Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Health Center At Bloomingdale during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors identified that the facility failed to accurately code the MDS for two residents. One resident with a history of MDRO and recent insulin use was not coded for these conditions on the MDS, despite care plan and MAR documentation. Another resident with severe cognitive impairment was not coded for a recent fall on the MDS, even though care plan records and family reports indicated a fall had occurred. These discrepancies were based on direct observation, record review, and interviews.
A facility failed to consistently complete and maintain dialysis communication records for a resident with End Stage Renal Disease. The resident's Dialysis Communication Binder was missing several forms, and the Director of Nursing could not explain the discrepancies. Facility policies on communication and documentation were not followed.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for two residents, resulting in deficiencies related to the management of care. For one resident, observations revealed signage and personal protective equipment indicating Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to a history of multiple drug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in the urine. The resident's care plan documented EBP for MDRO and insulin therapy for diabetes, and the Medication Administration Record showed insulin administration during the assessment period. However, the quarterly MDS did not reflect the resident's history of MDRO or insulin use in the relevant sections. For another resident, a review of the medical record and care plan indicated a diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease and dementia, with a severely impaired cognitive status. The admission MDS documented no falls in the 2-6 months prior to admission, but the baseline care plan and other documentation noted a fall in the relevant period as reported by the resident's daughter. Additional assessments identified the resident as being at risk for falls due to an unsteady gait. The discrepancies between the MDS coding and supporting documentation contributed to the deficiency.
Failure to Maintain Dialysis Communication Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to consistently complete the dialysis communication form and maintain a resident's dialysis communication record. This deficiency was identified for a resident who required dialysis three times a week. The resident's Dialysis Communication Binder (DCB) was missing several Resident Facility + Dialysis Center Information Exchange (RFDCI) forms for multiple dates. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the missing and incomplete forms but was unable to explain the discrepancies. The facility's policy required the nurse to complete the RFDCI form and ensure it was sent to the Dialysis Center (DC) and reviewed upon the resident's return. However, this process was not consistently followed, leading to gaps in communication regarding the resident's condition on dialysis days. The resident in question had a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease and required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The resident's care plan indicated that they attended dialysis three times a week. Despite this, the facility was unable to provide documentation that the resident's condition was communicated to the DC on several occasions. The facility's policies on the care of residents with end-stage renal disease and dialysis patients outlined the need for proper communication and documentation, which was not adhered to in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 824 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 9 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Bloomingdale
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix Center For Rehabilitation And Pediatrics | 0.9 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Lakeland Nursing & Rehab | 1.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Cedar Crest/mountainview Gardens | 2.2 mi | — | 10 | 1 |
| Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 2.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Complete Care At Wayne Hills Rehab & Resp Center | 2.5 mi | — | 18 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Health Center At Bloomingdale.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.