident's care plan inaccurately included a bed alarm. These oversights indicate a lack of timely and accurate care plan revisions.
A resident with multiple medical conditions experienced severe weight loss, which was not addressed by the facility. The care plan indicated a risk of nutritional decline, but staff failed to follow protocols for monitoring and responding to weight changes. Communication and documentation lapses led to the nursing staff being unaware of the weight loss, and no interventions were implemented to address the resident's nutritional concerns.
A resident with diabetes was not administered all prescribed medications upon admission to a facility, leading to symptoms of high blood sugar and eventual hospitalization for diabetic ketoacidosis. The facility failed to monitor the resident's condition adequately, and staff did not report symptoms or check blood glucose levels, resulting in a serious health incident.
A resident experienced multiple falls and a serious injury due to inadequate assessment and supervision. Despite symptoms of fatigue and weakness, the resident was allowed to use a wheelchair without proper evaluation. The care plan indicated a fall risk, but staff failed to monitor changes in condition or document necessary assistance levels. Interviews revealed a lack of communication and understanding among staff, leading to the resident's falls and subsequent intracranial hemorrhage.
The facility failed to complete necessary discharge summaries for three residents at the time of their discharge. One resident's recapitulation form was delayed by five days and lacked a medication list, another had a medication list but no recapitulation or summary, and the third's form was completed a day late. The DON confirmed the inconsistencies and expected uniformity in discharge documentation.
The facility failed to ensure timely documentation of provider notes for three residents. A nurse practitioner and two medical doctors delayed signing progress notes by two to three days after visits. The Health Information Manager explained that providers dictate notes post-visit, which are then transferred to the facility's electronic system, but do not always include the visit time.
A facility failed to effectively plan a resident's discharge by not involving the Insurance Case Manager in securing Mi Via services, despite the resident's mother raising the issue. The ICM was not contacted for a discharge meeting, and there was no documentation of efforts to ensure services were in place, leading to a potentially unsafe transition.
Failure to Ensure Resident Comfort and Dignity During Oxygen Tank Refill
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity when staff did not remain with the resident until she felt comfortable that her portable oxygen was functioning properly. According to the facility’s initial incident report, the resident required her portable oxygen tank to be refilled, and a CNA refilled the tank and returned it to the resident. The resident reported that the oxygen was not working properly, and the CNA stated she confirmed that the oxygen was flowing, but the resident continued to insist it was not. The CNA then left the resident to inform the nurse of the resident’s concern and did not return to the resident’s room afterward to ensure the resident was comfortable and that the issue was resolved. The resident had been admitted earlier in the year and later passed away, as documented in the nursing progress notes, and the DON stated her expectation was that the CNA should have stayed with the resident until the resident was comfortable that her oxygen was flowing properly. This deficiency centers on the CNA’s failure to remain with the resident and verify her comfort and satisfaction regarding the functioning of her oxygen after the resident expressed ongoing concern, despite the CNA’s belief that the oxygen was flowing.
Failure to Report Injuries of Unknown Origin and Investigation Results
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report all injuries of unknown origin and the results of related investigations to the State Survey Agency for one of three residents reviewed for falls. Specifically, a resident experienced multiple injuries of unknown origin, including a bruise on the chin, a large scratch from shoulder to hip, abrasions, and multiple skin tears on different dates. The resident was unable to state how the injuries occurred. Incident reports were completed for each event, but there was no documentation indicating that these reports or the follow-up investigation results were submitted to the state agency as required. During interviews, the facility's investigator stated that investigation reports and follow-up reports were completed and submitted via fax, but was unable to provide copies or fax confirmations due to computer issues. The state agency confirmed that it did not receive initial or follow-up reports for some of the injuries and only received an initial report for one incident, with no follow-up. There was no evidence in the facility's records to show that the required notifications and investigation results were sent to the state agency within the mandated timeframe.
Failure to Obtain Informed Consent for Psychotropic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident and/or their representative was informed in advance about the administration of Lorazepam, including the reasons, risks, and benefits of the medication. Record review showed that the resident was admitted to the facility and had a physician's order for Lorazepam to be administered on specific days for anxiety and agitation. However, the medical record did not contain documentation of consent for the resident to take Lorazepam. During an interview, the DON confirmed that there was no written consent in the resident's file and acknowledged that staff are expected to obtain such consent prior to starting any psychotropic medication.
Failure to Ensure Medical Necessity and Documentation for Psychotropic Medication Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that psychotropic medications were only administered when medically necessary for two of three residents reviewed. For one resident with vascular dementia and psychotic disturbance, Lorazepam was prescribed and administered on multiple occasions for anxiety/agitation associated with shower days. However, a review of the medical record revealed that this resident did not have a documented diagnosis of anxiety, despite the medication being ordered for that purpose. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that staff are expected to ensure an appropriate diagnosis is present prior to starting any medication, and acknowledged the absence of an anxiety diagnosis for this resident. For another resident with unspecified dementia and insomnia, Lorazepam was ordered to be given every four hours as needed (PRN) for restlessness, anxiety, or insomnia, with no specified end date. The medical record did not contain a rationale from the provider explaining why the PRN order was to continue for longer than 14 days, as required. The DON confirmed that the order was indefinite and that the necessary provider rationale for extended PRN use was missing from the record.
Incomplete and Inaccurate Medical Records for Resident Diagnoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medical records were complete and accurate for one of three residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, a resident was admitted with diagnoses including unspecified dementia and insomnia. However, a provider's progress note later documented a diagnosis of moderate dementia with anxiety, which was not added to the resident's official list of diagnoses. During an interview, the DON confirmed that staff are expected to update the diagnoses list when a new diagnosis is identified, but this was not done in this case.
Failure to Ensure Residents are Free from Unjustified Physical Restraints
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were free from physical restraints unless used to treat a specific medical condition, as identified through an assessment. This deficiency was observed in three residents who had alarms attached to their wheelchairs or beds without proper assessments or physician orders. For Resident #1, a seat belt alarm was attached to her wheelchair without a physician's order or any assessment indicating the need for such a device. Interviews with staff, including a CNA, RN, and the Director of Nursing, confirmed the absence of necessary documentation and consultation with the physician regarding the use of alarms. Similarly, Resident #2 had both a seat belt alarm and a bed alarm without any assessments to justify their use for a specific medical condition, despite a verbal order to continue their use. Resident #8 also had a seat belt alarm on her wheelchair without any documented assessment or physician consultation. The report further notes that staff were observed removing alarms from residents' rooms, and an anonymous complaint suggested that alarms were removed because surveyors were present. The facility administrator acknowledged that not all residents had been assessed for alarms by the time of the revisit, citing the time required to complete assessments.
Failure to Update Resident Care Plan with Current Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that care plans were reviewed and revised for a resident, leading to outdated information being used in their care. Specifically, the care plan for a resident, initiated on 10/30/23, indicated the use of a bathroom door alarm, bed alarm, and wheelchair alarm, which were to be checked for proper function every shift. However, observations and interviews revealed discrepancies. On 01/23/25, a CNA noted that the resident had a wheelchair alarm, despite stating earlier that alarms had been discontinued. Further clarification from an RN identified the alarm as a seat belt alarm, not a wheelchair alarm. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the care plan had not been updated to reflect the discontinuation of the alarms, indicating a failure to revise the care plan with the most current resident information.
Failure to Post Daily Nurse Staffing Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to comply with the requirement to post daily nurse staffing information for all 105 residents. The deficiency was identified when the facility did not post essential staffing information, including the facility name, current date, total number, and actual hours worked by registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, certified nurse aides, and the resident census per shift. Additionally, the facility did not retain 18 months of staff posting records, which is a regulatory requirement. During interviews and observations, it was revealed that the facility's practice was to write the names of staff working per shift on a whiteboard inside each unit, rather than posting the required information publicly. The Administrator confirmed that the facility does not post resident census numbers or staffing numbers. The Director of Nursing stated that the staffing schedule is posted outside her office, but it only shows staff names and their monthly schedule, without public notice of census numbers or staffing numbers for each shift. Furthermore, the facility could not demonstrate that they retained 18 months of posted staffing records.
Inadequate Legionella Water Management Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, specifically in managing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in the building's water system. The facility's Legionella Water Management Program policy outlines the need for a water management team and a detailed description of the water system, including areas where bacteria could grow. However, during the survey, it was found that the facility did not have a complete water management program in place. The Infection Control RN was unable to provide checklists for water flushes or facility maps and diagrams for the water management system, indicating a lack of proper documentation and oversight. This deficiency potentially affects all 105 residents in the facility, as the absence of a comprehensive water management program increases the risk of Legionella bacteria growth and transmission. The facility's failure to ensure the completion of water flushes and maintain necessary documentation could lead to the spread of infections among residents, compromising their health and safety.
Failure to Uphold Resident Dignity and Self-Determination
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to uphold the dignity of its residents by serving meals on disposable dishware and cutlery for an extended period. Observations revealed that residents across various dining areas were using disposable plates, cups, and utensils, which had been the practice for about a year due to a malfunctioning dishwasher. Interviews with residents indicated dissatisfaction with the use of disposable items, as it made them feel undervalued and like they were at a camp. Some residents expressed difficulty in cutting food with plastic utensils, which affected their independence. The Dietary Manager confirmed that the dishwasher had not been functioning properly since October 2023, leading to the continued use of disposable items. Additionally, the facility did not respect a resident's right to self-determination regarding the use of a belt alarm. A resident was observed with a lap belt alarm in her wheelchair, despite not having a physician's order for it. The resident expressed discomfort and embarrassment caused by the alarm, which she could remove herself. However, staff continued to reapply the belt, disregarding her preference. The resident's care plan indicated the use of a lap belt due to fall risk, but there was no specific order for the alarm, highlighting a lack of communication and respect for the resident's choices.
Facility Fails to Maintain Comfortable Sound Levels Due to Loud Alarms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a homelike environment with comfortable sound levels for three residents. Observations and interviews revealed that loud alarms, including bed, chair, and bathroom door alarms, were audible throughout the facility, causing discomfort to residents. These alarms were initially installed for all new residents until assessed for fall risk. The noise from these alarms was reported to be disruptive, particularly at night, affecting residents' ability to sleep and causing distress. Staff confirmed the loudness of these alarms and acknowledged that they could be heard from significant distances within the facility. Specific incidents included residents expressing difficulty sleeping due to the noise from alarms in nearby rooms. One resident reported that the noise from a bathroom door alarm across the hall was particularly disruptive, occurring multiple times each night. Another resident mentioned that the bed and bathroom door alarms from a neighboring room were bothersome, and despite informing staff, no action was taken to address the noise. Additionally, a resident in the secured unit was observed covering his ears in response to the loud entry door alarm, which staff confirmed was a common reaction.
Improper Use of Alarms as Physical Restraints
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents were free from the use of physical restraints unless medically necessary. Observations, record reviews, and interviews revealed that five residents were subjected to alarms on their wheelchairs, beds, and bathroom doors without proper assessments or physician orders. Specifically, residents had alarms placed on their wheelchairs, beds, and bathroom doors as a standard practice upon admission, without individualized assessments to determine the necessity of such alarms. This practice was confirmed by both a CNA and a Unit Manager, who stated that all newly admitted residents received these alarms until assessed for fall risk. The medical records of the residents involved did not contain any physician orders or assessments justifying the use of these alarms. For instance, one resident had alarms on her wheelchair, bed, and bathroom door, but her medical record lacked any documentation supporting the need for these alarms. Similarly, other residents had alarms on their beds, wheelchairs, and bathroom doors without any corresponding physician orders or assessments. The Director of Nursing confirmed that alarms were used for all new admissions and evaluated later for necessity, indicating a systemic issue in the facility's approach to using alarms as a form of restraint without proper justification.
Failure to Assess Bed Rail Entrapment Risk
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident, identified as R #35, was assessed for the risk of entrapment from bed rails. The resident was admitted to the facility on 10/21/14 and was observed on 08/07/24 to have bilateral half side rails on their bed. Despite being in a comatose state with no voluntary movement, the resident's medical records did not show any assessment by a physician for the use of these bed rails since admission, nor were there any current physician orders for them. Additionally, the MDS assessment did not indicate the use of bed rails, and the physical therapist had not been asked to assess the resident for bed rail use. The nursing bed rail assessments for the resident were completed on 03/09/24 and 06/24/24, but the reason for using the side rails was marked as Not Applicable. The head of the bed needed to be elevated for care, which increases the risk of entrapment, was marked as yes. Interviews with the DON and MDS Coordinator revealed that the bed rails were not considered restraints and were not coded on the MDS, although they were care planned for. There was no confirmation of bed rail assessments from PT or OT for the resident.
Failure to Review and Implement Pharmacist Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the consultant pharmacist's recommendations were reviewed and implemented by the physician or that the physician provided a rationale for not following the recommendations for two residents. For Resident #31, the pharmacist recommended evaluating the continued need for omeprazole, a medication used to treat excess stomach acid. However, there was no documentation of the provider's response or signature on the pharmacist's note, and the resident continued to have an active order for omeprazole. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the lack of documentation and was unsure of the provider's process for reviewing pharmacy recommendations. For Resident #50, the pharmacist recommended decreasing the dosage of ferrous sulfate, an iron supplement, due to normalized hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, and evaluating the dose of fluoxetine, an antidepressant. Both recommendations were not reviewed by the provider, and there was no documentation in the medical record regarding the prescriber's response. The DON confirmed the absence of documentation and expressed uncertainty about the provider's process for reviewing pharmacy recommendations. This deficiency could result in residents receiving unnecessary medications, potentially leading to adverse drug interactions or side effects.
Failure to Obtain Consent for Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents did not receive psychotropic medications unless necessary to treat a specific psychiatric diagnosis documented in the medical record. Additionally, the facility did not obtain consent from the residents' representatives for the use of these medications. Specifically, two residents were identified in this deficiency. One resident was prescribed Sertraline for depression without obtaining consent from their representative. The medical record review revealed that the resident had diagnoses of unspecified psychosis, dementia, and PTSD, but there was no documentation of consent for the medication. Another resident was prescribed multiple psychotropic medications, including Quetiapine and Divalproex for aggression and agitation, and Sertraline for agitation, without obtaining consent from their representative. The resident's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, and severe vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance. The Director of Nursing confirmed that written consent was not obtained for these medications and acknowledged that aggression and agitation are not medical diagnoses, emphasizing the need for a specific diagnosed condition for the use of psychotropic medication.
Failure to Provide Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to inform a resident about changes in Medicare and/or Medicaid coverage for services, specifically by not providing the CMS-10055 Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) of Non-Coverage. This form is crucial for informing residents about potential non-coverage and the option to continue services with the resident accepting financial liability. The deficiency was identified for one resident when the form was not completed or given prior to the end of services. The Office Manager explained that the notification was not completed due to her absence from work because of illness, along with the absence of her backup and supervisor.
Failure to Include DNR Order in Baseline Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for one of the residents reviewed. Specifically, the admission care plan for the resident did not include the physician's order for a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status, which is a legally recognized order indicating that the resident does not want to be resuscitated in the event of cardiac arrest or cessation of breathing. This omission was confirmed during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON). The lack of inclusion of the DNR order in the care plan could likely result in the resident not receiving appropriate care, potentially placing them at risk of an adverse event or worsening of their condition after admission.
Care Plan Revision Failures for Alarm Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure timely and accurate revisions of care plans for six residents, leading to discrepancies between the care provided and the documented care plans. Specifically, the care plans for five residents did not include interventions for alarms on wheelchairs, beds, and bathroom doors, despite these alarms being present during observations. For instance, one resident's care plan, dated October 11, 2023, lacked documentation for wheelchair, bed, and bathroom door alarms, even though these alarms were observed in the resident's room. Additionally, another resident's care plan inaccurately documented the use of a bed alarm, which was confirmed to be unnecessary by both the Director of Nursing and the MDS coordinator. This resident's care plan was eventually updated to remove the bed alarm, but the initial oversight highlights the facility's failure to maintain current and accurate care plans. These deficiencies suggest that the care plans were not updated to reflect the most current resident conditions and interventions, potentially leading to staff being unaware of necessary changes in care.
Failure to Address Severe Weight Loss in Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for a resident, identified as R #14, who experienced severe weight loss. R #14 had multiple medical conditions, including Tourette's Disorder, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Major Depressive Disorder, Hyperlipidemia, Dysphagia, and Chronic Kidney Disease. The care plan for R #14 indicated a risk of nutritional decline and specified that significant weight changes should be monitored and addressed. However, the facility did not follow protocols for identifying and responding to R #14's weight loss, which amounted to a 6.72% decrease in one month. The facility's staff, including the Unit Manager and Restorative Nursing Assistants (RNAs), failed to effectively communicate and document the resident's weight changes. Although RNAs were responsible for monitoring weights and notifying nursing staff of significant changes, there was no documentation to confirm that the nursing staff was informed of R #14's weight loss. The Unit Manager and RN #21 were unaware of the weight loss, and no changes were made to R #14's nutritional plan or physician's orders to address the issue. Additionally, R #14's weight loss was not discussed during the Risk Team meeting, which is intended to address potential risks for residents. The facility's Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the weight loss and acknowledged that the expected protocol was not followed. The DON stated that significant weight changes should prompt a reweigh and notification to the nurse or nurse manager, followed by provider notification and order adjustments. However, these steps were not taken for R #14, and no interventions were implemented to address the resident's nutritional concerns. The lack of communication and documentation led to a failure in addressing the resident's severe weight loss, which was not recognized or managed by the facility.
Failure to Administer Diabetic Medications Leads to Hospitalization
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide quality care for a resident with diabetes, leading to a serious health incident. Upon admission, the resident was not administered all prescribed diabetic medications, including Januvia, Glipizide, and Insulin glargine/Lantus, as per the hospital discharge summary. The facility only ordered Jardiance, and there was confusion regarding the resident's insulin requirement. This oversight was not clarified with the hospital, resulting in the resident not receiving necessary medications to manage her diabetes. The resident exhibited symptoms of high blood sugar, such as increased thirst, frequent urination, and fatigue, which were not adequately monitored or reported to a physician. Despite these symptoms, staff did not check the resident's blood glucose levels or administer the necessary medications. The resident's condition deteriorated over time, leading to an emergency room visit where she was diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and admitted to the hospital. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of communication and understanding of the resident's medical needs. The Assistant Unit Manager confirmed the confusion over the discharge paperwork and the failure to contact the hospital for clarification. Additionally, the Director of Nursing acknowledged that staff did not report the resident's symptoms or check her blood sugar levels, which they should have done according to the facility's diabetes policy.
Removal Plan
- Residents demonstrating signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia were transferred to the hospital.
- Residents with the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus will be audited to ensure orders are in place to reduce and/or prevent risk of severe adverse outcomes. Audits including blood sugar monitoring are included as part of the resident medication and/or treatment record.
- All applicable policies and procedures regarding admission assessment, physician orders and diabetic management were reviewed and revised when indicated by supporting professional references.
- The DON and Nursing Supervisors implemented a post admission checklist for all admissions. Admission Checklist is completed following completion of provider assessment and physician orders entry. Checklist includes review to ensure proper order transcription, correct medication administration, instruction for appropriate physician notification when residents demonstrate symptoms of hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia, review of necessary medical information and that the physician contact was properly documented. Checklist includes double checks by admitting nurse and unit manager.
- Admission checklist is completed following provider assessment at admission. Unit Manager/Nurse Supervisor will verify variances from documented treatment history to ensure orders are in agreement with treatment plan.
- The DON or designee re-educated licensed nurses on facility policies regarding admission procedures and diabetic management as well as medication reconciliation guidelines.
- Facility has secured additional providers to ensure that a provider is available in-house for all admissions. The provider will complete accurate review and completeness of admission assessments through reconciliation of all related admission documents.
- Medical providers have been trained on facility protocols regarding review of all related admission documents prior to or at admission. Providers shall document agreement with and/or changes with treatment history.
- Medical providers shall communicate with discharging entities to clarify any discrepancies in provided documentation.
- Direct care staff will be in-service regarding signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia and proper procedure to notify appropriate nursing staff.
- Direct care staff will be in-service on documenting all pertinent conversations in the electronic medical record.
- Licensed nursing staff will document communication with the provider through SBAR process. Evidence of notification will be included in the electronic health record.
Failure to Assess and Supervise Resident Leads to Falls and Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adequately assess and supervise a resident, leading to multiple falls and a serious injury. The resident, identified as R #21, experienced fatigue, weakness, and dizziness, which were not thoroughly investigated by the staff. Despite these symptoms, the resident was allowed to use a unit wheelchair without a proper evaluation of her ability to do so safely. The care plan for R #21 indicated a risk for falls and required monitoring for changes in condition, but these measures were not effectively implemented. Physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) evaluations were either incomplete or not conducted in a timely manner. PT recommended the use of a wheelchair without assessing the resident's ability to use it independently. The resident's care plan did not specify the level of assistance needed when using a wheelchair, and staff failed to document any changes in the resident's condition that could increase the risk of falls. This lack of assessment and documentation contributed to the resident's falls on multiple occasions. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of communication and understanding regarding the resident's needs and the use of the unit wheelchair. The unit manager and director of nursing confirmed that the resident was not properly assessed for wheelchair use, and the wheelchair was left with the resident without supervision. This oversight resulted in the resident sustaining an intracranial hemorrhage after a fall, highlighting the facility's failure to provide adequate supervision and prevent accidents.
Incomplete Discharge Summaries for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that staff completed necessary discharge summaries for three residents at the time of their discharge. For the first resident, the Recapitulation of Stay form was not completed until five days after discharge, and it lacked the discharge medication list. The second resident's record contained a discharge medication list but was missing a recapitulation of the resident's stay and a discharge summary. For the third resident, the Recapitulation of Stay form was completed one day after discharge. During an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the discharge summaries for these residents were not completed at the time of discharge. The DON acknowledged that each resident's discharge had different documents completed, but she expected all discharges to have consistent information. She also stated that staff should complete and sign the resident recapitulation of stay on the same day as the resident's discharge.
Deficiency in Timely Documentation of Provider Notes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents had written, signed, and dated progress notes from their healthcare providers at each visit. This deficiency was identified for three residents during a review of their medical records. For one resident, a nurse practitioner conducted a new patient encounter, but the note was not signed until two days later. Another resident's progress note by a medical doctor was not signed until three days after the visit. Similarly, a third resident's chronic care management note was signed three days post-visit. During an interview, the Health Information Manager explained that providers dictate their notes using software, which are then transferred to the facility's electronic system. However, the notes do not always include the time of the visit, as they are dictated after the resident is seen, and the provider must log in to sign the note once it appears in the electronic record.
Failure to Coordinate Discharge Planning with Insurance Case Manager
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop an effective discharge plan for a resident, identified as R #1, who was transitioning from the facility to a private residence. The deficiency involved the lack of involvement of the resident's Insurance Case Manager (ICM) in securing services through Mi Via, a self-directed waiver program for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Despite the resident's mother raising the need for Mi Via services during an interdisciplinary team (IDT) meeting on November 9, 2023, prior to the resident's discharge on March 28, 2024, the facility did not take the necessary steps to ensure these services were in place. The facility's records revealed that the ICM was not contacted to attend a discharge meeting held on March 21, 2024, and there was no documentation explaining the absence of the ICM or any efforts to contact the Mi Via program. Interviews with the ICM and a Unit Manager confirmed these oversights, indicating that the facility did not ensure a safe and coordinated discharge process for the resident. This lack of coordination and documentation likely resulted in a complicated or unsafe transition for the resident from the facility to their home setting.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 15 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Santa Clara
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silver City Care Center | 6.6 mi | — | 15 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Fort Bayard Medical Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.