Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Homestead Rehabilitation & Health Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility did not conduct or document annual performance evaluations or competency assessments for CNAs, as confirmed by a review of personnel files and interviews with the DON and LNHA. No policy or supporting documentation was available when requested.
The facility did not provide documentation that any of its CNAs received the required 12 hours of annual in-service training, including dementia care and abuse prevention. When education records were requested, none could be produced, and the DON reported that a change in the education system resulted in the loss of these records. No policies or further information regarding mandatory staff education were available.
The facility did not promptly report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft, nor did it communicate the results of its investigation to the proper authorities as required.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and multiple health conditions did not receive all required care plan interventions for skin integrity, specifically the daily skin inspection. Staff confusion over the intervention's implementation and lack of clear documentation resulted in the intervention not being properly carried out, despite facility policy requiring measurable and clear interventions.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering accessed an unsecured room under renovation, became stuck to floor adhesive, and fell, resulting in multiple brain bleeds. The facility did not provide adequate supervision or secure the hazardous area, and failed to complete a thorough investigation or maintain required documentation as per policy.
The facility failed to maintain safe and comfortable room temperatures on the Second and Third Floors, with temperatures ranging from 81.7 to 86.9 degrees Fahrenheit. Several air conditioning units were not functioning properly, leading residents to rely on desk and stand fans for cooling. Despite the high temperatures, residents were not in distress. The Administrator noted that repairs had been attempted but the units continued to fail intermittently.
The facility failed to ensure physicians completed monthly progress notes for residents, affecting 15 out of 16 reviewed. Physicians left placeholder letters in records, intending to complete notes later, which was not done. Residents with various medical conditions lacked adequate documentation, and facility staff could not explain the missing records.
The facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation and food labeling practices, risking foodborne illness. Observations included unlabeled condiment cups, milk containers, and spice containers, as well as soiled ovens and windows. The CDM could not confirm cleaning schedules or clarify labeling dates. The LNHA and DON had no comments on these issues.
A facility failed to ensure their designated Infection Preventionist (IP) had completed the required training and certification. An LPN serving as the IP was a per-diem employee without the necessary qualifications and was also performing other clinical duties. The facility's administration confirmed the LPN's lack of training and experience, violating state guidelines for facilities with 100 or more beds.
Surveyors observed infection control deficiencies in a facility, including improper hand hygiene by LPNs during wound treatment and medication administration, and failure to dispose of sharps containers properly. An LPN did not sanitize hands before applying gloves, and another used a contaminated paper towel and handled a saline solution without washing hands. Overflowing sharps containers were found in utility rooms, with maintenance staff unaware of disposal responsibilities.
Two residents with severely impaired cognition were observed being fed by CNAs who were standing, contrary to proper procedures. The facility's Feeding Policy lacked guidance on appropriate feeding methods, and the administration acknowledged the need for CNAs to be seated while feeding.
Facility staff failed to document a resident's medication refusal and did not consistently record daily weights as per physician orders. An LPN inaccurately documented medication administration, and daily weights were often missing from records, contrary to facility policy. Discussions with the LNHA and DON confirmed these documentation lapses.
A resident with a stage 4 pressure ulcer received wound care that did not follow physician's orders, as an LPN used a wound cleanser instead of normal saline. Additionally, the resident had an undocumented left upper buttock wound, which was not assessed or documented in the medical records. The facility's policies for weekly skin assessments and wound documentation were not adhered to, leading to the identification of this deficiency.
A resident with a history of falls and severe cognitive impairment experienced two falls due to inadequate supervision and lack of proper investigation into the causes. The facility failed to address the resident's involuntary movements in their care plan, and staffing shortages contributed to the incidents. The resident suffered minor and major injuries from the falls, with the second fall requiring hospitalization.
The facility failed to provide proper respiratory care for three residents, including outdated oxygen tubing for a resident with a tracheostomy, incorrect oxygen flow settings for a resident with COPD, and improper storage of oxygen tubing for a resident with asthma. Staff acknowledged these deficiencies, which were contrary to physician orders and facility policies.
A facility failed to ensure accurate signing of the narcotic medication shift-to-shift sign-in sheet, as observed during a State Surveyor's inspection. The sheet had missing nurse signatures on several occasions, contrary to the facility's Narcotics Accountability Policy, which requires outgoing and incoming nurses to count and sign for narcotics at each shift's end. This issue was discussed with the facility's administration, but no additional information was provided.
A facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, with an observed rate of 11.54%. Errors included administering the wrong multivitamin and not providing food with medications that required it, as observed by a surveyor. The LPN involved misunderstood medication equivalency and did not offer food with medications, despite orders and cautionary labels. The LNHA and DON could not explain the errors.
A facility failed to store medications at the required temperature, with a refrigerator found at 32°F instead of the acceptable 36-46°F range. Medications like insulin pens and lorazepam were affected. The discrepancy was noted despite a log showing a 40°F reading earlier. The issue was discussed with the administration, but no further information was provided.
The facility failed to prepare food to the correct consistency for two residents on mechanical soft diets, leading to a deficiency. Observations revealed that whole fish sticks and vegetables were served, requiring cutting with a knife, contrary to the diet requirements. The CDM and SLP confirmed that mechanical soft diets should be minced and not require cutting. The residents involved had conditions necessitating modified diets, and the facility's diet manual and IDDSI guidelines were not followed.
Failure to Complete Annual CNA Performance Evaluations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to evaluate the job performance of all Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) on an annual basis, as required. During a review of personnel files for five CNAs, it was found that none had recent employee evaluations completed. Additionally, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the facility does not have competency assessments for CNAs and was unable to provide any employee evaluations or competency documentation when requested. The DON also stated that there was no policy available regarding CNA evaluations, and no further relevant information was provided by facility leadership.
Failure to Provide Required In-Service Training for CNAs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) received the required 12 hours of mandatory in-service training, including education in dementia care and abuse prevention, for all five CNAs whose education records were reviewed. During the survey, the personnel education files for these CNAs were requested, but no records of education were provided for any of them. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the facility had changed its staff education program and was unable to retrieve the education records, and no copies were saved in the employee files. When further documentation and policies regarding mandatory staff education were requested, the facility was unable to provide them.
Failure to Timely Report Suspected Abuse, Neglect, or Theft
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and did not report the results of the investigation to the proper authorities. This deficiency was identified based on the facility's lack of prompt action in notifying the appropriate agencies when an incident of suspected abuse, neglect, or theft occurred. The report indicates that the required notifications and investigation results were not communicated as mandated.
Failure to Implement Care Plan Interventions for Skin Integrity
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency was identified when a resident with multiple diagnoses, including dementia, heart failure, and major depressive disorder, was not provided with all the care plan interventions necessary to maintain skin integrity. The resident, who had severely impaired cognition and required partial assistance with activities of daily living, had an individualized comprehensive care plan (ICCP) that included interventions such as keeping the skin clean and dry, daily skin inspection, notifying the physician of any skin breakdown, turning and repositioning every two hours, and monitoring for changes in circulation. Despite these interventions being documented, the facility failed to ensure that the daily skin inspection was implemented as required. The issue came to light after the resident's representative reported multiple complaints about the resident's skin condition, including irritations, upon discharge. Interviews with the DON and MDS Coordinator revealed confusion regarding the implementation of the daily skin inspection intervention, with staff believing it was either an automated entry or should be performed visually during care without specific documentation. The facility's policy required interventions to be clear, concise, and measurable, but the lack of clarity and proper implementation led to the deficiency.
Failure to Prevent Resident Access to Hazardous Area and Incomplete Incident Investigation
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a cognitively impaired, ambulatory, and wandering resident with multiple diagnoses, including Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia, accessed an unsecured room undergoing floor renovation. The resident, who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living and had a history of wandering and fall risk, entered the room where the floor was being redone and became stuck to the adhesive on the floor. While attempting to free themselves, the resident fell backwards, struck their head, and began vomiting, necessitating transfer to an emergency department. Subsequent hospital evaluation revealed three brain bleeds. The facility's documentation showed that the resident's care plan identified risks for elopement, wandering, and falls, and described behaviors such as pacing, entering other residents' rooms, and rummaging. Despite these known risks, the resident was able to access a hazardous area that should have been secured, indicating a failure to provide adequate supervision and a safe environment as required for residents with such vulnerabilities. Additionally, the facility failed to follow its own policy regarding the thorough investigation of accidents and incidents. When requested, the facility's new administration was unable to provide the full incident/accident report or staff statements related to the event, only producing a brief incident summary. This lack of complete documentation and investigation did not meet the facility's stated policy requirements for reporting, reviewing, and investigating all accidents and incidents involving residents.
Failure to Maintain Safe Room Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain safe and comfortable room temperature levels for residents in two of its three nursing units, specifically on the Second and Third Floors. On the Second Floor, room temperatures ranged from 82.2 to 86.9 degrees Fahrenheit, with several air conditioning units either not working or providing low air output. Despite the high temperatures, residents were not in distress, although some required additional cooling measures such as desk fans. The surveyor also noted that the air conditioning units in the hallways were not functioning and were leaking water. On the Third Floor, room temperatures ranged from 81.7 to 84.0 degrees Fahrenheit, with similar issues of air conditioning units not working or providing insufficient cooling. Residents were observed using stand fans to mitigate the heat, and none were reported to be in distress. The facility's Administrator acknowledged the issue, stating that the air conditioning units had been repaired the previous day but were experiencing intermittent failures. The deficiency was identified during a survey conducted on June 20, 2024.
Deficiency in Physician Documentation of Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the physicians responsible for supervising the care of residents completed monthly progress notes. This deficiency was observed over several months and affected 15 out of 16 residents reviewed. The survey revealed that the progress notes for these residents were either missing or held in draft form without any substantial information. The physicians, particularly Physician #1, were found to have left placeholder letters in the electronic medical records, indicating an intention to complete the notes later, which was not done. The surveyor's review of the medical records showed that residents with various medical conditions, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, sepsis, major depressive disorder, and atherosclerotic heart disease, did not have their care adequately documented. For instance, Resident #18's progress notes from February to March were incomplete, and similar issues were found with other residents, including those with chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and dementia. The facility's policy required that each resident be seen by their attending physician at least once every thirty days, with a progress note written and signed at the time of each visit, which was not adhered to. Interviews with facility staff, including the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON), revealed that they were unable to provide explanations for the missing documentation. Physician #1 admitted to visiting residents but acknowledged that the progress notes were not completed in a timely manner. The facility's failure to ensure proper documentation of physician visits and progress notes was a significant oversight, as it compromised the continuity and quality of care provided to the residents.
Deficient Kitchen Sanitation and Food Labeling Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices and did not store, label, and discard potentially hazardous foods correctly, which could lead to foodborne illness. During a kitchen inspection, several issues were observed, including condiment cups with parmesan cheese and milk containers without open or use-by labels. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) acknowledged that all products should have these labels. Additionally, black-colored baked-on debris was found inside the dual ovens, and the CDM could not explain why the debris was present or when the ovens were last cleaned. Further observations included open spice containers with unclear labeling, soiled windows, and a shelf with various containers lacking proper labeling. The CDM was unable to clarify the dates on these containers. The inspection also revealed a small bowl of scrambled eggs with an incorrect date and a walk-in refrigerator and freezer with dust-like debris and ice accumulation. The CDM stated that the maintenance department was responsible for cleaning these areas but could not confirm when they were last cleaned. The facility's policies on labeling, dating, and cleaning were reviewed, but the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and Director of Nursing (DON) had no comments regarding the kitchen issues.
Inadequate Infection Preventionist Qualifications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, as required by CMS and New Jersey State guidelines. During an interview, the surveyor found that the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) serving as the facility's IP was a per-diem employee who had not completed the necessary certification or training. The LPN stated that her work hours varied and that she sometimes performed clinical duties, such as administering medications and conducting wound rounds, which indicated that infection prevention was not her sole responsibility. The facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing confirmed that the LPN had not completed any infection control training or certification and did not have the required five years of experience as an IP. This deficiency was in violation of the State of New Jersey Department of Health Executive Directive, which mandates that facilities with 100 or more beds must employ a full-time IP with no other responsibilities. The survey team discussed these findings with the facility's administration, highlighting the LPN's lack of qualifications and the facility's non-compliance with the directive.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Hand Hygiene and Sharps Disposal
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to proper infection control practices during wound treatment and medication administration, as observed by surveyors. An LPN was seen performing wound treatment on a resident without following the facility's hand hygiene policy. The LPN did not sanitize her hands before applying gloves and did not lather her hands for the required 20 seconds during handwashing. The LPN acknowledged the oversight when informed by the surveyor. The facility's hand hygiene policy mandates washing hands before and after resident contact and procedures, with specific instructions on handwashing techniques. During a medication pass, another LPN was observed using a previously used paper towel to dry her hands and clean around the sink, which compromised hand hygiene. The LPN also handled a contaminated saline solution bottle without washing or sanitizing her hands before administering medication. The DON confirmed that the pitchers should be cleaned daily and that the LPN should have washed her hands after handling the contaminated bottle. These actions were not in line with the facility's infection control protocols. Additionally, the facility failed to properly dispose of sharps containers filled with contaminated needles. Surveyors found several overflowing sharps containers in the soiled utility rooms on two floors. The maintenance staff member responsible for disposal was unaware of this duty, as it was not communicated to him. The facility's policy states that Environmental Services personnel are responsible for disposing of full sharps containers. The lack of proper disposal practices poses a risk of infection spread within the facility.
Failure to Maintain Dignity During Mealtime
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain dignity during mealtime for two residents who required assistance with eating. On the specified date, a surveyor observed a hospice CNA feeding a resident in a Broda chair by standing behind and reaching over the resident's right side. The hospice CNA acknowledged that staff should be seated at eye level while feeding residents, indicating awareness of the proper procedure. The resident had been admitted with diagnoses including Aphasia, Cerebral Infarction, and Atrial Fibrillation, and had a severely impaired cognition score, requiring partial/moderate assistance for eating. Similarly, another resident was observed being fed by a CNA who was standing over them. The CNA admitted awareness that staff should be seated next to residents during feeding. This resident had been admitted with diagnoses of Vascular Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, and Abnormal weight loss, and also had a severely impaired cognition score, requiring supervision or touching assistance for eating. The facility's Feeding Policy lacked specific guidance on the appropriate way to feed residents, and the administration acknowledged the need for CNAs to be seated while feeding residents.
Documentation Failures in Medication and Weight Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to adhere to professional standards of clinical practice by not accurately documenting a resident's refusal of medication and not adequately recording daily weights as per physician's orders. During a medication pass, a resident identified and returned a medication they had not taken the previous night, despite the electronic medication administration record (eMAR) indicating it had been administered. This discrepancy was discussed with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON), who acknowledged that the administering nurse should document accurately whether the medication was swallowed or refused. Additionally, the facility did not consistently document daily weights for residents as required by physician orders. A review of the Resident Medication Administration Record (RMAR) for January and February 2024 showed numerous instances where weights were not recorded, despite a standing order to weigh residents daily before breakfast. The Registered Nurse (RN) responsible for one of the residents could not explain the missing documentation. The facility's policy mandates that all weights be documented in the electronic medical record or designated form, but this was not followed, as confirmed in discussions with the LNHA and Interim DON.
Deficient Pressure Ulcer Care and Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for a resident with a pressure ulcer. The deficiency was identified during a survey when a resident with a stage 4 pressure ulcer was observed receiving wound care that did not adhere to the physician's orders. Specifically, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) used a wound cleanser instead of normal saline as prescribed, and there was a lack of proper documentation and assessment of the resident's wounds. The resident, who was cognitively intact, had a sacral wound and an additional wound on the left upper buttock, which was not documented in the medical records. The facility's records only included treatment orders for the sacral wound and right buttock, with no mention of the left buttock wound. The Director of Nursing (DON) later confirmed the presence of the left buttock wound, but there was no previous documentation or assessment of this wound in the resident's medical records. The facility's policies required weekly skin assessments and documentation of wounds, including their location, size, and treatment effectiveness. However, the survey revealed that these policies were not followed, as there was no documentation of the left buttock wound, and the wound treatment did not comply with the physician's orders. The lack of proper documentation and adherence to treatment protocols led to the identification of this deficiency during the survey.
Failure to Investigate and Prevent Falls for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident at risk for falls was adequately supervised and that the causes of their falls were properly investigated. The resident, who had a history of falls and was diagnosed with conditions such as unspecified convulsions and hemiplegia, experienced two falls on 11/11/23 and 11/13/23. The investigation reports for these incidents did not include possible causes or root causes of the falls, nor were appropriate interventions evaluated or implemented. The resident's care plan did not address their specific needs, including involuntary jerking movements that contributed to the falls. The first fall on 11/11/23 was witnessed and resulted in minor injuries, while the second fall on 11/13/23 was unwitnessed and resulted in a major injury requiring hospitalization. The facility was also found to be deficient in CNA staffing on the day of the second fall. Additionally, the resident was left unattended in a dining room with their Broda chair in an upright position, contrary to the recommended reclined position. The facility's Director of Nursing acknowledged that the investigations were not thoroughly assessed to determine the causes of the falls.
Deficient Respiratory Care and Equipment Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper respiratory care for three residents, as evidenced by inappropriate storage and administration of oxygen equipment. For Resident #11, the oxygen tubing connected to the tracheostomy was dated 2/7/24, indicating it had not been changed weekly as per the physician's order and facility policy. The resident, in a vegetative state, was observed with the outdated tubing, and the assigned RN confirmed the tubing was overdue for a change. Resident #12 was observed receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula with a humidified bottle dated 2/15/24, and the oxygen concentrator was set at 4 LPM instead of the ordered 2 LPM. The LPN responsible for the resident's care admitted to not checking the oxygen setting that morning and acknowledged the humidified bottle should have been changed. The resident, with moderate cognitive impairment, was admitted with COPD and acute respiratory failure, and the physician's order specified a lower oxygen flow rate. Resident #58's oxygen nasal tubing was found improperly stored in a nightstand drawer without a protective bag, contrary to facility policy. The resident, with moderate cognitive impairment and medical diagnoses including asthma and pneumonitis, had a care plan requiring oxygen equipment to be checked and stored correctly. The LPN confirmed the improper storage and acknowledged the tubing should have been bagged to prevent contamination.
Narcotic Medication Sign-In Sheet Not Accurately Signed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the narcotic medication shift-to-shift sign-in and out sheet was accurately signed, as observed during a State Surveyor's inspection of the 2nd floor medication Cart A. The inspection revealed that the Narcotic Count shift-to-shift sign-in sheet had empty areas where nurse signatures were missing. Specifically, the sheet lacked signatures from the outgoing nurse on 3/1/24 at 11:00 PM, the incoming nurse on 3/3/24 at 3:00 PM, and the outgoing nurse on 3/4/24 at 11:00 PM. This was confirmed by an interview with a registered nurse who stated that the sheet should be signed by every incoming and outgoing nurse on each shift. The facility's Narcotics Accountability Policy, reviewed on 5/16/23, mandates that all narcotics must be counted daily by two nurses and documented in the log. The policy specifies that outgoing and incoming nurses must count narcotics at the end of each shift and sign the narcotic count form. The discrepancy was discussed with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing, but no further information was provided.
Medication Error Rate Exceeds Acceptable Limit
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, resulting in an observed error rate of 11.54%. During a medication pass, a surveyor observed two nurses administer 26 doses of medication to three residents, with three errors identified. The first error involved the administration of Multi-Vitamin with Minerals instead of the prescribed Multivitamin 50 Plus to a resident. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) incorrectly assumed these were the same, despite the Physician's Order specifying Multivitamin 50 Plus. The second and third errors involved the administration of medications without food, contrary to the Physician's Orders. Potassium Chloride Extended Release and Decadron were both administered without food, despite orders and cautionary labels indicating they should be taken with food to prevent stomach discomfort. The LPN stated that food was only offered upon request, and breakfast was served later. The Licensed Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing were unable to explain the reasons for these errors when discussed with the surveyor.
Improper Medication Refrigeration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly store and refrigerate medication at the required temperature, as observed during an inspection of the 2nd floor locked medication refrigerator. The State Surveyor, accompanied by an RN, found the refrigerator's thermometer reading at 32 degrees Fahrenheit, which is below the documented acceptable range of 36 to 46 degrees Fahrenheit. This discrepancy was noted despite the Daily Freezer/Refrigerator Temperature Log indicating a recorded temperature of 40 degrees Fahrenheit earlier that day. The medications stored in the refrigerator included insulin pens, calcitonin salmon nasal spray, latanoprost ophthalmic solution, tuberculin purified protein derivative, and lorazepam intensil oral concentrate. The facility's Medication Storage Policy, revised in May 2023, requires medications to be stored in a manner that maintains their integrity and safety, in accordance with state Department of Health guidelines. The policy specifies that medications requiring refrigeration should be kept between 36 and 46 degrees Fahrenheit. The surveyor discussed the temperature discrepancy with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing, but no further information was provided. This deficiency was observed in one of the two facility units inspected during the initial facility unit inspection.
Failure to Prepare Food to Correct Consistency for Residents on Modified Diets
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prepare vegetables in the proper consistency for two residents on a modified diet, leading to a deficiency. During a survey, it was observed that the lunch tray for residents on a mechanical soft diet included whole fish sticks and regular mixed vegetables, which were not prepared to the required minced consistency. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) explained that the food was considered fork mashable, but acknowledged that mechanical soft consistency should be minced. This inconsistency was confirmed by the Speech Language Pathologist (SLP), who stated that foods needing to be cut with a knife should be prepared in the kitchen to ensure the correct size. Resident #5, who had severe cognitive impairment and was on a mechanical soft diet, was observed eating whole fish sticks and vegetables. The resident's care plan indicated a need for a mechanical soft diet due to conditions like Down syndrome and protein-calorie malnutrition. Despite the resident's need for 1:1 feeding assistance, the food was not prepared to the appropriate consistency, requiring the CNA to cut the vegetables with a knife. Similarly, Resident #36, who had diagnoses including epilepsy and dysphagia, received a lunch tray with intact fish sticks and vegetables, which also required cutting with a knife, contrary to the mechanical soft diet requirements. The facility's diet manual and the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) guidelines were not adhered to, as they specify that mechanical soft diets should not require cutting with a knife and should be prepared to minimize chewing. The Director of Therapy and the CDM both acknowledged the discrepancy in food preparation, and the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) confirmed that food should be prepared in the kitchen to the correct size for residents on mechanical soft diets.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 69 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Newton
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Care At Barn Hill | 4.6 mi | — | 12 | 0 |
| Valley View Rehabilitation And Healthcare Ctr | 4.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| United Methodist Communities At Bristol Glen | 5.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Mohawk Meadows | 6.2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Milford Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 14.2 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Homestead Rehabilitation & Health Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.