Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Maple Glen Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with intact cognition and psychosocial distress was interviewed about an alleged sexual incident in the presence of multiple staff and another resident, leading to feelings of humiliation and embarrassment. The investigation process did not maintain confidentiality or privacy as required by facility policy, resulting in emotional distress for the resident.
A resident admitted with pleural effusion, end stage renal disease, and other complex conditions had physician orders for Pleurex catheter drainage, but the baseline care plan developed within 48 hours of admission did not include a focus, goal, or interventions for this special procedure. The DON confirmed the omission, which was identified through record review and staff interview.
A facility failed to ensure that a nurse had documented competency for performing Pleurex drainage on a resident with pleural effusion and other complex conditions. Although education was reportedly provided, the facility could not produce records verifying that nurses were assessed and found competent in this procedure, leading to concerns about the adequacy of care and discrepancies in drainage documentation.
A registered nurse did not follow medication orders for a resident with heart disease and hypertension, relying on outdated vitals instead of retaking them before administering Zestril. The issue was reported to the facility's administration.
The facility failed to accurately code the MDS for four residents, leading to discrepancies in their medical records. Errors included incorrect coding of bed rails as restraints, omission of tracheostomy care, and incorrect discharge status. These inaccuracies were identified through observations, interviews, and record reviews.
The facility failed to complete the MDS assessments on time for a resident, with delays confirmed by the MDS Coordinator and validated through submitted reports. This is a violation of federal mandates and NJAC 8:39 - 11.1.
Failure to Protect Resident Privacy During Abuse Investigation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect the confidentiality and privacy of a resident during the investigation of an alleged sexual incident involving a staff member. The resident, who had intact cognition and a history of psychosocial distress related to the allegation, was interviewed in a conference room with multiple staff members and another resident present. The social worker conducted the interview in the presence of the accuser, a supervisor, a unit manager, and a business manager, despite the sensitive nature of the allegation. The resident expressed feeling humiliated, embarrassed, and disrespected due to the presence of unnecessary personnel and the public recounting of the alleged incident. The investigation process did not adhere to the facility's abuse prohibition policy, which requires maintaining confidentiality and protecting residents from mental abuse, including humiliation and degradation. The social worker was unable to articulate the facility's policy on confidentiality and privacy during the surveyor's interview. The resident reported ongoing emotional distress, including being subjected to jokes and derogatory comments from staff following the incident. Documentation showed that the resident was not physically harmed and denied any inappropriate interaction with the staff member. The investigation included interviews with the accused staff member and other residents, none of whom corroborated the allegation. However, the manner in which the investigation was conducted resulted in a breach of the resident's privacy and confidentiality, as required by facility policy and state regulations.
Failure to Include Pleurex Drainage in Baseline Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that addressed a resident's need for a special procedure, specifically Pleurex catheter drainage, despite physician orders indicating the necessity for this intervention due to a diagnosis of pleural effusion. The resident was admitted with multiple complex medical conditions, including pleural effusion, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and chronic atrial fibrillation. The resident required assistance with activities of daily living and had orders for both dialysis and Pleurex drainage on specific days. A review of the resident's baseline care plan showed that while several focus areas were addressed, such as assistance with ADLs, fall risk, skin breakdown, and renal function, there was no specific care plan focus, goal, or interventions created for the Pleurex catheter drainage procedure. The Director of Nursing confirmed during interview that the baseline care plan should have included the Pleurex catheter drainage as a special procedure upon admission, in accordance with facility policy and professional standards. The omission was identified through record review and staff interview, and was not corrected within the required timeframe.
Lack of Documented Nurse Competency for Pleurex Drainage Procedure
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a licensed nurse had the specific competency and skill set necessary to care for a resident with a Pleurex drainage system, as required for a resident diagnosed with pleural effusion, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and chronic atrial fibrillation. The resident required staff assistance for activities of daily living and had physician orders for Pleurex drainage twice weekly. Documentation showed that the drainage was performed by different nurses, with significant discrepancies in the recorded output volumes within the same day. The resident's family expressed concerns about the adequacy of care and the accuracy of the drainage procedure, leading to the resident being taken home against medical advice. Interviews with nursing staff and the staff educator revealed that while education on Pleurex drainage was provided via video and bedside demonstration, the facility was unable to produce documentation verifying that nurses had completed competency assessments specific to the Pleurex drainage procedure. The staff educator and Director of Nursing both acknowledged that competency sign-offs were expected but could not provide records to confirm that the involved nurses were assessed and deemed competent for this specific clinical skill. No additional documentation was provided to demonstrate that the required competencies were met.
Failure to Follow Medication Administration Parameters
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involved a registered nurse (RN) who did not follow medication orders that included specific parameters for administering Zestril to a resident. The RN prepared the medication based on vitals taken earlier in the shift, which were documented on a piece of paper. The State Surveyor requested the RN to retake the vitals before administering the medication, revealing different readings. The RN initially relied on outdated vitals, which could have led to improper medication administration. The resident involved had a history of heart disease, congestive heart failure, essential hypertension, and ventricular tachycardia. The resident's care plan required monitoring and reporting of vital signs to ensure blood pressure remained within baseline parameters. The facility's policy also mandated obtaining necessary vital signs before medication administration. The deficiency was reported to the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing, who did not provide additional information at the time.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Multiple Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for four residents, leading to discrepancies in their medical records. For Resident #33, the MDS indicated the use of bed rails as restraints, which was contradicted by observations and staff interviews that confirmed the bed rails were used as enablers for repositioning. Similarly, Resident #95's MDS also incorrectly coded the use of bed rails as restraints, despite the resident being observed without bed rails and being independent in bed mobility. Both errors were acknowledged by the MDS Coordinator as data entry mistakes. Resident #32's MDS inaccurately reflected the absence of tracheostomy care, despite the resident having a tracheostomy and receiving daily care as documented in the medical records. This discrepancy was identified during a review of the resident's treatment administration records and was later confirmed as an error by the Director of Nursing (DON). Additionally, Resident #133's discharge MDS incorrectly documented the discharge status as being to an acute hospital, while the resident was actually discharged home with family. This error was also acknowledged by the MDS Coordinator as a typographical mistake. These coding inaccuracies were identified through a combination of observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted by the surveyors. The facility's policy on MDS completion was found to be in place, but the errors indicate lapses in adherence to the policy. The DON and Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) acknowledged the errors and indicated that corrections would be made, but no further comments were provided during the survey team's meeting.
Failure to Complete MDS Assessments Timely
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in a timely manner for one resident. Specifically, the Entry MDS for a resident with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/19/23 was due by 9/26/23 but was not completed until 9/28/23. Additionally, the Admission MDS for the same resident with an ARD of 9/21/23 was due by 10/4/23 but was not completed until 10/6/23. These delays were confirmed by the facility's MDS Coordinator and validated through the submitted MDS reports. The issue was identified during a review of the facility's assessment tasks and was discussed with the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing. The MDS Coordinator responsible for completing the assessments could not initially provide an explanation for the delays. The facility's MDS Coordinator later confirmed the late completion of the MDS assessments through a Validation Report. This failure to complete the MDS assessments on time is a violation of the federal mandate and the New Jersey Administrative Code (NJAC 8:39 - 11.1).
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,186 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 14 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Fairlawn
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Careone At Ridgewood Avenue | 1.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Family Of Caring Healthcare At Ridgewood | 2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Bergen New Bridge Medical Center | 2.2 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| New Jersey Veterans Memorial Home At Paramus | 2.3 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Complete Care At Fair Lawn Edge | 2.3 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Maple Glen Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.