Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Brookefield Park during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to maintain refrigerated foods at the required temperatures, with observations showing consistent temperatures above 41°F in the walk-in refrigerator. Interviews revealed that staff did not properly record or address out-of-range temperatures, and there was a discrepancy in temperature standards between the Dietary Manager and Registered Dietitian. This deficiency potentially affected all 58 residents consuming food from the facility kitchen.
The facility did not ensure that three nursing aides completed the required 12 hours of annual training, with NA-H, NA-G, and NA-I completing only 6.82, 6.38, and 9.69 hours respectively. This deficiency was confirmed by the DNS and HR, potentially impacting all 58 residents, as staff competencies in mental health, dementia, and infectious diseases were necessary.
A facility failed to conduct a Level II PASRR for a resident newly diagnosed with a serious mental illness and prescribed an antipsychotic medication. Initially assessed with a Level I PASRR, the resident was later diagnosed with delusional disorder and prescribed Seroquel, but the required Level II evaluation was not completed. This was confirmed by the Social Services Director.
Refrigeration Temperature Control Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain refrigerated foods at the required temperatures, which is essential for food safety. Observations in the facility's main kitchen revealed that the thermometer inside the walk-in refrigerator consistently displayed temperatures above the required 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Specifically, temperatures were recorded at 44 degrees Fahrenheit on multiple occasions, with milk and cottage cheese stored inside. These observations were made over several days, indicating a persistent issue with maintaining the correct temperature. Interviews with dietary staff and record reviews further highlighted the deficiency. The dietary staff member responsible for recording refrigerator temperatures confirmed that the temperatures were not being recorded as required each morning. Additionally, the staff member indicated that out-of-range temperatures should be circled on the temperature log, but this was not done. The temperature log for February 2025 showed that 26 out of 38 recorded temperatures were above the required 41 degrees Fahrenheit, yet none of these were circled to indicate they were out of range. The facility's Dietary Manager and Registered Dietitian were also interviewed, revealing discrepancies in the expected temperature standards. The Dietary Manager stated that the expected temperature for refrigerators was 45 degrees Fahrenheit or below, which contradicts the Registered Dietitian's confirmation that temperatures should be kept at 40 degrees Fahrenheit or below for food safety. This inconsistency in understanding and enforcing temperature standards contributed to the deficiency, as the facility failed to ensure that refrigerated foods were stored at safe temperatures, potentially affecting all 58 residents who consumed food prepared by the facility kitchen.
Deficiency in Nursing Aide Training Hours
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that three out of five sampled nursing aides received the required 12 hours of ongoing training over the past 12 months, as mandated by licensure reference 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(ii)(1). This deficiency was identified through record reviews and interviews. Specifically, NA-H completed only 6.82 hours, NA-G completed 6.38 hours, and NA-I completed 9.69 hours of training within the specified period. The Director of Nursing Services and Human Resources confirmed during an interview that these nursing aides did not meet the annual training requirements. This oversight had the potential to affect all 58 residents residing at the facility, as the facility's assessment indicated the need for staff to have competencies in areas such as mental health, dementia, and infectious diseases.
Failure to Complete Level II PASRR for Resident with New Mental Illness Diagnosis
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a Level II Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for a resident who was newly diagnosed with a serious mental illness and had a change in psychotropic medication. The deficiency involved Resident 10, who was initially assessed with a Level I PASRR on 05/02/2024, indicating no serious mental illness and routine use of antidepressant and opioid medications. However, on 05/09/2024, Resident 10 was diagnosed with delusional disorder, a serious mental health condition, and later prescribed Seroquel, an antipsychotic medication, on 11/14/2024. Despite these significant changes in Resident 10's mental health status and medication regimen, the facility did not conduct a Level II PASRR evaluation as required. This oversight was confirmed during an interview with the facility's Social Services Director, who acknowledged the absence of a Level II PASRR reflecting the resident's new diagnosis and medication use. The facility census at the time was 58, and Resident 10 was the only sampled resident affected by this deficiency.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 42 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near St Paul
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good Samaritan Society - Grand Island Village | 20.9 mi | — | 16 | 0 |
| Tiffany Square | 21 mi | — | 7 | 0 |
| Adept Nursing & Rehab Of Grand Island | 21.1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Chi Health St. Francis | 21.2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Eventide Prairie Commons Care Center | 23.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Brookefield Park.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.